Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12619001493134p
Ethics application status
Submitted, not yet approved
Date submitted
17/09/2019
Date registered
29/10/2019
Date last updated
29/10/2019
Date data sharing statement initially provided
29/10/2019
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Comparison of the effect of an anaesthetic spray and an anaesthetic spray with additional flavouring in providing anaesthesia for nasendoscopy
Query!
Scientific title
A randomised, cross-over clinical trial to evaluate the equivalence of a reformulated Co-phenylcaine spray incorporating taste masking and flavouring agents as compared to the currently marketed Co-phenylcaine Forte spray in providing anaesthesia for nasendoscopy procedures
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
299281
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1240-2088
Query!
Trial acronym
None
Query!
Linked study record
None
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
ENT conditions requiring nasopharyngeal examination
314414
0
Query!
Nasopharyngeal examination
314560
0
Query!
Intubation
314561
0
Query!
Nasoendoscopy
314562
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Oral and Gastrointestinal
312756
312756
0
0
Query!
Other diseases of the mouth, teeth, oesophagus, digestive system including liver and colon
Query!
Anaesthesiology
312897
312897
0
0
Query!
Anaesthetics
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Co-Phenylcaine Forte local anaesthetic spray. 100 ul spray containing 5 mg lignocaine hydrochloride and 0.5 mg phenylephrine. 5 sprays administered by ENT surgeon per nostril. The anaesthetic spray will be administered 10 minutes prior to nasendoscopy.
Cross over with wash out period of 4-6 weeks.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
315563
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Co-Phenylcaine Forte local anaesthetic spray. 100 ul spray containing 5 mg lignocaine hydrochloride and 0.5 mg phenylephrine with the addition of taste masking and flavouring agents, 5 sprays administered per nostril administered by ENT surgeon. The anaesthetic spray will be administered 10 minutes prior to nasendoscopy.
There will be a 4-6 week crossover period.between trials.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
321384
0
100 mm Visual analogue scale rating of discomfort (no discomfort: maximum possible discomfort).
Query!
Assessment method [1]
321384
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
321384
0
Immediately after nasendoscopy procedure
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
374834
0
100 mm Visual Analogue Scale rating of pain (no pain: maximum possible pain).
Query!
Assessment method [1]
374834
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
374834
0
Immediately after nasendoscopy procedure
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
374835
0
Likert scale rating of anaesthetic spray taste (like extremely to dislike extremely).
Query!
Assessment method [2]
374835
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
374835
0
Immediately after the local anaesthetic spray is administered.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
375142
0
Likert scale rating of anaesthetic spray after taste (like extremely to dislike extremely).
Query!
Assessment method [3]
375142
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
375142
0
5 min after the anaesthetic spray has been administered.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Patients attending an Ear nose and throat (ENT) practice for nasendoscopy examination and minor surgical procedures.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
significant oral disease or injury, any known impairment of taste function and any history of cardiac, liver or kidney conditions.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Numbered/coded spray containers.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Simple randomisation using a computer generated random number sequence.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Crossover
Query!
Other design features
Cross over trial in which all participants receive both interventions for procedures carried out with a 4-6 week crossover period.
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Poisson models for discrete data will be run on the pain and discomfort data. 95 % Confidence intervals (CI) around the model estimates will be compared to ensure that the CI for the Co-Phenylcaine Neo values lies within the 10% equivalence margin for the Co-Phenylcaine Forte values. If there is a predominance of zero values in the data we will use a zero inflated Poisson model. Taste data will be analysed using t-tests or equivalent non-parametric tests (Mann-Witney U test) if the data do not meet the assumptions of normality.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
18/11/2019
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
20/01/2020
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
24/02/2020
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
22
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
WA
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
28030
0
6027 - Joondalup
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
303813
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
303813
0
Department of Industry, Innovation and Science
Query!
Address [1]
303813
0
Industry House, 10 Binara Street, Reid, ACT 2612
Query!
Country [1]
303813
0
Australia
Query!
Funding source category [2]
303814
0
Commercial sector/Industry
Query!
Name [2]
303814
0
ENT Technologies Pty Ltd
Query!
Address [2]
303814
0
Suite 304, 12 Cato Street, Hawthorn East VIC 3123
Query!
Country [2]
303814
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
Curtin University
Query!
Address
GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
303937
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
303937
0
Query!
Address [1]
303937
0
Query!
Country [1]
303937
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Submitted, not yet approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
304328
0
Curtin University Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
304328
0
Curtin University, GPO Box U 1987, Perth, WA 6845
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
304328
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
304328
0
26/08/2019
Query!
Approval date [1]
304328
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
304328
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The objective of this study will be to compare the effectiveness of the currently marketed Co-phenylcaine Forte spray with a reformulated Co-phenylcaine spray incorporating taste masking and flavouring agents (Co-Phenylcaine Neo spray), when administered intra-nasally, in a group of patients undergoing nasendoscopy. The study will be an equivalence trail (10% equivalence margin) using a randomised, blinded, cross-over design with participants undergoing two nasendoscopy procedures approximately 4 weeks apart. Participants will be asked to rate the taste associated with the spray and rate any pain or discomfort they feel following insertion of the nasendoscope. It is hypothesised that both interventions will have an equivalent effect in reducing discomfort and the new formulation will have a preferred taste.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
96558
0
Prof Anthony Wright
Query!
Address
96558
0
School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science
Curtin University
GPO Box U1987
Perth, WA 6845
Query!
Country
96558
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
96558
0
+61401103476
Query!
Fax
96558
0
Query!
Email
96558
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
96559
0
Anthony Wright
Query!
Address
96559
0
School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science
Curtin University
GPO Box U1987
Perth, WA 6845
Query!
Country
96559
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
96559
0
+61401103476
Query!
Fax
96559
0
Query!
Email
96559
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
96560
0
Anthony Wright
Query!
Address
96560
0
School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science
Curtin University
GPO Box U1987
Perth, WA 6845
Query!
Country
96560
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
96560
0
+61401103476
Query!
Fax
96560
0
Query!
Email
96560
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
The data are commercial in confidence
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF