Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02980731
Registration number
NCT02980731
Ethics application status
Date submitted
30/11/2016
Date registered
2/12/2016
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Study Evaluating the Impact of Venetoclax on the Quality of Life for Subjects With Relapsed (Your Cancer Has Come Back) or Refractory (no Response to Previous Cancer Treatments) Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) While Receiving Venetoclax Monotherapy (a Single Agent).
Query!
Scientific title
Open-Label, Single Arm, Phase 3b, Multi-Center Study Evaluating the Impact of Venetoclax on the Quality of Life of Relapsed/Refractory Subjects With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) (VENICE II)
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2016-001097-15
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
M15-889
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
VENICE II
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Leukaemia - Acute leukaemia
Query!
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Leukaemia - Chronic leukaemia
Query!
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Children's - Leukaemia & Lymphoma
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Venetoclax
Experimental: Venetoclax - Venetoclax was administered orally once daily (QD) for a planned duration of up to 2 years or until disease progression; median time on treatment was 127 weeks. The starting dose was 20 mg daily, increasing over a period of 5 weeks up to the daily dose of 400 mg.
Treatment: Drugs: Venetoclax
Venetoclax tablets were to be taken orally once daily with a meal and water in the morning at approximately the same time each day. Tablets were to be swallowed whole and not chewed, crushed, or broken prior to swallowing.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) Subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item participant self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including a global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL) scale. Participants rate items and a score ranging from 0 to 100 is calculated. A higher score on the global health status/quality of life scale indicates a better level of functioning, and positive changes from baseline indicate improvement. A change of 5 - 10 points is considered a small change, and a change of 10 - 20 points is considered a moderate change.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline, Week 48
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline in Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) Subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item participant self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including a global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL) scale. Participants rate items and a score ranging from 0 to 100 is calculated. A higher score on the global health status/quality of life scale indicates a better level of functioning, and positive changes from baseline indicate improvement. A change of 5 - 10 points is considered a small change, and a change of 10 - 20 points is considered a moderate change.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, Final visit (at study drug discontinuation and/or upon discontinuation from the study, up to Week 108)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item participant self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including a physical functioning scale. Participants rate items and a score ranging from 0 to 100 is calculated. A higher score on the physical functioning scale indicates a better level of functioning, and positive changes from baseline indicate improvement. A change of 5 - 10 points is considered a small change, and a change of 10 - 20 points is considered a moderate change.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, Final visit (at study drug discontinuation and/or upon discontinuation from the study, up to Week 108)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline in Role Functioning Subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item participant self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including a role functioning scale. Participants rate items and a score ranging from 0 to 100 is calculated. A higher score on the role functioning scale indicates a better level of functioning, and positive changes from baseline indicate improvement. A change of 5 - 10 points is considered a small change, and a change of 10 - 20 points is considered a moderate change.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, Final visit (at study drug discontinuation and/or upon discontinuation from the study, up to Week 108)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline in Emotional Functioning Subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item participant self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including an emotional functioning scale. Participants rate items and a score ranging from 0 to 100 is calculated. A higher score on the emotional functioning scale indicates a better level of functioning, and positive changes from baseline indicate improvement. A change of 5 - 10 points is considered a small change, and a change of 10 - 20 points is considered a moderate change.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, Final visit (at study drug discontinuation and/or upon discontinuation from the study, up to Week 108)
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline in Cognitive Functioning Subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item participant self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including a cognitive functioning scale. Participants rate items and a score ranging from 0 to 100 is calculated. A higher score on the cognitive functioning scale indicates a better level of functioning, and positive changes from baseline indicate improvement. A change of 5 - 10 points is considered a small change, and a change of 10 - 20 points is considered a moderate change.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, Final visit (at study drug discontinuation and/or upon discontinuation from the study, up to Week 108)
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline in Social Functioning Subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item participant self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including a social functioning scale. Participants rate items and a score ranging from 0 to 100 is calculated. A higher score on the social functioning scale indicates a better level of functioning, and positive changes from baseline indicate improvement. A change of 5 - 10 points is considered a small change, and a change of 10 - 20 points is considered a moderate change.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, Final visit (at study drug discontinuation and/or upon discontinuation from the study, up to Week 108)
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline in Fatigue Subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item participant self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including a fatigue scale. Participants rate items and a score ranging from 0 to 100 is calculated. A higher score on the fatigue scale indicates a lower level of functioning, and negative changes from baseline indicate improvement. A change of 5 - 10 points is considered a small change, and a change of 10 - 20 points is considered a moderate change.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, Final visit (at study drug discontinuation and/or upon discontinuation from the study, up to Week 108)
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline in Nausea and Vomiting Subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item participant self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including a nausea and vomiting scale. Participants rate items and a score ranging from 0 to 100 is calculated. A higher score on the nausea and vomiting scale indicates a lower level of functioning, and negative changes from baseline indicate improvement. A change of 5 - 10 points is considered a small change, and a change of 10 - 20 points is considered a moderate change.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, Final visit (at study drug discontinuation and/or upon discontinuation from the study, up to Week 108)
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline in Pain Subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item participant self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including a pain scale. Participants rate items and a score ranging from 0 to 100 is calculated. A higher score on the pain scale indicates a lower level of functioning, and negative changes from baseline indicate improvement. A change of 5 - 10 points is considered a small change, and a change of 10 - 20 points is considered a moderate change.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, Final visit (at study drug discontinuation and/or upon discontinuation from the study, up to Week 108)
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline in Dyspnea Subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item participant self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including a dyspnea scale. Participants rate items and a score ranging from 0 to 100 is calculated. A higher score on the dyspnea scale indicates a lower level of functioning, and negative changes from baseline indicate improvement. A change of 5 - 10 points is considered a small change, and a change of 10 - 20 points is considered a moderate change.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, Final visit (at study drug discontinuation and/or upon discontinuation from the study, up to Week 108)
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline in Insomnia Subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item participant self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including an insomnia scale. Participants rate items and a score ranging from 0 to 100 is calculated. A higher score on the insomnia scale indicates a lower level of functioning, and negative changes from baseline indicate improvement. A change of 5 - 10 points is considered a small change, and a change of 10 - 20 points is considered a moderate change.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, Final visit (at study drug discontinuation and/or upon discontinuation from the study, up to Week 108)
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline in Appetite Loss Subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item participant self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including an appetite loss scale. Participants rate items and a score ranging from 0 to 100 is calculated. A higher score on the appetite loss scale indicates a lower level of functioning, and negative changes from baseline indicate improvement. A change of 5 - 10 points is considered a small change, and a change of 10 - 20 points is considered a moderate change.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, Final visit (at study drug discontinuation and/or upon discontinuation from the study, up to Week 108)
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline in Constipation Subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item participant self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including a constipation scale. Participants rate items and a score ranging from 0 to 100 is calculated. A higher score on the constipation scale indicates a lower level of functioning, and negative changes from baseline indicate improvement. A change of 5 - 10 points is considered a small change, and a change of 10 - 20 points is considered a moderate change.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, Final visit (at study drug discontinuation and/or upon discontinuation from the study, up to Week 108)
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline in Diarrhea Subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item participant self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including a diarrhea scale. Participants rate items and a score ranging from 0 to 100 is calculated. A higher score on the diarrhea scale indicates a lower level of functioning, and negative changes from baseline indicate improvement. A change of 5 - 10 points is considered a small change, and a change of 10 - 20 points is considered a moderate change.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, Final visit (at study drug discontinuation and/or upon discontinuation from the study, up to Week 108)
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline in Financial Difficulties Subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item participant self-report questionnaire composed of both multi-item and single scales, including a financial difficulties scale. Participants rate items and a score ranging from 0 to 100 is calculated. A higher score on the financial difficulties scale indicates a lower level of functioning, and negative changes from baseline indicate improvement. A change of 5 - 10 points is considered a small change, and a change of 10 - 20 points is considered a moderate change.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, Final visit (at study drug discontinuation and/or upon discontinuation from the study, up to Week 108)
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline in Fatigue Subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL16)
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-CLL16 is comprised of 16 questions that address 5 domains of health-related quality of life important in CLL. Participants rate items and a score ranging from 0 to 100 is calculated. A higher score on the fatigue scale indicates a lower level of functioning, and negative changes from baseline indicate improvement. A change of 5 - 10 points is considered a small change, and a change of 10 - 20 points is considered a moderate change.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, Final visit (at study drug discontinuation and/or upon discontinuation from the study, up to Week 108)
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline in Treatment Side Effects Subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL16)
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-CLL16 is comprised of 16 questions that address 5 domains of health-related quality of life important in CLL. Participants rate items and a score ranging from 0 to 100 is calculated. A higher score on the treatment side effects scale indicates a lower level of functioning, and negative changes from baseline indicate improvement. A change of 5 - 10 points is considered a small change, and a change of 10 - 20 points is considered a moderate change.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, Final visit (at study drug discontinuation and/or upon discontinuation from the study, up to Week 108)
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline in Disease Effects Subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL16)
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-CLL16 is comprised of 16 questions that address 5 domains of health-related quality of life important in CLL. Participants rate items and a score ranging from 0 to 100 is calculated. A higher score on the disease effects scale indicates a lower level of functioning, and negative changes from baseline indicate improvement. A change of 5 - 10 points is considered a small change, and a change of 10 - 20 points is considered a moderate change.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, Final visit (at study drug discontinuation and/or upon discontinuation from the study, up to Week 108)
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline in Infection Subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL16)
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-CLL16 is comprised of 16 questions that address 5 domains of health-related quality of life important in CLL. Participants rate items and a score ranging from 0 to 100 is calculated. A higher score on the infection scale indicates a lower level of functioning, and negative changes from baseline indicate improvement. A change of 5 - 10 points is considered a small change, and a change of 10 - 20 points is considered a moderate change.
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, Final visit (at study drug discontinuation and/or upon discontinuation from the study, up to Week 108)
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline in Social Problems Subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL16)
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-CLL16 is comprised of 16 questions that address 5 domains of health-related quality of life important in CLL. Participants rate items and a score ranging from 0 to 100 is calculated. A higher score on the social problems scale indicates a lower level of functioning, and negative changes from baseline indicate improvement. A change of 5 - 10 points is considered a small change, and a change of 10 - 20 points is considered a moderate change.
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, Final visit (at study drug discontinuation and/or upon discontinuation from the study, up to Week 108)
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline in Future Health Subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Module (EORTC QLQ-CLL16)
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-CLL16 is comprised of 16 questions that address 5 domains of health-related quality of life important in CLL. Participants rate items and a score ranging from 0 to 100 is calculated. A higher score on the future health scale indicates a lower level of functioning, and negative changes from baseline indicate improvement. A change of 5 - 10 points is considered a small change, and a change of 10 - 20 points is considered a moderate change.
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, Final visit (at study drug discontinuation and/or upon discontinuation from the study, up to Week 108)
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analog Scale Score
Query!
Assessment method [22]
0
0
The EQ-5D 5L measures quality of life in five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which are rated on five levels of severity (1: no problems, 2: slight problems, 3: moderate problems, 4: severe problems, 5: extreme problems), and a separate visual analog scale (VAS). Participants rated their health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints were labelled 100, "The best health you can imagine" and 0, "The worst health you can imagine". Positive values indicate improvement from baseline.
Query!
Timepoint [22]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, Final visit (at study drug discontinuation and/or upon discontinuation from the study, up to Week 108)
Query!
Secondary outcome [23]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Health Index Score
Query!
Assessment method [23]
0
0
The EQ-5D 5L measures quality of life in five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) each of which are rated on five levels of severity (1: no problems, 2: slight problems, 3: moderate problems, 4: severe problems, 5: extreme problems), and a separate visual analog scale (VAS). The scores for the 5 dimensions are used to compute a single utility index score ranging from zero (0.0) to 1 (1.0) representing the general health status of the individual, with '0' defined as a health state equivalent to being dead and '1' is full health. The higher the score the better the health status. Positive values indicate improvement from baseline.
Query!
Timepoint [23]
0
0
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, Final visit (at study drug discontinuation and/or upon discontinuation from the study, up to Week 108)
Query!
Secondary outcome [24]
0
0
Complete Remission Rate (Complete Remission [CR] + Complete Remission With Incomplete Marrow Recovery [CRi])
Query!
Assessment method [24]
0
0
Complete remission rate (CR + CRi) is defined as the percentage of participants achieving a CR or CRi as their best response (per the investigator assessment) based on 2008 Modified International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) National Cancer Institute-Working Group (NCI-WG) Guidelines criteria.
Query!
Timepoint [24]
0
0
From the first dose of study drug until the last participant completed the Week 48 assessments; median time on follow-up was 184 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [25]
0
0
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Query!
Assessment method [25]
0
0
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieved complete remission (CR), complete remission with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi), nodular partial remission (nPR), or confirmed partial remission (PR) based on the 2008 Modified International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) National Cancer Institute-Working Group (NCI-WG) Guidelines criteria as assessed by investigator using the best response at any time during the study.
Query!
Timepoint [25]
0
0
From the first dose of study drug until the last participant completed the Week 48 assessments; median time on follow-up was 184 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [26]
0
0
Duration of Overall Response (DOR)
Query!
Assessment method [26]
0
0
DoR is defined as the number of days from the date of first response (complete remission (CR), complete remission with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi), nodular partial remission (nPR), or confirmed partial remission (PR) based on the 2008 Modified International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) National Cancer Institute-Working Group (NCI-WG) Guidelines criteria to the earliest date of progressive disease (PD) or death. DOR was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier (K-M) methodology.
Query!
Timepoint [26]
0
0
From the first dose of study drug until the last participant completed the Week 48 assessments; median time on follow-up was 184 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [27]
0
0
Time to Progression (TTP)
Query!
Assessment method [27]
0
0
TTP is defined as the number of days from the date of first dose of venetoclax to the date of earliest disease progression (PD). TTP was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier (K-M) methodology.
Query!
Timepoint [27]
0
0
From the first dose of study drug until the last participant completed the Week 48 assessments; median time on follow-up was 184 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [28]
0
0
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Query!
Assessment method [28]
0
0
PFS is defined as the number of days from the date of first dose of venetoclax to the date of earliest disease progression (PD) or death. PFS was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methodology.
Query!
Timepoint [28]
0
0
From the first dose of study drug until the last participant completed the Week 48 assessments; median time on follow-up was 184 weeks
Query!
Secondary outcome [29]
0
0
Overall Survival (OS)
Query!
Assessment method [29]
0
0
OS is defined as the number of days from the date of first dose of venetoclax to the date of death. For participants who did not die, their data was censored at the date of last study visit or the last known date to be alive, whichever was later. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.
Query!
Timepoint [29]
0
0
From the first dose of study drug until the last participant completed the Week 48 assessments; median time on follow-up was 184 weeks
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score of = 2
* Participant has relapsed/refractory disease (received at least one prior therapy)
* Diagnosis of CLL that meets published 2008 Modified International Workshop on CLL National Cancer Institute - Working Group (IWCLL NCI-WG) Guidelines and:
* has an indication for treatment according to the 2008 Modified IWCLL NCI-WG Guidelines
* has clinically measurable disease (lymphocytosis > 5 × 10^9/L and/or palpable and measurable nodes by physical exam and/or organomegaly assessed by physical exam)
* with or without 17p deletion or TP53 mutation
* may have been previously treated with a prior B-cell receptor inhibitor therapy
* Adequate bone marrow function
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
99
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Participant has developed Richter's transformation or Prolymphocytic leukemia (PLL)
* Participant has previously received venetoclax
* History of active malignancies other than CLL within the past 2 years prior to first dose of venetoclax, with the exception of:
* adequately treated in situ carcinoma of the cervix uteri
* adequately treated basal cell carcinoma or localized squamous cell carcinoma of the skin
* previous malignancy confined and surgically resected (or treated with other modalities) with curative intent
* Active and uncontrolled autoimmune cytopenias (within 2 weeks prior to screening), including autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) or idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), despite low dose corticosteroids
* Prior allogeneic stem cell transplant
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
NA
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Single group
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
13/12/2016
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
29/12/2021
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
210
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,QLD,VIC,WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
St George Hospital /ID# 154212 - Kogarah
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Liverpool Hospital /ID# 154950 - Liverpool
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Gold coast University Hospital /ID# 150833 - SouthPort
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Peter MacCallum Cancer Ctr /ID# 154948 - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
Perth Blood Institute Ltd /ID# 154949 - Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2217 - Kogarah
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
2170 - Liverpool
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
4215 - SouthPort
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
3000 - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
6009 - Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Buenos Aires
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Ciuadad Autonoma De Buenos Aires
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
Argentina
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Cordoba
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Sofia
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
Bulgaria
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Plovdiv
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
Hong Kong
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Hong Kong
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Budapest
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Michoacan
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Nuevo Leon
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Auckland
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Wellington
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Lodzkie
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Mazowieckie
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Pomorskie
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Slaskie
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Moskva
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Penzenskaya Oblast
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Moscow
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Taichung City
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Taiwan
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Taipei City
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
AbbVie
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of this open-label, single-arm study was to evaluate the impact of venetoclax on the quality of life of participants including those with with relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL; a type of cancer affecting the blood and the bone marrow) with or without the 17p deletion or TP53 mutation, including participants with an unknown status, as well as R/R CLL participants who had been previously treated with B-cell receptor inhibitor (BCRi) therapy. The starting dose of venetoclax was 20 mg once daily. The dose must have been gradually increased over a period of 5 weeks up to the daily dose of 400 mg. Participants may have continued receiving venetoclax for up to 2 years. After the treatment period, participants may have continued on into a 2-year follow-up period.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02980731
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Cochrane T, Enrico A, Gomez-Almaguer D, Hadjiev E, Lech-Maranda E, Masszi T, Nikitin E, Robak T, Weinkove R, Wu SJ, Sail KR, Pesko J, Pai M, Komlosi V, Anderson MA. Impact of venetoclax monotherapy on the quality of life of patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results from the phase 3b VENICE II trial. Leuk Lymphoma. 2022 Feb;63(2):304-314. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2021.1986217. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
ABBVIE INC.
Query!
Address
0
0
AbbVie
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
AbbVie is committed to responsible data sharing regarding the clinical trials we sponsor. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information (e.g., protocols and clinical study reports), as long as the trials are not part of an ongoing or planned regulatory submission. This includes requests for clinical trial data for unlicensed products and indications.
Supporting document/s available: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan (SAP), Clinical study report (CSR)
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
For details on when studies are available for sharing visit https://vivli.org/ourmember/abbvie/
Query!
Available to whom?
Access to this clinical trial data can be requested by any qualified researchers who engage in rigorous independent scientific research, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and statistical analysis plan and execution of a data sharing statement. Data requests can be submitted at any time after approval in the US and/or EU and a primary manuscript is accepted for publication. For more information on the process, or to submit a request, visit the following link https://www.abbvieclinicaltrials.com/hcp/data-sharing/
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
IPD available at link: https://vivli.org/ourmember/abbvie/
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/31/NCT02980731/Prot_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/31/NCT02980731/SAP_001.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02980731