Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12607000461493
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
28/08/2007
Date registered
12/09/2007
Date last updated
12/09/2007
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Reducing barriers to colorectal cancer screening: The impact of enhanced advance notification letters.
Query!
Scientific title
Improving participation in bowel cancer screening through the use of enhanced advance notification letters
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Bowel cancer.
2302
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
2399
2399
0
0
Query!
Bowel - Back passage (rectum) or large bowel (colon)
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Two alternative advance notification strategies will be trialed. Intervention 1 will consist of a simple 'advance notification of an invitation to participate in screening for Colorectal Carcinoma (CRC)' letter incorporating messages introducing the concept of screening for CRC, increased risk for CRC and the value of screening to reduce risk. Intervention 2 (enhanced advance notification) will include those messages plus more complex messages to reduce known barriers (lack of knowledge about CRC and its prevention, aversion for faecal sampling, low perception of the value of Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT) screening). The advance notification letters will be followed in 2 weeks by a standard invitation-to-screen letter. A control group will receive the standard invitation only. Invitees have 12 weeks from date of invitation-to-screen in which to participate in screening.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
2020
0
Behaviour
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
An invitation to screening without prior advance notification.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
3301
0
Completion of faecal immunochemical test expressed as the population participation rate.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
3301
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
3301
0
Within 12 weeks of screening invitation.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
5498
0
Test positivity rate.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
5498
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
5498
0
Within 12 weeks of screening offer.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Present on the electoral roll of the Australian Electoral Commission, and living in specified post code.
Query!
Minimum age
50
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
74
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
People already participating in bowel screening research and service programs, people who have medical conditions that invalidate screening test results or preclude them from colonoscopy, all people who have had an faecal occult blood test within the last year.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Invitees randomly selected by computer from an extract of the Australian electoral roll are randomly allocated by a computer to a screening program with a preliminary notification letter (2 types) or without notification letter. Invitations to participate are sent by mail, there is no direct interpersonal contact. Help line calls are answered without knowledge of intervention group.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Group sizes of 600 each were determined by power analysis assuming that an intervention that produces a 10% increase in participation is a significant program improvement. All eligible people were assigned a random number using the MS Excel RAND function. The listing was ordered by ascending random number. The first 600 were assigned to intervention group 1 (enhanced advance notification), the second to intervention group 2 (standard advance notification), the third to control (no advance notification).
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
17/09/2007
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
1800
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
237
0
5007
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
238
0
5009
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
239
0
5022
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
240
0
5024
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
241
0
5025
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
242
0
5031
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [7]
243
0
5032
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [8]
244
0
5033
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [9]
245
0
5037
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [10]
246
0
5038
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [11]
247
0
5039
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [12]
248
0
5040
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [13]
249
0
5043
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [14]
250
0
5044
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [15]
406
0
5045
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [16]
407
0
5041
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [17]
408
0
5042
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [18]
409
0
5046
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [19]
410
0
5047
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [20]
411
0
5048
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [21]
412
0
5049
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [22]
413
0
5050
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [23]
414
0
5051
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [24]
415
0
5052
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [25]
416
0
5062
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [26]
417
0
5064
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [27]
418
0
5156
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [28]
419
0
5159
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
2558
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
2558
0
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)
Query!
Address [1]
2558
0
GPO Box 1421
Canberra ACT 2601
Query!
Country [1]
2558
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
Flinders University
Query!
Address
Bedford Park SA 5042
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
2318
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
2318
0
Repatriation General Hospital Daw Park
Query!
Address [1]
2318
0
Daws Rd
Daw Park SA 5041
Query!
Country [1]
2318
0
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [2]
2319
0
None
Query!
Name [2]
2319
0
Query!
Address [2]
2319
0
Query!
Country [2]
2319
0
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
19
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
19
0
University of Adelaide
Query!
Address [1]
19
0
Adelaide SA 5000
Query!
Country [1]
19
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
4485
0
Research and Ethics Committee, Repatriation General Hospital
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
4485
0
Daws Rd Daw Park SA 5041
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
4485
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
4485
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
4485
0
20/06/2007
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
4485
0
39/07
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Previous research has demonstrated that the use of a simple advance notification letter preceding an invitation to participate in bowel cancer screening resulted in a significant increase in population participation compared to no advance notification of invitation. This study further explores the value of advance notification by comparing screening participation between 3 groups: 1) using an enhanced version specifically addressing known barriers (aversion for collecting faecal samples, lack of knowledge about bowel cancer, low perception of the value of screening); 2) a simple advance notification letter and 3) a control group not receiving advance notification.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
28010
0
Query!
Address
28010
0
Query!
Country
28010
0
Query!
Phone
28010
0
Query!
Fax
28010
0
Query!
Email
28010
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
11167
0
Stephen Cole
Query!
Address
11167
0
Bowel Health Service
Repartiation General Hospital
Daws Rd
Daw Park SA 5041
Query!
Country
11167
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
11167
0
+61 8 82751083
Query!
Fax
11167
0
Query!
Email
11167
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
2095
0
Stephen Cole
Query!
Address
2095
0
Bowel Health Service
Repartiation General Hospital
Daws Rd
Daw Park SA 5041
Query!
Country
2095
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
2095
0
+61 8 82751083
Query!
Fax
2095
0
Query!
Email
2095
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF