Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00119509
Registration number
NCT00119509
Ethics application status
Date submitted
11/07/2005
Date registered
13/07/2005
Date last updated
25/04/2007
Titles & IDs
Public title
The IMAP Study Improving Management of Mildly Abnormal Pap Smears
Query!
Scientific title
HPV DNA Testing Versus Conventional Management for Women With Minor Atypia on Pap Smear: Psychosocial and Quality of Life Outcomes and Development of a Decision Analytic Model
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
211205_IMAP
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Cervix Neoplasms
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Womb (Uterine or endometrial cancer)
Query!
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Cervical (cervix)
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Psychosocial wellbeing assessed using psychometric scales including (a) global measures of psychological health (STAI, SF36)and (b) measures specific to cervical screening.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Quality of Life (Utility) Assessment two stage standard gamble (SG) technique produces a utility score between 0 and 1.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Clinical outcomes: results of follow-up Pap smear and Colposcopy and HPV testing
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Management preference: women's preference for HPV or repeat Pap testing measured by a Decision Aid.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Decision Aid evaluation: Measure the impact of the DA of knowledge, decisional conflict, and satisfaction with decision making
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Women with ONLY the following results on a routine Pap smear:
* Low grade epithelial abnormality;
* Minor changes in squamous cell;
* Minor changes in squamous cells with appearances consistent with Papillomavirus
* Women aged between 18-70 years
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
70
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* Women who are pregnant or planning to become pregnant in the next 12 months
* Women with previous Pap smear abnormality for 2 years.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Diagnosis
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Factorial
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
UNKNOWN
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/01/2004
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
1/04/2008
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,QLD,SA,WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
North Coast Community Health Centre - Port Macquarie
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Family Planning Association - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Taree Community Health Centre - Taree
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Illawarra Women's Health Centre - Warilla
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
Family Planning Queensland - Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
0
0
Shine SA - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment hospital [7]
0
0
Family Planning Western Australia - Perth
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2444 - Port Macquarie
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
2000 - Sydney
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
2430 - Taree
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
2528 - Warilla
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
4006 - Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
0
0
5068 - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [7]
0
0
6865 - Perth
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Other
Query!
Name
University of Sydney
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Other
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Other collaborator category [2]
0
0
Government body
Query!
Name [2]
0
0
Family Planning Association New South Wales
Query!
Address [2]
0
0
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The study compares the psychosocial outcomes of different management strategies for women with minor atypia (including 'HPV effect') detected on Pap smears: conventional management (a repeat Pap smear at 6 months) versus Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing, a new method proposed for the management of minor atypia and the informed choice of either management supported by a decision aid. The study examines women's informed preferences for each of these options and compares the psychosocial outcomes in women who are or are not given the choice of management. HPV DNA testing offers considerable changes to the management of women with minor atypia and there is evidence from the USA which suggests that the use of HPV DNA testing as a triage strategy is effective for women within this group (Solomon et al 2001). The introduction of HPV DNA testing may bring both benefits and harms to women. These harms and benefits are not well understood. Examination of the psychosocial outcomes of HPV DNA testing compared to conventional management and women's preferences for each is needed to guide decisions concerning HPV DNA testing in cervical screening in Australia and also internationally.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00119509
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Kirsten McCaffery, PhD
Query!
Address
0
0
University of Sydney
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00119509
Download to PDF