Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Register a trial
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01849874
Registration number
NCT01849874
Ethics application status
Date submitted
6/05/2013
Date registered
9/05/2013
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Study of MEK162 vs. Physician's Choice Chemotherapy in Patients With Low-grade Serous Ovarian, Fallopian Tube or Peritoneal Cancer
Query!
Scientific title
The MILO Study (MEK Inhibitor in Low-grade Serous Ovarian Cancer): A Multinational, Randomized, Open-label Phase 3 Study of MEK162 vs. Physician's Choice Chemotherapy in Patients With Recurrent or Persistent Low-grade Serous Carcinomas of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube or Primary Peritoneum
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
C4211003
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
ARRAY-162-311
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Low-grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
0
0
Query!
Low-grade Serous Fallopian Tube Cancer
0
0
Query!
Low-grade Serous Peritoneal Cancer
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Ovarian and primary peritoneal
Query!
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Womb (Uterine or endometrial cancer)
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - MEK162, MEK inhibitor; oral
Treatment: Drugs - Physician's choice chemotherapy
Experimental: MEK162 -
Active comparator: Physician's choice chemotherapy -
Treatment: Drugs: MEK162, MEK inhibitor; oral
multiple dose, single schedule
Treatment: Drugs: Physician's choice chemotherapy
Patients will receive one of the following chemotherapies as determined by the physician:
* Liposomal doxorubicin, anthracycline antibiotic; intravenous (multiple dose, single schedule)
* Paclitaxel, mitotic inhibitor; intravenous (multiple dose, single schedule)
* Topotecan, topoisomerase 1 inhibitor; intravenous (multiple dose, single schedule)
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the earliest documented disease progression date or death due to any cause whichever occurred first. Disease progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum of diameters recorded on study (including Baseline) and an absolute increase of greater than or equal to (\>=) 5 millimeter (mm). Appearance of new lesions \>=10 mm in diameter also constituted PD. If a participant did not have an event at the time of the analysis cutoff or at the start of any new therapy, PFS was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From randomization until documented progressive disease (PD) or death, whichever occurred first, for censored participants at the date of last adequate tumor assessment (up to 24 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Overall Survival (OS)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants who were alive at the data cutoff date were censored for overall survival at their last contact date.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From randomization date to the date of death, for censored participants at their last contact date (up to 24 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Objective Response Rate Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), Version 1.1 (RECIST V1.1)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants achieving an overall best response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) (responders). CR was defined as disappearance of target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures less than (\<) 10 mm, PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of measures (longest diameter for tumor lesions and short axis measure for nodes) of target lesions, taking as reference the Baseline sum of diameters. Non-target lesions must be non-progressive disease.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
From randomization until disease progression or death (up to 24 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Duration of Response (DOR)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
DOR was defined as the time from first radiographic evidence of response to the earliest documented progression date or death due to any cause, and was calculated on responders only. Responders with no PD or death date or subsequent anticancer therapy by the data cutoff date, were censored for DOR at their last radiological assessment. Responders who received subsequent anticancer therapy prior to PD or death were censored at their last radiological assessment prior to initiation of subsequent anticancer therapy.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
From the first radiographic evidence of response to the first documentation of PD or death, for censored participants at their last radiological assessment (up to 24 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Disease control rate was defined as percentage of participants with disease control. Disease control was defined as a best response of CR or PR, or stable disease (SD) documented at Week 24 or later. CR was defined as disappearance of target and non-target lesions and normalization of tumor markers. Pathological lymph nodes must have short axis measures \<10 mm, and PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of measures (longest diameter for tumor lesions and short axis measure for nodes) of target lesions, taking as reference the Baseline sum of diameters. Non-target lesions must be non-progressive disease. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters on study.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Week 24
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study intervention without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE: an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial/prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
From the first dose of study intervention until 30 days after the last dose (up to 9 years)
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Number of Participants With Shift Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 From Baseline in Laboratory Parameter Values Based on National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Number of participants with shifts from normal Baseline values (Grade 0) to abnormal post-baseline values on-study (shift to greater than or equal to Grade 3) were reported as per NCI-CTCAE, v4.03 graded from Grade 1 to 5. Grade 1: Mild; asymptomatic/ mild symptoms; clinical/diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2: Moderate; minimal, local/noninvasive intervention indicated. Grade 3: Severe/medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization/prolongation of hospitalization indicated. Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5: Death. Shifts in lab parameter from Grade 0 to 3, Grade 0 to 4 and Grade 0 to Low 3 and 4 and Grade 0 to High 3 and 4 (for parameters total hemoglobin, lymphocytes, white blood cells, calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium) were reported.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
From the first dose of study intervention until 30 days after the last dose (up to 9 years)
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Quality of Life Per European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (QLQ-C30)
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item cancer-specific instrument that assesses participant reported outcomes, consisting of 5 functional scales, 3 symptoms scales, a global health status/quality of life (QOL) scale, and 6 single-item scales. The global health status/QOL scale has 7 possible scores of responses (1=very poor to 7=excellent). All other items have 4 possible scores (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). A linear transformation was applied to the raw scores so that all transformed scores lie between 0 to 100, with 0 being the worst and 100 being the best for global health status/QOL and functional scales, and 0 being the best and 100 being the worst for symptoms scales. In this study, global health status/QOL scale score was identified as the primary patient-reported outcome variable of interest. Physical functioning, emotional functioning, and social functioning scale scores were considered as secondary. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
Screening, every 8 weeks from randomization for the first 72 weeks (while on treatment), treatment discontinuation visit, 30-day safety follow-up visit
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Quality of Life Per European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire - Ovarian Cancer Module (QLQ-OV28)
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
EORTC QLQ-OV28 contains 28 items which assess a comprehensive range of relevant issues: abdominal/gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, peripheral neuropathy, other chemotherapy side-effects, hormonal/menopausal symptoms, body image, attitude to disease/treatment and sexual functioning. The score for each domain and component score were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). Higher scores indicate lower quality of life except for sexual functioning where higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
Screening, every 8 weeks from randomization for the first 72 weeks (while on treatment), treatment discontinuation visit, 30-day safety follow-up visit
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Quality of Life Per Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-NTX)
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
FACT/GOG-NTX questionnaire consists of questions for dimensions related to physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being which contains 11 items, with responses scored on a Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) designed to capture the symptoms of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). The summed scores of each item were reverted into standardized scores ranging from 0 to 44, with a higher score indicating a lower level of neurological toxicity and less effect on quality of life (ie, higher scores indicate better quality of life). The trial outcome index consists of two subscales from the FACT-G: Physical Well Being (7 items) and Functional Well Being (7 items), plus the Cervix Cancer-specific subscale (15 items). Each item in the trial outcome index scored using a 5-point scale (0=not at all to 4=very much). The summed scores of each item were reverted into standardized scores ranging from 0 to 116. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
Screening, every 8 weeks from randomization for the first 72 weeks (while on treatment), treatment discontinuation visit, 30-day safety follow-up visit
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Predose Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) of MEK162
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
Ctrough of MEK162 is defined as the predose plasma concentration of MEK162. Ctrough of MEK162 was observed directly from data.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
Predose on Study Days 1, 57, and 113.
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of MEK162
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
Cmax is maximum observed plasma concentration. Cmax of MEK162 was observed directly from data.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
2 hours ± 10 minutes postdose on Study Days 1, 57, and 113.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Key
* Diagnosis of LGS carcinoma of the ovary, fallopian tube or primary peritoneum (invasive micropapillary serous carcinoma or invasive grade 1 serous carcinoma), confirmed histologically and verified by central pathology review.
* Recurrent or persistent measurable disease that has progressed (defined as radiological and/or clinical progression; an increase in cancer antigen [CA]-125 alone is not sufficient) on or after last therapy (i.e., chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, surgery) and is not amenable to potentially curative intent surgery, as determined by the patient's treating physician.
* Must have received at least 1 prior platinum-based chemotherapy regimen but have received no more than 3 lines of prior chemotherapy regimens, with no limit to the number of lines of prior hormonal therapy. Front-line therapy may include neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy and will be counted as 1 prior systemic regimen. Biological therapy (e.g. bevacizumab) administered as a single agent is considered a prior systemic regimen and not a prior chemotherapy regimen. Maintenance therapy is not considered its own regimen but should be included with the regimen that it follows.
* Available archival tumor sample (excisional or core biopsy) for confirmation of LGS carcinoma diagnosis. If adequate archival tumor sample is not available, willingness to consent to tissue biopsy.
* Suitable for treatment with at least one of the physician's choice chemotherapy options (liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel or topotecan) as determined by the Investigator.
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0 or 1.
* Additional criteria exist.
Key
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* History or current evidence of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) or current risk factors for RVO (e.g., uncontrolled glaucoma or ocular hypertension, history of hyperviscosity or hypercoagulability syndromes).
* Prior therapy with a MEK or BRAF inhibitor.
* History of Gilbert's syndrome.
* Impaired cardiovascular function or clinically significant cardiovascular diseases.
* Uncontrolled or symptomatic brain metastases that are not stable or require steroids, are potentially life-threatening or have required radiation within 28 days prior to first dose of study treatment.
* Concomitant malignancies or previous malignancies with less than a 5-year disease-free interval at the time of first dose of study treatment; patients with adequately resected basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, carcinoma in situ of the cervix or ductal carcinoma in situ may be enrolled irrespective of the time of diagnosis.
* Known positive serology for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), active hepatitis B and/or active hepatitis C.
* Prior randomization into this clinical study.
* Additional criteria exist.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Stopped early
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
27/06/2013
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
23/08/2022
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
341
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,QLD,SA,VIC,WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Dr Anil Arora - Wahroonga
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Sydney Adventist Hospital - Wahroonga
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Westmead Hospital - Westmead
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Mater Misericordiae Health Services Brisbane Limited - South Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
Adelaide Cardiology - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
0
0
Adelaide Eye and Retina Centre - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment hospital [7]
0
0
Royal Adelaide Hospital - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment hospital [8]
0
0
Thomas and Delaney Optometrists - Norwood
Query!
Recruitment hospital [9]
0
0
Burnside War Memorial Hospital - Toorak Gardens
Query!
Recruitment hospital [10]
0
0
Sunshine Hospital - St Albans
Query!
Recruitment hospital [11]
0
0
Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital - Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2076 - Wahroonga
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
2145 - Westmead
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
4101 - South Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
5000 - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
5067 - Norwood
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
0
0
5065 - Toorak Gardens
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [7]
0
0
3021 - St Albans
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [8]
0
0
6009 - Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Arizona
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Colorado
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Connecticut
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Georgia
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Illinois
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Indiana
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Iowa
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Maryland
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Michigan
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Montana
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
New Mexico
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Ohio
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Oklahoma
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Pennsylvania
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Virginia
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Austria
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Tirol
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Luxembourg
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
Vlaams-brabant
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Brussels
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Gent
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Liege
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Namur
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Wilrijk
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Alberta
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
British Columbia
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Manitoba
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Quebec
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Hradec Kralove
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Olomouc
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Ostrava - Poruba
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Ostrava-Poruba
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Prague 2
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Czechia
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Prague
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
North Jutland
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Herlev
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Kobenhavn o
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
København Ø
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Finland
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Tampere
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Besancon
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Lille
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
LYON Cedex 08
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Lyon
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Marseille Cedex 09
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Marseille
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Montferrier S/lez
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Montpellier CEDEX 5
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
NANTES Cedex 2
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Nantes
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Paris Cedex 15
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Paris
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Plerin
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Saint-Herblain Cedex
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
France
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Villejuif Cedex
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Baden-wuerttemberg
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Baden-wurttemberg
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Bavaria
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Hessen
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
North Rhine-westphalia
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
North-rhine Westphalia
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Saxony
Query!
Country [68]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [68]
0
0
Schleswig-holstein
Query!
Country [69]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [69]
0
0
Berlin
Query!
Country [70]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [70]
0
0
Freiburg
Query!
Country [71]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [71]
0
0
Greifswald
Query!
Country [72]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [72]
0
0
Heidelberg
Query!
Country [73]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [73]
0
0
Gyor-moson-sopron
Query!
Country [74]
0
0
Hungary
Query!
State/province [74]
0
0
Budapest
Query!
Country [75]
0
0
Ireland
Query!
State/province [75]
0
0
Dublin 8
Query!
Country [76]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [76]
0
0
Milano
Query!
Country [77]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [77]
0
0
Pordenone
Query!
Country [78]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [78]
0
0
Ravenna
Query!
Country [79]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [79]
0
0
RM
Query!
Country [80]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [80]
0
0
Rome
Query!
Country [81]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [81]
0
0
Bologna
Query!
Country [82]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [82]
0
0
Brescia
Query!
Country [83]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [83]
0
0
Catania
Query!
Country [84]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [84]
0
0
Napoli
Query!
Country [85]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [85]
0
0
Roma
Query!
Country [86]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [86]
0
0
Noord-holland
Query!
Country [87]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [87]
0
0
Groningen
Query!
Country [88]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [88]
0
0
Maastricht
Query!
Country [89]
0
0
Norway
Query!
State/province [89]
0
0
Oslo
Query!
Country [90]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [90]
0
0
Warsaw
Query!
Country [91]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [91]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [92]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [92]
0
0
Castilla LA Mancha
Query!
Country [93]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [93]
0
0
Guipuzcoa
Query!
Country [94]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [94]
0
0
Cordoba
Query!
Country [95]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [95]
0
0
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat
Query!
Country [96]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [96]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [97]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [97]
0
0
Palma de Mallorca
Query!
Country [98]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [98]
0
0
Sevilla
Query!
Country [99]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [99]
0
0
Toledo
Query!
Country [100]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [100]
0
0
Valencia
Query!
Country [101]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [101]
0
0
Stockholm
Query!
Country [102]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [102]
0
0
Uppsala
Query!
Country [103]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [103]
0
0
England
Query!
Country [104]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [104]
0
0
Nottinghamshire
Query!
Country [105]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [105]
0
0
Surrey
Query!
Country [106]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [106]
0
0
Sutton
Query!
Country [107]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [107]
0
0
WEST Midlands
Query!
Country [108]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [108]
0
0
London
Query!
Country [109]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [109]
0
0
Manchester
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Pfizer
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The MILO Study (MEK Inhibitor in Low-grade Serous Ovarian Cancer) is a Phase 3 study during which patients with recurrent or persistent low-grade serous (LGS) carcinomas of the ovary, fallopian tube or primary peritoneum will receive either investigational study drug MEK162 or a chemotherapy chosen by the physician (liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel or topotecan). Patients will be followed to compare the effectiveness of the study drug to that of the selected chemotherapies. Patients may be eligible to crossover from physician's choice chemotherapy to MEK162 if they meet certain inclusion criteria including centrally confirmed disease progression. Approximately 360 patients from North America, Europe and Australia will be enrolled in this study.
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01849874
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Monk BJ, Grisham RN, Banerjee S, Kalbacher E, Mirza MR, Romero I, Vuylsteke P, Coleman RL, Hilpert F, Oza AM, Westermann A, Oehler MK, Pignata S, Aghajanian C, Colombo N, Drill E, Cibula D, Moore KN, Christy-Bittel J, Del Campo JM, Berger R, Marth C, Sehouli J, O'Malley DM, Churruca C, Boyd AP, Kristensen G, Clamp A, Ray-Coquard I, Vergote I. MILO/ENGOT-ov11: Binimetinib Versus Physician's Choice Chemotherapy in Recurrent or Persistent Low-Grade Serous Carcinomas of the Ovary, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneum. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Nov 10;38(32):3753-3762. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01164. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Pfizer Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Query!
Address
0
0
Pfizer
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Query!
Available to whom?
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
IPD available at link: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01849874