Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12624000199516
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
23/01/2024
Date registered
29/02/2024
Date last updated
29/07/2024
Date data sharing statement initially provided
29/02/2024
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Comparison between face masks and mouthpieces: effects on measurement of cough strength and use of a cough assist machine
Query!
Scientific title
Comparison between oronasal and mouthpiece interfaces: effects on peak cough flow measurement and mechanical insufflation-exsufflation treatment in people with known or suspected respiratory muscle weakness
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
311341
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Respiratory muscle weakness
332600
0
Query!
Neuromuscular disease
332601
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Neurological
329297
329297
0
0
Query!
Other neurological disorders
Query!
Neurological
329298
329298
0
0
Query!
Neurodegenerative diseases
Query!
Respiratory
329562
329562
0
0
Query!
Other respiratory disorders / diseases
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Stage 1 of the study
The use of a mouthpiece interface will be compared to an oronasal (face) mask interface during the measurement of unassisted peak cough flow using a peak flow meter in people with known or suspected respiratory muscle weakness. Assessment of unassisted peak cough flow will be:
- performed with participants in the upright seated position
- performed using a nose peg when the mouthpiece interface is being used
- five repetitions of peak cough flow measurement will be performed with each interface, at least 30 seconds apart with at least a five minute rest between interfaces. Each peak cough flow measurement value will be recorded on a data collection form
- performed by a physiotherapist with >7 years experience in the performance of bedside respiratory function tests in people with neuromuscular weakness
- performed in the respiratory outpatient department at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital or in the participant's home
- Stage 1 of the study will be completed during a single visit
- It is anticipated that Stage 1 study procedures will be completed within 20 minutes
Stage 2 of the study
In participants from Stage 1 of the study with reduced cough strength (peak cough flow <270L/min) and where mechanical in-exsufflation is deemed appropriate, the use of a mouthpiece interface will be compared to an oronasal mask interface during mechanical in-exsufflation. Assessment of peak cough flow during mechanical in-exsufflation using a mouthpiece and oronasal mask interface will be:
- performed with participants in the upright seated position
- mechanical in-exsufflation settings will be individually titrated while using an oronasal mask prior to commencing Stage 2 of the study. Settings will then be fixed for the comparison between interfaces
- five repetitions of mechanical in-exsufflation will be performed via each interface and peak cough flow measurement via the mechanical in-exsufflation machine will be recorded on a data collection form. Mechanical in-exsufflation cycles will be performed at least 30 seconds apart with at least a five minute rest between interfaces
- performed by a physiotherapist with >7 years experience in the delivery of mechanical in-exsufflation therapy in people with respiratory muscle weakness
- performed in the respiratory outpatient department at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital or in the participant's home
- Stage 2 of the study will be completed during a single visit. This may be on the same day as Stage 1 of the study, or at the participant's request, on another day
- It is anticipated that Stage 2 study procedures will be completed within 20 minutes
Data from Stage 1 and Stage 2 will be analyzed separately. Participants included in Stage 2 of the study will have completed Stage 1 of the study. However, participants from Stage 1 of the study will only be eligible for Stage 2 of the study if unassisted peak cough flow <270L/min.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
327807
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Intervention code [2]
327808
0
Diagnosis / Prognosis
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Participants will act as their own control (randomised cross-over study) to enable comparison of mouthpiece and oronasal face mask interfaces during measurement of unassisted peak cough flow and measurement of peak cough flow during mechanical in-exsufflation therapy.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
337155
0
Stage 1: Unassisted peak cough flow (L/min) with the oronasal mask compared to the mouthpiece interface
Query!
Assessment method [1]
337155
0
Stage 1: Mini Wright peak flow meter attached to each interface
Query!
Timepoint [1]
337155
0
Stage 1: All measures will be completed during a single visit . Unassisted peak cough flow will be recorded on the data collection form immediately after each manoeuvre is performed.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
337156
0
Stage 2: Peak cough flow (L/min) during mechanical in-exsufflation with the oronasal mask compared to the mouthpiece interface
Query!
Assessment method [2]
337156
0
Stage 2: The mechanical in-exsufflation machine will measure and display peak cough flow real-time for each interface
Query!
Timepoint [2]
337156
0
Stage 2: All measures will be completed in a single visit (this may be the same visit as Stage 1). Peak cough flow measured using the mechanical in-exsufflation device will be recorded on the data collection form immediately after each manoeuvre is performed.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
430879
0
Stage 2: Impact of oronasal and mouthpiece interfaces on cough effectiveness during mechanical in-exsufflation.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
430879
0
Stage 2: A download of flow-time and pressure-time waveforms from the mechanical in-exsufflation device will be performed at the end of data collection in Stage 2. A blinded assessor will review waveforms and assess for the presence of inspiratory leaks and airflow obstruction, determine the synchronisation between participant and device inspiratory and expiratory times, and measure peak cough flow (excluding the gas decompression spike) for each cough manoeuvre performed with both oronasal mask and mouthpiece interfaces.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
430879
0
Stage 2: All measures will be completed during a single visit (this may be the same visit as Stage 1). Waveform data will be downloaded after Stage 2 data collection has been completed. Flow-time and pressure-time waveforms will be reviewed for each cough manoeuvre using the oronasal mask and mouthpiece interfaces on the mechanical in-exsufflation device.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
430880
0
Comparison of real-time peak cough flow (L/min) displayed on the device screen and peak cough flow (L/min) determined by assessment of flow-time waveform data for oronasal mask and mouthpiece interfaces during mechanical in-exsufflation.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
430880
0
Real-time peak cough flow (L/min) is measured by the mechanical in-exsufflation device and represents the peak flow rate detected during exhalation for each cough manoeuvre. This value is displayed on the device screen after each cough manoeuvre is performed. Peak cough flow (L/min) will also be determined manually by downloading flow-time waveform data after using the mechancial in-exsufflation device. The expiratory waveform for each cough manoeuvre will be assessed and peak cough flow (L/min) determined after the gas decompression spike has been excluded.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
430880
0
Stage 2: All measures will be completed during a single visit (this may be the same visit as Stage 1). Peak cough flow measured using the mechanical in-exsufflation device will be displayed on the device screen immediately after the in-exsufflation cycle (i.e. real-time) is performed will be recorded on the data collection form immediately after each manoeuvre. This real-time measure of peak cough flow will be compared to peak cough flow derived from review of the flow-time waveform data, i.e. the first real-time peak cough flow value using the oronasal mask will be compared with the first flow-time waveform peak cough flow value for the oronasal mask and so on. The flow-time waveform data will be downloaded after Stage 2 data collection has been completed. Flow-time waveforms will be reviewed for each cough manoeuvre using the oronasal mask and mouthpiece interfaces on the mechanical in-exsufflation device.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
430881
0
Stage 1 Participant interface preference: Ease of use
Query!
Assessment method [3]
430881
0
100mm visual analogue scale (0mm = extremely difficult, 100mm = extremely easy)
Query!
Timepoint [3]
430881
0
Stage 1: All measures will be completed during a single visit. The Ease of use visual analogue scale for the oronasal mask will be completed after the five measures of unassisted peak cough flow using the oronasal mask has been completed, and for the mouthpiece after the five measures of unassisted peak cough flow have been performed using the mouthpiece.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
431552
0
Stage 2 Participant interface preference: Comfort
Query!
Assessment method [4]
431552
0
100mm visual analogue scale (0mm = extremely uncomfortable, 100mm = extremely uncomfortable)
Query!
Timepoint [4]
431552
0
Stage 2: All measures will be completed during a single visit (this may be the same visit as Stage 1). The Comfort visual analogue scale for the oronasal mask will be completed after the five measures of peak cough flow using the mechanical in-exsufflation device with the oronasal mask has been completed, and for the mouthpiece after the five measures of peak cough flow using the mechanical in-exsufflation device have been performed using the mouthpiece.
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
431557
0
Stage 2 Participant interface preference: Ease of use
Query!
Assessment method [5]
431557
0
100mm visual analogue scale (0mm = extremely difficult, 100mm = extremely easy)
Query!
Timepoint [5]
431557
0
Stage 2: All measures will be completed during a single visit (this may be the same visit as Stage 1). The Ease of use visual analogue scale for the oronasal mask will be completed after the five measures of peak cough flow using the mechanical in-exsufflation device with the oronasal mask has been completed, and for the mouthpiece after the five measures of peak cough flow using the mechanical in-exsufflation device have been performed using the mouthpiece.
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
431558
0
Stage 2 Participant interface preference: Effectiveness
Query!
Assessment method [6]
431558
0
100mm visual analogue scale (0mm = extremely ineffective, 100mm = extremely effective)
Query!
Timepoint [6]
431558
0
Stage 2: All measures will be completed during a single visit (this may be the same visit as Stage 1). The Effectiveness visual analogue scale for the oronasal mask will be completed after the five measures of peak cough flow using the mechanical in-exsufflation device with the oronasal mask has been completed, and for the mouthpiece after the five measures of peak cough flow using the mechanical in-exsufflation device have been performed using the mouthpiece.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Stage 1 and Stage 2 of the study:
-Medically stable individuals with suspected or known respiratory muscle weakness who are
greater than or equal to 18 years of age
- Able to provide informed consent and willing to participate and comply with the study requirements
Additional criteria for Stage 2 of the study:
- Free from contraindications to forced manoeuvres or positive pressure ventilation
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Stage 1
- Inability to follow instructions
- Inability to understand written or verbal English
- Inability to obtain a seal lip with a mouthpiece
- Pain or other conditions that may impede cough
- Tracheostomy
- Standard contraindications to forced respiratory manoeuvres
Stage 2
- Standard contraindications to positive pressure therapy
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Sealed opaque envelopes
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Computerised sequence generation
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Crossover
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Paired oronasal mask and mouthpiece peak cough flow measures will be compared using Bland Altman analysis (Bland & Altman, 1986).
Secondary outcome measures including participant perception of ease of use, comfort and effectiveness of the two interfaces in both Stages will be analysed with paired t-tests to compare mean results of the two measurements. Interface preference in both Stages will be calculated as percentages and analysed using a Chi squared test to compare between the two interfaces.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
18/03/2024
Query!
Actual
10/04/2024
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
31/12/2024
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
43
Query!
Accrual to date
22
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
26078
0
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital - Camperdown
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
41933
0
2050 - Camperdown
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
315594
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
315594
0
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Query!
Address [1]
315594
0
Query!
Country [1]
315594
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Government body
Query!
Name
Sydney Local Health District
Query!
Address
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Rd, Camperdown NSW 2050
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
317689
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
317689
0
Query!
Address [1]
317689
0
Query!
Country [1]
317689
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
314485
0
Sydney Local Health District HREC (RPA zone)
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
314485
0
Research Ethics and Governance Office (REGO), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Rd, Camperdown NSW 2050
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
314485
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
314485
0
28/11/2023
Query!
Approval date [1]
314485
0
14/02/2024
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
314485
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The aim of this research project is to investigate whether the type of interface (a face mask or a mouthpiece) used during the measurement of cough strength, called peak cough flow, changes the values obtained. While face masks are commonly used during measurements of cough strength in clinical practice, a mouthpiece can also be used. However, it is unclear whether these interfaces are interchangeable. This is important to know as differences in the measurement of cough strength due to interface type could delay access to therapies to improve cough strength. If an individual is found to have a weak cough, therapies such as a cough assist machine can be used to improve cough effectiveness. Again, both face mask and mouthpiece interfaces are used with the cough assist machine but it is unclear if interface type changes the effectiveness of the cough assist machine. Currently no studies have compared face masks and mouthpieces in the measurement of cough strength in people with respiratory muscle weakness. Similarly, there is no information about how these two interfaces studies effect how cough assist machines perform or how comfortable each interface is to use.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
131754
0
Dr Collette Menadue
Query!
Address
131754
0
Sleep Unit, Level 11, Building 75, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Rd, Camperdown NSW 2050
Query!
Country
131754
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
131754
0
+61 295158708
Query!
Fax
131754
0
Query!
Email
131754
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
131755
0
Collette Menadue
Query!
Address
131755
0
Sleep Unit, Level 11, Building 75, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Rd, Camperdown NSW 2050
Query!
Country
131755
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
131755
0
+61 295158708
Query!
Fax
131755
0
Query!
Email
131755
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
131756
0
Collette Menadue
Query!
Address
131756
0
Sleep Unit, Level 11, Building 75, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Rd, Camperdown NSW 2050
Query!
Country
131756
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
131756
0
+61 295158708
Query!
Fax
131756
0
Query!
Email
131756
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Consent will not be obtained for future use of data
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF