Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01802788
Registration number
NCT01802788
Ethics application status
Date submitted
21/02/2013
Date registered
1/03/2013
Titles & IDs
Public title
5 Year Observation of Patients With PORTICO Valves
Query!
Scientific title
International Long-term Follow-up Study of Patients Implanted With a Portico™ Valve
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
CV-12-054-EU-PV
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
PORTICO-1
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Aortic Valve Stenosis
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cardiovascular
0
0
0
0
Query!
Diseases of the vasculature and circulation including the lymphatic system
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Query!
Patient registry
Query!
Target follow-up duration
Query!
Target follow-up type
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Cohort A - Patients implanted with a Portico valve after CE mark
Cohort B - Patients implanted in previous SJM-sponsored premarket studies
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With All-cause Mortality
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Percentage of participants that died for any reason at 1 year post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
1 year post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With All Cause Mortality in Cohort A
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Percentage of participants that died for any reason at 30 days through 5 years post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
30 days through 5 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Number of Participants With All-cause Mortality (30 Days, Annually From 1 Year Through 5 Years) in Cohort B
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Number of participants who died for any reason at different time points such as 30 days, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
30 days through 5 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Cardiovascular Mortality as Defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Percentage of participants that died for cardiovascular or unknown reasons as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days through 5 years post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
30 days through 5 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Number of Participants With Cardiovascular Mortality Occurring at Each Time Window (30 Days, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years and 5 Years) in Cohort B
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Number of participants who died for any reason at different time points such as 30 days, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
30 days through 5 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Non-Cardiovascular Mortality as Defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Percentage of participants that died for any reason at 30 days through 5 years post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
30 days through 5 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Number of Participants With Non-Cardiovascular Mortality Occurring at Each Time Window (30 Days, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years and 5 Years) in Cohort B
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Number of participants who died for any reason at different time points such as 30 days, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
30 days through 5 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Myocardial Infarction as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Percentage of participants with a myocardial infarction as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days through 5 years post implantation post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
30 days through 5 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Number of Participants With Myocardial Infarction as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort B
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Number of participants with a myocardial infarction as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days through 5 years post implantation post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
30 days through 5 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Vascular Access Site Complication as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Percentage of participants with vascular access site complication (major or minor) as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
30 days post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Bleeding Events as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
Percentage of participants with a bleeding events (life threatening, major or minor) as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
30 days post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Stage 1, 2 and 3 Acute Kidney Injury as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
Percentage of participants with a Stage 1, 2 or Stage 3 acute kidney injury as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
30 days post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Mean Prosthetic Valve Function as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (Aortic Valve Area)
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
The aortic valve area as interpreted by an independent echocardiographic core laboratory at 30 days through 5 years post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
30 days through 5 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Mean Prosthetic Valve Function as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (Mean Transvalvular Gradient)
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
The mean transvalvular gradient as interpreted by an independent echocardiographic core laboratory at 30 days through 5 years post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
30 days through 5 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification of Heart Failure
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity:
Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity; Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity; Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms; Class IV - Severe limitations.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
30 days post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification of Heart Failure
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity:
Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity; Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity; Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms; Class IV - Severe limitations.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
1 year post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification of Heart Failure
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity:
Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity; Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity; Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms; Class IV - Severe limitations.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
2 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification of Heart Failure
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity:
Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity; Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity; Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms; Class IV - Severe limitations.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
3 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification of Heart Failure
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity:
Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity; Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity; Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms; Class IV - Severe limitations.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
4 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification of Heart Failure
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity:
Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity; Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity; Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms; Class IV - Severe limitations.
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
5 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
Mean Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
Distance in metres that the participant can walk in 6 minutes. The six-minute walking test (6MWT) is a commonly used objective measure of functional exercise capacity in individuals with moderately severe impairment.
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
30 days through 5 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
0
0
Mean Quality of Life Assessment in Cohort A
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
EuroQuol-5 Dimensions (EQ5D) is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments. A visual analog scale (VAS) for health is also included in the measure as a patient-reported estimate of overall health status. This scale ranges between 0-100, where 0 is 'the worst health you can imagine' and 100 is 'the best health you can imagine'.
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
30 days and 1 year post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Transient Ischemic Attack in Cohort A
Query!
Assessment method [22]
0
0
Percentage of participants with transient ischemic attack as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days through 5 years post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [22]
0
0
30 days through 5 years post implantation
Query!
Secondary outcome [23]
0
0
Number of Participants With Transient Ischemic Attack in Cohort B
Query!
Assessment method [23]
0
0
Number of participants with transient ischemic attack as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days through 5 years post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [23]
0
0
30 days through 5 years post implantation
Query!
Secondary outcome [24]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Query!
Assessment method [24]
0
0
Percentage of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [24]
0
0
30 days post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [25]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Query!
Assessment method [25]
0
0
Percentage of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 1 year post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [25]
0
0
1 year post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [26]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Query!
Assessment method [26]
0
0
Percentage of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 2 years post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [26]
0
0
2 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [27]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Query!
Assessment method [27]
0
0
Percentage of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 3 years post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [27]
0
0
3 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [28]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Query!
Assessment method [28]
0
0
Percentage of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 4 years post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [28]
0
0
4 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [29]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Query!
Assessment method [29]
0
0
Percentage of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 5 years post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [29]
0
0
5 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [30]
0
0
Number of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort B
Query!
Assessment method [30]
0
0
Number of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 2 years post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [30]
0
0
2 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [31]
0
0
Number of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort B
Query!
Assessment method [31]
0
0
Number of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 3 years post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [31]
0
0
3 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [32]
0
0
Number of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort B
Query!
Assessment method [32]
0
0
Number of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 4 years post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [32]
0
0
4 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [33]
0
0
Number of Participants With Stroke as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort B
Query!
Assessment method [33]
0
0
Number of participants with a stroke (disabling and non-disabling) as defined by VARC-2 at 5 years post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [33]
0
0
5 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [34]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Conduction Disturbances and Cardiac Arrythmias as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Query!
Assessment method [34]
0
0
Percentage of participants with a conduction disturbances and cardiac arrhythmias as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [34]
0
0
30 days post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [35]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Conduction Disturbances and Cardiac Arrythmias as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Query!
Assessment method [35]
0
0
Percentage of participants with a conduction disturbances and cardiac arrhythmias as defined by VARC-2 at 1 year post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [35]
0
0
1 year post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [36]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Conduction Disturbances and Cardiac Arrythmias as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Query!
Assessment method [36]
0
0
Percentage of participants with a conduction disturbances and cardiac arrhythmias as defined by VARC-2 at 2 years post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [36]
0
0
2 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [37]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Conduction Disturbances and Cardiac Arrythmias as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Query!
Assessment method [37]
0
0
Percentage of participants with a conduction disturbances and cardiac arrhythmias as defined by VARC-2 at 3 years post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [37]
0
0
3 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [38]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Conduction Disturbances and Cardiac Arrythmias as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Query!
Assessment method [38]
0
0
Percentage of participants with a conduction disturbances and cardiac arrhythmias as defined by VARC-2 at 4 years post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [38]
0
0
4 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [39]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Conduction Disturbances and Cardiac Arrythmias as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort A
Query!
Assessment method [39]
0
0
Percentage of participants with a conduction disturbances and cardiac arrhythmias as defined by VARC-2 at 5 years post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [39]
0
0
5 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [40]
0
0
Number of Participants With Conduction Disturbances and Cardiac Arrythmias as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort B
Query!
Assessment method [40]
0
0
Number of participants with a conduction disturbances and cardiac arrhythmias as defined by VARC-2 at 2 years post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [40]
0
0
2 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [41]
0
0
Number of Participants With Conduction Disturbances and Cardiac Arrythmias as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort B
Query!
Assessment method [41]
0
0
Number of participants with a conduction disturbances and cardiac arrhythmias as defined by VARC-2 at 3 years post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [41]
0
0
3 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [42]
0
0
Number of Participants With Conduction Disturbances and Cardiac Arrythmias as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort B
Query!
Assessment method [42]
0
0
Number of participants with a conduction disturbances and cardiac arrhythmias as defined by VARC-2 at 4 years post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [42]
0
0
4 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [43]
0
0
Number of Participants With Conduction Disturbances and Cardiac Arrythmias as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) in Cohort B
Query!
Assessment method [43]
0
0
Number of participants with a conduction disturbances and cardiac arrhythmias as defined by VARC-2 at 5 years post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [43]
0
0
5 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [44]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Prosthetic Valve Function as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation) in Cohort A
Query!
Assessment method [44]
0
0
Percentage of participants with a paravalvular aortic regurgitation as defined by VARC-2 at 30 days post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [44]
0
0
30 days post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [45]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Prosthetic Valve Function as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation) in Cohort A
Query!
Assessment method [45]
0
0
Percentage of participants with a paravalvular aortic regurgitation as defined by VARC-2 at 1 year post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [45]
0
0
1 year post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [46]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Prosthetic Valve Function as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation)
Query!
Assessment method [46]
0
0
Percentage of participants with a paravalvular aortic regurgitation as defined by VARC-2 at 2 years post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [46]
0
0
2 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [47]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Prosthetic Valve Function as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation)
Query!
Assessment method [47]
0
0
Percentage of participants with a paravalvular aortic regurgitation as defined by VARC-2 at 3 years post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [47]
0
0
3 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [48]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Prosthetic Valve Function as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation)
Query!
Assessment method [48]
0
0
Percentage of participants with a paravalvular aortic regurgitation as defined by VARC-2 at 4 years post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [48]
0
0
4 years post implant
Query!
Secondary outcome [49]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Prosthetic Valve Function as Defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) (Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation)
Query!
Assessment method [49]
0
0
Percentage of participants with a paravalvular aortic regurgitation as defined by VARC-2 at 5 years post implantation
Query!
Timepoint [49]
0
0
5 years post implant
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Patient has signed the Patient Informed Consent prior to participating in the clinical investigation.
* Patient has been referred for a Portico Valve implant as per Heart Team decision or patient has received a Portico Valve as per participation in an SJM sponsored regulatory or first-in-human trial.
* Patient has senile degenerative aortic valve stenosis confirmed by echocardiographically derived criteria*:
* An initial aortic valve area (AVA) of less than or equal to (=) 1.0 cm2 (or indexed EOA less than or equal to (=) 0.6 cm2/m2) AND
* A mean gradient greater than (>)40 mmHg or jet velocity greater than (>)4.0 m/s or Doppler Velocity Index less than (<)0.25. If the mean gradient is <40 mmHg and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <55%, then the site may as well perform a dobutamine stress echo to see if the mean gradient increases to >40 mmHg." (Baseline measurement taken by echo within 6 months of index procedure.)
* Patient has a life expectancy more than (>) 12 months.
For patients enrolled in a French site:
* Patient is at high risk for surgery as demonstrated by a Logistic EuroSCORE equal or more than (=) 20 and/or a Society of Thoracic Surgeon (STS) mortality risk score of more than (>) 10% and/or by clinical judgment of the Heart Team based on the individual risk profile (comorbidities).
* Not applicable for a patient who has received a Portico Valve as per participation in an SJM sponsored Regulatory or First-In-Human trial.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Any case in which the Portico Valve would not be indicated for the patient as per current instructions for use (i.e any "off-label" use).
* Patient has any other aortic valve than tricuspid one.
* Patient has a prosthetic valve or ring in the aortic position.
* Patient needs a concomitant structural heart procedure..
* Patient needs the usage of an embolic protection device.
* Patient is unwilling or unable to comply with all clinical investigation-required follow-up evaluations.
* Patient is pregnant
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Query!
Duration
Query!
Selection
Query!
Timing
Prospective
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
16/04/2013
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
19/10/2022
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
1032
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Royal Adelaide Hospital - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
St Andrews Hospital - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Heart Care Partners-Wesley Hospital - Auchenflower
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
The Prince Charles Hospital - Chermside
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
Royal North Shore hospital - Leonards Hill
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
0
0
The Alfred Hospital - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [7]
0
0
Royal Melbourne Hospital - City Campus - Parkville
Query!
Recruitment hospital [8]
0
0
Fiona Stanley Hospital - Perth
Query!
Recruitment hospital [9]
0
0
North Shore Private Hospital - St Leonards
Query!
Recruitment hospital [10]
0
0
Princess Alexandra Hospital - Woolloongabba
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
- Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
- Auchenflower
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
- Chermside
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
- Leonards Hill
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
- Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
0
0
- Parkville
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [7]
0
0
- Perth
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [8]
0
0
- St Leonards
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [9]
0
0
- Woolloongabba
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Antwerp
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Bruxelles
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Liege
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Calgary
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Halifax
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Montreal
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Ottawa
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Saint John
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Toronto
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Vancouver
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Copenhagen
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Rennes
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Toulouse
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Bad Nauheim
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Berlin
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Bernau
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Dortmund
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Dresden
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Frankfurt
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Göttingen
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Hamburg
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Jena
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Karlsruhe
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Leipzig
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Munchen
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Israel
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Re?ovot
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Alessandria
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Catania
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Massa
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Milano
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Milan
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Monza
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Lithuania
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Vilnius
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Amsterdam
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Leeuwarden
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
El Palmar
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Sevilla
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Zurich
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Belfast
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Brighton
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
London
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Morriston
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Abbott Medical Devices
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of this clinical investigation is to further assess the performance and safety profile of the commercially-available Portico™ TAVI System in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01802788
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Sondergaard L, Rodes-Cabau J, Hans-Peter Linke A, Fichtlscherer S, Schafer U, Kuck KH, Kempfert J, Arzamendi D, Bedogni F, Asch FM, Worthley S, Maisano F. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With a Repositionable Self-Expanding Prosthesis: The PORTICO-I Trial 1-Year Outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Dec 11;72(23 Pt A):2859-2867. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.014. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Lars Søndergaard, DMSc
Query!
Address
0
0
Rigshopitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/88/NCT01802788/Prot_SAP_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/88/NCT01802788/Prot_SAP_000.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01802788