Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12620000853943
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
22/05/2020
Date registered
27/08/2020
Date last updated
27/08/2020
Date data sharing statement initially provided
27/08/2020
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Remote video auditing of surgical safety checklist compliance before and after feedback in the emergency operating theatre at the Royal Melbourne Hospital
Query!
Scientific title
Remote video auditing of hospital staff surgical safety checklist compliance before and after feedback in the emergency operating theatre at the Royal Melbourne Hospital
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
301351
0
nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1252-4376
Query!
Trial acronym
nil
Query!
Linked study record
nil
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Surgical safety checklist practice compliance
317567
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Surgery
315652
315652
0
0
Query!
Other surgery
Query!
Public Health
316052
316052
0
0
Query!
Other public health
Query!
Surgery
316053
316053
0
0
Query!
Surgical techniques
Query!
Emergency medicine
316054
316054
0
0
Query!
Other emergency care
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
During the observation period, participants will monitored for the entire duration of an individual surgery via remote video every day for 4 weeks without feedback, followed by 4 weeks of weekly feedback of performance reports to healthcare workers.
Two independent auditors will review and assess all the recorded video data. An event is defined as when a patient is having an operation in OR 2. “Passing” an event means healthcare workers have completed 3 phases of the checklist procedure. The criteria for “failing” an event is when any one of the 3 phases of the checklist procedure is not completed. The three phases of the checklist completion are: 1) before the induction of anaesthesia (“sign in”) and 2) before the incision of the skin (“time out”) and 3) before the patient leaves the operating room (“sign out”). This checklist is adhered to the World Health Organisation Surgical Safety Checklist: https://www.who.int/patientsafety/safesurgery/tools_resources/SSSL_Checklist_finalJun08.pdf?ua=1.
During the 4-week feedback period, a weekly performance report will be displayed in multiple areas of the perioperative department and will also be emailed weekly to all floor staff. In the case that a department meeting is held, performance reports will also be announced periodically. Feedback will be provided to all healthcare workers regardless of their involvement in this study.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
317645
0
Other interventions
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
4-week of no feedback
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
323887
0
Compliance rate of surgical checklist completion. It is defined as the number of observed checklist items completed as a percentage of total number of checklist items that should be completed during the observation period.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
323887
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
323887
0
Recorded videos will be reviewed daily for the duration of the 8 week study period.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
383251
0
Completion of each of the three phases of surgical checklist procedures. It is defined as the number of observed checklist items for each phase completed as a percentage of total number of checklist items that should be completed for each phase during the observation period.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
383251
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
383251
0
Recorded videos will be reviewed daily for the duration of the 8 week study period.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
All health care workers completing a surgical checklist in the emergency theatre
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Any healthcare workers who do not work directly in the emergency theatre.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Educational / counselling / training
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Not applicable
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Not applicable
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Single group
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Analysis of compliance rate before and after providing feedback will be calculated using paired t-test. A P value < 0.05 is considered statistically significant.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
31/08/2020
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
2/11/2020
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
2/11/2020
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
150
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
30343
0
3050 - Royal Melbourne Hospital
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
305788
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
305788
0
The Royal Melbourne Hospital
Query!
Address [1]
305788
0
300 Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria, 3050
Query!
Country [1]
305788
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital
Query!
Address
300 Grattan St, Parkville, Victoria, 3050
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
306227
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
306227
0
Query!
Address [1]
306227
0
Query!
Country [1]
306227
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
306062
0
The Melbourne Health Human Research Ethics Committee - Quality Assurance Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
306062
0
Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan St, Parkville, Victoria, 3050
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
306062
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
306062
0
06/05/2020
Query!
Approval date [1]
306062
0
23/07/2020
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
306062
0
QA2020080
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The World Health Organisation (WHO) released a surgical safety checklist for use in any operating theatre environment. It was launched as part of the initiative: “Safe Surgery Saves Lifes” in 2008, aiming to reduce the number of surgical death around the world. However, surgical incident reports including near misses are still ongoing issues in hospitals nationally. It is therefore important to monitor compliance of surgical checklist completion and also its effectiveness. The use of remote video auditing has been described in the operating theatre to improve patient quality care because it influences healthcare worker’s behaviour, encourages best practice and also helps objectively analyse any adverse events. At the Royal Melbourne Hospital, we are installing remote video cameras in the operating theatre complex. The aim of this study is to assess the compliance of surgical checklist completion. We will compare the compliance rate before and after feedback with the use of remote video auditing. This study will be conducted over an 8-week period – 4 weeks without feedback of results to healthcare workers (HCW), followed by 4 weeks of weekly feedback of performance reports to HCW. We hypothesise that the compliance rate will improve with weekly feedback of performance.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
102562
0
Dr Irene Ng
Query!
Address
102562
0
Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan St, Parkville, Victoria, 3050
Query!
Country
102562
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
102562
0
+613 9342 7540
Query!
Fax
102562
0
Query!
Email
102562
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
102563
0
Irene Ng
Query!
Address
102563
0
Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan St, Parkville, Victoria, 3050
Query!
Country
102563
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
102563
0
+613 9342 7540
Query!
Fax
102563
0
Query!
Email
102563
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
102564
0
Irene Ng
Query!
Address
102564
0
Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan St, Parkville, Victoria, 3050
Query!
Country
102564
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
102564
0
+613 9342 7540
Query!
Fax
102564
0
Query!
Email
102564
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF