Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12607000439448
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
9/08/2007
Date registered
29/08/2007
Date last updated
7/09/2011
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Efficacy of a 96hr duration local anaesthesia (l-bupivacaine) infusion using PainBuster device at the incision site compared with saline controls for post-operative pain management against a background of narcotic analgesia, following open or laparoscopic abdominal surgery.
Query!
Scientific title
Colorectal surgical patients treated with Chirocaine infusion versus saline at surgical site, and demands/usage of PCA narcotic analgesic and VAS score.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
263001
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Post-operative pain management
2233
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Surgery
2325
2325
0
0
Query!
Other surgery
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
The aim is to test whether continuous local anaesthetic infusion (0.5% l-bupivacaine at 5ml/h for 0-48hr and 2ml/h for 48-96h post-op) using a commercial infiltration device can minimise, or eliminate, the need for narcotic analgesia following abdominal open or laparoscopic surgery. The potential benefits to the patient include earlier mobilisation, minimisation or averting the side-effects from narcotics (a particular issue in elderly patients following abdominal surgery), and shorter length-of-stay.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
1943
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
saline placebo infusion, double-blind
Query!
Control group
Placebo
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
3221
0
Pain management measured by (a) reduction in demands and usage of narcotic available using patient-controlled analgesic (PCA) device, and (b) visual analogue pain scores in patients on local anaesthetic infusion compared with saline/placebo controls
Query!
Assessment method [1]
3221
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
3221
0
pain scores and PCA usage recorded 12 hourly for 96 hours post-op
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
5375
0
patient satisfaction, mobilisation, return normal bowel function, would infection, length of hospital stay, adverse effects from local anaesthetic, unbound l-bupivacaine concentrations throughout infusion period
Query!
Assessment method [1]
5375
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
5375
0
wound sterility, drug conc, pain scores determined 12hrly
Satisfaction at discharge and followup
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Able to give informed consent
ASA Score <4 (ie., level 1, 2 or 3)
Normal to mildly elevated biochemical indices of renal and/or hepatic function
Mental status of the patient should be considered and included only if in the opinion of the surgeon and other attended medical staff, that the patient is capable of giving informed consent and would be capable of complying with the reasonable instructions to allow the study to progress
Smokers are admissible, and other drugs/medicines normally taken, other than those specified below
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
90
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Pregnancy.
ASA Score >4 (ie., level 4, 5)
Moderate to severely elevated indices of renal and/or hepatic function, and patients with dementia
Taking drugs known to influence l-bupivacaine kinetics (CYP1A2 or CYP3A inhibitor/inducers; fluvoxamine, quinoline antibacterials, “conazole” antifungals)
Taking drugs that may affect pain perception [narcotics (including codeine containing preparations), tricyclic antidepressants, chronic pain killers, anti-epileptic drugs also used in pain therapy)
Patients receiving epidural anaesthesia
Known allergy to l-bupivacaine or fentanyl
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/09/2007
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
81
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
208
0
5000 numbers
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
2492
0
Self funded/Unfunded
Query!
Name [1]
2492
0
Raymond Morris
Query!
Address [1]
2492
0
Clinical Pharmacology
The Queen Eluizabeth Hospital
Woodville SA 5011
Query!
Country [1]
2492
0
Australia
Query!
Funding source category [2]
2493
0
Commercial sector/Industry
Query!
Name [2]
2493
0
Surgical Synergies
Query!
Address [2]
2493
0
PO Box 2121
Hilton SA 5033
Query!
Country [2]
2493
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Query!
Address
28 Woodville Rd
Woodville SA 5011
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
2261
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
2261
0
University of Adelaide
Query!
Address [1]
2261
0
North Tce
Adelaide SA 5000
Query!
Country [1]
2261
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
2
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
2
0
Mr Peter Hewett
Query!
Address [1]
2
0
Dept of Surgery
University of Adelaide
TQEH
Woodville SA 5011
Query!
Country [1]
2
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
4389
0
Ethics of Human Research Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
4389
0
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital 28 Woodville Rd Woodville SA 5011
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
4389
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
4389
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
4389
0
01/12/2006
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
4389
0
2008006
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
27972
0
Query!
Address
27972
0
Query!
Country
27972
0
Query!
Phone
27972
0
Query!
Fax
27972
0
Query!
Email
27972
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
11129
0
Raymond Morris
Query!
Address
11129
0
Clinical Pharmacology
TQEH
Woodville Rd
Woodville SA 5011
Query!
Country
11129
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
11129
0
61882226753
Query!
Fax
11129
0
61882226033
Query!
Email
11129
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
2057
0
Raymond Morris
Query!
Address
2057
0
Clinical Pharmacology
TQEH
Woodville Rd
Woodville SA 5011
Query!
Country
2057
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
2057
0
61882226753
Query!
Fax
2057
0
61882226033
Query!
Email
2057
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF