Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Show all queries
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00122382
Registration number
NCT00122382
Ethics application status
Date submitted
19/07/2005
Date registered
22/07/2005
Date last updated
16/11/2010
Titles & IDs
Public title
Remission and Joint Damage Progression in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis
Query!
Scientific title
A Phase IIIB Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate Remission and Joint Damage Progression in Methotrexate Naive Early Erosive RA Subjects Treated With Abatacept Plus Methotrexate Compared With Methotrexate
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
IM101-023
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Rheumatoid Arthritis
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
0
0
0
0
Query!
Osteoarthritis
Query!
Inflammatory and Immune System
0
0
0
0
Query!
Rheumatoid arthritis
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Abatacept
Treatment: Drugs - placebo
Treatment: Drugs - methotrexate
Active comparator: ABA + MTX - abatacept 10 mg/kg intravenous (IV) + methotrexate
Active comparator: Placebo (PLA) + MTX - placebo IV + methotrexate
Treatment: Drugs: Abatacept
abatacept 10 mg/kg IV monthly, methotrexate weekly, for 24 months
Treatment: Drugs: placebo
placebo IV, monthly, methotrexate weekly for 12 months followed by abatacept 10 mg/kg IV monthly, methotrexate weekly for 12 months
Treatment: Drugs: methotrexate
Oral, titrated to at least 15 mg per week not to exceed 20 mg per week administered every 28 days from Month 12 to Month 24
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Number of Participants in DAS 28 C-reactive Protein (CRP) Remission at Month 12
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Number of participants who achieved remission at Month 12 of treatment, as defined by a Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28-CRP score of \<2.6. DAS 28-CRP is a continuous measure, a composite of 4 variables: number of tender joints out of 28 joints, number of swollen joints out of 28 joints, CRP (in mg/L), and subject assessment of disease activity measure on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 100 millimeters (mm). The DAS28 scale=0 (best) to 10 (worst), indicating the current activity of the rheumatoid arthritis. A DAS28 \>5.1 = high disease activity; \<=3.2 = low disease activity; \<2.6 = remission.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Month 12
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline in Radiographic Total Score to Month 12
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
To assess joint damage progression, the Genant-modified Sharp scoring method was used to evaluate radiographs of hands/wrists and feet for erosions and joint space narrowing (JSN). The total Genant-modified Sharp score ranges from 0 (no radiographic damage) to 290 (worst possible radiographic damage) and is the sum of the erosion score (range 0-145) and the joint space narrowing score (range 0-145). Higher scores indicated more damage.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Baseline, Month 12
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
0
0
Number of Subjects With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths, and Discontinuations Due to AEs During the Open-Label Period
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition in a subject administered an investigational product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Related AE/SAE=Certain, Probable, Possible, or Missing. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs inpatient hospitalization (including elective surgery), results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an important medical event.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Continuously through open-label period (from Month 12 to Month 24). Includes data up to 56 days post last dose in the open-label period or start of the maintenance sub-study, whichever occurred first.
Query!
Primary outcome [4]
0
0
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events Reported During the Open-Label Period
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs inpatient hospitalization (including elective surgery), results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an important medical event.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Continuously through open-label period (from Month 12 to Month 24). Includes data up to 56 days post last dose in the open-label period or start of the maintenance sub-study, whichever occurred first.
Query!
Primary outcome [5]
0
0
Number of Participants With SAEs With an Outcome of Death During the Open-label Period
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Any untoward medical occurrence (SAE) that resulted in death
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Continuously through open-label period (from Month 12 to Month 24). Includes data up to 56 days post last dose in the open-label period or start of the maintenance sub-study, whichever occurred first.
Query!
Primary outcome [6]
0
0
Incidence Rates of Autoimmune Disorders in ABA-Treated Participants
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
The incidence rates of autoimmune disorders are defined as the (number of patients experiencing the event/exposure within the period)\*100 and are expressed in 100 person-years. Subjects experiencing the event had their exposure censored at the time of the 1st event.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Double Blind Period (+56 days post last dose in double-blind period or start of open-label period, whichever came first). Open-label period (56 days post last dose in the open-label period or start of maintenance sub-study, whichever came first).
Query!
Primary outcome [7]
0
0
Incidence Rates of Infections and Infestations of Adverse Events in ABA-Treated Participants
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
The incidence rates of infections and infestations are defined as the (number of patients experiencing the event /exposure within the period)\*100 and are expressed in 100 person-years. Subjects experiencing the event had their exposure censored at the time of the 1st event.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Double Blind Period (+56 days post last dose in double-blind period or start of the open-label period, whichever came first). Open-label period (56 days post last dose in open-label period or start of maintenance sub-study, whichever came first).
Query!
Primary outcome [8]
0
0
Incidence Rates of Malignant Neoplasm Adverse Events in ABA-Treated Participants
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
The incidence rates of malignant neoplasms are defined as the (number of patients experiencing the event /exposure within the period)\*100 and are expressed in 100 person-years. Subjects experiencing the event had their exposure censored at the time of the 1st event.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Double Blind Period (+56 days post last dose in double-blind period or start of the open-label period, whichever came first). Open-label period (56 days post last dose in open-label period or start of maintenance sub-study, whichever came first).
Query!
Primary outcome [9]
0
0
Number of Participants With a Serious Acute-Infusional AE of Anaphylactic Shock During Open-Label Period
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
There were 107 Prespecified, acute-infusional SAEs (occurring within 1 hour after the start of study drug infusion) pre-specified in the protocol; anaphylactic shock was the only one occuring in this study.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Open-Label Period (Month 12 to Month 24)
Query!
Primary outcome [10]
0
0
Number of Participants With Select Blood Chemistry Laboratory Values Meeting the Marked Abnormality Criteria During the Open-Label Period
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
Number of subjects with high liver function and kinedy tests: alkaline phosphatase (ALP) \>2x upper limit of normal (ULN) or if pretreatment (PRE-RX) \>ULN then \>3x PRE-RX; aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \>3x ULN or if PRE-RX \>ULN then \>4x PRE-RX; alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \>3x ULN or if PRE-RX \>ULN then \>4x PRE-RX; g-glutamyl transferase (GGT)\>2x ULN or if PRE-RX \>ULN then \>3x PRE-RX; total bilirubin \>2x ULN or if PRE-RX \>ULN then \>4x PRE-RX; blood urea nitrogen \>2x PRE-RX; creatinine \>1.5x PRE-RX.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Continuously through open-label period (from Month 12 to Month 24). Includes data up to 56 days post last dose in the open-label period or start of the maintenance sub-study, whichever occurred first.
Query!
Primary outcome [11]
0
0
Number of Participants With Hematology Laboratory Values Meeting the Marked Abnormality Criteria During the Open-Label Period
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
Marked abnormalities in hemoglobin \>3 g/dL decrease from PRE-RX; hematocrit \<0.75x PRE-RX; erythrocytes \<0.75x PRE-RX; platelet count \<0.67x lower limit of normal (LLN) or \>1.5x ULN or if PRE-RX \<LLN then \<0.5x PRE-RX and \<100,000/mm3; leukocytes \<0.75x LLN or \>1.25x ULN or if PRE-RX \<LLN then \<0.8x PRE-RX or \>ULN if PRE-RX \>ULN then \>1.2x PRE-RX or \<LLN; neutrophils if value \<1.00 x10\^3 c/uL; lymphocytes if value \<.750 x10\^3 c/uL or if value \>7.50 x10\^3 c/uL; monocytes if value \>2000/MM3; basophils if value \>400/mm3; eosinophils if value \>.750 x10\^3 c/uL
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Continuously from start of open-label period up to 56 days post the last dose in the open-label period or start of the maintenance sub-study, whichever occurred first.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Number of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response at Month 12
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
ACR 50 response was defined as a 50% improvement from baseline to Month 12 in tender and swollen joint counts and 50% improvement in 3 of the remaining 5 core set measures (subject global assessment of pain, subject global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, subject assessment of physical function), and 1 acute phase reactant value \[ie, CRP\].
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Month 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Number of Participants With Major Clinical Response (MCR) at Month 12
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
MCR was defined as 6 months of consecutive ACR 70 response at Month 12. ACR 70, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) definition of 70% improvement was based on a 70% improvement (compared to baseline values) in tender and swollen joint counts and 70% improvement in 3 of the remaining 5 core set measures (subject global assessment of pain, subject global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, subject assessment of physical function, and 1 acute phase reactant value \[ie, CRP\]).
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Month 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in DAS-28-CRP Score to Month 12
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
DAS 28-CRP is a continuous variable that is a composite of 4 variables: the number of tender joints out of 28 joints, the number of swollen joints out of 28 joints, CRP in milligrams/Liter (mg/L), and subject assessment of disease activity measure on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 100 millimeters (mm). The DAS28 scale=0 to 10, indicating the current activity of the rheumatoid arthritis. A DAS28 \>5.1=high disease activity; \<3.2=low disease activity; \<2.6=remission. Change from Baseline=Post-baseline - Baseline value; Adjusted for baseline value.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Baseline, Month 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Number of Participants With Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Response at Month 12
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Physical function was evaluated using the HAQ-disability index (HAQ-DI), a questionnaire with 20 questions assessing function in 8 domains: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common activities. The questions are evaluated on a 4-point scale: 0 = without any difficulty; 1 = with some difficulty; 2 = with much difficulty; 3 = unable to do. The 8 category scores are averaged into an overall HAQ-DI score on a scale from 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled). Higher scores indicate greater dysfunction. HAQ response=improvement of at least 0.3 units from baseline.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Month 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Adjusted Mean Change in Short Form 36 (SF-36) From Baseline to Month 12
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
The SF-36 covers 8 health dimensions: 4 physical subscales (physical function, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health) and 4 mental subscales (vitality, social function, role-emotional, and mental health). The scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. Two summary scores (physical and mental component summaries) were produced taking a weighted linear combination of the 8 individual subscales. Change from Baseline=Post-baseline - Baseline value; adjusted for baseline value.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Baseline, Month 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline in Radiographic Erosion and Joint Space Narrowing (JSN) Scores to Month 12
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
To assess joint damage progression, the Genant-modified Sharp scoring method was used to evaluate radiographs of hands/wrists and feet for erosions and JSN. The erosion score range is 0 (no radiographic damage) to 145 (worst possible radiographic damage). The joint space narrowing score range is 0 (no radiographic damage) to 145 (worst possible radiographic damage). Higher scores indicated more damage. Change from baseline = Post-baseline - Baseline value
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
Baseline, Month 12
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Number of Participants With Anti-abatacept or Anti-CTLA4-T Responses in the Double-blind Period as Analyzed by Enzyme-linked-immunosorbent Serologic Assay (ELISA)
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Serum samples were analyzed by ELISA to detect antibodies against the whole molecule (both CTLA4 and Ig \[anti-abatacept antibody\]) or solely to CTLA4 (anti-CTLA4-T antibody). Reported as titer, the reciprocal of the sample dilution which yielded a signal equivalent to the statistically set cut point for the assay. For the anti-abatacept assay, minimum required dilution is 400-fold, therefore seronegative samples are those \< lowest reportable titer (\<400). For the anti-CTLA4-T assay, minimum required dilution is 25-fold, therefore seronegative samples are those \< lowest reportable titer (\<25).
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
includes data up to approximately 85 days past the last dose of the double-blind period or start of the open-label period, whichever occurred first.
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Number of Participants With Anti-abatacept or Anti-CTLA4-T Responses During the Open-Label Period (From Month 12 to Month 24) as Analyzed by ELISA
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Serum samples were analyzed by ELISA to detect antibodies against the whole molecule (both CTLA4 and Ig \[anti-abatacept antibody\]) or solely to CTLA4 (anti-CTLA4-T antibody). Reported as titer, the reciprocal of the sample dilution which yielded a signal equivalent to the statistically set cut point for the assay. For the anti-abatacept assay, minimum required dilution is 400-fold, therefore seronegative samples are those \< lowest reportable titer (\<400). For the anti-CTLA4-T assay, minimum required dilution is 25-fold, therefore seronegative samples are those \< lowest reportable titer (\<25).
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Includes open-label data up to approximately 85 days post last dose in the open-label period or start of the maintenance sub-study, whichever occurred first.
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Number of Participants With Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Response at Month 24
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Physical function was evaluated using the HAQ-disability index (HAQ-DI), a questionnaire with 20 questions assessing function in 8 domains: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common activities. The questions are evaluated on a 4-point scale: 0 = without any difficulty; 1 = with some difficulty; 2 = with much difficulty; 3 = unable to do. The 8 category scores are averaged into an overall HAQ-DI score on a scale from 0 (no disability) to 3 (completely disabled). Higher scores indicate greater dysfunction. HAQ response=improvement of at least 0.3 units from baseline.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Baseline, Month 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Mean Change From Baseline in Radiographic Total, Erosion and JSN Scores to Month 24
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
To assess joint damage progression, the Genant-modified Sharp scoring method was used to evaluate radiographs of hands/wrists and feet for erosions and JSN. The total Genant-modified Sharp score ranges from 0 (no radiographic damage) to 290 (worst possible radiographic damage) and is the sum of the erosion score (range 0-145) and the joint space narrowing score (range 0-145). Higher scores indicated more damage. Change from baseline = Postbaseline - baseline value.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Baseline, Month 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Number of Participants Without Radiographic Progression (as Measured by in Erosion Scores, JSN Scores, and Total Scores) From Baseline at Month 24
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
Participants with no radiographic progression (defined as change in score \<=0 or \<=0.5), from baseline to Month 24. To assess joint damage progression, the Genant-modified Sharp scoring method was used to evaluate radiographs of hands/wrists and feet for erosions and JSN. The total Genant-modified Sharp score ranges from 0 (no radiographic damage) to 290 (worst possible radiographic damage) and is the sum of the erosion score (range 0-145) and the joint space narrowing score (range 0-145). Higher scores indicated more damage.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
Baseline, Month 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Number of Participants Without Radiographic Progression (as Measured by in Erosion Scores, JSN Scores, and Total Scores) at Month 24 in Participants Without Progression at Month 12
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
Participants with no radiographic progression ((defined as change in score \<=0 or \<=0.5), sustained from Month 12 and Month 24. To assess joint damage progression, the Genant-modified Sharp scoring method was used to evaluate radiographs of hands/wrists and feet for erosions and JSN. The total Genant-modified Sharp score ranges from 0 (no radiographic damage) to 290 (worst possible radiographic damage) and is the sum of the erosion score (range 0-145) and the joint space narrowing score (range 0-145). Higher scores indicated more damage.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
Month 12, Month 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Mean Difference Observed in Change From Baseline to Month 12 and Between Month 12 and Month 24 in Radiographic Scores (Total Score)
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
Mean difference observed in change from baseline to Month 12 and between Month 12 and Month 24 in radiographic scores (Total Score). To assess joint damage, the Genant-modified Sharp scoring method was used to evaluate radiographs of hands/wrists and feet for erosions and JSN. The total Genant-modified Sharp score ranges from 0 (no radiographic damage) to 290 (worst possible radiographic damage) and is the sum of the erosion score (range 0-145) and the joint space narrowing score (range 0-145). Higher scores indicated more damage.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
Baseline, Month 12, Month 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Deaths, and Discontinuations Reported During the Double-blind Period
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition in a subject administered an investigational product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Related AE/SAE=Certain, Probable, Possible, or Missing. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs inpatient hospitalization (including elective surgery), results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an important medical event.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Includes data up to 56 days post the last dose in the double-blind period or start of the open-label period, whichever occurred first.
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Number of Participants With Laboratory Values Meeting the Marked Abnormality Criteria During the Double-blind Period
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
Number of participants with laboratory values (hematology, liver and kidney functions, electrolytes, glucose tests, protein tests, metabolite tests, and urine chemistry tests) considered markedly abnormal according to prespecified protocol criteria
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Includes data up to 56 days post the last dose in the double-blind period or start of the open-label period, whichever occurred first.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) <=2 years; MTX naive or <=10 mg/wk for <=3 weeks. No dose within 3 months prior to informed consent.
* C-Reactive Protein (CRP) >= 4.5 mg/L (after amendment)
* Rheumatoid factor or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP) positive
* Tender joints >=12 and swollen joints >=10
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Women and men who are not willing to use birth control
* Diagnosed with other rheumatic disease
* History of cancer within 5 years
* Active tuberculosis
* Treatment with another investigation drug within 28 days
* Active bacterial or viral infection
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/07/2005
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/02/2009
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
1052
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC,WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Local Institution - Malvern
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Local Institution - Shenton Park
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
3144 - Malvern
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
6008 - Shenton Park
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Alabama
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Connecticut
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Indiana
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Nebraska
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Oklahoma
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
South Carolina
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Antwerpen
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Bruxelles
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Hasselt
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Leuven
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Goias
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Parana
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Rio De Janeiro
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Rio Grande Do Sul
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Brazil
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Sao Paulo
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Newfoundland and Labrador
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Saskatchewan
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Czech Republic
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Prague 2
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Dijon
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Montpellier Cedex 5
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Nice Cedex 03
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Strasbourg Cedex
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Berlin
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Hamburg
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Leipzig
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Jesi(Ancona)
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Milano
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Anyang
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Daegu
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Daejeon
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Korea, Republic of
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Seoul
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Distrito Federal
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Estado De Mexico
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Guanajuato
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Jalisco
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Michioacan
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Morelos
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Nuevo Leon
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Chihuahua
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Mexico
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
San Luis Potosi
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Amsterdam
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Leiden
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Nijmegen
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Poznan
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Warszawa
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Puerto Rico
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Ponce
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Russian Federation
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Moscow
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
South Africa
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Free State
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
South Africa
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Gauteng
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
South Africa
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Kwa Zulu Natal
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
South Africa
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Western Cape
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
A Coruna
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Santander
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Sevilla
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Greater Manchester
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Lanarkshire
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
North Yorkshire
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Northumberland
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This is a world wide study to evaluate the remission and joint damage in subjects treated with abatacept in addition to methotrexate versus subjects who receive methotrexate along with a placebo.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00122382
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Durez P, Westhovens R, Baeke F, Elbez Y, Robert S, Ahmad HA. Identification of poor prognostic joint locations in an early rheumatoid arthritis cohort at risk of rapidly progressing disease: a post-hoc analysis of the Phase III AGREE study. BMC Rheumatol. 2022 Apr 14;6(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s41927-022-00252-4. Jansen DTSL, Emery P, Smolen JS, Westhovens R, Le Bars M, Connolly SE, Ye J, Toes REM, Huizinga TWJ. Conversion to seronegative status after abatacept treatment in patients with early and poor prognostic rheumatoid arthritis is associated with better radiographic outcomes and sustained remission: post hoc analysis of the AGREE study. RMD Open. 2018 Mar 30;4(1):e000564. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000564. eCollection 2018. Smolen JS, Wollenhaupt J, Gomez-Reino JJ, Grassi W, Gaillez C, Poncet C, Le Bars M, Westhovens R. Attainment and characteristics of clinical remission according to the new ACR-EULAR criteria in abatacept-treated patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: new analyses from the Abatacept study to Gauge Remission and joint damage progression in methotrexate (MTX)-naive patients with Early Erosive rheumatoid arthritis (AGREE). Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 Jun 11;17(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0671-9. Bathon J, Robles M, Ximenes AC, Nayiager S, Wollenhaupt J, Durez P, Gomez-Reino J, Grassi W, Haraoui B, Shergy W, Park SH, Genant H, Peterfy C, Becker JC, Covucci A, Moniz Reed D, Helfrick R, Westhovens R. Sustained disease remission and inhibition of radiographic progression in methotrexate-naive patients with rheumatoid arthritis and poor prognostic factors treated with abatacept: 2-year outcomes. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Nov;70(11):1949-56. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.145268. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Query!
Address
0
0
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00122382
Download to PDF
Show all queries