Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02682927
Registration number
NCT02682927
Ethics application status
Date submitted
5/02/2016
Date registered
17/02/2016
Date last updated
28/09/2023
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Trial of Two Fixed Doses of ZX008 (Fenfluramine HCl) in Children and Young Adults With Dravet Syndrome
Query!
Scientific title
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Placebo-controlled Trial of Two Fixed Doses of ZX008 (Fenfluramine Hydrochloride) Oral Solution as an Adjunctive Therapy in Children and Young Adults With Dravet Syndrome
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
ZX008-1502
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
ZX008-1501
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Dravet Syndrome
0
0
Query!
Seizure Disorder
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Neurological
0
0
0
0
Query!
Epilepsy
Query!
Neurological
0
0
0
0
Query!
Other neurological disorders
Query!
Other
0
0
0
0
Query!
Research that is not of generic health relevance and not applicable to specific health categories listed above
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - ZX008 (Fenfluramine Hydrochloride)
Treatment: Drugs - Matching Placebo
Experimental: ZX008 - 0.8 mg/kg/day - ZX008 (fenfluramine HCl) is supplied as an oral solution in concentrations of 1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg/mL. ZX008 will be administered twice a day (BID) in equally divided doses with food.
Experimental: ZX008 - 0.2 mg/kg/day - ZX008 (fenfluramine HCl) is supplied as an oral solution in concentrations of 1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg/mL. ZX008 will be administered twice a day (BID) in equally divided doses with food.
Placebo comparator: Matching Placebo - Placebo will be administered twice a day (BID) in equally divided doses with food.
Treatment: Drugs: ZX008 (Fenfluramine Hydrochloride)
ZX008 drug product is an oral aqueous solution of fenfluramine hydrochloride buffered to pH 5. The product is sugar free and is intended to be compatible with a ketogenic diet.
Treatment: Drugs: Matching Placebo
Placebo solution for ZX008. The product is sugar free and is intended to be compatible with a ketogenic diet.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Change From Baseline in the Mean Convulsive Seizures Frequency (MCSF) to the Combined Titration and Maintenance Periods (T+M) in Participants Receiving ZX008 0.8 mg/kg/Day Compared to Placebo
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Monthly (28 day) convulsive seizure frequency (CSF) was based on electronic diary data obtained for each participant. Convulsive seizures included hemiclonic, focal with clear observable motor signs, generalized tonic clonic, secondarily generalized tonic clonic, tonic, clonic, and drop seizures (tonic/atonic). The number of convulsive seizures reported during the entire time interval was divided by the number of nonmissing diary days and the result was then multiplied by 28 to get a 28-day CSF.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) plus Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Change From Baseline in the Mean Convulsive Seizures Frequency to the Combined Titration and Maintenance Period (T+M) in Participants Receiving ZX008 0.2 mg/kg/Day Compared to Placebo
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Monthly (28 day) convulsive seizure frequency (CSF) was based on electronic diary data obtained for each participant. Convulsive seizures included hemiclonic, focal with clear observable motor signs, generalized tonic clonic, secondarily generalized tonic clonic, tonic, clonic, and drop seizures (tonic/atonic). The number of convulsive seizures reported during the entire time interval was divided by the number of nonmissing diary days and the result was then multiplied by 28 to get a 28-day CSF.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) plus Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Greater Than or Equal to 25% (=25%) Reduction in Convulsive Seizure Frequency in Each ZX008 Treatment Arm Compared to Placebo From Baseline During the Titration and Maintenance Period
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Convulsive seizures included hemiclonic, focal with clear observable motor signs, generalized tonic clonic, secondarily generalized tonic clonic, tonic, clonic, and drop seizures (tonic/atonic). A responder was a participant who experienced a 25% or greater reduction in convulsive seizure frequency per 28 days during Titration and Maintenance Period.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) plus Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a =50% Reduction in Convulsive Seizure Frequency in Each ZX008 Treatment Arm Compared to Placebo From Baseline During the Titration and Maintenance Period
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Convulsive seizures included hemiclonic, focal with clear observable motor signs, generalized tonic clonic, secondarily generalized tonic clonic, tonic, clonic, and drop seizures (tonic/atonic). A responder was a participant who experienced a 50% or greater reduction in convulsive seizure frequency per 28 days during Titration and Maintenance Period.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) plus Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a =75% Reduction in Convulsive Seizure Frequency in Each ZX008 Treatment Arm Compared to Placebo From Baseline During the Titration and Maintenance Period
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Convulsive seizures included hemiclonic, focal with clear observable motor signs, generalized tonic clonic, secondarily generalized tonic clonic, tonic, clonic, and drop seizures (tonic/atonic). A responder was a participant who experienced a 75% or greater reduction in convulsive seizure frequency per 28 days during Titration and Maintenance Period.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) plus Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 100% Reduction in Convulsive Seizure Frequency in Each ZX008 Treatment Arm Compared to Placebo From Baseline During the Titration and Maintenance Period
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Convulsive seizures included hemiclonic, focal with clear observable motor signs, generalized tonic clonic, secondarily generalized tonic clonic, tonic, clonic, and drop seizures (tonic/atonic). A responder was a participant who experienced a 100% reduction in convulsive seizure frequency per 28 days during Titration and Maintenance Period.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) plus Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Longest Convulsive Seizure-free Interval in Each ZX008 Treatment Arm Compared to Placebo During the Titration and Maintenance Period
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
The longest interval between convulsive seizures was calculated over the entire Titration and Maintenance Period and was derived as the maximum of the number of days between consecutive convulsive seizures.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
During 14 weeks Titration (2 weeks) and Maintenance Period (12 weeks) (average of 99 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Number of Convulsive Seizure-free Days in Each ZX008 Treatment Arm Compared to Placebo During the Titration and Maintenance Period
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
A convulsive seizure free day was defined as a day for which diary data are available and no convulsive seizures were reported. Convulsive seizure free days were taken from the electronic diary data.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
During 14 weeks Titration (2 weeks) and Maintenance Period (12 weeks) (average of 99 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Non-convulsive Seizure Frequency to the Combined Titration and Maintenance Period in Each ZX008 Treatment Arm Compared to Placebo
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Non-convulsive seizures included focal without clear observable motor signs, absence or atypical absence, myoclonic and atonic. The number of non-convulsive seizures reported during the entire time interval was divided by the number of nonmissing diary days and the result was then multiplied by 28 to get a 28-day non-convulsive seizure frequency.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) plus Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Change From Baseline in Convulsive + Non-convulsive Seizure Frequency to the Combined Titration and Maintenance Period in Each ZX008 Treatment Arm Compared to Placebo
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Total seizure frequency were defined as the combination of convulsive and non-convulsive seizures. Convulsive seizures included hemiclonic, focal with clear observable motor signs, generalized tonic clonic, secondarily generalized tonic clonic, tonic, clonic, and drop seizures (tonic/atonic). Non-convulsive seizures included focal without clear observable motor signs, absence or atypical absence, myoclonic and atonic. The seizure frequency was based on electronic diary data obtained for each participant. The number of all seizures reported during the entire time interval was divided by the number of nonmissing diary days and the result was then multiplied by 28 to get a 28-day convulsive or non-convulsive seizure frequency.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) plus Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Rescue Medication Usage in Each ZX008 Treatment Arm Compared to Placebo During the Titration and Maintenance Period
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
Rescue medication was administered according to each participant's usual or prescribed regimen consisting of 1 or more medications. The usage of rescue medication (number of days and number of medications used per seizure episode) was based on electronic diary data obtained for each participant. The number of days rescue medication was taken (normalized to 28 days) was calculated for each participant. Multiple medications taken on the same day were counted once for that day.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
From Baseline up to 14 weeks [Titration Period (2 weeks) plus Maintenance Period (12 weeks)]
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Hospitalization and Healthcare Resource Utilization to Treat Seizures in Each ZX008 Treatment Arm Compared to Placebo During Study
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
Participants who utilized medical center care to treat a seizure during the study were reported.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
During 14 weeks Titration (2 weeks) and Maintenance Period (12 weeks) (average of 99 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Status Epilepticus (SE) in Each ZX008 Treatment Arm Compared to Placebo During the Titration and Maintenance Period
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
The participants who either had SE episode recorded as an adverse event (AE) during treatment or a seizure greater than 10 minutes were reported for each treatment group. Additionally, a single participant who may had more than one episode of SE, and an episode of SE recorded as both an AE and as a seizure longer than 10 minutes was counted as a single event.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
During 14 weeks Titration (2 weeks) and Maintenance Period (12 weeks) (average of 99 days)
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Distribution of Duration of Convulsive Seizures (in Percentage) in Each ZX008 Treatment Arm Compared to Placebo at Baseline and During the Titration and Maintenance Period
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
Duration of single convulsive seizures during the Baseline and the duration over the Titration and Maintenance Period were reported by treatment group using categories as \<2 minutes, 2 to 10 minutes and \> 10 minutes as collected in the seizure diary.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
At Baseline and 14 weeks of Titration (2 weeks) and Maintenance Period (12 weeks)
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Rating Score, as Assessed by the Principal Investigator in Each ZX008 Treatment Arm Compared to Placebo
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
CGI-I scale measures improvement in the participant's clinical status from Baseline. The severity of a participant's condition was rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), as follows: 1-very much improved,2-much improved, 3-minimally improved, 4- no change, 5-minimally worse, 6-much worse and 7-very much worse. The Principal Investigator rated their global impression of the participant's condition during the study.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
At Visit 6 (Day 15), 8 (Day 43), 10 (Day 71) and 12 (Day 99)
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Rating Score, as Assessed by the Parent/Caregiver in Each ZX008 Treatment Arm Compared to Placebo
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
CGI-I scale measures improvement in the participant's clinical status from Baseline. The severity of a participant's condition was rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), as follows: 1-very much improved,2-much improved, 3-minimally improved, 4- no change, 5-minimally worse, 6-much worse and 7-very much worse. The Parent/Caregiver rated their global impression of the participant's condition during the study.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
At Visit 6 (Day 15), 8 (Day 43), 10 (Day 71) and 12 (Day 99)
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Day 99 in the Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy (QOLCE) Score to Measure Quality of Life in Each ZX008 Treatment Arm Compared to Placebo
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
QOLCE is a low-burden parent/caregiver completed assessment that evaluates how epilepsy affects day-to day functioning of the participant in various life areas, including physical activities, well being, cognition, social activities, behavior, and general health. QOLCE scores items on 16 subscales with possible 5-point response for each, where scores of 5 was best possible response and 1 was worst possible response. Item scores were then transformed to a 0-100 scale as follows: 1-0, 2-25, 3-50, 4-75, 5-100. A score for each participant for each subscale was calculated by averaging that participant's responses to each item in the subscale. Subscale scores per participant were averaged to obtain an overall QoL score for each participant. Higher the subscale and overall QoL scores, better the response.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
From Baseline to Day 99
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Day 99 in the Overall Quality of Life Score From the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventoryâ„¢ (PedsQL) Score in Each ZX008 Treatment Arm Compared to Placebo
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) is a pediatric modular measure of health related quality of life (QoL) completed by the parent/caregiver on behalf of the participant. It consisted of 23 items across 4 core scales that measure physical (8 items), emotional, social, and school functioning (5 items each). Each of the responses to the 23 items is initially scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (Never) to 4 (Almost always). Scores are linearly transformed to a scale of 0 to 100, where 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25 and 4=0, and higher scores correspond to better health-related QoL. The Overall Quality of Life is the average of all the items over the number of items answered on all the Scales.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
From Baseline to Day 99
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Day 99 in the Total Score From PedsQL Family Impact Module Score in Each ZX008 Treatment Arm Compared to Placebo
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
The PedsQL Family Impact measured the impact of pediatric chronic health conditions on parents and the family by measuring parent self-reported physical, emotional, social, and cognitive functioning, communication, worry, and family daily activities and relationships. There are a total of 36 items in the PedsQL: 6 items for Physical Functioning, 5 items each for Emotional Functioning, Cognitive Functioning and Worry, 4 for Social Functioning, 3 for Communication, 3 questions for Daily Activities, and 5 for Family Relationships. Each of the responses are initially scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 (Never) to 4 (Almost always) and then linearly transformed to a scale of 0 to 100, where 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25 and 4=0, and higher scores mean better health-related QoL.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
From Baseline to Day 99
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
Quality of Life (QoL) of the Parent/Caregiver Using the EQ- 5D-5L Scale in Each ZX008 Treatment Arm Compared to Placebo at Baseline and Day 99
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
The EuroQOL-5 Dimensions-5 Levels scale produced by European QOL Group (EQ-5D-5L) health questionnaire is a health-related QOL instrument with 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The 5 dimensions of EQ-5D-5L health questionnaire were assessed on a Likert scale with 5 possible levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The categories "slight problems", "moderate problems", "severe problems" and "extreme problems" are collapsed into one response category "problems. The QOL of the parent/caregiver was assessed and percentage of participants was reported for each item.
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
At Baseline and Day 99
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
Change From Baseline to Day 99 in Affective Symptoms of the Parent/Caregiver Using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in Each ZX008 Treatment Arm Compared to Placebo
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
The HADS is a tool that was validated to assess presence of anxiety or depression in an outpatient non-psychiatric population. The HADS a 14-item scale that generates ordinal data for 2 dimensions: 1) Anxiety (7 items), and 2) Depression (7 items). Each item has 4 possible answers rated 0 to 3, of which 0 = No distress and 3 = worst distress. All answers to the items for a dimension with their respective rating are added resulting in a range for each dimension from 0-21, out of which of 0-7 = normal; 8-10=borderline abnormal; 11-21=abnormal. Scores for the entire scale (emotional distress) range from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating more distress.
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
From Baseline to Day 99
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
0
0
Maximum Observed Concentration of ZX008 Determined Directly From the Concentration Time Profile [Cmax] at Steady State
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
Cmax is the maximum observed concentration determined directly from the concentration-time profile.
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
At Visit 8 (Day 43): pre-dose, 1, 2, and 4-6 hours postdose
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
0
0
Area Under the Concentration Time Curve of ZX008 From Time Zero to Time 24 Hours [AUC0-24hours] at Steady State
Query!
Assessment method [22]
0
0
AUC0-24 is the area under the concentration time curve from time zero to 24 hours.
Query!
Timepoint [22]
0
0
At Visit 8 (Day 43): pre-dose, 1, 2, and 4-6 hours postdose
Query!
Secondary outcome [23]
0
0
Time to Maximum Concentration [Tmax] of ZX008 at Steady State
Query!
Assessment method [23]
0
0
Tmax is the time to maximum concentration at steady state.
Query!
Timepoint [23]
0
0
At Visit 8 (Day 43): pre-dose, 1, 2, and 4-6 hours postdose
Query!
Secondary outcome [24]
0
0
Elimination Half-life [t1/2 Beta] of ZX008 at Steady State
Query!
Assessment method [24]
0
0
t1/2 beta is the elimination half-life.
Query!
Timepoint [24]
0
0
At Visit 8 (Day 43): pre-dose, 1, 2, and 4-6 hours postdose
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Key
* Male or non-pregnant, non-lactating female, age 2 to 18 years, inclusive as of the day of the Screening Visit.
* Clinical diagnosis of Dravet syndrome, where convulsive seizures are not completely controlled by current antiepileptic drugs.
* Must have a minimum # of convulsive seizures per 4-week period for past 12 weeks prior to screening.
* All medications or interventions for epilepsy must be stable for at least 4 weeks prior to screening and expected to remain stable throughout the study.
* No cardiovascular or cardiopulmonary abnormality based on ECHO, ECG or physical examination.
* Parent/caregiver is willing and able to be compliant with diary completion, visit schedule and study drug accountability.
Key
Query!
Minimum age
2
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Pulmonary arterial hypertension.
* Current or past history of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease, such as cardiac valvulopathy, myocardial infarction or stroke.
* Current or past history of glaucoma.
* Moderate or severe hepatic impairment.
* Receiving concomitant therapy with: anorectic agents; monoamine-oxidase inhibitors; medications that act via serotonin including serotonin reuptake inhibitors; atomoxetine, or other centrally-acting noradrenergic agonist; or cyproheptadine.
* Currently receiving or has received stiripentol in the past 21 days prior to Screening.
* Currently taking carbamazepine, oxcarbamazepine, eslicarbazepine, phenobarbital, or phenytoin, or has taken any of these within the past 30 days.
* Positive result on tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) or cannabidiol (CBD) test at the Screening Visit.
* A clinically significant medical condition,that would interfere with study participation, collection of study data, or pose a risk to the subject.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
15/01/2016
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
29/07/2020
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
262
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Melbourne Brain Centre Austin Hospital - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service at Lady Cilento Children's Hospital - South Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
The Children's Hospital Westmead Dept. of Neurology and Neurosurgery - Westmead
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
- Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
- South Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
- Westmead
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Arizona
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Minnesota
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
New Jersey
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Utah
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Washington
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Antwerp
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
British Columbia
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Montréal
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Dianalund
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Paris
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Berlin
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Bielefeld
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Freiburg
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Jena
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Kiel
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Radeberg
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Tübingen
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Vogtareuth
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Firenze
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Genova
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Mantova
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Milano
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Roma
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Verona
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Okayama
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Saitama
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Shizuoka
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Tokyo
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Pamplona
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Birmingham
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Glasgow
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Liverpool
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
London
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Sheffield
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Zogenix International Limited, Inc., a subsidiary of Zogenix, Inc.
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Study 1 and Study 3 are the prospective, merged analyses of 2 identical double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, ZX008-1501 and ZX008-1502, to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of ZX008 when used as adjunctive therapy in pediatric and young adult subjects with Dravet syndrome. Study 1501 and Study 1502 were conducted in parallel; Study 1501 was conducted at approximately 30 study sites in North America; Study 1502 was conducted at approximately 30 study sites in Europe, Asia and Australia. Upon completion of the Baseline Period after initial Screening and Baseline charting of seizure frequency, subjects who qualified for the studies were randomized (1:1:1) in a double-blind manner to receive either 1 of 2 doses of ZX008 (0.2 mg/kg/day or 0.8 mg/kg/day; maximum dose: 30 mg/day) or placebo. Randomization was stratified by age group (\< 6 years, =6 to 18 years) to achieve balance across treatment arms, with the target of 25% of subjects in each age group. All subjects were titrated to their randomized dose over a 14-day Titration Period. Following titration, subjects continued treatment at their randomly assigned dose over a 12-week Maintenance Period. Subjects exiting the study underwent a 2-week taper, unless they enrolled in a follow-on study. Subjects were followed for post-study safety monitoring.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02682927
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Sullivan J, Lagae L, Cross JH, Devinsky O, Guerrini R, Knupp KG, Laux L, Nikanorova M, Polster T, Talwar D, Ceulemans B, Nabbout R, Farfel GM, Galer BS, Gammaitoni AR, Lock M, Agarwal A, Scheffer IE; FAiRE DS Study Group. Fenfluramine in the treatment of Dravet syndrome: Results of a third randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Epilepsia. 2023 Oct;64(10):2653-2666. doi: 10.1111/epi.17737. Epub 2023 Aug 17. Cross JH, Galer BS, Gil-Nagel A, Devinsky O, Ceulemans B, Lagae L, Schoonjans AS, Donner E, Wirrell E, Kothare S, Agarwal A, Lock M, Gammaitoni AR. Impact of fenfluramine on the expected SUDEP mortality rates in patients with Dravet syndrome. Seizure. 2021 Dec;93:154-159. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2021.10.024. Epub 2021 Nov 2. Sullivan J, Specchio N, Devinsky O, Auvin S, Perry MS, Strzelczyk A, Gil-Nagel A, Dai D, Galer BS, Gammaitoni AR. Fenfluramine significantly reduces day-to-day seizure burden by increasing number of seizure-free days and time between seizures in patients with Dravet syndrome: A time-to-event analysis. Epilepsia. 2022 Jan;63(1):130-138. doi: 10.1111/epi.17106. Epub 2021 Oct 22. Lagae L, Sullivan J, Knupp K, Laux L, Polster T, Nikanorova M, Devinsky O, Cross JH, Guerrini R, Talwar D, Miller I, Farfel G, Galer BS, Gammaitoni A, Mistry A, Morrison G, Lock M, Agarwal A, Lai WW, Ceulemans B; FAiRE DS Study Group. Fenfluramine hydrochloride for the treatment of seizures in Dravet syndrome: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2019 Dec 21;394(10216):2243-2254. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32500-0. Epub 2019 Dec 17. Sullivan J, Perry MS, Wheless JW, Galer B, Gammaitoni A. Fenfluramine responder analyses and numbers needed to treat: Translating epilepsy trial data into clinical practice. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2021 Mar;31:10-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2021.01.005. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
UCB Cares
Query!
Address
0
0
001 844 599 2273
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/27/NCT02682927/Prot_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/27/NCT02682927/SAP_001.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
Type
Citations or Other Details
Journal
Sullivan J, Lagae L, Cross JH, Devinsky O, Guerrin...
[
More Details
]
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02682927
Download to PDF