Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00085735
Registration number
NCT00085735
Ethics application status
Date submitted
14/06/2004
Date registered
16/06/2004
Titles & IDs
Public title
Comparison of Radiation Therapy Regimens in Combination With Chemotherapy in Treating Young Patients With Newly Diagnosed Standard-Risk Medulloblastoma
Query!
Scientific title
A Study Evaluating Limited Target Volume Boost Irradiation and Reduced Dose Craniospinal Radiotherapy (18.00 Gy) and Chemotherapy in Children With Newly Diagnosed Standard Risk Medulloblastoma: A Phase III Double Randomized Trial
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
NCI-2009-00335
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
ACNS0331
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Untreated Childhood Medulloblastoma
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Children's - Brain
Query!
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Brain
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Cisplatin
Treatment: Other - Craniospinal Irradiation
Treatment: Drugs - Cyclophosphamide
Treatment: Other - Involved-Field Radiation Therapy
Other interventions - Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
Treatment: Drugs - Lomustine
Other interventions - Quality-of-Life Assessment
Treatment: Other - Radiation Therapy
Treatment: Drugs - Vincristine Sulfate
Experimental: Arm I (3-7 years of age, LDCSI, IFRT) - See Detailed Description (Arm I)
Experimental: Arm II (3-7 years of age, LDCSI, PFRT) - See Detailed Description (Arm II)
Experimental: Arm III (3-7 years of age, SDCSI, IFRT) - See Detailed Description (Arm III)
Active comparator: Arm IV (3-7 years of age, SDCSI, PFRT) - See Detailed Description (Arm IV)
Experimental: Arm V (8-21 years of age, SDCSI, IFRT) - See Detailed Description (Arm V)
Active comparator: Arm VI (8-21 years of age, SDCSI, PFRT) - See Detailed Description (Arm VI)
Treatment: Drugs: Cisplatin
Given IV
Treatment: Other: Craniospinal Irradiation
Undergo craniospinal Irradiation
Treatment: Drugs: Cyclophosphamide
Given IV
Treatment: Other: Involved-Field Radiation Therapy
Undergo smaller volume boost (involved-field radiation therapy)
Other interventions: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
Correlative studies
Treatment: Drugs: Lomustine
Given orally
Other interventions: Quality-of-Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Treatment: Other: Radiation Therapy
Undergo standard volume boost (whole posterior fossa radiation therapy)
Treatment: Drugs: Vincristine Sulfate
Given IV
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Intervention code [2]
0
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Intervention code [3]
0
0
Other interventions
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Event-free Survival (EFS)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
EFS was defined as the time interval from date of study entry to date of disease progression, disease recurrence, second malignant neoplasm or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, or to the date of last follow-up for patients without events. EFS was estimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier. 3-year estimates are reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI's).
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Assessed at 3 years
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Overall Survival (OS)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
OS was defined as the time interval from date of study entry to date of death from any cause or to the date of last follow-up for survivors. OS was estimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier. 3-year estimates are reported with 95% CI's. For purposes of this analysis, arms I, III and V (involved field radiation therapy \[IFRT\]) are combined and compared to arms II, IV and VI (posterior fossa irradiation \[PFRT\]).
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
3 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Local Posterior Fossa (LPF) Failure Rate
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
LPF failure was defined as tumor recurrence/progression within the tumor bed. The cumulative incidence (CI) of LPF failure was estimated; 3-year estimates were reported with 95% confidence intervals. Patients with other failure types (e.g., NPF) and with other events prior to LPF failure (e.g., death, second malignancy) were considered as having competing events.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
3 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Non-local Posterior Fossa (NLPF) Failure Rate
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
NLPF failure was defined as tumor recurrence/progression outside the radiation therapy clinical target volume boost (CTV-boost) but within the posterior fossa CTV (CTV-PF). The cumulative incidence (CI) of NLPF failure was estimated; 3-year estimates were reported with 95% confidence intervals. Patients with other failure types (e.g., NPF, LPF) and with other events prior to NLPF failure (e.g., death, second malignancy) were considered as having competing events.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
3 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Non-posterior Fossa (NPF) Failure Rate
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
NPF failure was defined as tumor recurrence within the neuroaxis but outside the radiation therapy clinical target volume (CTV). The cumulative incidence (CI) of NPF failure was estimated; 3-year estimates were reported with 95% confidence intervals. Patients with other failure types (e.g., LPF failure) and with other events prior to NPF failure (e.g., death, second malignancy) were considered as having competing events.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
3 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Post-treatment Endocrine Function by CSI Group
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Post-treatment endocrine function was measured by laboratory assessment of the thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH). The mean TSH will be reported.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Up to 3 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Post-treatment Grade 3+ Hearing Loss as Measured by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version (v)4
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Proportions of patients with grade 3+ hearing loss after the completion of therapy will be calculated and reported separately for low dose craniospinal irradiation (LDCSI) versus (vs.) standard dose craniospinal irradiation (SDCSI) patients. Eligible and evaluable patients 3-7 years of age will be used.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
Up to 3 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Post-treatment Neurocognitive Function as Measured by the Estimated Full-scale IQ (FSIQ) by CSI Group Within Time Window 1 (4 - 15 Months Post Diagnosis).
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Post-treatment neurocognitive function was assessed. Full-scale IQ (FSIQ) is a representative measurement for neurocognitive function. FSIQ was measured by IQ tests. Assessments within the time window, from eligible and evaluable patients are reported. The time window is 4-15 months post diagnosis, only the assessments before progression date were reported. The Range of FSIQ is 50-150. A higher FSIQ is better.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
4 -15 months post diagnosis
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Post-treatment Neurocognitive Function as Measured by the Estimated Full-scale IQ (FSIQ) by CSI Group Within Time Window 2 (27 - 48 Months Post Diagnosis)
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
Post-treatment neurocognitive function was assessed. Full-scale IQ (FSIQ) is a representative measurement for neurocognitive function. FSIQ was measured by IQ tests. Assessments within the time window, from eligible and evaluable patients are reported. The time window is 27-48 months post diagnosis, only the assessments before progression date were reported. The range of FSIQ is 50 - 150. A higher FSIQ is better.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
27 - 48 months post diagnosis
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Post-treatment Neurocognitive Function as Measured by the Estimated Full-scale IQ (FSIQ) by CSI Group Within Time Window 3 (49 - 72 Months Post Diagnosis)
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
Post-treatment neurocognitive function was assessed. Full-scale IQ (FSIQ) is a representative measurement for neurocognitive function. FSIQ was measured by IQ tests. Assessments within the time window, from eligible and evaluable patients are reported. The time window is 49-72 months post diagnosis, only the assessments before progression date were reported. The Range of FSIQ is 50-150. A higher FSIQ is better.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
49 - 72 months post diagnosis
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Incidence of Grade 3+ Hearing Loss at 1-year Post Treatment as Assessed by CTCAE v4
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Proportions of patients with grade 3+ hearing impairment as assessed by CTCAE v4 at 1-year post treatment were calculated.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Up to 3 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Incidence of Endocrine Dysfunction as Measured by Growth Hormone Stimulation Tests at the Time of Completion of Therapy by Radiotherapy (RT) Group
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
Endocrine dysfunction was assessed by growth hormone stimulation (GHS) tests. We report the percentage of patients with abnormal growth hormone stimulation tests.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Post-treatment up to 3 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Overall Survival (OS) by Molecular Subgroup Based on Methylation Arrays
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
OS was defined as the time interval from date of study entry to date of death from any cause or to date of last contact for survivors. OS was estimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier. 3-year estimates are reported with 95% CI's.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
3 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Molecular Subgroup Based on Methylation Arrays
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
PFS was defined as the time interval from date of study entry to disease progression, relapse or death due to cancer or to last follow-up. Second malignancies and deaths from causes clearly not associated with tumor progression or recurrence were censored. PFS was estimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier. 3-year estimates are reported with 95% CI's.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
3 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Post-treatment Metacognition Index (MI) on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) by CSI Group Within Time Window 1 (4-15 Months Post Diagnosis)
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
Metacognition index (MI) was measured by BRIEF test. Assessments within the time window, from eligible and evaluable patients are reported. If the patient had disease progression, only the assessments before progression date were reported. The MI is a standard T- score, and it ranges from 0 to 100. The higher score reported suggests a higher level of dysfunction.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
4 - 15 months post diagnosis
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Post-treatment Metacognition Index (MI) on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) by CSI Group Within Time Window 2 (27-48 Months Post Diagnosis)
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
Metacognition index (MI) was measured by BRIEF test. Assessments within the time window, from eligible and evaluable patients are reported. If the patient had disease progression, only the assessments before progression date were reported. The MI is a standard T- score, and it ranges from 0 to 100. The higher score reported suggests a higher level of dysfunction.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
27-48 months post diagnosis
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Post-treatment Metacognition Index (MI) on the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) by CSI Group Within Time Window 3 (49 - 72 Months Post Diagnosis)
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
Metacognition index (MI) was measured by BRIEF test. Assessments within the time window, from eligible and evaluable patients are reported. If the patient had disease progression, only the assessments before progression date were reported. The MI is a standard T- score, and it ranges from 0 to 100. The higher score reported suggests a higher level of dysfunction.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
49 - 72 months post diagnosis
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Compliance Rates for All Eligible and Evaluable Patients Enrolled Within Time Window 1 (4-15 Months Post Diagnosis)
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
Compliance rates are calculated to monitor the compliance with long-term quality of life and functional status data submission. A patient will be compliant if the patient has metacognition index score. Compliance rates will be assessed at each of the 3 neurocognitive/quality of life assessment time windows. All eligible and evaluable patients enrolled will be used. Patients removed from treatment prior to the time of neuropsychological assessment (for reasons such as disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, etc.) will not be included in the denominator to assess the compliance rate. The time window is 4 - 15 months post diagnosis.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
4-15 months post diagnosis
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Compliance Rates for All Eligible and Evaluable Patients Enrolled Within Time Window 2 (27-48 Months Post Diagnosis)
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
Compliance rates are calculated to monitor the compliance with long-term quality of life and functional status data submission. A patient will be compliant if the patient has metacognition index score. Compliance rates will be assessed at each of the 3 neurocognitive/quality of life assessment time windows. All eligible and evaluable patients enrolled will be used. Patients removed from treatment prior to the time of neuropsychological assessment (for reasons such as disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, etc.) will not be included in the denominator to assess the compliance rate. The time window is 27 - 48 months post diagnosis.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
27-48 months post diagnosis
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Compliance Rates for All Eligible and Evaluable Patients Enrolled Within Time Window 3 (49 - 72 Months Post Diagnosis)
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
Compliance rates are calculated to monitor the compliance with long-term quality of life and functional status data submission. A patient will be compliant if the patient has metacognition index score. Compliance rates will be assessed at each of the 3 neurocognitive/quality of life assessment time windows. All eligible and evaluable patients enrolled will be used. Patients removed from treatment prior to the time of neuropsychological assessment (for reasons such as disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, etc.) will not be included in the denominator to assess the compliance rate. The time window is 49 - 72 months post diagnosis.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
49 - 72 months post diagnosis
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Histologically confirmed medulloblastoma located in the posterior fossa
* Standard-risk disease
* Minimal volume, non-disseminated disease, defined by the following:
* Residual tumor = 1.5 cm^2 confirmed by MRI with contrast imaging within 21 days after surgery
* No metastatic disease in the head, spine, or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) confirmed by both of the following:
* Enhanced MRI of the spine within 5 days before surgery OR within 28 days after surgery
* Negative cytological examination of CSF after surgery, but before study enrollment
* Brain stem involvement allowed
* Performance status - Karnofsky 50-100% (> 16 years of age)
* Performance status - Lansky 30-100% (= 16 years of age)
* Absolute neutrophil count > 1,500/uL
* Platelet count > 100,000/uL (transfusion independent)
* Hemoglobin > 10 g/dL (transfusions allowed)
* Bilirubin < 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN) for age
* AST or ALT < 1.5 times ULN for age
* Creatinine clearance OR radioisotope glomerular filtration rate >= 70 mL/min/1.73m^2 or a serum creatinine based on age/gender as follows:
Age Maximum Serum Creatine (mg/dL)
* 1month to < 6 months male: 0.4 female: 0.4
* 6 months to <1 year male: 0.5 female: 0.5
* 1 year to < 2 years male: 0.6 female: 0.6
* 2 to < 6 years male: 0.8 female: 0.8
* 6 to < 10 years male: 1 female: 1
* 10 to < 13 years male: 1.2 female: 1.2
* 13 to < 16 years male: 1.5 female: 1.4
* >= 16 years male: 1.7 female: 1.4
* Not pregnant or nursing
* Negative pregnancy test
* Fertile patients must use effective contraception
* No prior chemotherapy
* Prior corticosteroids allowed
* No prior radiotherapy
Query!
Minimum age
3
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
21
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Active, not recruiting
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/04/2004
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
549
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
SA,WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Women's and Children's Hospital-Adelaide - North Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Princess Margaret Hospital for Children - Perth
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
5006 - North Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
6008 - Perth
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Alabama
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Arizona
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Connecticut
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Delaware
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
District of Columbia
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Hawaii
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Idaho
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Indiana
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Iowa
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Kentucky
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Louisiana
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Maine
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Michigan
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Minnesota
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Mississippi
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Nebraska
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Nevada
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
New Hampshire
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
New Jersey
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
New Mexico
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
North Dakota
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Oklahoma
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Oregon
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Rhode Island
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
South Carolina
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
South Dakota
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Tennessee
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Utah
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Vermont
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Washington
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
West Virginia
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Wisconsin
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Alberta
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
British Columbia
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Manitoba
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Newfoundland and Labrador
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Nova Scotia
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Saskatchewan
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Den Haag
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Auckland
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Christchurch
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Bern
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Geneva
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Lausanne
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Other
Query!
Name
Children's Oncology Group
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This randomized phase III trial is studying how well standard-dose radiation therapy works compared to reduced-dose radiation therapy in children 3-7 years of age AND how well standard volume boost radiation therapy works compared to smaller volume boost radiation therapy when given together with chemotherapy in treating young patients who have undergone surgery for newly diagnosed standard-risk medulloblastoma. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as vincristine, cisplatin, lomustine, and cyclophosphamide, work in different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Giving radiation therapy with chemotherapy after surgery may kill any remaining tumor cells. It is not yet known whether standard-dose radiation therapy is more effective than reduced-dose radiation therapy when given together with chemotherapy after surgery in treating young patients with medulloblastoma.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00085735
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Michalski JM, Janss AJ, Vezina LG, Smith KS, Billups CA, Burger PC, Embry LM, Cullen PL, Hardy KK, Pomeroy SL, Bass JK, Perkins SM, Merchant TE, Colte PD, Fitzgerald TJ, Booth TN, Cherlow JM, Muraszko KM, Hadley J, Kumar R, Han Y, Tarbell NJ, Fouladi M, Pollack IF, Packer RJ, Li Y, Gajjar A, Northcott PA. Children's Oncology Group Phase III Trial of Reduced-Dose and Reduced-Volume Radiotherapy With Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Average-Risk Medulloblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Aug 20;39(24):2685-2697. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02730. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Jeff Michalski
Query!
Address
0
0
Children's Oncology Group
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
Select individual patient-level data from this trial can be requested from the NCTN/NCORP Data Archive
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Query!
Available to whom?
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00085735