Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12621001437853
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
18/02/2020
Date registered
25/10/2021
Date last updated
25/10/2021
Date data sharing statement initially provided
25/10/2021
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database on the safety and effectiveness of preemptive esophageal dilatation in the management of high-grade food bolus obstruction in the upper esophagus
Query!
Scientific title
A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database on the safety and effectiveness of preemptive esophageal dilatation in the management of high-grade food bolus obstruction in the upper esophagus
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
300587
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Food bolus obstruction
316322
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Oral and Gastrointestinal
314589
314589
0
0
Query!
Other diseases of the mouth, teeth, oesophagus, digestive system including liver and colon
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Query!
Patient registry
False
Query!
Target follow-up duration
Query!
Target follow-up type
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
We propose to assess the safety and effectiveness of esophageal dilation at the time of food bolus disimpaction in reducing the risk of recurrent FBO in a retrospective analysis of a prospective database from 2008 to 2017. We aim to compare patients who undergo concurrent esophageal dilation using Savary Gillard dilator catheters at the time of food bolus disimpaction and those who have elective esophageal dilation as an outpatient.
a) Participant requirement (no involvement, the following data will be collected from each case:
• Demographic data,
• Clinical presentations
• Underlying pathology
• Mucosal damage to the esophagus and larynx
• Complications after endoscopy such as aspiration, sore throat, GI bleeding.
• Hospital stay duration
b) the duration of observation/follow-up per participant (Up to 48 hours post-enrolment and 10 days post-enrolment)
Query!
Intervention code [1]
316892
0
Not applicable
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
No control group
Query!
Control group
Uncontrolled
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
322918
0
Safety of esophageal dilation assessed through medical records and hospital admissions records.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
322918
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
322918
0
48 hours after procedure
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
326739
0
Safety, devoid of any procedure related complications assessed through hospital records and patient reporting.
Adverse events or Complications are defined as procedure related complications from esophageal dilation which are bleeding and perforation.
-Bleeding is categorized into (i)“minor bleeding”- transient bleeding that spontaneously resolved without requirement of blood transfusion or intervention to stop bleeding OR (ii) “major bleeding”- persistent bleeding leading to hemodynamic instability and requirement of blood transfusion and intervention to cease bleeding such as radiologic embolization or endoscopic hemostasis.
-Perforation is defined as iatrogenic esophageal mucosal tear with direct communication with mediastinum or peritoneum the after esophageal dilation evident on endoscopic view
Query!
Assessment method [2]
326739
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
326739
0
48 hours after procedure
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
380240
0
Effectiveness of esophageal dilation in reducing recurrent FBO will be defined as the ability of the endoscope to traverse the esophageal stenosis after dilation and ability to reduce the number of recurrent food bolus obstruction, this will be assessed through medical records and hospital admissions.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
380240
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
380240
0
Within 48 hours of procedure
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
392530
0
-Esophageal Structural abnormalities defined as obvious esophageal pathologies including peptic stricture, eosinophilic esophagitis and schatzki rings that is evident during endoscopy
Query!
Assessment method [2]
392530
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
392530
0
Within 48 hours of procedure
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
401808
0
Total endoscopy time, this will be assessed through data-linkage to medical records.
-Total endoscopy time is defined as the time when the first endoscopic dilator is inserted into the oral cavity to the time when the last dilator is removed from the oral cavity
Query!
Assessment method [3]
401808
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
401808
0
Within 48 hours of procedure
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
• Age 18-90 years
• Confirmed acute food bolus requiring endoscopy
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
90
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
• Age <18
• Patients managed medically, not requiring endoscopic retrieval of food bolus
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Query!
Duration
Query!
Selection
Query!
Timing
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
18/06/2018
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
30/09/2019
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
30/09/2019
Query!
Sample size
Target
400
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
456
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
SA
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
305009
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
305009
0
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Query!
Address [1]
305009
0
Department of Gastroenterology
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Port Road Adelaide SA 5000
Query!
Country [1]
305009
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Query!
Address
Department of Gastroenterology
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Port Road Adelaide SA 5000
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
305366
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
305366
0
Query!
Address [1]
305366
0
Query!
Country [1]
305366
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
305406
0
Royal Adelaide Hospital Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
305406
0
CALHN Research Office RAH Clinical Trial Centre Level 3, Royal Adelaide Hospital Port Road ADELAIDE SA 5000
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
305406
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
305406
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
305406
0
15/06/2018
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
305406
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
We propose to assess the safety and effectiveness of esophageal dilation at the time of food bolus disimpaction in reducing the risk of recurrent FBO in a retrospective analysis of a prospective database from 2008 to 2017. We aim to compare patients who undergo concurrent esophageal dilation using Savary Gillard dilator catheters at the time of food bolus disimpaction and those who have elective esophageal dilation as an outpatient. We expect that the concurrent esophageal dilation at the time of initial removal of food bolus is safe and effective in reducing the risk of recurrent FBO given it will treat the underlying pathology and stretch the esophagus. As a consequence, the patient does not need to return to hospital for a second endoscopy or represent to hospital with recurrent FBO. This would not only reduce health care cost but also reduce the number of patients presenting to emergency department with recurrent FBO.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
100270
0
A/Prof Nam Q Nguyen
Query!
Address
100270
0
Department of Gastroenterology
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Port Road Adelaide SA 5000
Query!
Country
100270
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
100270
0
+61 8 70742189
Query!
Fax
100270
0
Query!
Email
100270
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
100271
0
Romina Safaeian
Query!
Address
100271
0
Department of Gastroenterology
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Port Road Adelaide SA 5000
Query!
Country
100271
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
100271
0
+61 8 70742189
Query!
Fax
100271
0
Query!
Email
100271
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
100272
0
Romina Safaeian
Query!
Address
100272
0
Department of Gastroenterology
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Port Road Adelaide SA 5000
Query!
Country
100272
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
100272
0
+61 8 70742189
Query!
Fax
100272
0
Query!
Email
100272
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF