Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12607000432415
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
15/08/2007
Date registered
24/08/2007
Date last updated
24/08/2007
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Which exercise for chronic low back pain?
Query!
Scientific title
A comparison of the effects of motor control exercises and graded activity on pain and disability in subjects with chronic non specific low back pain.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
461
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Nil
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Chronic low back pain
2267
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
2358
2358
0
0
Query!
Other muscular and skeletal disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Pragmatic randomised controlled trial with 172 subjects randomised to two treatment groups (i) motor control exercise (ii) graded activity. Both treatments will consist of 12 one hour treatments over an 8 week period, ie: 2 sessions/week in the first month and 1 session/week in the second month and 2 additional 1 hour follow-up sessions at 4 & 10 months. Patients will be advised to do home exercises, consistent with the exercise approach they are receiving. The total time for home exercises will sum to at least 1/2 hour/week in the first month and 1 hr/week in the second month. The treatment sessions and home exercises will add up to at least 20 hours of treatment.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
1978
0
Rehabilitation
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
The trial compares two active treatments.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
3256
0
Function measured with the Patient-specific functional scale
Query!
Assessment method [1]
3256
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
3256
0
2 and 6 months
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
3257
0
"Average pain intensity over the last week" measured on a 0-10 scale
Query!
Assessment method [2]
3257
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
3257
0
2 and 6 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
5430
0
Condition-specific measure of disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
5430
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
5430
0
2, 6 and 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
5431
0
Generic measure of health status (SF 36)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
5431
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
5431
0
2, 6 and 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
5432
0
"Average pain intensity over the preceding 24 hours" measured on a 0-10 scale
Query!
Assessment method [3]
5432
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
5432
0
Monthly for 1-12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
5433
0
"Average pain intensity over the preceding week" measured on a 0-10 scale
Query!
Assessment method [4]
5433
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
5433
0
Monthly for 1-12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
5434
0
Function measured with the Patient-specific functional scale
Query!
Assessment method [5]
5434
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
5434
0
12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
5435
0
Patient's global impression of change (Global Perceived Effect)
Query!
Assessment method [6]
5435
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
5435
0
2, 6 and 12 months
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Non specific low back pain +/- leg pain persisting for at least 3 months.
Currently seeking treatment for low back pain.
Clinical assessment indicates that the subject is suitable for active exercises.
At least "moderate" on item 7 or 8 of the SF 36.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
80
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Known or suspected serious spinal pathology.
Nerve root compromise.
Previous spinal surgery or scheduled for major surgery during the treatment or follow-up period.
Co-morbid health conditions that would prevent active participation in exercise programs.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Subjects seeking treatment for their low back pain will be approached by medical practitioners and physiotherapists. If the subject demonstrates interest in participating in the study the recruiting primary care practitioner will contact the investigators who will screen the subjects for eligibility criteria and obtain consent. Randomisation will be performed at the first treatment session by the physiotherapist. Numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes will be used to conceal the patient's group allocation.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
The allocation schedule will be generated using the random number function in Excel. We will generate a sequence with random permuted blocks.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
nil
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
20/08/2007
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
172
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
223
0
2148
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
2516
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
2516
0
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)
Query!
Address [1]
2516
0
Level 5, 20 Allara St, Canberra, ACT 2601
Query!
Country [1]
2516
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
The University of Sydney
Query!
Address
Facutly of Health Sciences
PO Box 170
Lidcombe
NSW 1825
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
2280
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
2280
0
The University of Queensland
Query!
Address [1]
2280
0
School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences,
The University of Queensland,
Brisbane, QLD, 4072
Query!
Country [1]
2280
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
4430
0
The University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
4430
0
Room L4.13 Main Quadrangle - A14 The University of Sydney NSW 2006
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
4430
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
4430
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
4430
0
18/12/2006
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
4430
0
12-2006/9704
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
About 1 in 10 Australians have persisting or chronic low back pain. Most are managed in primary care and the most frequently prescribed treatment is exercise. Chronic low back pain remains a major health problem because not all patients respond to each treatment so on average treatment effects are small. At present there are no guidelines to help clinicians select the best treatment for a patient. As a result, time and money is wasted on treatments which ultimately fail to help the patient. Our proposed study is a direct comparison of the two most promising types of exercise approaches used in Australia: a graded activity program where patients perform an individualised, whole body exercise program, and a motor control program, where patients perform a series of specific spinal stabilisation exercises. This study will compare the effects of these two interventions. We will also identify patient features that may predict a patient's response to treatment. Prediction features used will be clinical/demographic data, measures of beliefs and attitudes about pain, measures of physical activity and fitness, measures of control and co-ordination of the lumbar spine and pelvis.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
27988
0
Query!
Address
27988
0
Query!
Country
27988
0
Query!
Phone
27988
0
Query!
Fax
27988
0
Query!
Email
27988
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
11145
0
Luciana Macedo
Query!
Address
11145
0
Discipline of Physiotherapy,
Faculty of Health Sciences,
The University of Sydney
PO Box 170
Lidcombe 1825
Query!
Country
11145
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
11145
0
+61 2 9351 9952
Query!
Fax
11145
0
+61 2 9351 9681
Query!
Email
11145
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
2073
0
Dr Jane Latimer
Query!
Address
2073
0
Discipline of Physiotherapy,
Faculty of Health Sciences,
The University of Sydney
PO Box 170
Lidcombe 1825
Query!
Country
2073
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
2073
0
+61 2 9351 9191
Query!
Fax
2073
0
+61 2 9351 9601
Query!
Email
2073
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Dimensions AI
Motor control or graded activity exercises for chronic low back pain? A randomised controlled trial
2008
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-9-65
Embase
Predicting response to motor control exercises and graded activity for patients with low back pain: preplanned secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
2014
https://dx.doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20140014
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF