Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12622000251729
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
17/01/2022
Date registered
11/02/2022
Date last updated
8/12/2022
Date data sharing statement initially provided
11/02/2022
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Harnessing technology in labour and birth for women with increased BMI.
Query!
Scientific title
Efficacy of harnessing technology in labour and birth for women with increased BMI.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
306224
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1273-3013
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Complex labour and childbirth
324945
0
Query!
Obesity
324946
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Reproductive Health and Childbirth
322376
322376
0
0
Query!
Fetal medicine and complications of pregnancy
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Participants will be randomised with consent to either the standard care for fetal monitoring cardiotocograph or the non invasive fetal electrocardiogram (NIFECG). Participants will be monitored throughout labour with the device to which they have been randomised. Midwives at the site will deliver the intervention once in each participant's labour. The time period depends on the length of time it takes each woman to give birth. This is impossible to predict but may last anything from 1 minute to 18 hours. The intervention occurs in the hospital labour wards of the clinical sites.
The key differences in the two devices are the wearables and in the way the data is retrieved.
CTG involves the woman wearing two elastic belts, to each of which a transducer is attached. One is an ultrasound transducer that measures fetal herat via sound waves. The other is a tocodynamometer that measures the pressure of uterine contractions. CTG image is at http://www.mvb-med.ch/Philips_CTG_Avalon_fm30-fr.html
NIFECG uses fetal ECG, maternal ECG to collect data on fetal and maternal heart rates. It also uses electromyography to collect data on uterine contractions by picking up electrical signals from the myometrium. NIFECG image is at https://www.philips.com.au/healthcare/product/HC866488/avalon-beltless-fetal-monitoring-solution
Query!
Intervention code [1]
322626
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Intervention code [2]
322627
0
Diagnosis / Prognosis
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Standard care, continuous fetal monitoring in labour and birth as per protocol with cardiotocograph (CTG). Example guidelines:
NSW Health, Office of Kids and Families 2018, Maternity - Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring Guideline (GL2018_025), NSW Health, Sydney.
Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) 2019, Intrapartum Fetal Surveillance Clinical Guidelines – 4th Edition. RANZCOG, Melbourne.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
330144
0
Cord blood gas results for all participating women who had an operative birth (#routinely
collected for all operative births including those by caesarean section, forceps and
vacuum extraction). Cord blood gas results determine whether a baby was hypoxic in utero or not. All cord blood gases will be collected from all participants who had an operative birth due to suspected fetal hypoxia. Detection of fetal hypoxia* in women with BMI equal to or greater than 35kg/m2 who had an operative birth (caesarean section, forceps or vacuum extraction) for suspected fetal distress, detected by cord blood gas results.
(*According to cord blood gas analysis (pH, lactate and base excess levels as per hospital protocol).
Query!
Assessment method [1]
330144
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
330144
0
Umbilical cord blood gas results, blood gases collected immediately after the time of birth.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
405044
0
Barriers and facilitators to upscaling the implementation of NIFECG as standard care for the monitoring of women with BMI of 35 or above in Australia.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
405044
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
405044
0
Post intervention focus groups and/or semi structured
qualitative interviews with midwives and obstetricians, as soon as practicable after the intervention.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
405045
0
Rate of fetal scalp electrode (FSE) use, derived from routinely collected hospital data
Query!
Assessment method [2]
405045
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
405045
0
During labour and birth. To be analysed from routinely collected data that is collected post intervention.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
405046
0
Participants’ perceptions of their autonomy and agency during labour and birth, using the Labour Agentry Scale (LAS) (Hodnett and Simmonds-Tropea 1987).
Query!
Assessment method [3]
405046
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
405046
0
Participating women will be invited to complete the LAS at 2-8 weeks postpartum.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
405047
0
The impact of different continuous electronic fetal monitoring (CEFM) devices on midwifery practice. (Ethnographic observations of 3 hour portions of 30 participating women’s labours).
Query!
Assessment method [4]
405047
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
405047
0
Active 1st stage of labour.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
BMI of 40 or above, or
BMI of 35 or above in the presence of one or more co-morbidities
Equal to or greater than 34 weeks gestation at the time of recruitment
Equal to or greater than 36 weeks at onset of labour
Planning a vaginal birth
Able to read and speak English – (this study does not have adequate budget or resources
to develop multi-lingual consent and information sheets or to provide interpreters at
interviews).
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
45
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Women with a multiple pregnancy (the device is suitable only for singleton pregnancies).
Women who are not being continuously monitored.
Women who are known to be giving birth by planned caesarean section (as labour and
continuous monitoring are not applicable).
Women with a fetus known to be incompatible with life (as this clinical circumstance
brings added burden to the woman, her family and caregivers and is beyond the scope of
this study).
Women who commence labour and give birth prior to 36 weeks’ gestation (as the device
is not registered for use in women of less than 36 weeks’ gestation)
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Diagnosis
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Centralised allocation by computer
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Simple randomisation using a randomisation table created by computer software (i.e. computerised sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Our study has three sites available, and we project that we will be able to recruit 150 patients per site (total of 450). The rate of unnecessary unplanned c-sections in our target population is estimated to be 42%, so we have >0.8 power to detect an absolute decrease of 13.2 percentage points (42% to 28.8%) between groups assuming a drop-rate of 10%.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
14/12/2022
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
30/12/2023
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
15/01/2024
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
450
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,QLD,VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
21491
0
Wollongong Hospital - Wollongong
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
21492
0
Box Hill Hospital - Box Hill
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
23694
0
Townsville University Hospital - Douglas
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
36397
0
2500 - Wollongong
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
36398
0
3128 - Box Hill
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
39129
0
4814 - Douglas
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
310572
0
Commercial sector/Industry
Query!
Name [1]
310572
0
Philips Medizin Systeme Boeblingen GmbH
Query!
Address [1]
310572
0
Hewlett Packard Strasse
71034 Boeblingen
GERMANY
Query!
Country [1]
310572
0
Germany
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
University of Technology Sydney
Query!
Address
PO Box 123 Broadway NSW 2007
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
311751
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
311751
0
Query!
Address [1]
311751
0
Query!
Country [1]
311751
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
310179
0
Joint University of Wollongong and Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District Health and Medical HREC
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
310179
0
University of Wollongong, Northfields Ave, Wollongong, NSW 2522
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
310179
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
310179
0
08/02/2022
Query!
Approval date [1]
310179
0
30/05/2022
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
310179
0
Query!
Ethics committee name [2]
310180
0
University of Technology Sydney HREC
Query!
Ethics committee address [2]
310180
0
PO Box 123 Broadway NSW 2007
Query!
Ethics committee country [2]
310180
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [2]
310180
0
15/02/2022
Query!
Approval date [2]
310180
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [2]
310180
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
For women with a BMI>40, or a BMI 30-40 and one or more comorbidities, continuous electronic fetal monitoring via cardiotocograph (CTG) monitoring, is recommended (RANZCOG 2019). Conventional forms of CTG monitoring require the labouring woman to wear two tight elastic belts around her abdomen and to be tethered to a machine by wiring, thus restricting her mobility. A wireless and beltless monitoring device, the non-invasive fetal electrocardiogram (NIFECG) was registered by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) for clinical use in Australia in 2018. The aim of this study is to determine how the use of an innovative monitoring technology, NIFECG, in women with increased BMI, compares with the current standard monitoring, CTG in: • Detection of fetal distress requiring intervention • Fetal scalp electrode (FSE) use • Maternal feelings of control and agency during labour and birth • Capacity for midwives to provide woman-centred care. Using the results of both the quantitative and qualitative data that will be collected, the study will also explore barriers and facilitators to implementation of the NIFECG as routine care for women with increased BMI. Hybrid RCT Type 1 methodology, following the approach of Curran et al. (2012), uses a hybrid effectiveness-implementation typology. The study design therefore enables a dual focus a priori, testing the effectiveness of a clinical intervention on specified outcomes whilst also synthesising implementation needs. The RCT will be conducted at three clinical sites in Australia. The sample size is 450 women.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
116770
0
A/Prof Deborah Fox
Query!
Address
116770
0
Collaborative for Midwifery, Child and Family Health,
University of Technology Sydney
PO Box 123 Broadway NSW 2007
Query!
Country
116770
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
116770
0
+61 02 95147982
Query!
Fax
116770
0
Query!
Email
116770
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
116771
0
Deborah Fox
Query!
Address
116771
0
Centre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health,
University of Technology Sydney
PO Box 123
Broadway NSW 2007
Query!
Country
116771
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
116771
0
+61 02 95147982
Query!
Fax
116771
0
Query!
Email
116771
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
116772
0
Deborah Fox
Query!
Address
116772
0
Collaborative for Midwifery, Child and Family Health,
University of Technology Sydney
PO Box 123 Broadway NSW 2007
Query!
Country
116772
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
116772
0
+61 02 95147982
Query!
Fax
116772
0
Query!
Email
116772
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Individual participant data will be aggregated by intervention or control group. Data will not be made publicly available unless a reasonable request is made to the Chief Investigator.
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF