Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02855164
Registration number
NCT02855164
Ethics application status
Date submitted
20/07/2016
Date registered
4/08/2016
Titles & IDs
Public title
Study of Safety and Efficacy of Tropifexor (LJN452) in Patients With Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)
Query!
Scientific title
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, 3- Part, Adaptive Design, Multicenter Study to Assess Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Tropifexor (LJN452) in Patients With Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH): FLIGHT-FXR
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2015-005215-33
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
CLJN452A2202
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
FLIGHT-FXR
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Oral and Gastrointestinal
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other diseases of the mouth, teeth, oesophagus, digestive system including liver and colon
Query!
Metabolic and Endocrine
0
0
0
0
Query!
Metabolic disorders
Query!
Diet and Nutrition
0
0
0
0
Query!
Obesity
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Tropifexor (LJN452)
Treatment: Drugs - Placebo
Experimental: LJN452 10 µg - Tropifexor (LJN452) Part A
Experimental: LJN452 30 µg - Tropifexor (LJN452) Part A
Experimental: LJN452 60 µg - Tropifezor (LJN452) Parts A + B
Experimental: LJN452 90 µg - Tropifexor (LJN452) Parts A + B
Placebo comparator: Placebo A+ B - Placebo Parts A + B
Experimental: LJN452 140 µg - Tropifexor (LJN452) Part C
Experimental: LJN452 200 µg - Tropifexor (LJN452) Part B
Placebo comparator: Placebo C - Placebo Part C
Treatment: Drugs: Tropifexor (LJN452)
Comparison of different doses of drug
Treatment: Drugs: Placebo
Comparator
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Number of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Number of Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) patients with TEAEs
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
End of Treatment (EoT): For Parts A&B, EoT was Week 12 (Primary Outcome Measure). For Part C, EoT was Week 48 (Secondary Outcome Measure)
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Change in Transaminase Levels (ALT)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The alanine aminotransferase (ALT) test is a blood test that checks for liver damage. High levels of ALT may indicate liver damage. Normal range for ALT is typically 10 to 45 U/L or so (varies a little by age and gender). Elevation of these values indicate more liver inflammation/damage.
ALT elevation is not unexpected in this patient population
Dose relationship of tropifexor (LJN452) on ALT marker of hepatic inflammation in NASH from baseline to week 12
Summary statistics of change in ALT from baseline to EOT by treatment
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
End of Treatment (EoT): For Parts A&B, EoT was Week 12 (Primary Outcome Measure). For Part C, EoT was Week 48 (Secondary Outcome Measure)
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
0
0
Change in Aspartate Transaminase (AST)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
To determine the dose relationship of tropifexor (LJN452) on markers of hepatic inflammation (AST) in NASH from baseline to Week 12 The alanine aminotransferase (AST) test is a blood test that checks for liver damage. High levels of AST may indicate liver damage. Normal range for AST is typically 10 to 45 U/L or so (varies a little by age and gender). Elevation of these values indicate more liver inflammation/damage
AST elevation is not unexpected in this patient population
The aspartate aminotransferase (AST) test is a blood test that checks for liver damage. Higher levels indicate more possible liver damage
Summary statistics of change in AST from baseline up to end of treatment (EOT)
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
End of Treatment (EoT): For Parts A&B, EoT was Week 12 (Primary Outcome Measure). For Part C, EoT was Week 48 (Secondary Outcome Measure)
Query!
Primary outcome [4]
0
0
Change From Baseline in % of Fat in the Liver Assessed Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Repeated measures analysis: Relative change in percentage of fat in the liver assessed using MRI from baseline by visit up to EOT (Full analysis set)
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
End of Treatment (EoT): For Parts A&B, EoT was Week 12 (Primary Outcome Measure). For Part C, EoT was Week 48 (Secondary Outcome Measure)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Weight
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Repeated measures for LS mean change in weight after 12 weeks of treatment
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
48 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Repeated measures for the LS mean change in BMI after 12 weeks of treatment. Body mass index (BMI) is a measure of body fat based on height and weight
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
12 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Waist to Hip (WTH) Ratio
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
The LS mean change in waist to hip ratio after 12 weeks of treatment
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
12 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Biomarker FGF19
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Dose-response relationship of tropifexor (LJN452) on FGF19 over time, a marker of FXR target engagement in the gut.
ANCOVA: Ratio of FGF19 (pg/mL) post-dose to pre-dose at Week 6
Value at 6 weeks minus value at baseline
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
baseline, week 6
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Biomarker C4
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Dose-response relationship of LJN452 on C4, a marker of hepatic target engagement at 4 hours post dose
C4 (ng/mL): Summary statistics by treatment and visit
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Week 6, 4 hours post dose
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Change From Baseline on Markers of Liver Fibrosis, Fibroscan
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Dose-response relationship of tropifexor (LJN452) on markers of liver fibrosis commonly available such as Fibroscan®
Liver stiffness (kPa): Summary statistics by treatment and visit
FibroScan is a specialized ultrasound machine for measuring fibrosis (scarring) in the liver
Scores range from 0-4 with zero being no liver scarring and 4 being advanced liver scarring (cirrhosis)
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
End of Treatment (EoT): For Parts A&B, EoT was Week 12. For Part C, EoT was Week 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Change From Baseline on Markers of Liver Fibrosis Panel (ELF) Score
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
ANCOVA: LS Mean Change in Enhanced liver fibrosis panel (ELF) score from baseline by visit up to EOT.
The total ELF score reference range calculated non-parametrically is 6.72 (90% CI 6.58-6.84) to 9.79 (90% CI 9.45-10.01); Journal of Hepatology 2013 vol. 59 j 236-242.
Enhanced liver fibrosis Test (ELF) panel: the following was assessed: hyaluronic acid (HA), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP-1), and amino-terminal pro-peptide of procollagen type III (PIIINP).
The Enhanced Liver Fibrosis score is a linear combination of TIMP-1, PIIINP, and HA with the following formula: ELF score = 2.494+0.846 x ln(HA) + 0.735 x ln (PIIINP) + 0.391 x ln (TIMP-1).
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
End of Treatment (EoT): For Parts A&B, EoT was Week 12. For Part C, EoT was Week 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Change From Baseline on Markers of Liver Fibrosis, Fibrotest (Parts A+B)
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Fibrosis biomarker test, originally called Fibrotest®/ Fibrosure®, is combines a2-macroglobulin (a2m), apolipoprotein A1 (aA1), total bilirubin (BIL), haptoglobin (h), GGT, and ALT. The coefficient for the score is calculated as: z = 4.467 x log(a2m) - 1.357 x log(h) + 1.017 x log(GGT) + 0.0281 x Age + 1.737 x log(BIL) - 1.184 x (aA1) + 0.301 x Gender - 5.54 where Gender = 1 for male and Gender = 0 for female. The score is then: 1/(1+e\^-z).
Calculated scores range from 0.00 (no fibrosis) to 1.00 (severe fibrosis or cirrhosis) (See Part C in separate outcomes that follows)
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
End of Treatment (EoT):12 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Change From Baseline on Markers of Liver Fibrosis, Fibrotest, (Part C)
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Fibrosis biomarker test, originally called Fibrotest®/ Fibrosure®, is combines a2-macroglobulin (a2m), apolipoprotein A1 (aA1), total bilirubin (BIL), haptoglobin (h), GGT, and ALT. The coefficient for the score is calculated as: z = 4.467 x log(a2m) - 1.357 x log(h) + 1.017 x log(GGT) + 0.0281 x Age + 1.737 x log(BIL) - 1.184 x (aA1) + 0.301 x Gender - 5.54 where Gender = 1 for male and Gender = 0 for female. The score is then: 1/(1+e\^-z).
Calculated scores range from 0.00 (no fibrosis) to 1.00 (severe fibrosis or cirrhosis)
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
End of Treatment (EoT) was 48 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Change From Baseline on Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT)
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
Summary statistics of change in GGT (IU/L) from baseline by visit up to EoT
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
EoT for Parts A+B=12 weeks; EoT for Part C = 48 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Change From Baseline on Fasting Lipid Profile
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
Repeated measures analysis: LS geometric mean ratio of fasting lipids to baseline by visit up to EOT
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
End of Treatment (EoT): For Parts A&B, EoT was Week 12. For Part C, EoT was Week 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Itch Based on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Rating Scale
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
Repeated measures analysis: Change in VAS for Itch from baseline by visit up to EoT
VAS score 0 = no disease; and 9 is severely advanced disease
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
EoT for Parts A+B=12 weeks; EoT for Part C = 48 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Pre-dose Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of LJN452
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
Pre-dose Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of tropifexor (LJN452)
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
In Parts A and B, LJN452 Ctrough was measured on Study Days 7, 14, 28, 42, 56, and 84. In Part C LJN452 Ctrough was measured on Study Days 42, 84, 168, 280 and 336
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
C2h (Steady-state Drug Levels 2 Hours Postdose) of LJN452
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
Summary C2h of tropifexor (LJN452)
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Days 7 and 14 (10 and 30µg LJN452 C2h was not measured day 14)
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Biopsy-based Response at Week 48 Compared to Baseline: At Least One Point Improvement in Fibrosis (NASH CRN Staging) Without Worsening of Steatohepatitis (Part C) - Total Score
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
Number of patients who have at least one point improvement in fibrosis (NASH CRN staging) without worsening of steatohepatitis (total score)
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
EoT (Week 48)
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Biopsy-based Response at Week 48 Compared to Baseline: At Least One Point Improvement in Fibrosis (NASH CRN Staging) Without Worsening - FDA
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
Number of patients who have at least one point improvement in fibrosis (NASH CRN staging) without worsening of steatohepatitis (FDA)
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
EoT (Week 48)
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Biopsy-based Response at Week 48 Compared to Baseline: At Least One Point Improvement in Fibrosis (NASH CRN Staging) Without Worsening - EMA
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
Number of patients who have at least one point improvement in fibrosis (NASH CRN staging) without worsening of steatohepatitis (EMA)
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
EoT (Week 48)
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Biopsy-based Response at Week 48 Compared to Baseline: Difference Between Treatment Groups (Part C) - Resolution of Steatohepatitis (Diagnostic Category)
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
Resolution of steatohepatitis (diagnostic category) without worsening of fibrosis (NASH CRN staging)
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
EoT (Week 48)
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
Biopsy-based Response at Week 48 Compared to Baseline: Difference Between Treatment Groups (Part C) - Resolution of Steatohepatitis (FDA, EMA)
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
Resolution of steatohepatitis (diagnostic category) without worsening of fibrosis (NASH CRN staging)
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
EoT (Week 48)
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* male/female patients, 18 years or older
* written informed consent
* Part A and B patients : presence of NASH by histological evidence (liver biopsy obtained 2 years or less prior to randomization) with fibrosis level of F1, F2 or F3 (fibrosis in the absence of cirrhosis) and no diagnosis of chronic liver disease and elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) OR phenotypic diagnosis based on elevated ALT, BMI and diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM)
* Part C patients: presence of NASH by histological evidence (liver biopsy obtained during the Screening period or 6 months or less prior to randomization) with fibrosis level of F2 or F3 and no diagnosis of chronic liver disease
And ( All Parts):
* ALT = 43 IU/L (males) or = 28 IU/L (females)
* Liver fat equal to or higher than 10% by MRI
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* previous exposure to OCA
* patients taking prohibited medications
* patients taking the following medicines UNLESS on a stable dose (within 25% of baseline dose) for at least 1 month before randomization: (for Part C patients, dose must be stable for at least 1 month prior to biopsy through Screening : anti- diabetic medications, insulin, beta-blockers, thiazide diuretics, fibrates, statins, niacin, ezetimibe, vitamin E (if doses > 200 IU/day; doses > 800 IU/day are prohibited), thyroid hormone, psychotropic medications, estrogen or estrogen containing birth control
* pregnant or nursing (lactating) women
* current or history of significant alcohol consumption for a period of more than 3 consecutive months within 1 year prior to screening
* uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
* new use of GLP-1 agonists such as liraglutide, exenatide, lixisenatide, albiglutide or dulaglutide within 3 months of screening
* presence of cirrhosis
* hepatic decompensation or severe liver impairment
* previous diagnosis of other forms of chronic liver disease
* patients with contraindications to MRI imaging
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 2
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Stopped early
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/08/2016
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
6/04/2020
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
350
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Novartis Investigative Site - Kingswood
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Novartis Investigative Site - Fitzroy
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2747 - Kingswood
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
3065 - Fitzroy
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Alabama
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Arkansas
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Michigan
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Minnesota
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
New Jersey
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Buenos Aires
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Salzburg
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Wien
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Bruxelles
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Gent
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Leuven
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Montpellier
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Paris
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Dresden
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Hamburg
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Hannover
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Leipzig
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Wuerzburg
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
India
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Delhi
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
BG
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Bologna
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Roma
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Hiroshima
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Kanagawa
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Saga
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Shimane
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Korea
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Busan
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Utrecht
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Singapore
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Singapore
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Banska Bystrica
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Bratislava
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Nitra
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Andalucia
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Cataluna
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Kaoshiung
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Keelung City
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Taichung
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Taipei
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Taoyuan
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of the study was to assess the effects of different doses of tropifexor (LJN452) with respect to safety, tolerability, and on markers of liver inflammation in patients with NASH
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02855164
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Naoumov NV, Brees D, Loeffler J, Chng E, Ren Y, Lopez P, Tai D, Lamle S, Sanyal AJ. Digital pathology with artificial intelligence analyses provides greater insights into treatment-induced fibrosis regression in NASH. J Hepatol. 2022 Nov;77(5):1399-1409. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.06.018. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Undecided
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Novartis is committed to sharing access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies with qualified external researchers. Requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to protect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations.
This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/64/NCT02855164/Prot_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/64/NCT02855164/SAP_001.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02855164