The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov

For full trial details, please see the original record at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00097825




Registration number
NCT00097825
Ethics application status
Date submitted
30/11/2004
Date registered
1/12/2004
Date last updated
27/04/2012

Titles & IDs
Public title
Efficacy and Safety of Zoledronic Acid for the Treatment of Osteoporosis in Men
Scientific title
Efficacy and Safety of Zoledronic Acid for the Treatment of Osteoporosis in Men
Secondary ID [1] 0 0
CZOL446M2308
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Osteoporosis 0 0
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal 0 0 0 0
Osteoporosis

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Comparator / control treatment
Control group

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 0 0
To compare % change in Lumbar Spine BMD from Baseline to Month 24 in ZOL (annual i.v. infusion) vs Alendronate (weekly oral) osteoporotic male populations
Timepoint [1] 0 0
Secondary outcome [1] 0 0
To compare % change in Lumbar Spine BMD from Baseline to Months 6 and 12 in ZOL (annual i.v. infusion) vs Alendronate (weekly oral) osteoporotic male populations
Timepoint [1] 0 0
Secondary outcome [2] 0 0
To compare % change in BMD at the Total Hip, Femoral Neck, Trochanter and Total Body, from Baseline to Months 6, 12 and 24 in ZOL (annual i.v. infusion) vs Alendronate (weekly oral) osteoporotic male populations
Timepoint [2] 0 0
Secondary outcome [3] 0 0
To compare Biomarkers of bone turnover in the annual Zol i.v. and weekly alendronate populations at all study timepoints, relative to Baseline
Timepoint [3] 0 0

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Male, 25-85 years old
Minimum age
25 Years
Maximum age
85 Years
Sex
Males
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
* Current users of bisphosphonates such as Aredia® (pamidronate), Didronel® (etidronate), Fosamax® (alendronate), Actonel ® (residronate), Skelid® (tiludronate)
* History of severe liver, kidney or eye disease

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?



Intervention assignment
Parallel
Other design features
Phase
Phase 3
Type of endpoint/s
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Data analysis
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,SA,WA
Recruitment hospital [1] 0 0
Garvan Institute of Medical Research - Sydney
Recruitment hospital [2] 0 0
Repatriation General Hospital - Daw Park
Recruitment hospital [3] 0 0
Keogh Institute for Medical Research - Nedlands
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 0 0
2010 - Sydney
Recruitment postcode(s) [2] 0 0
5041 - Daw Park
Recruitment postcode(s) [3] 0 0
6009 - Nedlands
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [1] 0 0
Arizona
Country [2] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [2] 0 0
California
Country [3] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [3] 0 0
Colorado
Country [4] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [4] 0 0
Florida
Country [5] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [5] 0 0
Georgia
Country [6] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [6] 0 0
Illinois
Country [7] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [7] 0 0
Iowa
Country [8] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [8] 0 0
Maine
Country [9] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [9] 0 0
Maryland
Country [10] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [10] 0 0
New Mexico
Country [11] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [11] 0 0
New York
Country [12] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [12] 0 0
Ohio
Country [13] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [13] 0 0
Oregon
Country [14] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [14] 0 0
Pennsylvania
Country [15] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [15] 0 0
Virginia
Country [16] 0 0
Canada
State/province [16] 0 0
British Columbia
Country [17] 0 0
Canada
State/province [17] 0 0
Nova Scotia
Country [18] 0 0
Canada
State/province [18] 0 0
Ontario
Country [19] 0 0
Canada
State/province [19] 0 0
Quebec
Country [20] 0 0
Canada
State/province [20] 0 0
Saskatchewan

Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Name
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Address
Country

Ethics approval
Ethics application status

Summary
Brief summary
Trial website
Trial related presentations / publications
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for scientific queries

No information has been provided regarding IPD availability


What supporting documents are/will be available?

No Supporting Document Provided



Results publications and other study-related documents

No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.