The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial registered on ANZCTR


Registration number
ACTRN12622001031752
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
7/06/2022
Date registered
22/07/2022
Date last updated
22/07/2022
Date data sharing statement initially provided
22/07/2022
Type of registration
Prospectively registered

Titles & IDs
Public title
Efficacy of physiotherapy treatment in term newborns who have difficulty breastfeeding
Scientific title
Efficacy of the lip out method for breastfeeding outcomes in term newborns who have difficulty breastfeeding
Secondary ID [1] 307304 0
Nil known
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1279-0551
Trial acronym
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Ankyloglossia 326593 0
Condition category
Condition code
Physical Medicine / Rehabilitation 323840 323840 0 0
Physiotherapy
Musculoskeletal 323841 323841 0 0
Other muscular and skeletal disorders

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
The day after birth, the newborns and the mother will be evaluated using the Hazelbaker, Lach and VAS scales: based on the score obtained, it is checked whether there are difficulties in breastfeeding and, therefore, it is optimal to participate in the study.
You will be randomly (randomly) assigned to one of two study groups. The intervention group will begin the Physiotherapy treatment based on the "Lip Out" method prior to hospital discharge.
This method consists of specifically addressing the function of breastfeeding in terms of the seal that is made between the baby's mouth and the mother's breast. Oral motor dysfunctions that may be related to ankyloglossia (difficulty in tongue mobility due to a short and/or restrictive frenulum and also due to other alterations) that generate an incorrect sucking pattern will be addressed.
The treatment will be carried out both during suction and at the moment of grasping. What is intended is to relax tensions that may be related to compensatory structures that make it difficult for the tongue to perform a correct function when sucking. Specifically, the posture of the mother at the time of breastfeeding the baby will be corrected, the accessory muscles of the mouth (orbicularis oculi, masseter muscles) will be relaxed and digital longitudinal stretching of the frenulum.
Before hospital discharge, these exercises will be taught to the parents and an exhaustive follow-up will be carried out for one month. The frequency of the sessions will be one hour a week during the first month of life (4 sessions of one hour in total). This follow-up of the baby will be carried out until the first month of life.

After this month of treatment, it will be evaluated again with the same scales to check whether or not there are differences with respect to the initial scores.

Who performs the intervention is a physiotherapist who has 10 years of experience.
Intervention code [1] 323749 0
Prevention
Intervention code [2] 323750 0
Rehabilitation
Comparator / control treatment
The control group will not receive physiotherapy treatment to treat the problems derived from alterations at the orofacial level. Instead, they will receive a weekly one-hour physical therapy session during the baby's first month of life (i.e. 4 one-hour sessions per month) in which the parents will be instructed through direct observation of the physical therapist and a written document on the performance of the Shantala massage (performed by the physical therapist). After observing the physiotherapist, they will perform it on the baby under supervision; This will verify the good practice of massage.
Another assessment will be carried out once a month to check if after a certain time the structures at the orofacial level are restructured without the need to receive any treatment.
Control group
Active

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 331633 0
Visual Analog Scale to check the pain experienced by the mother when breastfeeding. The mother will be instructed to mark her perception of pain with an X, considering 0 (null value) and 10 (maximum value).
Timepoint [1] 331633 0
Before the intervention and one month after the beginning of the intervention
Primary outcome [2] 331634 0
Lach scale to assess breastfeeding. The following items will be assessed from 0 (null value) to 2 (maximum value), with an intermediate score of 1 (mean value): attachment, swallowing, type of breast and positioning of the baby at the breast. The maximum score will be 10, which means that there would be no risk of early weaning. If the score is less than 9, it indicates the need for support and monitoring of breastfeeding by professionals.
Timepoint [2] 331634 0
Before the intervention and one month after the beginning of the intervention.
Primary outcome [3] 331635 0
Hazelbaker scale to assess both the structure and function of the infant's tongue. This instrument is made up of items related to function (lateralization, elevation, width and length extension, cupping, peristalsis and spring of the tongue) and appearance. Each item will be scored from 0 (does not do it) to 2 (does it adequately), with an intermediate score of 1 (does not fully complete that item). If the function score is 14, regardless of appearance, no intervention is necessary. If the function score is 11, Physiotherapy treatment is recommended. Finally, if the score is less than 11, the function is considered impaired, so it is necessary to treat as soon as possible.
Timepoint [3] 331635 0
Before the intervention and one month after the beginning of the intervention.
Secondary outcome [1] 410588 0
NIL
Timepoint [1] 410588 0
NIL

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Term newborns (between 37 and 41 weeks of gestation).
2. Both men and women will be selected.
3. Both normal delivery and cesarean section.
4. Infants who have a low score on the initial assessment scale and, therefore, a problem in breastfeeding.
5. The parents of the babies must authorize their participation in the clinical trial, as well as subjecting the baby to low-intervention physiotherapy treatment, signing said authorization in the Informed Consent.
Minimum age
1 Days
Maximum age
7 Days
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Key exclusion criteria
1. Preterm, post-term and low birth weight newborns (less than 2,500 Kg).
2. Newborns who present pathology or have had problems during the immediate prenatal or postnatal period.
3. Patients who do not understand and are unable to fill in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
4. Mothers who trigger problems in the immediate postpartum period and, as a consequence, prevent them from being with the baby in the first hours after birth.
5. Patient who does not want and does not authorize to participate in the study, does not adequately understand the Spanish language.

Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Allocation is not concealed
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Before starting the study, the online Randomizer 18 (Research Randomizer, 1997) was used to randomly generate 186 sets of numbers, each of which contained two numbers ranging from 1 to 2 in random order. A total of 186 unique codes were generated based on the 57 sets of {1 and 2}. After signing the consent, a code was randomly chosen for each patient, thus ensuring that the 186 patients were equally distributed into two groups according to the group number of each code: group 1 (experimental group) and group 2 (control group).
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?



Intervention assignment
Parallel
Other design features
Phase
Not Applicable
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Statistical methods / analysis
The calculation of the sample size, performed with the Ene 3.0 software, was estimated considering the effectiveness of the physiotherapy technique in infants, for a 95% CI with an alpha error of 5% and a beta error of 20% for an OR to detect of 2. The sample size was 93 patients for each group, that is, a total of 186 patients distributed in 93 individuals for the group that received the physiotherapy technique and 93 patients for the group that did not receive intervention.

With all the variables described above, a database will be created and the statistical treatment will be carried out with the SPSS 27.0 program.
A univariate or descriptive analysis will be performed. For qualitative variables, frequencies will be calculated with their corresponding percentages, and for quantitative variables, central tendency measurements and dispersion measurements (mean, minimum, maximum and standard deviation) will be performed.
In the bivariate analysis, for the comparison of qualitative variables, the Chi-square test (?2) will be used, considering significant a value of p<0.005. For the comparison of means of quantitative variables, after a normality test (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test), parametric or non-parametric tests will be used, as appropriate. For variables with normal distribution, the T-Student test for independent variables, the T-Student test for paired variables and one-factor ANOVA with their corresponding "post hot" test will be confirmed. For variables that follow a non-normal distribution, the Mann-Whitney U test to compare independent variables, the Wincoxon test for paired variables, the Kruskal-Wallis test for more than two independent variables, and the Friedman test for more than two paired variables.
The multivariate analysis will be performed using binary logistic regression and multiple linear regression.

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 24825 0
Spain
State/province [1] 24825 0
Almería

Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1] 311560 0
Self funded/Unfunded
Name [1] 311560 0
Gemma María López Segura
Country [1] 311560 0
Spain
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Name
Gemma Mª López Segura
Address
Hermandad donantes de sangre S/N Barrio Torrecárdenas, 04009, Almería
Country
Spain
Secondary sponsor category [1] 312977 0
None
Name [1] 312977 0
Address [1] 312977 0
Country [1] 312977 0

Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Ethics committee name [1] 311009 0
Provincial Research Ethics Committee of Almería (CEI/CEIm)
Ethics committee address [1] 311009 0
Ethics committee country [1] 311009 0
Spain
Date submitted for ethics approval [1] 311009 0
25/04/2022
Approval date [1] 311009 0
27/04/2022
Ethics approval number [1] 311009 0
35/2022

Summary
Brief summary
Trial website
Trial related presentations / publications
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 119682 0
Miss Gemma María López Segura
Address 119682 0
Hermandad donates de sangre S/N Barrio Torrecárdenas, 04009, Almería.
Country 119682 0
Spain
Phone 119682 0
+34610024516
Fax 119682 0
Email 119682 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 119683 0
Gemma María López Segura
Address 119683 0
Hermandad donates de sangre S/N Barrio Torrecárdenas, 04009, Almería.
Country 119683 0
Spain
Phone 119683 0
+34610024516
Fax 119683 0
Email 119683 0
Contact person for scientific queries
Name 119684 0
Gemma María López Segura
Address 119684 0
Hermandad donates de sangre S/N Barrio Torrecárdenas, 04009, Almería.
Country 119684 0
Spain
Phone 119684 0
+34610024516
Fax 119684 0
Email 119684 0

Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment


What supporting documents are/will be available?

Doc. No.TypeCitationLinkEmailOther DetailsAttachment
16333Ethical approval    384156-(Uploaded-07-06-2022-22-05-19)-Study-related document.pdf



Results publications and other study-related documents

Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.

Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.