Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12623000157673
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
2/02/2023
Date registered
16/02/2023
Date last updated
16/02/2023
Date data sharing statement initially provided
16/02/2023
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Functional and self-reported outcomes of primary total knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis comparing two variations of the B.Braun prosthesis used in standard care
Query!
Scientific title
Primary hinged total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in severe osteoarthritis: A prospective study
of survival, patient function and satisfaction compared with unconstrained TKA
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
308892
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Osteoarthritis
328885
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Surgery
325880
325880
0
0
Query!
Surgical techniques
Query!
Musculoskeletal
325964
325964
0
0
Query!
Osteoarthritis
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Query!
Patient registry
True
Query!
Target follow-up duration
12
Query!
Target follow-up type
Months
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
This study has been designed to utilise a currently operating standard care system of functional and patient-reported data collection in order to compare patient reported outcome measures and satisfaction scores of patients 60 years and over at the time of surgery, receiving a B.Braun Enduro hinged knee prosthesis for osteoarthritis, to age-matched controls receiving a primary conventional B.Braun Columbus unconstrained prosthesis.
Furthermore, to determine early functional outcomes of patients receiving a hinged knee prosthesis at day 3, day 14 and 6 weeks post-operative; medium-term patient-reported outcomes at 6 and 12 months post-operative; complication, survival and revision rates following use of the hinged knee prosthesis at 12 months post-operative.
This current standard practice of patient-reported outcome measure data collection from each patient may take approximately 20 minutes to complete from a home computer at each interval. Functional measurements completed by physiotherapists occur as part of standard treatment and progress visits. None of these measures occur in addition to standard care or require an additional time commitment than any other Joint Replacement Clinic patient.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
325338
0
Not applicable
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
The standard care prosthesis will serve as the comparator group for this study; the B.Braun Columbus unhinged prosthesis.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
333717
0
To compare patient functional outcomes using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) at 6 weeks post-operative in the hinged TKA group, as compared to SC.
These questionnaires are completed by all patients via a secure electronic database as per standard care.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
333717
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
333717
0
6 weeks post-operative.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
418042
0
To determine early recovery outcomes of patients receiving a hinged knee prosthesis including timed-up-and-go (TUG).
This data is collected by physiotherapists at routine follow-up visits.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
418042
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
418042
0
Day 3 and day 14 post-operative.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
418043
0
To assess patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) including the Oxford Knee Score (OKS).
These questionnaires are completed by all patients via a secure electronic database as per standard care.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
418043
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
418043
0
6 and 12 months post-operative.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
418044
0
To assess patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) including the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score 12-item (KOOS-12).
These questionnaires are completed by all patients via a secure electronic database as per standard care.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
418044
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
418044
0
6 weeks, 6 and 12 months post-operative.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
418045
0
To assess patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) including the Euroqol 5 Dimensional Health Survey Level 5 (EQ5D5L).
These questionnaires are completed by all patients via a secure electronic database as per standard care.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
418045
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
418045
0
6 weeks, 6 and 12 months postoperative.
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
418372
0
To determine early recovery outcomes of patients receiving a hinged knee prosthesis including length of stay (LOS).
This data is collected by physiotherapists at routine follow-up visits.
Query!
Assessment method [5]
418372
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
418372
0
Day 3 (or alternate hospital discharge day).
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
418373
0
To determine early recovery outcomes of patients receiving a hinged knee prosthesis including range of movement (ROM).
This data is collected by physiotherapists at routine follow-up visits.
Query!
Assessment method [6]
418373
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
418373
0
Day 3 and day 14 post-operative.
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
418377
0
To assess patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) of 'normal'.
These questionnaires are completed by all patients via a secure electronic database as per standard care.
Query!
Assessment method [7]
418377
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
418377
0
6 weeks, 6 and 12 months post-operative.
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
418378
0
To assess patient-reported outcome measures including the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain.
These questionnaires are completed by all patients via a secure electronic database as per standard care.
Query!
Assessment method [8]
418378
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
418378
0
6 weeks, 6 and 12 months post-operative.
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
418379
0
To assess patient revision rates post-operative.
Patients are created and monitored in our electronic database as both primary or revision surgeries. Data will be exported at the conclusion of the study to determine revision rates. In the case of patients who receive a revision surgery at an alternative clinic, the surgeon is notified by the treating surgeon and this is maintained in patient records.
Query!
Assessment method [9]
418379
0
Query!
Timepoint [9]
418379
0
12 months post-operative.
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
418380
0
To assess patient complication rates post-operative.
This data is routinely collected and maintained by the JRC clinical co-ordinator and patient liaison who is made aware of any patient complications by either hospital staff or patient files when seeing patients on the ward, or patients themselves. On occasion, the administrative staff are made aware, in which case the JRC clinical co-ordinator and patient liaison is made aware. This is routinely recorded within the clinic patient files and subsequently entered into the electronic database. Standard clinical complications may include; DVT, wound concerns, falls, infection, fracture or 'other'.
Query!
Assessment method [10]
418380
0
Query!
Timepoint [10]
418380
0
12 months post-operative.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Patients 60 years and over receiving a primary HTKA prosthesis for advanced OA of the knee (Kellgren-Lawrence grade IV).
2. Patients 60 years and over receiving a primary TKA conventional unconstrained prosthesis for advanced OA of the knee (Kellgren-Lawrence grade IV).
Query!
Minimum age
60
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Patients receiving a hinged TKA for revision knee surgery.
2. Patients receiving a hinged TKA for Rheumatoid arthritis, neuromuscular disorders or pathologies other than Osteoarthritis.
3. Patients under 60 years of age at the time of surgery.
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Screening
Query!
Duration
Longitudinal
Query!
Selection
Defined population
Query!
Timing
Prospective
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
The study arm (HTKA) will be compared against the control arm (SC) for all analyses. Non-inferiority will be claimed if the lower 95% confidence limit of the mean difference between HTKA and SC is less than the minimally clinical important difference (MCID) of -5 after adjusting for key potential confounders (pre-operative OKS, age, BMI and gender).
Other continuous secondary outcomes will be analysed in a similar manner, that is, using multiple linear regression with terms for group (HTKA vs SC), pre-operative score, age, gender and BMI.
Survival and revision will be examined using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression with terms for group, age, gender and BMI. Complications will be described using frequency and percentages at 12 months.
Two subgroups will be examined;
• Patients with valgus deformity
• Patients with varus deformity
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
28/02/2023
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
29/02/2024
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
28/02/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
132
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
SA
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
313104
0
Commercial sector/Industry
Query!
Name [1]
313104
0
B.Braun Australia
Query!
Address [1]
313104
0
Level 5/7-9 Irvine Pl, Bella Vista New South Wales 2153
Query!
Country [1]
313104
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Other
Query!
Name
The Joint Replacement Clinic
Query!
Address
151 Hutt St, Adelaide SA 5000
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
314803
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
314803
0
nil
Query!
Address [1]
314803
0
nil
Query!
Country [1]
314803
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
312353
0
Bellberry Pty Ltd
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
312353
0
123 Glen Osmond Road, Eastwood South Australia 5063
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
312353
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
312353
0
06/12/2022
Query!
Approval date [1]
312353
0
25/01/2023
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
312353
0
2022-11-1253
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
In this study we are trying to find out whether 2 different types of knee joint prostheses have the same clinical and functional outcomes for patients 60 years or over at the time of surgery. Once patient and surgeon decide that the patient will undergo total knee replacement with a B.Braun knee replacement prosthesis; depending on the structural features of the joint, the patient may be receiving either a B.Braun Enduro if additional stability is required, or a B.Braun Columbus prosthesis. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of these two variations of the B.Braun prosthesis when considering patient related factors and the complexity of surgery. This study will analyse outcomes, satisfaction, survival, complication, and revision rates of patients 60 years or over who receive the B.Braun Enduro hinged prosthesis, as compared to an age-matched standard care group who receive the B.Braun Columbus prosthesis. This study will collect data at baseline, day 3, day 14, 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months post-operative. These devices are both used as standard care globally and are not experimental. All components of these devices can be found on the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods (ARTG) under B.Braun Australia Pty Ltd EnduRo or Columbus.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
124350
0
Dr Sunil Reddy
Query!
Address
124350
0
The Joint Replacement Clinic,
151 Hutt Street Adelaide SA 5000
Query!
Country
124350
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
124350
0
+61451051291
Query!
Fax
124350
0
Query!
Email
124350
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
124351
0
Shehara Silva
Query!
Address
124351
0
The Joint Replacement Clinic,
151 Hutt Street Adelaide SA 5000
Query!
Country
124351
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
124351
0
+61 08 8232 8889
Query!
Fax
124351
0
Query!
Email
124351
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
124352
0
Kristen Georgiou
Query!
Address
124352
0
The International Musculoskeletal Research Institute (IMRI)
13 Laffers Road Belair SA 5052
Query!
Country
124352
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
124352
0
+61 08 8232 8889
Query!
Fax
124352
0
Query!
Email
124352
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Doc. No.
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
18214
Ethical approval
385323-(Uploaded-02-02-2023-13-50-28)-Study-related document.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF