Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12624000217505p
Ethics application status
Submitted, not yet approved
Date submitted
8/01/2024
Date registered
5/03/2024
Date last updated
5/03/2024
Date data sharing statement initially provided
5/03/2024
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
JOURNEYS - Where are the inequities in the journey from health to gynaecological cancer in Aotearoa New Zealand?
Query!
Scientific title
JOURNEYS - Health care system barriers leading to inequities in the journey from health to gynaecological cancer in Aotearoa New Zealand for people diagnosed in 2024 - 2025
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
311433
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1299-2338
Query!
Trial acronym
JOURNEYS
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Gynaecological cancer
332513
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
329197
329197
0
0
Query!
Cervical (cervix)
Query!
Cancer
329198
329198
0
0
Query!
Ovarian and primary peritoneal
Query!
Cancer
329199
329199
0
0
Query!
Womb (Uterine or endometrial cancer)
Query!
Cancer
329200
329200
0
0
Query!
Other cancer types
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Query!
Patient registry
False
Query!
Target follow-up duration
Query!
Target follow-up type
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
The study will use a descriptive mixed-methods analysis to document the journey of a cohort of people with a newly-diagnosed ovarian, cervical, endometrial, or vulval cancer including their location, timeline of health touch points, and individual stories, told in their own language in a cultural context.
All eligible tangata will be approached by a trained research nurse at the time of their diagnosis (in person, if possible, or by other method such as phone or virtual meeting, if not possible), to obtain consent to access clinical data and separate consent to potentially take part in a future interview.
525 people will be recruited over 12 months including 85 Maori, 85 Pasifika, and 85 rural people. A real-time audit of clinical notes (from primary, secondary, and tertiary care) will be undertaken by a researcher or research nurse. Clinical notes will be used to create a timeline and description of clinical appointments related to their cancer investigation, diagnosis, and treatment.
After completion of study recruitment and analysis of quantitative clinical data, purposive maximum variation sampling will be used to identify 20–30 study participants to undertake a one-off, one-to-one, semi-structured interview of up to 60 minutes duration. The group to be interviewed will include at least 6 Maori, 6 Pacific, and 6 people with remote or low urban accessibility, and selection will be guided by the findings of the quantitative clinical data. People will only be approached (by a trained culturally appropriate researcher or research nurse) if, at time of recruitment, they had provided separate consent to take part in a future interview. A trained culturally appropriate researcher or research nurse will undertake the semi-structured interviews.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
327726
0
Not applicable
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
No control group
Query!
Control group
Uncontrolled
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
337036
0
Proportion of participants who do not have treatment beginning within 31 days of a decision being made that they will have that treatment (New Zealand Faster Cancer Treatment target 1)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
337036
0
Review of medical records will be used to determine the time between the date of decision to treat and the date of first cancer treatment for each participant.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
337036
0
Cumulative data will be assessed 3 months after the final participant has been enrolled.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
337037
0
Proportion of participants referred urgently with a high suspicion of gynaecological cancer who do not receive their first cancer treatment within 62 days (New Zealand Faster Cancer Treatment target 2)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
337037
0
Review of medical records will be used to determine the time between the date of referral and the date of first cancer treatment for each participant.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
337037
0
Cumulative data will be assessed 3 months after the final participant has been enrolled.
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
337039
0
Identify patterns and themes in the responses to semi-structured interviews of 20-30 study participants.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
337039
0
Purposive maximum variation sampling will be used to identify 20–30 study participants to undertake a one-off, one-to-one, semi-structured interview of up to 60 minutes duration.
In addition to ensuring that the group includes at least 6 Maori, 6 Pasifika, and 6 tangata with remote or low urban accessibility, those invited to share their stories will be guided by the findings of the timeline touch point analysis of clinical data. We will use theoretical sampling based on timeline touch point analysis to target people from both the fastest and slowest quartiles for total clinical journey. Additional interviews may be undertaken if information is lacking around particular delay types or geographical differences identified by the quantitative analysis.
Semi-structured interview scripts will include questions to describe pre-diagnostic symptoms, number of symptoms, whether people were diagnosed in the course of other medical investigations or as a result of symptom investigation, number of people experiencing one or more diagnostic delays, perceptions of doctors’ attribution of presented symptoms to non-cancer causes and their treatment, perceived barriers to clinical investigation, and perceived impact of restrictions implemented during the global pandemic on access to health care. Interviews will be recorded and transcripts analysed using reflexive thematic analysis (facilitated through NVivo software) to identify patterns and themes in the responses.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
337039
0
Interviews will be undertaken as soon as possible after (and within 6 months of) clinical data being collected
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
430441
0
Proportion of participants referred urgently with a high suspicion of gynaecological cancer who do not have their first specialist assessment within 14 days.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
430441
0
Review of medical records will be used to determine the time between the date of referral and the date of first specialist assessment
Query!
Timepoint [1]
430441
0
Cumulative data will be assessed 3 months after the final participant has been enrolled.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
430442
0
Proportion of participants needing radiotherapy or systemic therapy who do not receive their first treatment within four weeks of the decision to treat.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
430442
0
Review of medical records will be used to determine the time between the date of the decision to treat and first radiotherapy or systemic therapy treatment.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
430442
0
Cumulative data will be assessed 3 months after the final participant has been enrolled.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
430443
0
Proportion of participants with postmenopausal bleeding or clinical suspicion of a pelvic mass who are not offered an appointment for a pelvic ultrasound that falls within two weeks of the date of receipt of that referral.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
430443
0
Review of medical records will be used to determine the time between the date of the receipt of referral and the date of first pelvic ultrasound.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
430443
0
Cumulative data will be assessed 3 months after the final participant has been enrolled.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
430444
0
Proportion of participants with a new diagnosis of gynaecological malignancy who are not offered an appointment for radiological investigations required for treatment planning that falls within two weeks of the date of receipt of that referral.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
430444
0
Review of medical records will be used to determine the time between the date of the receipt of referral and the date of first radiological investigation.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
430444
0
Cumulative data will be assessed 3 months after the final participant has been enrolled.
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
430450
0
Proportion of participants, who meet referral criteria, who are not discussed at an MDM meeting within 14 days of referral.
Query!
Assessment method [5]
430450
0
Review of medical records will be used to determine the time between the date of the receipt of eligible referral and the date of MDM discussion.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
430450
0
Cumulative data will be assessed 3 months after the final participant has been enrolled.
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
430451
0
Proportion of participants with a diagnosis of gynaecological cancer who do not have contact with their gynaecological cancer clinical nurse specialist or other health professional who will help coordinate her care within seven days of receipt of their diagnosis.
Query!
Assessment method [6]
430451
0
Review of medical records will be used to determine the time between the date of diagnosis and date of first contact with the clinical nurse specialist or other health professional who will help coordinate her care.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
430451
0
Cumulative data will be assessed 3 months after the final participant has been enrolled.
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
431835
0
Proportion of participants who do not have their provisional or final pathology reports communicated with the lead clinician within 10 working days of the specimen being taken.
Query!
Assessment method [7]
431835
0
Review of medical records will be used to determine the time between the date of first histological specimen being collected and the date of provisional or final pathology report.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
431835
0
Cumulative data will be assessed 3 months after the final participant has been enrolled.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
A new diagnosis of ovarian, cervical, vulval, or endometrial cancer
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Unwilling or unable to provide informed consent (e.g., due to being too unwell to provide informed consent).
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Psychosocial
Query!
Duration
Longitudinal
Query!
Selection
Defined population
Query!
Timing
Both
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
The study populations will be described by age, prioritised ethnicity, co-morbidities,[1, 2] NZ socioeconomic deprivation index, urban accessibility [8], cancer type, and stage of cancer at diagnosis. Associations between groups and demographic and clinical characteristics will be tested statistically using chi-square or linear-by-linear tests for categorical or ordinal variables, respectively. Risk ratios versus reference levels will be calculated with 95% confidence intervals for each independent variable using generalised linear regression models. The time from first relevant health contact to diagnosis, will be presented graphically using cumulative distribution plots and summarised in tables by key characteristic variables.
The proportion of people exceeding Aotearoa NZ Faster Cancer treatment targets and current model of practice for diagnosis and treatment of gynaecological cancer timelines will be determined for the whole group and stratified by ethnicity, NZ socioeconomic deprivation index, and urban accessibility. Timeline analyses will be used to identify points of inequity at primary, secondary, and tertiary care levels.
We have based our recruitment ethnicity estimations on 2019 National Cancer registrations [3] which reported 1197 ovarian, cervical, endometrial, or vulval cancer diagnoses. Of these, 15% were Maori and 85% were non-Maori tangata. In addition, our recruitment estimations to assess geographical differences have been informed by Environmental Health Intelligence New Zealand (EHINZ) [4] which indicates that approximately 16% of the total NZ population (and 18% of Maori) live in rural areas. However, study estimates also take into account evidence that incidence of cancer overall is lower among those living in rural areas.[5] Indeed, in our most recent national review of cervical cancer occurrences (2013-2017),[6] we reported that 13% of tangata diagnosed with cervical cancer had a rural home address.
A power analysis was undertaken to determine recruitment targets based on data from our recent national cervical cancer audit.[6] Of 1009 women with a high-grade cytology prior to their diagnosis, 86% of European were diagnosed within 6 months of their high-grade cytology result. In contrast, Maori and Pasifika tangata were nearly twice as likely to have a delay from high-grade cytology to diagnosis of more than 6 months. We used these results as a basis for our sample-size power calculations for a cohort study using OpenEPI.[7] The sample size estimate recommended a reference group sample of 323 tangata and a comparison group sample of 85 tangata (2-sided significance level 95%; 80% power; ratio of sample size 3.83; risk/prevalence ratio of 2, Fleiss with continuity correction). The study will be powered for separate Maori and Pasifika primary outcomes, thus, based on our power analysis, the overall recruitment target will be 525 tangata over a 12-month period and include at least 85 Maori, 85 Pasifika, 85 tangata with a home address indicating low urban accessibility or a more remote classification (as defined by Stats NZ Tatauranga Aotearoa),[8] and 325 non-Maori non-Pasifika tangata.
1. Charlson ME, Carrozzino D, Guidi J, Patierno C. Charlson Comorbidity Index: A Critical Review of Clinimetric Properties. Psychother Psychosom. 2022;91:8-35.
2. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, Mackenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373-83.
3. Cancer: New registrations and deaths 2019. 2021. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health. ^https://www.health.govt.nz/publication/new-cancer-registrations-2019
4. Urban–rural profile. EHINZ: Environmental Health Intelligence New Zealand; Access date: 6/11/2022, 2022. Available from:^https://www.ehinz.ac.nz/indicators/population-vulnerability/urbanrural-profile/
5. Robson B, Purdie G, Cormack D. Unequal Impact II: Maori and Non-Maori Cancer Statistics 2002-2006. 2010. Wellington: Ministry of Health.
6. Sykes P, Williman J, Innes C, Hider P. Review of Cervical Cancer Occurrences in relation to Screening History in New Zealand for the years 2013-2017. 2020. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health. ^https://www.nsu.govt.nz/system/files/resources/cancer-case-review-2013-2017-final-report-29-august-2019.pdf
7. Dean AG, Sullivan KM, Soe MM. OpenEpi: Open Source Epidemiologic Statistics for Public Health, 2013.
8. Urban accessibility – methodology and classification. Wellington, New Zealand: Stats NZ Tatauranga Aotearoa; Access date: 28 October, 2021. Available from:^https://www.stats.govt.nz/methods/urban-accessibility-methodology-and-classification
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/04/2024
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
31/03/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
30/09/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
525
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
26063
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [1]
26063
0
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
315530
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
315530
0
Health Research Council of New Zealand
Query!
Address [1]
315530
0
Health Research Council of New Zealand, Level 1 South Tower, 110 Symonds Street, Grafton, Auckland 1010
Query!
Country [1]
315530
0
New Zealand
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
University of Otago
Query!
Address
362 Leith Street, Dunedin North, Dunedin 9016
Query!
Country
New Zealand
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
317615
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
317615
0
Query!
Address [1]
317615
0
Query!
Country [1]
317615
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Submitted, not yet approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
314430
0
Northern B Health and Disability Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
314430
0
Ministry of Health Health and Disability Ethics Committees PO Box 5013 Wellington 6140
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
314430
0
New Zealand
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
314430
0
01/03/2024
Query!
Approval date [1]
314430
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
314430
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Compared with non-Maori, Maori and Pasifika wahine have a higher incidence and mortality from gynaecological cancer in Aotearoa NZ. Of particular concern, the incidence of endometrial cancer in young women in Aotearoa NZ is increasing faster than anywhere else in the world and the greatest burden of this lies in Maori and Pasifika wahine. Inequities can occur at any stage along the pathway from health to gynaecological cancer and also between different ethnicities and geographical regions. This research study will identify the cultural, geographical, and timeline inequities in the journey from health to gynaecological cancer across all of Aotearoa NZ. Through investigation of health data and interviews with wahine newly-diagnosed with gynaecological cancer, we will document the ethnicity, timetable, and geographical location, of presentations to health care services, clinical investigations, stage and disease burden at diagnosis, and consider barriers to accessing health care or investigations.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Timely access to services as specified in the New Zealand Faster Cancer Treatment (FCT) targets and proposed in the Standards of service provision for gynaecological cancer patients in New Zealand (Standards 1, 2, 6, 12, 15:(references 1-4) Standard 1 • Women referred urgently with a high suspicion of gynaecological cancer have their first specialist assessment (FSA) within 14 days. • Women with a confirmed diagnosis of gynaecological cancer receive their first treatment within 31 days of the decision to treat. • Women referred urgently with a high suspicion of gynaecological cancer receive their first cancer treatment within 62 days. • Women needing radiotherapy or systemic therapy receive their first treatment within four weeks of the decision to treat. Standard 2 • Women with postmenopausal bleeding or clinical suspicion of a pelvic mass are offered an appointment for a pelvic ultrasound that falls within two weeks of the date of receipt of that referral. Standard 6 • Women with a new diagnosis of gynaecological malignancy are offered an appointment for radiological investigations required for treatment planning that falls within two weeks of the date of receipt of that referral. Standard 12 • The MDM discussion takes place within 14 days of referral (provided referral criteria are met). Standard 15 • Women with a diagnosis of gynaecological cancer have contact with their gynaecological cancer clinical nurse specialist or other health professional who will help coordinate her care within seven days of receipt of their diagnosis. Pathology Review Good Practice Point 3.3 • Provisional or final pathology reports are communicated with the lead clinician within 10 working days of the specimen being taken. REFERENCES 1. Askew C, Gangji A. Gynaecological cancer pathway for faster cancer treatment: a clinical audit. N Z Med J. 2016;129:79-89. 2. Ha M, Gangji A. Faster Cancer Treatment pathway in gynaecological malignancy: a repeat clinical audit. N Z Med J. 2018;131:45-55. 3. Cherry RJ, Gangji A. Gynaecological cancer pathway for faster cancer treatment: a repeat clinical audit. N Z Med J. 2022;135:74-85. 4. Standards of Service Provision for Gynaecological Cancer Patients in New Zealand - Provisional. 2013. Wellington: Ministry of Health. ^https://cancerhub.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/standards-of-service-provision-gynaecological-cancer-patients-jan14.doc
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
131554
0
Dr Carrie Innes
Query!
Address
131554
0
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Otago, Christchurch, 2 Riccarton Ave, PO Box 4345, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
Query!
Country
131554
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
131554
0
+64 3 364 4625
Query!
Fax
131554
0
Query!
Email
131554
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
131555
0
Carrie Innes
Query!
Address
131555
0
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Otago, Christchurch, 2 Riccarton Ave, PO Box 4345, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
Query!
Country
131555
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
131555
0
+64 3 364 4625
Query!
Fax
131555
0
Query!
Email
131555
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
131556
0
Carrie Innes
Query!
Address
131556
0
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Otago, Christchurch, 2 Riccarton Ave, PO Box 4345, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
Query!
Country
131556
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
131556
0
+64 3 364 4625
Query!
Fax
131556
0
Query!
Email
131556
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Doc. No.
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
21332
Study protocol
[email protected]
21334
Informed consent form
[email protected]
21335
Ethical approval
[email protected]
21336
Clinical study report
[email protected]
21337
Other
[email protected]
Participant Information Sheet, Data management pla...
[
More Details
]
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF