Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12623000617662
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
26/05/2023
Date registered
6/06/2023
Date last updated
11/08/2024
Date data sharing statement initially provided
6/06/2023
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Positive Beliefs about the Future and Suicidal Ideation in University Students
Query!
Scientific title
Evaluating the Efficacy of Positive Episodic Future Thinking (EFT-P) to Increase Positive Beliefs about the Future and Decrease Suicidal Ideation in University Students
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
309746
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1293-0495
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Suicidal Ideation
330142
0
Query!
Schizotypy
330143
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Mental Health
327022
327022
0
0
Query!
Suicide
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Participants will complete 8 sessions of positive episodic future thinking (EFT-P) every 4 days, over the course of 28 days. In each of the EFT-P sessions, participants will be provided with a series of audio prompts on the Qualtrics platform, each corresponding to a new visualisation exercise where participants will be encouraged to close their eyes and immerse themselves in the described scenario as though they were actively involved and experiencing it through their own eyes. Each of these sessions will last roughly 15 minutes. On Days 0, 12, 28, and 42, participants will be asked to complete pre-, mid-, post-, and follow-up questionnaires. These will each take roughly 20 minutes to complete.
In each of the sessions during the first and second weeks (Days 0, 4, 8, and 12), formal training exercises will consist of the imagination of four positive hypothetical events. In each exercise, participants will listen to a recording of a script, verbally guiding them through the imagination of a positive scenario or activity. In each session in the third week (Days 16 and 20), there will be three guided exercises. In each exercise, participants will listen to a recording of a script which will prompt them to imagine a pleasant experience that will really happen to them within the next three days. In each session in the fourth week (Days 24 and 28), there will be three guided exercises. In each exercise, participants will listen to a recording of a script which will ask them to think about an event in the far future that involves their idealised self in a future where everything has worked out in the best possible way.
Qualtrics analytics will be used to monitor adherence to the intervention. Completion rates will be tracked for each stage of the intervention, and time spent on activities will be measured to ensure participants are engaging adequately. Response quality will be assessed with manipulation checks after each exercise, evaluating vividness, difficulty, pleasure, and excitement of visualisations. In two open-response spaces, participants will be asked to write down as many details from their visualisation as possible. In addition, psychometric measures in the surveys will incorporate measures of participants' disingenuous responses (e.g., "To show you are reading, select the answer that means strongly disagree").
Query!
Intervention code [1]
326187
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Participants will not complete any sessions of EFT-P. They will complete the same online surveys as the intevention group at the same time points relative to their commencement of participation in the study. That is, participants will be asked to complete four online surveys at Days 0, 12, 28, and 42. These online surveys will contain psychometric measures of suicidal ideation, beliefs related to the future and one's capacity to experience pleasure, mood, schizotypy, and use of mental imagery. Each of these surveys will take roughly 20 minutes to complete.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
334885
0
Severity of recent suicidal ideation: Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS).
Query!
Assessment method [1]
334885
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
334885
0
Baseline, 12 days, 28 days (primary timepoint), and 42 days after intervention commencement.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
334943
0
Participants' beliefs related to their future experience of pleasureable events: Beliefs About Pleasure Scale (BAPS).
Query!
Assessment method [2]
334943
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
334943
0
Baseline, 12 days, 28 days (primary timepoint), and 42 days after intervention commencement.
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
334944
0
Participants' beliefs related to their ability to enjoy future events: Savoring Beliefs Inventory (SBI).
Query!
Assessment method [3]
334944
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
334944
0
Baseline, 12 days, 28 days (primary timepoint), and 42 days after intervention commencement.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
422342
0
Participants' self-defeating beliefs, social indifference beliefs, and expectancies of low pleasure: Demotivating Beliefs Inventory (DBI)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
422342
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
422342
0
Baseline, 12 days, 28 days, and 42 days after intervention commencement.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
422499
0
Current affect: Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
422499
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
422499
0
Baseline, 12 days, 28 days, and 42 days after intervention commencement.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
422500
0
Future Orientation: Future Orientation Scale (FOS)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
422500
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
422500
0
Baseline, 12 days, 28 days, and 42 days after intervention commencement.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Participants will be undergraduate psychology students from the University of Otago. They will be asked to take part in this study if they had previously indicated experiencing suicidal ideation in the past month.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
45
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
None
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Allocation is not concealed
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
The randomisation feature in Qualtrics
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Assuming a medium effect size of 0.5 and alpha level of 0.05, a power analysis suggests that a sample size of 31 participants would be required to achieve 90% power to detect a significant difference between pre-, mid-, post-, and follow-up intervention scores on the primary outcome measure (suicidal ideation) using a repeated-measures ANOVA. To accommodate a control group in the sample size, a total sample size of 62 participants would be needed to achieve 90% power to detect a significant difference between the intervention and control groups using a mixed-design ANOVA.
It is possible that some participants may drop out or fail to complete all the assessments. Assuming a 30% dropout rate, it is reasonable to aim for a sample size of at least 80 participants to ensure adequate statistical power and account for potential attrition.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/08/2023
Query!
Actual
7/09/2023
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/08/2024
Query!
Actual
20/06/2024
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
15/09/2024
Query!
Actual
2/08/2024
Query!
Sample size
Target
100
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
127
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
25557
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [1]
25557
0
Otago
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
313933
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
313933
0
University of Otago
Query!
Address [1]
313933
0
275 Leith Walk
Dunedin North
Dunedin 9016
Query!
Country [1]
313933
0
New Zealand
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
University of Otago
Query!
Address
275 Leith Walk
Dunedin North
Dunedin 9016
Query!
Country
New Zealand
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
315800
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
315800
0
Query!
Address [1]
315800
0
Query!
Country [1]
315800
0
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
282688
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
282688
0
A/Professor Richard Linscott
Query!
Address [1]
282688
0
Department of Psychology
University of Otago
275 Leith Walk
Dunedin North
Dunedin 9016
Query!
Country [1]
282688
0
New Zealand
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
313078
0
Health and Disability Ethics Committees
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
313078
0
Ministry of Health Health and Disability Ethics Committees PO Box 5013 Wellington 6140
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
313078
0
New Zealand
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
313078
0
26/07/2023
Query!
Approval date [1]
313078
0
06/09/2023
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
313078
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
We seek to determine whether an online psychological intervention (positive episodic future thinking, EFT-P) effectively increases positive beliefs about the future and decreases suicidal ideation. Through this, we seek to understand how personality influences the beliefs that one holds and one’s responsiveness to future reward and pleasure over time, and whether these influence one’s propensity to think about suicide. Our first aim is to investigate whether one’s beliefs about the future can be altered by improving one’s ability to mentally simulate positive events in one’s personal future, and whether these increased positive beliefs lead to a reduction in suicidal thinking. A secondary aim was to examine who may benefit most from EFT-P. Specifically, we propose to examine whether EFT-P is more effective for people with schizotypy, a subclinical manifestation of schizophrenia. In addition, we examine whether the EFT-P’s effectiveness is associated with factors such as the individual’s mood, their existing tendency to use mental imagery in everyday scenarios, and their general optimism towards the future.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Understanding how specific personality traits contribute to the development of suicidality is important to decreasing the rates of suicide in the wider population. Schizotypy, the subclinical expression of schizophrenia, has been identified as an important predictor of suicidal thinking. As with schizophrenia, schizotypy has positive (e.g., hallucinations; delusions) and negative (e.g., decrease in emotional expression, motivation, and speech) components. Previous research has found that negative schizotypy predicts STB without any specific confounding factors (O’Hare et al., 2020). That is, evidence suggests that negative schizotypy may cause STB. In research we have conducted previously (University of Otago Human Ethics Committee (Health); H21/081, H22/095), we have found that this relationship is heavily influenced by anticipation of future pleasure and core beliefs relating to one’s personal future. These beliefs about the future could be modifiable, and increasing one’s positive beliefs about their future experience of pleasurable experiences could lead to a reduction in suicidal thinking. One approach that shows promise in improving people’s anticipation and beliefs are interventions aimed at improving one’s ability to mentally visualise positive future experiences (episodic future thinking, EFT; Hallford et al., 2020; Renner et al., 2019, 2021). In the proposed research, we investigate whether episodic future thinking of positive events (EFT-P) will be successful in reducing negative beliefs about the future and reducing suicidal thinking. In addition, we hope to determine whether EFT-P is more effective for individuals with high levels of negative schizotypy.
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
126918
0
Miss Rebecca Salzano
Query!
Address
126918
0
Department of Psychology
University of Otago
275 Leith Walk
Dunedin North
Dunedin 9016
Query!
Country
126918
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
126918
0
+64 22 403 2583
Query!
Fax
126918
0
Query!
Email
126918
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
126919
0
Rebecca Salzano
Query!
Address
126919
0
Department of Psychology
University of Otago
275 Leith Walk
Dunedin North
Dunedin 9016
Query!
Country
126919
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
126919
0
+64 22 403 2583
Query!
Fax
126919
0
Query!
Email
126919
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
126920
0
Rebecca Salzano
Query!
Address
126920
0
Department of Psychology
University of Otago
275 Leith Walk
Dunedin North
Dunedin 9016
Query!
Country
126920
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
126920
0
+64 22 403 2583
Query!
Fax
126920
0
Query!
Email
126920
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
In describing confidentiality to participants, we propose to undertake not disclosing to others any information they provide in the course of the research. It is crucial to maintain participants' privacy and autonomy, and sharing their information without their explicit consent could breach their confidentiality and compromise their trust in the study.
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Doc. No.
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
19258
Study protocol
385965-(Uploaded-25-05-2023-14-02-34)-Study-related document.docx
19259
Informed consent form
385965-(Uploaded-25-05-2023-13-40-12)-Study-related document.docx
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF