The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov

For full trial details, please see the original record at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00121784




Registration number
NCT00121784
Ethics application status
Date submitted
15/07/2005
Date registered
21/07/2005
Date last updated
2/11/2016

Titles & IDs
Public title
Heart Spare the Nephron (STN) Study - A Study of CellCept (Mycophenolate Mofetil) and Rapamune (Sirolimus) in Heart Transplant Recipients
Scientific title
A Randomized, Open-label Study of the Effect of Replacing CNI With Sirolimus in a Standard Care Regimen of CNI, CellCept, and Steroids on Renal Function in Heart Transplant Patients
Secondary ID [1] 0 0
MT18328
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Heart Transplantation 0 0
Condition category
Condition code

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - mycophenolate mofetil [CellCept]

Experimental: 1 - 1


Treatment: Drugs: mycophenolate mofetil [CellCept]
1

Intervention code [1] 0 0
Treatment: Drugs
Comparator / control treatment
Control group

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 0 0
Renal function assessed by calculated GFR at 24 months post-transplant, and incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) or HDC, graft loss or lost to follow-up\n
Timepoint [1] 0 0
Secondary outcome [1] 0 0
Incidence of BPAR, number of episodes of BPAR per patient, time to first BPAR, incidence of re-transplant, death, rejection including antibody treated rejection, time to graft loss or death, rejection associated with HDC\n
Timepoint [1] 0 0

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* adult (>=18 years of age) heart transplant patients (4-6 weeks post-transplant);
* receipt of first heart (single-organ) transplant;
* standard care regimen of CNI, MMF, and corticosteroids since transplantation.
Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
No limit
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
* positive donor-specific cross-match at time of transplantation;
* history of malignancies, other than non-melanoma skin cancer that has been totally excised with no recurrence for 2 years;
* patients participating in another interventional clinical trial or requiring treatment with unmarketed investigational drugs.

Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?



Intervention assignment
Parallel
Other design features
Phase
Phase 4
Type of endpoint/s
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Stopped early
Data analysis
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Recruitment hospital [1] 0 0
- Darlinghurst
Recruitment hospital [2] 0 0
- Perth
Recruitment hospital [3] 0 0
- Prahran
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 0 0
2010 - Darlinghurst
Recruitment postcode(s) [2] 0 0
6847 - Perth
Recruitment postcode(s) [3] 0 0
3181 - Prahran
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [1] 0 0
Illinois
Country [2] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [2] 0 0
Massachusetts
Country [3] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [3] 0 0
Michigan
Country [4] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [4] 0 0
Minnesota
Country [5] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [5] 0 0
Ohio
Country [6] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [6] 0 0
Pennsylvania
Country [7] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [7] 0 0
South Carolina
Country [8] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [8] 0 0
Tennessee
Country [9] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [9] 0 0
Texas
Country [10] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [10] 0 0
Utah
Country [11] 0 0
Austria
State/province [11] 0 0
Innsbruck
Country [12] 0 0
France
State/province [12] 0 0
Marseille
Country [13] 0 0
France
State/province [13] 0 0
Nantes
Country [14] 0 0
France
State/province [14] 0 0
Paris
Country [15] 0 0
France
State/province [15] 0 0
Rennes
Country [16] 0 0
France
State/province [16] 0 0
Rouen
Country [17] 0 0
France
State/province [17] 0 0
Tours
Country [18] 0 0
France
State/province [18] 0 0
Vandoeuvre-les-nancy
Country [19] 0 0
Germany
State/province [19] 0 0
Berlin
Country [20] 0 0
Germany
State/province [20] 0 0
Hannover
Country [21] 0 0
Germany
State/province [21] 0 0
Heidelberg
Country [22] 0 0
Germany
State/province [22] 0 0
Jena
Country [23] 0 0
Spain
State/province [23] 0 0
Madrid
Country [24] 0 0
Spain
State/province [24] 0 0
Pamplona

Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Name
Hoffmann-La Roche
Address
Country

Ethics approval
Ethics application status

Summary
Brief summary
Trial website
Trial related presentations / publications
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 0 0
Clinical Trials
Address 0 0
Hoffmann-La Roche
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for scientific queries

No information has been provided regarding IPD availability


What supporting documents are/will be available?

No Supporting Document Provided



Results publications and other study-related documents

No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.