Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02585960
Registration number
NCT02585960
Ethics application status
Date submitted
21/10/2015
Date registered
26/10/2015
Titles & IDs
Public title
BAX 855 PK-guided Dosing
Query!
Scientific title
Phase 3, Prospective, Randomized, Multi-center Clinical Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of BAX 855 Following PK-guided Prophylaxis Targeting Two Different FVIII Trough Levels in Subjects With Severe Hemophilia A
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2014-005477-37
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
261303
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
PROPEL
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Hemophilia A
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Blood
0
0
0
0
Query!
Clotting disorders
Query!
Human Genetics and Inherited Disorders
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other human genetics and inherited disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Other - PEGylated Recombinant Factor VIII
Treatment: Other - PEGylated Recombinant Factor VIII
Treatment: Other - PEGylated Recombinant Factor VIII
Experimental: Pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation of BAX 855 - Participants will first undergo an initial pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment. Following the PK assessment participants will be randomized to one of 2 dosing regimens.
Experimental: FVIII trough target 1-3% - Standard treatment arm - PK-guided dosing schedule to achieve a Factor VIII (FVIII) trough of 1-3%
Experimental: FVIII trough target 8-12% - Intensified treatment arm - PK-guided dosing schedule to achieve a Factor VIII (FVIII) trough of 8-12%
Treatment: Other: PEGylated Recombinant Factor VIII
Pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation
Treatment: Other: PEGylated Recombinant Factor VIII
Standard treatment
Treatment: Other: PEGylated Recombinant Factor VIII
Intensified treatment
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With a Total Annualized Bleeding Rate (ABR) of Zero for Second Six Months
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Annualized bleeding rate was determined by dividing the number of bleeds by observation period in years.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Day 183 to Day 364 (6 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Total Annualized Bleeding Rate for Second Six Months
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Annualized bleeding rate was determined by dividing the number of bleeds by observation period in years.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Day 183 to Day 364 (6 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Annualized Spontaneous Bleeding Rate for Second Six Months
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Annualized spontaneous bleeding rate was determined by dividing the number of spontaneous bleeds by observation period in years. A bleed was defined as spontaneous if it was not related to injury/trauma.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Day 183 to Day 364 (6 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Annualized Traumatic Bleeding Rate for Second Six Months
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Annualized traumatic bleeding rate was determined by dividing the number of traumatic bleeds by observation period in years. A bleed was defined as traumatic if it was related to injury/trauma.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Day 183 to Day 364 (6 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Annualized Joint Bleeding Rate (AJBR) for Second Six Months
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Annualized joint bleeding rate was determined by dividing the number of joint bleeds by observation period in years. An acute joint bleed include some or all of the following: 'aura', pain, swelling, warmth of the skin over the joint, decreased range of motion and difficulty in using the limb compared with baseline or loss of function.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Day 183 to Day 364 (6 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Total Weight-adjusted Consumption of BAX 855
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Total weight-adjusted consumption of BAX 855 were reported.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
From start of study treatment up to 12 months (completion or termination)
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Number of Bleeding Episodes: Overall Hemostatic Efficacy Rating at Number of Infusions
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
The participant or caregiver rated the overall treatment response using a 4-point efficacy rating scale as Excellent: Full relief of pain and cessation of objective signs of bleeding after a single infusion and no additional infusion is required for the control of bleeding; Good: Definite pain relief and/or improvement in signs of bleeding after a single infusion and possibly requires more than 1 infusion for complete resolution; Fair: Probable and/or slight relief of pain and slight improvement in signs of bleeding after a single infusion and required more than 1 infusion for complete resolution and None: No improvement or condition worsens.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
8 hours after study drug administration
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Number of Bleeding Episodes: Overall Hemostatic Efficacy Rating at Bleed Resolution
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
The participant or caregiver rated the overall treatment response using a 4-point efficacy rating scale as Excellent: Full relief of pain and cessation of objective signs of bleeding after a single infusion and no additional infusion is required for the control of bleeding; Good: Definite pain relief and/or improvement in signs of bleeding after a single infusion and possibly requires more than 1 infusion for complete resolution; Fair: Probable and/or slight relief of pain and slight improvement in signs of bleeding after a single infusion and required more than 1 infusion for complete resolution and None: No improvement or condition worsens.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
From start of study treatment up to bleed resolution (up to 12 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Treatment of Bleeding Episodes: Number of BAX 855 Infusions Per Bleeding Episode Required Until Bleed Resolution
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Infusions of BAX 855 that were required until bleed resolution were reported.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
From start of study treatment up to 12 months (completion or termination)
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS)- Total Score
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
HJHS was assessed based on the following components of the elbow, knee, and ankle joints: swelling, duration of swelling, muscle atrophy, crepitus on motion, flexion loss, extension loss, joint pain, and strength, together with an assessment of the global gait. The HJHS is a validated 11-item scoring tool based on radiologic and clinical evaluation, sensitive to detect early signs and minor changes. HJHS ranges from 0 to 124. Higher values in the HJHS represent worse situation for the participant.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline, Month 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Number of Participants With Hemostatic Efficacy Ratings for BAX 855 Treatment of Operative Bleeds
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
The participant or caregiver rated the overall treatment response using a 4-point efficacy rating scale as Excellent: Full relief of pain and cessation of objective signs of bleeding after a single infusion and no additional infusion is required for the control of bleeding; Good: Definite pain relief and/or improvement in signs of bleeding after a single infusion and possibly requires more than 1 infusion for complete resolution; Fair: Probable and/or slight relief of pain and slight improvement in signs of bleeding after a single infusion and required more than 1 infusion for complete resolution and None: No improvement or condition worsens. Hemostatic efficacy was evaluated intra-operatively (from start to end of the procedure), post-operatively (from the end of procedure up to 24 h post procedure), and perioperatively (from the start of procedure to participant discharge from hospital or 14 days after completion of procedure; whichever was first).
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Day 0 through discharge or 14 days post-surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Blood Loss Per Participant in Case of Surgery
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
The intraoperative blood loss was measured by determining the volume of blood and fluid removal through suction into the collection container (waste box and/or cell saver) and the estimated blood loss into swabs and towels during the procedure, per the anesthesiologist's record. Postoperatively, blood loss was determined by the drainage volume collected, which mainly consisted of drainage fluid via vacuum or gravity drain, as applicable. In cases where no drain was present, blood loss was determined by the surgeon's clinical judgment, as applicable or entered as "not available". Blood loss was evaluated intra-operatively (from start to end of the procedure), post-operatively (from the end of procedure up to 24 h post procedure), and perioperatively (from the start of procedure to participant discharge from hospital or 14 days after completion of procedure; whichever was first).
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Day 0 through discharge or 14 days post-surgery
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
An AE was any unfavorable and unintended sign (an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom (rash, pain, discomfort, fever, dizziness, etc.), disease (peritonitis, bacteremia, etc.), or outcome of death temporally associated with the use of an investigational product (IP), whether or not considered causally related to the IP. A SAE was defined as an untoward medical occurrence that at any dose met one or more of the following criteria: outcome was fatal/results in death, life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or resulted in prolongation of an existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event that was not immediately life-threatening or resulted in death or required hospitalization but jeopardize the participant or required medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above outcomes.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
From start of study treatment up to 12 months (completion or termination)
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs Reported as Treatment Related Adverse Events
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
Vital signs included systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate, body temperature.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
From start of study treatment up to 12 months (completion or termination)
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Clinical Laboratory Parameters Reported as Treatment Related Adverse Events
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
Clinical laboratory assessments included clinical chemistry, hematology, lipid panel, genetics, T-cell, B-cell and NK cell (TBNK) and viral serology.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
From start of study treatment up to 12 months (completion or termination)
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Number of Participants With Positive Inhibitory Antibodies and Binding Antibodies to Factor VIII (FVIII), BAX 855, Polyethylene Glycol (PEG), and Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) Protein
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
Positive Inhibitory Antibodies and Binding Antibodies to Factor VIII (FVIII), BAX 855, Polyethylene Glycol (PEG), and Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) Protein were reported here.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
From start of study treatment up to 12 months (completion or termination)
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Physical Component Scores (PCS) of the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) is a 36-item validated, generic health related quality of life (HR QoL) instrument. PCS is a summary scale of the dimensions physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, and general health. The component score is normalized to a standard population. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both sub-scores and summary scores.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Baseline, Month 12 (completion or termination)
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Area Under the Plasma Concentration of BAX 855 From Zero to Infinity (AUC0-inf)
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time 0 to infinity of BAX 855 were reported.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Pre-infusion, 15 - 30 minutes, 3, 8, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours post-infusion
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Incremental Recovery (IR) at Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of BAX 855
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
IR at Cmax of BAX 855 were reported.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
Pre-infusion, 15 - 30 minutes, 3, 8, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours post-infusion
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
Plasma Half-life (T1/2) of BAX 855
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
T1/2 of BAX 855 in plasma were reported.
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
Pre-infusion, 15 - 30 minutes, 3, 8, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours post-infusion
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
Mean Residence Time (MRT) of BAX 855
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
MRT of BAX 855 were reported.
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
Pre-infusion, 15 - 30 minutes, 3, 8, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours post-infusion
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
0
0
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of BAX 855
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
Cmax of BAX 855 were reported.
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
Pre-infusion, 15 - 30 minutes, 3, 8, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours post-infusion
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
0
0
Time to Maximum Concentration of BAX 855 in Plasma (Tmax)
Query!
Assessment method [22]
0
0
Tmax of BAX 855 were reported.
Query!
Timepoint [22]
0
0
Pre-infusion, 15 - 30 minutes, 3, 8, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours post-infusion
Query!
Secondary outcome [23]
0
0
Total Body Clearance (CL) of BAX 855
Query!
Assessment method [23]
0
0
Total body clearance of BAX 855 from blood by the kidney were reported.
Query!
Timepoint [23]
0
0
Pre-infusion, 15 - 30 minutes, 3, 8, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours post-infusion
Query!
Secondary outcome [24]
0
0
Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss)
Query!
Assessment method [24]
0
0
Volume of distribution was defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug was uniformly distributed to produce the desired blood concentration of a drug. Vss is the apparent volume of distribution at steadystate.
Query!
Timepoint [24]
0
0
Pre-infusion, 15 - 30 minutes, 3, 8, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours post-infusion
Query!
Secondary outcome [25]
0
0
Incremental Recovery (IR) Over Time
Query!
Assessment method [25]
0
0
Incremental recovery was calculated by BAX 855 increment (IU/dL) / BAX 855 dose (IU/kg).
Query!
Timepoint [25]
0
0
Baseline, Month 3, 6, 7.5, 9, 10.5, 12 (Completion or termination)
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
INCLUSION CRITERIA:
* Participants transitioning from another BAX 855 study who meet ALL of the following criteria are eligible for this study:
1. Participant has completed the end of study visit of a BAX 855 study or is transitioning from the ongoing Baxalta Continuation Study 261302.
2. Participant is either receiving on-demand treatment or prophylactic treatment with BAX 855 and had an Annual Bleed Rate (ABR) of = 2 documented and treated during the past 12 months.
3. Participant is human immunodeficiency virus negative (HIV-); or HIV+ with stable disease and CD4+ count = 200 cells/mm^3, as confirmed by central laboratory.
4. Participant is willing and able to comply with the requirements of the protocol.
* Newly recruited participants (ie not transitioning from another BAX 855 study) including BAX855 naïve participants who meet ALL of the following criteria are eligible for this study:
1. Participant has severe hemophilia A (FVIII clotting activity < 1%) as confirmed by central laboratory OR by historically documented FVIII clotting activity performed by a certified clinical laboratory, optionally supported by a FVIII gene mutation consistent with severe hemophilia A
2. Participant has been previously treated with plasma-derived FVIII concentrates or recombinant FVIII for = 150 documented exposure days (EDs)
3. Participant is either receiving on-demand treatment or prophylactic treatment and had an annual bleeding rate of = 2 documented and treated during the past 12 months.
4. Participant has a Karnofsky performance score of = 60 at screening
5. Participant is HIV-; or HIV+ with stable disease and CD4+ count = 200 cells/mm^3, as confirmed by central laboratory at screening
6. Participant is hepatitis C virus negative (HCV-) by antibody (if positive, additional PCR testing will be performed), as confirmed by central laboratory at screening; or HCV+ with chronic stable hepatitis
7. If female of childbearing potential, participant presents with a negative urine pregnancy test and agrees to employ adequate birth control measures for the duration of the study
8. Participant is willing and able to comply with the requirements of the protocol.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
* Participants transitioning from another BAX 855 study who meet ANY of the following criteria are not eligible for this study:
1. Participant has developed a confirmed inhibitory antibody to FVIII with a titer of = 0.6 BU using the Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay as determined at the central laboratory during the course of the previous BAX 855 study.
2. Participant has been diagnosed with an acquired hemostatic defect other than hemophilia A.
3. The participant's weight is < 35 kg or > 100 kg.
4. Participant's platelet count is < 100,000/mL.
5. Participant has an abnormal renal function (serum creatinine > 1.5 times the upper limit of normal).
6. Participant has active hepatic disease with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels = 5 times the upper limit of normal.
7. Participant is scheduled to receive a systemic immunomodulating drug (e.g. corticosteroid agents at a dose equivalent to hydrocortisone greater than 10 mg/day, or a-interferon) other than anti-retroviral chemotherapy during the study.
8. Participant has a clinically significant medical, psychiatric, or cognitive illness, or recreational drug/alcohol use that, in the opinion of the investigator, would affect participant's safety or compliance.
9. Participant is planning to take part in any other clinical study during the course of the study.
10. Participant is a member of the team conducting this study or is in a dependent relationship with one of the study team members. Dependent relationships include close relatives (ie, children, partner/spouse, siblings, parents) as well as employees of the investigator or site personnel conducting the study.
Newly recruited participants (ie not transitioning from another BAX 855 study) who meet ANY of the following criteria are not eligible for this study:
1. Participant has detectable FVIII inhibitory antibodies (= 0.6 BU using the Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay) as confirmed by central laboratory at screening.
2. Participant has a history of confirmed FVIII inhibitors with a titer = 0.6 Bethesda Units (BU) (as determined by the Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay or the assay employed with the respective cut-off in the local laboratory) at any time prior to screening.
3. Participant has been diagnosed with an inherited or acquired hemostatic defect other than hemophilia A (eg, qualitative platelet defect or von Willebrand's disease).
4. The participant's weight is < 35 kg or > 100 kg.
5. Participant's platelet count is < 100,000/mL.
6. Participant has known hypersensitivity towards mouse or hamster proteins, PEG or Tween 80.
7. Participant has severe chronic hepatic dysfunction [eg, = 5 times upper limit of normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or aspartate aminotransferase (AST), as confirmed by central laboratory at screening, or a documented INR > 1.5].
8. Participant has severe renal impairment (serum creatinine > 1.5 times the upper limit of normal).
9. Participant has current or recent (< 30 days) use of other pegylated drugs prior to study participation or is scheduled to use such drugs during study participation.
10. Participant is scheduled to receive during the course of the study, a systemic immunomodulating drug (e.g. corticosteroid agents at a dose equivalent to hydrocortisone greater than 10 mg/day, or a-interferon) other than anti-retroviral chemotherapy.
11. Participant has participated in another clinical study involving an IP or investigational device within 30 days prior to enrollment or is scheduled to participate in another clinical study involving an IP or investigational device during the course of this study.
12. Participant has a medical, psychiatric, or cognitive illness or recreational drug/alcohol use that, in the opinion of the investigator, would affect participant safety or compliance.
13. Participant is a member of the team conducting this study or is in a dependent relationship with one of the study team members. Dependent relationships include close relatives (ie, children, partner/spouse, siblings, parents) as well as employees of the investigator or site personnel conducting the study.
Query!
Minimum age
12
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
65
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
23/11/2015
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
5/08/2018
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
135
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
QLD,WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Royal Brisbane Women's Hospital - Herston
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
The Perth Blood Institute - Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
4006 - Herston
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
6009 - Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Arizona
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Kentucky
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Louisiana
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Nebraska
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Utah
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Washington
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Vienna
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Plovdiv
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Sofia
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Varna
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Alpes Maritimes
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Finistere
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Ille Et Vilaine
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Caen
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Rouen
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Hessen
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Nordrhein Westfalen
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Berlin
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Leipzig
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Hong Kong
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Hong Kong
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Hong Kong
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Shatin
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Budapest
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Debrecen
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Pecs
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Tel-Hashomer
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Treviso
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Catania
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Milano
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Roma
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Torino
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Vicenza
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Kuala Lumpur
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Sabah
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Melaka
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Malaysia
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Pulau Pinang
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Norway
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Oslo
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Lodz
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Poznan
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Warszawa
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Wroclaw
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Brasov
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Cluj Napoca
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Singapore
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Singapore
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Baleares
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
La Coruña
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Málaga
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Gothenburg
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Stockholm
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Zürich
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Taichung
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Taipei
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Adana
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Antalya
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Istanbul
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Turkey
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Izmir
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Kyiv
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Lviv
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Poltava
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Avon
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Greater London
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Greater Manchester
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
Hampshire
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
Leicestershire
Query!
Country [71]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [71]
0
0
Oxfordshire
Query!
Country [72]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [72]
0
0
West Glamorgan
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Baxalta now part of Shire
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
Baxalta Innovations GmbH, now part of Shire
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
1. To compare the efficacy and safety of pharmacokinetic (PK)-guided treatment with BAX 855 targeting FVIII trough levels of 1-3% and approximately 10% (8-12%) 2. To further characterize pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters of BAX 855
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02585960
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Klamroth R, Windyga J, Radulescu V, Collins PW, Stasyshyn O, Ibrahim HM, Engl W, Tangada SD, Savage W, Ewenstein B. Rurioctocog alfa pegol PK-guided prophylaxis in hemophilia A: results from the phase 3 PROPEL study. Blood. 2021 Apr 1;137(13):1818-1827. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020005673.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Study Director
Query!
Address
0
0
Takeda
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.
Supporting document/s available: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan (SAP), Informed consent form (ICF), Clinical study report (CSR)
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Query!
Available to whom?
IPD from eligible studies will be shared with qualified researchers according to the criteria and process described on https://vivli.org/ourmember/takeda/. For approved requests, the researchers will be provided access to anonymized data (to respect patient privacy in line with applicable laws and regulations) and with information necessary to address the research objectives under the terms of a data sharing agreement.
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
IPD available at link: https://vivli.org/ourmember/takeda/
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
Study Protocol: Protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/60/NCT02585960/Prot_000.pdf
Study protocol
Study Protocol: Amendment 1
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/60/NCT02585960/Prot_001.pdf
Study protocol
Study Protocol: Amendment 2
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/60/NCT02585960/Prot_002.pdf
Study protocol
Study Protocol: Amendment 3
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/60/NCT02585960/Prot_003.pdf
Study protocol
Study Protocol: Amendment 5
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/60/NCT02585960/Prot_004.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/60/NCT02585960/SAP_005.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02585960