Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02477839
Registration number
NCT02477839
Ethics application status
Date submitted
13/05/2015
Date registered
23/06/2015
Date last updated
1/07/2021
Titles & IDs
Public title
Efficacy and Safety of Lacosamide as Adjunctive Therapy in Subjects =1 Month to <4 Years With Partial-onset Seizures
Query!
Scientific title
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Lacosamide as Adjunctive Therapy in Subjects With Epilepsy >=1 Month to <4 Years of Age With Partial-Onset Seizures
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2013-000717-20
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
SP0967
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Epilepsy With Partial-onset Seizures
0
0
Query!
Adenomatous Polyps
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Bowel - Back passage (rectum) or large bowel (colon)
Query!
Metabolic and Endocrine
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other endocrine disorders
Query!
Neurological
0
0
0
0
Query!
Epilepsy
Query!
Neurological
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other neurological disorders
Query!
Other
0
0
0
0
Query!
Research that is not of generic health relevance and not applicable to specific health categories listed above
Query!
Oral and Gastrointestinal
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other diseases of the mouth, teeth, oesophagus, digestive system including liver and colon
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional(has expanded access)
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Lacosamide
Other interventions - Placebo
Other interventions - blood or stool samples will be collected
Experimental: Lacosamide - Lacosamide syrup 8 mg/kg/day to 12 mg/kg/day
Placebo comparator: Placebo - Matching placebo syrup
Normal subjects - blood or stool samples will be collected from people referred for screening colonoscopy
Colorectal cancer - blood or stool samples will be collected from people with colorectal cancer detected at colonoscopy or resection
Polyps <10mm and no high risk features - blood or stool samples will be collected from people with no polyps or low risk polyps (\<10mm, no villous component or dysplasia) detected at colonoscopy
Advanced Mucosal Neoplasia - blood or stool samples will be collected from people with AMN detected at resection
Sessile Serrated Adenoma - blood or stool samples will be collected from people with SSP detected at resection
non-colorectal neoplastic disease - Participants with disease that is not colorectal neoplasia. Analysis of this cohort is not a primary endpoint but the investigators will report assay positivity in this group on an opportunistic basis. This cohort will include patients diagnosed with, for example, inflammatory bowel disease or extracolonic cancer.
Treatment: Drugs: Lacosamide
Active Substance: Lacosamide Pharmaceutical Form: Syrup Concentration: 10 mg/mL Route of Administration: oral
Other interventions: Placebo
Active Substance: Placebo Pharmaceutical Form: Syrup Concentration: N/A Route of Administration: oral
Other interventions: blood or stool samples will be collected
blood or stool samples will be collected
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Intervention code [2]
0
0
Other interventions
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Change in Average Daily Frequency (ADF) of Electrographic Partial-onset Seizures From End-of-Baseline (EOB) Period Video-EEG to End-of-Maintenance (EOM) Period Video-EEG
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The change in ADF of electrographic partial-onset seizures as measured on the End-of-Maintenance Period video-electroencephalogram (EEG) compared to the End-of-Baseline Period video-EEG.
Seizure frequency was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with terms for treatment, pooled randomized age stratum, pooled center, and Baseline seizure ADF. Seizure ADF was log transformed using the transformation of ln(X+1), where X is the seizure ADF. Baseline seizure ADF was log transformed.
Least squares means were based on log-transformed data of the full ANCOVA model.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
End-of-Baseline Period (Day -3 to Day 1) to End-of-Maintenance Period (Day 24 to Day 27)
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Participant Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events (AEs) During the Study
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study medication, whether or not considered related to the study medication. An AE could, therefore, be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study medication.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
From the Baseline Period (Day -7) to the End of Study Visit (up to 93 days)
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events Reported Spontaneously by the Participant's Parent(s) and/or Legal Representative(s)/Caregiver(s) (in Accordance With Local Regulation) or Observed by the Investigator
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study medication, whether or not considered related to the study medication. An AE could, therefore, be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study medication.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
From the Baseline Period (Day -7) to the End of Study Visit (up to 93 days)
Query!
Primary outcome [4]
0
0
Demographics
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Data to adequately describe demographic situations of each participant.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
1 day
Query!
Primary outcome [5]
0
0
Level of methylated DNA in circulation
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
The process will use an automated extraction procedure incorporating state-of-the-art magnetic silica-coated beads on a QIASymphony (Qiagen). The extracted DNA is bisulphite-converted and further purified (automated on a QIACube HT liquid handler) prior to analyzing 12uL of bis-DNA in a multi-plexed (BCAT1, IKZF1, ACTB (control assay)) real-time PCR for measuring the methylation levels of target amplicons.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
5 years
Query!
Primary outcome [6]
0
0
Level of haemoglobin in stool
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Suspended stool collected in the HM-JACKarc sampling device will be processed for Hb measurements using commercially available reagents and the bench-top analyser instrument, HM-JACKarc, according to manufacturer recommendation (Kyowa Medex Co Ltd, Japan). Measured haemoglobin concentrations will be reported as ug Hb/g stool. A 20 ug Hb/g stool a cut-off concentration will be used for qualitative reporting.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
5 years
Query!
Primary outcome [7]
0
0
Demographics
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Data to adequately decribe the clinical situations of each participant.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
1 day
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Absolute Change in Average Daily Frequency (ADF) of Electrographic Partial-onset Seizures From End-of-Baseline (EOB) Period Video-EEG to End-of-Maintenance (EOM) Period Video-EEG
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The absolute change in ADF of electrographic partial-onset seizures as measured on the End-of-Maintenance Period video-EEG compared to the End-of-Baseline Period video-EEG.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
End-of-Baseline Period (Day -3 to Day 1) to End-of-Maintenance Period (Day 24 to Day 27)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Percent Change in Average Daily Frequency (ADF) of Electrographic Partial-onset Seizures From End-of-Baseline (EOB) Period Video-EEG to End-of-Maintenance (EOM) Period Video-EEG
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The percent change in ADF of electrographic partial-onset seizures as measured on the End-of-Maintenance Period video-EEG compared to the End-of-Baseline Period video-EEG.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
End-of-Baseline Period (Day -3 to Day 1) to End-of-Maintenance Period (Day 24 to Day 27)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved 'Seizure-free' Status From All Seizure Types During the End-of-Maintenance (EOM) Period Video-EEG
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
A study participant was considered seizure-free from all seizures if the End-of-Maintenance (EOM) Period video-EEG had zero seizures reported from all seizure types (not just partial-onset seizures (POS)).
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
During the End-of-Maintenance Period (Day 24 to Day 27)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved 'Seizure-free' Status From Partial-onset Seizure Types Only During the End-of-Maintenance (EOM) Period Video-EEG
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
A study participant was considered seizure free from partial-onset seizures (POS) if the End-of-Maintenance (EOM) Period video-EEG had zero POS reported.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
During the End-of-Maintenance Period (Day 24 to Day 27)
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Experiencing a >=25% to <50% Reduction in Average Daily Frequency (ADF) of Electrographic Partial-onset Seizures From End-of-Baseline (EOB) Period Video-EEG to End-of-Maintenance (EOM) Period Video-EEG
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
A =25% to \<50% response was defined as =25% to \<50% reduction in ADF of electrographic partial-onset seizures (POS) from the End-of-Baseline (EOB) video-EEG to the End-of-Maintenance (EOM) video-EEG.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
End-of-Baseline Period (Day -3 to Day 1) to End-of-Maintenance Period (Day 24 to Day 27)
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Experiencing a 50% to 75% Reduction in Average Daily Frequency (ADF) of Electrographic Partial-onset Seizures From End-of-Baseline (EOB) Period Video-EEG to End-of-Maintenance (EOM) Period Video-EEG
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
A =50% to =75% response was defined as =50% to =75% reduction in ADF of electrographic partial-onset seizures (POS) from the End-of-Baseline (EOB) video-EEG to the End-of-Maintenance (EOM) video-EEG.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
End-of-Baseline Period (Day -3 to Day 1) to End-of-Maintenance Period (Day 24 to Day 27)
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Experiencing a >75% Reduction in Average Daily Frequency (ADF) of Electrographic Partial-onset Seizures From End-of-Baseline (EOB) Period Video-EEG to End-of-Maintenance (EOM) Period Video-EEG
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
A \>75% response was defined as \>75% reduction in ADF of electrographic partial-onset seizures (POS) from the End-of-Baseline (EOB) video-EEG to the End-of-Maintenance (EOM) video-EEG.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
End-of-Baseline Period (Day -3 to Day 1) to End-of-Maintenance Period (Day 24 to Day 27)
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Experiencing no Change in Average Daily Frequency (ADF) of Electrographic Partial-onset Seizures (Between <25% Reduction and <25% Increase) From EOB Period Video-EEG to EOM Period Video-EEG
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
No change was defined as between \<25% reduction and \<25% increase in ADF of electrographic partial-onset seizures (POS) from the End-of-Baseline (EOB) video-EEG to the End-of-Maintenance (EOM) video-EEG.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
End-of-Baseline Period (Day -3 to Day 1) to End-of-Maintenance Period (Day 24 to Day 27)
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Experiencing an Increase in Average Daily Frequency (ADF) of Electrographic Partial-onset Seizures of >=25% From End-of-Baseline (EOB) Period Video-EEG to End-of-Maintenance (EOM) Period Video-EEG
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
An increase was defined as =25% increase in ADF of electrographic partial-onset seizures (POS) from the End-of-Baseline (EOB) video-EEG to the End-of-Maintenance (EOM) video-EEG.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
End-of-Baseline Period (Day -3 to Day 1) to End-of-Maintenance Period (Day 24 to Day 27)
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Subject is male or female from >=1 month (ie, 4 weeks after full term [37 weeks gestational age]) to <4 years of age
* Subject has a diagnosis of epilepsy with partial-onset seizures. The results of >=1 prior EEG and >=1 magnetic resonance imaging/computerized tomography scan should be consistent with this diagnosis
* Subject weighs >=4 kg to <30 kg at Visit 1
* Subject has experienced >=2 partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization during each consecutive 7-day period during the 2 weeks prior to Visit 1
* Subject has >=2 partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization during the End-of-Baseline video-EEG. Electrographic seizures are defined as recognizable ictal patterns on an EEG involving >=2 contiguous electrodes. The seizures are initiated as a unilateral or strongly asymmetric abnormal epileptiform discharge lasting a total of >10 seconds
* Subject is on a stable (concurrently or sequentially) dosage regimen of 1 to 3 AEDs. The dosage regimen of concomitant AED therapy must be kept constant for a period of >=2 weeks prior to Visit 1. A stable daily dosage regimen of a concomitant benzodiazepine (BZD) will be considered as a concomitant AED
* Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is allowed and will not be counted as a concomitant AED. The VNS device must have been implanted for >=6 months prior to Visit 1; device settings must be kept stable for >=2 weeks prior to Visit 1 and kept stable during the Baseline, Treatment, and Transition Periods. Use of the VNS device magnet is allowed
* Subject is an acceptable candidate for venipuncture
Query!
Minimum age
1
Month
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
47
Months
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Subject has experienced febrile seizures exclusively. The occurrence of febrile seizures in addition to partial-onset seizures is not exclusionary
* Subject is on a ketogenic diet that has either changed within the 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 or is expected to change during the study
* Subject has creatinine clearance <30 mL/minute
* Subject has a clinically relevant ECG abnormality, in the opinion of the investigator (eg, second or third degree heart block at rest or a corrected QT interval [QTc] >=450 ms)
* Subject has a hemodynamically significant congenital heart disease
* Subject has an arrhythmic heart condition requiring medical therapy
* Subject has a known history of severe anaphylactic reaction secondary to medication intake or serious blood dyscrasias
* Subject has nonepileptic events that could be confused with seizures. Subjects may be included if epileptic events can be clearly distinguished and the frequency meets the study inclusion criteria
* Subject has a current diagnosis of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, epilepsia partialis continua, primary generalized epilepsy, Dravet Syndrome, or seizures that are not of partial-onset origin
* Subject has a history of generalized convulsive status epilepticus <=2 months prior to Screening (Visit 1)
* Subject has been treated with felbamate and has experienced any serious toxicity issues (defined as liver failure, aplastic anemia) with this treatment. Subjects treated with felbamate for <12 months are excluded. Subjects treated with felbamate for >=12 months prior to Visit 1 and who have not experienced serious toxicity issues are eligible
* Subject has an acute or subacutely progressive central nervous system disease. Subject has epilepsy secondary to a progressing cerebral disease or any other progressively neurodegenerative disease (malignant brain tumor or Rasmussen Syndrome)
* Subject has a known cardiac sodium channelopathy, such as Brugada syndrome
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
5/06/2015
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
28/05/2020
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
255
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Westmead Endoscopy Unit - Westmead
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2145 - Westmead
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Alabama
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Nevada
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
New Hampshire
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Córdoba
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Passo Fundo
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Porto Alegre
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
São Paulo
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Plovdiv
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Beijing
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Changchun
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Chongqing
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Nanchang
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Shanghai
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
China
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Shenzhen
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
Croatia
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Osijek
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Croatia
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Rijeka
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Croatia
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Zagreb
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Ostrava-Poruba
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Marseille
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Rennes
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Strasbourg
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Tbilisi
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Athens
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Budapest
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Petah tikva
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Genova
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Messina
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Milano
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Napoli
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Roma
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Aguascalientes
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Chihuahua
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Culiacán
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Guadalajara
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Monterrey
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Moldova, Republic of
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Chisinau
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Philippines
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Cebu
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Philippines
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Manila
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Philippines
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Quezon City
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Kraków
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Lisbon
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Bucuresti
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Iasi
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Sibiu
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Romania
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Timisoara
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Kemerovo
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Nizhny Novgorod
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Novosibirsk
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Omsk
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Perm
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Smolensk
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Tomsk
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Ulyanovsk
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Yekaterinburg
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Serbia
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Belgrade
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Serbia
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Novi Sad
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Slovakia
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Bratislava
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Taipei
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Thailand
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Bangkok
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Thailand
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Pathum Wan
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Dnipropetrovs'k
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Dnipro
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Ivano-Frankivs'k
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Kiev
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
Uzhgorod
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
Ukraine
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
Vinnytsia
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
UCB BIOSCIENCES, Inc.
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of this trial is to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of lacosamide administered as add-on therapy with 1 to 3 anti-seizure medications. This trial is for children aged 1 month to less than 4 years with epilepsy who currently have uncontrolled partial-onset seizures.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02477839
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Awadie H, Klein A, Tate D, Jideh B, Bar-Yishai I, Goodrick K, Ahlenstiel G, Bourke MJ. The prevalence of small-bowel polyps on video capsule endoscopy in patients with sporadic duodenal or ampullary adenomas. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Mar;93(3):630-636. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.07.029. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
UCB Cares
Query!
Address
0
0
+1 877 822 9493 (UCB)
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/39/NCT02477839/Prot_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/39/NCT02477839/SAP_001.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02477839
Download to PDF