Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12624000187549
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
21/01/2024
Date registered
27/02/2024
Date last updated
11/08/2024
Date data sharing statement initially provided
27/02/2024
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Hospital Acquired Pneumonia PrEveNtion (The HAPPEN study): exploring the effectiveness of oral care on the incidence of pneumonia in hospitalised patients.
Query!
Scientific title
Hospital Acquired Pneumonia PrEveNtion (The HAPPEN study): A multi-centre randomised control trial exploring the effectiveness of improving the frequency and quality of oral care, in reducing the incidence of pneumonia in hospitals.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
311364
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
HAPPEN
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Hospital-acquired pneumonia
332632
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Infection
329337
329337
0
0
Query!
Other infectious diseases
Query!
Respiratory
329508
329508
0
0
Query!
Other respiratory disorders / diseases
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
We will develop a multi-modal intervention that aims to improve the frequency and quality of oral care for patients in hospitals. This intervention will be developed in consultation with healthcare professionals and consumers. Clinical evidence from the literature will be used to help design the intervention strategy. The three pillars of the intervention include oral care, education, and audit/feedback.
1. Oral care
During the intervention, every patient on the ward will be assisted with oral care by a nurse. Oral care includes cleaning of the teeth/dentures, tongue, moisturising the lips, using toothbrushes suitable for elderly populations, and toothpaste containing sodium bicarbonate.
The goal is for oral care to be performed twice a day, increasing to 4-hourly in participants who are nil by mouth or require assistance with oral care (dependent participants).
An oral care pack (containing a toothbrush and sodium bicarbonate toothpaste) will be offered to all hospitals, improving the ease of use. It is not mandatory for patients to use the provided pack, it is provided as an optional resource to aid the intervention.
The patient will be encouraged and reminded to undertake oral care by the study and nursing team; for dependent participants, a suction toothbrush may be used, with oral care provided by nursing staff, supported by the study team (research nurse).
2. Education
For Staff
Face-to-face education and educational resources (developed in our foundation work) for nursing staff will be provided immediately before the intervention phase and reinforced during the intervention. A nurse on the study team will assist in disseminating educational resources to staff on the participating wards. The initial training session will be run by a nurse on the research team, and consist of a 30-min face-to-face session with nursing staff on the wards, to describe the project and how to use the oral care pack. The nurse employed by the study will be available for training and/or to answer questions weekdays during the intervention, thus there is no limit to the frequency/duration of education provided. Additional training sessions will be run as needed, depending on the need (example: a face-to-face 10 min training session to refresh training on the technique of providing oral care).
For patients
The face-to-face education for patients will be delivered by a nurse on the research team with the appropriate qualifications and experience. The education topics covered include: why improving oral care may reduce the incidence of pneumonia, the correct technique of oral care, where to find information and resources (for example, the study website). This nurse will be available on the ward weekdays during the intervention, thus there is no limit to the frequency/duration of education provided.
Resources
Additional online resources will be made available to participating wards that cover the topics covered in the face-to-face education sessions. Examples of these include: a video explaining why improving oral care may reduce the incidence of pneumonia, a video of a nurse providing oral care to a patient, a link to the study website and a flyer that describes the relationship between oral care and pneumonia. The use of resources will be available for all patients and staff, but will not be monitored. The online resources will be designed specifically for this study, in co-design with consumers and clinicians.
3. Audit/feedback
Adherence to the intervention will be monitored electronically by reviewing hospital notes and recording when patients/nurses performed oral care. The nurse employed by the study team will have the ability to record when patients performed, or were assisted with oral care. Nurses can also record when the supplied oral care pack is given to patients, to help monitor stock levels. Audit results will be used to inform further informal face to face education and training. Additional reports will be provided for internal committees, such as the Infection Prevention and Control committee, as required. Ongoing education will be based on a behaviour change model – based on information obtained during the trial regarding how many times a day patients perform oral care. The nurses employed by the research team will provide monthly feedback on the number of cases of HAP and compliance with the intervention to nursing staff. This will be face-to-face or via email, depending on the preference of the nursing staff. Adherence to the education, for example following correct technique of oral care, will not be audited.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
327806
0
Prevention
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
The usual practice of oral care will continue during the control phase. The usual practice of oral care is determined by local practice and policy. These will be described in any future reporting. Generally, standard oral care would include supporting the brushing someone’s teeth at least once per day, using a toothbrush and toothpaste.
No education will be provided and no feedback on the cases of HAP will be provided during the control phase.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
337154
0
Incidence of HAP, measured as the number of cases per 100 admissions.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
337154
0
Data used to determine the incidence of HAP will be collected using electronic medical records of patients for their most recent admission to hospital. We will use the European Centre for Disease Control definition of HAP (version 6.1). For clarity this excludes infection present on admission or occurring within 48 hours after admission.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
337154
0
All patients discharged from participating wards during the study period will be included for analysis. For example, once a patient has been discharged from the participating ward their medical records will be used to determine if they acquired a respiratory infection during their most recent hospital stay.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
430874
0
Incidence of lower and upper respiratory tract infection, per 100 admissions (composite outcome).
Query!
Assessment method [1]
430874
0
Data used to determine the incidence of lower and upper respiratory tract infections will be collected using electronic medical records of patients for their most recent admission to hospital. We will use the European Centre for Disease Control definition of lower and upper respiratory tract infections (version 6.1). For clarity this excludes infection present on admission or occurring within 48 hours after admission.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
430874
0
All patients discharged from participating wards during the study period will be included for analysis. For example, once a patient has been discharged from the participating ward their medical records will be used to determine if they acquired a respiratory infection during their most recent hospital stay.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
430875
0
Estimate excess attributable length of stay in hospital associated with HAP
Query!
Assessment method [2]
430875
0
Differences in length of stay between those with HAP and those without (participants in control period only) will be calculated using a multi-state model, as infection is time-dependent. Controls will be selected using linked health data, matching for variables such as age and sex. Data will be sourced using Electronic Medical Records of patients once they have been discharged from our study wards.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
430875
0
Participants will be assessed for their length of stay once they have been discharged from hospital. For example, once a patient has been discharged from the participating ward their medical records will be used to determine the length of their hospital stay. The secondary outcome [2] will be assessed at the conclusion of the study for control and intervention periods.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
430876
0
Description of the patient experience of having HAP
Query!
Assessment method [3]
430876
0
Interviews will be one-on-one with a participant and a member of the research team - via video call or phone call. Interview transcripts will be analysed using a thematic analysis approach, seeking to understand the patients’ lived experience and their experience of a having HAP.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
430876
0
Once a patient has recovered from HAP, they will be invited to participate in an interview. Interviews will occur within 3 months of discharge from our study hospitals at a time convenient for the patient.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
430877
0
Understanding clinician barriers, enablers and the experience of implementing the intervention and educational approaches used (composite outcome).
Query!
Assessment method [4]
430877
0
Interviews will be 30-minute focus groups conducted by phone call or video call. These will be semi-structured interviews with open-ended questions. We aim to have 12-16 participants across the participating hospitals. Participants will primarily be nurses (can include other healthcare professionals for example doctors and infection control). Interview transcripts will be analysed using a thematic analysis approach, seeking to understand their perceptions of barriers, enablers and the experience of implementing the intervention and their experience of the educational resources used in the project.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
430877
0
An invitation to participate will be shared electronically and in flyers to nurses on the participating wards at the conclusion of the intervention period. Interviews will occur within 1 month of the conclusion of the intervention period.
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
430878
0
Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of adopting the intervention
Query!
Assessment method [5]
430878
0
No primary data collected. Existing literature and effectiveness outcomes derived from primary outcome 1. Changes to health benefits will be estimated in QALYs using the number of life years gained from reduced infection outcomes, the mortality effects; and the valuation of the relevant health states obtained from the study. A cost-effectiveness model will be developed to include prior distributions on costs and effectiveness parameters. This will be evaluated using probabilistic sensitivity analysis to estimate the posterior distributions of ‘change to costs’ and ‘change to QALY’ outcomes. The decision will be informed by plotting cost-effectiveness acceptability curves with threshold value between $0 and $100,000 per QALY gained. A health services perspective will be adopted for the analyses and a maximum willingness to pay for marginal health benefits of $28,000 will be used based on recent Australian research. We will determine QALY gained using the EuroQol-5D-5L tool and Visual Analogue Scale.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
430878
0
This secondary outcome will be assessed at the conclusion of the trial, when all hospitals have finished the intervention period.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
The eligible hospital will meet the following criteria:
• classified as a “Public acute group A hospital” by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare and
• have an intensive care unit and
• have on average, over 50,000 admissions each year and
Three Australian hospitals categorised by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare as either a principal referral hospital, public hospital (Group A) or private hospital (Group A) will participate in the study. We will randomly select three eligible wards, within each hospital. Wards will qualify for inclusion if they have one or more of the following characteristics enabling the recruitment of participants at greater risk of HAP: medical ward, stroke ward, patients with an average age greater than 70 years. Eligible wards must have a turnover of approximately 150 patients per month.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Exclusions include: any unit that cares for ventilated patients, paediatric, neonatal, adolescent, mental health, medical admission units and wards managing specific respiratory conditions e.g., COVID-19.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
A research assistant will collect data from patients’ records (electronic medical record and pathology). The research assistant will be blinded from knowing whether the ward they are collecting data on is a control or intervention ward. Thus, allocation was concealed as the person who determined if a subject was eligible for inclusion in the trial (the data collector) was unaware, when this decision was made, whether the patient was in the control or intervention period.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Randomisation for the study will be performed through the allocation of cluster identifiers prior to commencement of the intervention roll-out. There will be sequential roll-out of the intervention. All wards receive the intervention, with the timing randomised. An independent statistician will be responsible for computer generation of the allocation times and the allocation of hospital identifiers. Wards will be informed of their intervention start date four weeks prior.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
6/05/2024
Query!
Actual
3/06/2024
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
19/12/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
19/12/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
15000
Query!
Accrual to date
1000
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,VIC
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
315624
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
315624
0
Medical Research Future Fund, administered by the National Health and Medical Research Council
Query!
Address [1]
315624
0
National Health and Medical Research Council GPO Box 1421 Canberra ACT 2601
Query!
Country [1]
315624
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
Avondale University
Query!
Address
582 Freemans Drive, Cooranbong NSW 2265 Australia
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
317718
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
317718
0
Query!
Address [1]
317718
0
Query!
Country [1]
317718
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
314507
0
Hunter New England Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
314507
0
Locked Bag 1 New Lambton NSW 2305
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
314507
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
314507
0
16/11/2023
Query!
Approval date [1]
314507
0
19/12/2023
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
314507
0
2023/ETH02447
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Why this study is important? Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are acquired as a direct or indirect result of healthcare. Infections associated with healthcare are not inevitable, and prevention programmes have been successful at reducing the incidence of some HAIs. In Australia, we have estimated 160,000 patients contract a HAI annually. Furthermore, one in ten patients today have an infection acquired in hospital. Non-ventilator hospital-associated pneumonia (HAP) is the most common type of HAI, accounting for approximately one third of these infections, with an estimated 50,000 patients affected each year in Australian public hospitals alone. HAP is associated with increased length of stay in hospital, increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs.Approximately 19% of patients with HAP require transfer into an intensive care unit (ICU), with mortality reported at 18%. Patients with HAP are eight times more likely Our study will: Evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the intervention Develop educational and digital resources and evaluate these as part of the trial Estimate excess length of stay in hospital associated with HAP Describe the patient’s experience of a having a HAP Understand the clinician’s experience of implementing the intervention Assess the impact of HAP on quality of life
Query!
Trial website
happenstudy.com
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
131830
0
Prof Brett Mitchell
Query!
Address
131830
0
Avondale University, 582 Freemans Drive, Cooranbong NSW 2265 Australia
Query!
Country
131830
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
131830
0
+61 24980 2213
Query!
Fax
131830
0
Query!
Email
131830
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
131831
0
Brett Mitchell
Query!
Address
131831
0
Avondale University, 582 Freemans Drive, Cooranbong NSW 2265 Australia
Query!
Country
131831
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
131831
0
+61 24980 2213
Query!
Fax
131831
0
Query!
Email
131831
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
131832
0
Brett Mitchell
Query!
Address
131832
0
Avondale University, 582 Freemans Drive, Cooranbong NSW 2265 Australia
Query!
Country
131832
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
131832
0
+61 24980 2213
Query!
Fax
131832
0
Query!
Email
131832
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
No; IPD will not be available.
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF