Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12619001575123
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
31/10/2019
Date registered
14/11/2019
Date last updated
21/06/2021
Date data sharing statement initially provided
14/11/2019
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Choose your own adventure: An evaluation of a training video on escalation of care conversations during the pre-Medical Emergency Team (MET) period.
Query!
Scientific title
Choose your own adventure: An evaluation of a training video on escalation of care conversations for clinical deterioration not breaching the Medical Emergency Team (MET) criteria.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
298974
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1238-3388
Query!
Trial acronym
na
Query!
Linked study record
na
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Clinical deterioration
313964
0
Query!
Clinical Decision Making
313965
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Public Health
312365
312365
0
0
Query!
Health service research
Query!
Public Health
312366
312366
0
0
Query!
Health promotion/education
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
The intervention consists of a short interactive training video completed as a one-off training session, lasting approximately 10 minutes. The training is designed to improve escalation of care conversations between clinicians by exposing each participant to a series of pre-Medical Emergency Team (MET) conversations and scenarios that enable them to practice identifying specific pre-MET communication skills and navigate common challenges. The training takes the form of a choose-your-own adventure video to engage and immerse the viewer and to enable computer-generated feedback on their learning via different outcomes and lessons associated with the choices made at each decision point. The scenarios were developed specifically for this study, with input from key stakeholders, including from four public hospitals in Victoria (Eastern Health, Austin Health, The Alfred, and Royal Melbourne hospitals). The video will take every participant through five core scenarios related to the escalation of care process, designed to elicit a key communication principle central to appropriate escalation of care (in the same order). The themes of these five scenarios are: i) effective communication of critical information between team members, ii) obtaining the right information before escalating care, iii) ensuring communication is clear, concise, and structured, iv) speaking up and discussing clinical concerns as the arise, and v) respectful, closed-loop communication. A participant questionnaire will be used to monitor adherence to the intervention, and up to two email reminders to complete the training will be sent to participants over a one-week period.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
315241
0
Behaviour
Query!
Intervention code [2]
316008
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
No control group.
Query!
Control group
Uncontrolled
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
321306
0
Potential barriers to escalating care, using the ‘Factors influencing escalation of care by junior medical officers’ survey (Rotella et al., 2014).
Query!
Assessment method [1]
321306
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
321306
0
Baseline and 2-4 weeks (primary timepoint) after intervention delivery.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
321307
0
Confidence in escalating care, using five items developed specifically for this study.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
321307
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
321307
0
Baseline and 2-4 weeks (primary timepoint) after intervention delivery.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
374580
0
Mean number of reported escalation of care conversations per day, gathered using experience sampling.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
374580
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
374580
0
Once per day prior to (baseline) and once per day for 2-4 weeks after (primary timepoint) intervention delivery.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
374581
0
Mean number of communication challenges identified during escalation of care conversations per day, using a list of 10 communication challenges designed specifically for this study, gathered using experience sampling.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
374581
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
374581
0
Once per day prior to (baseline) and once per day for 2-4 weeks after (primary timepoint) intervention delivery.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
374597
0
Mean number of MET calls made per day from the trial sites, assessed via Decision Support reports.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
374597
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
374597
0
Each day prior to (baseline) and each day for 2-4 weeks after (primary timepoint) intervention delivery.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Clinicians of all age groups who work at the recruitment sites during the trial period and are potentially involved in escalation of care conversations through their work are eligible to participate, including nursing staff, doctors, and allied health professionals.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
No further exclusion criteria were required following recruitment.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Educational / counselling / training
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Single group
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
The sample size will be determined on a pragmatic basis, and will include eligible clinicians who participate during the 1-2 month trial period. This is estimated to be a total sample size of 60 participants across two recruitment sites, which would allow us to detect a mean difference of 0.3 from pre- to post-intervention with 80% power. This assumes an intracluster correlation of .1, a correlation between pre- and post-intervention responses of r = .3, and a two-sided significance level of p < 0.05.
The effects of the intervention on quantitative outcomes will be examined using the generalised estimating equations procedure. For all other quantitative outcomes, descriptive statistics will be reported. For qualitative outcomes, thematic analysis will be used.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
20/11/2019
Query!
Actual
20/11/2019
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
27/11/2019
Query!
Actual
27/11/2019
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
23/12/2019
Query!
Actual
30/12/2019
Query!
Sample size
Target
60
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
67
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
14468
0
Box Hill Hospital - Box Hill
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
14469
0
Maroondah Hospital - Ringwood East
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
14731
0
Austin Health - Austin Hospital - Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
27483
0
3128 - Box Hill
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
27484
0
3135 - Ringwood East
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
27773
0
3084 - Heidelberg
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
303511
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
303511
0
Victorian Managed Insurance Authority
Query!
Address [1]
303511
0
161 Collins St, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000
Query!
Country [1]
303511
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
Monash University
Query!
Address
8 Scenic Blvd, Clayton, Victoria, 3800
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
303566
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
303566
0
Box Hill Hospital
Query!
Address [1]
303566
0
8 Arnold St, Box Hill, Victoria, 3128
Query!
Country [1]
303566
0
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [2]
303568
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [2]
303568
0
Maroondah Hospital
Query!
Address [2]
303568
0
Davey Drive, East Ringwood, Victoria, 3135
Query!
Country [2]
303568
0
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [3]
303861
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [3]
303861
0
Austin Health
Query!
Address [3]
303861
0
145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084
Query!
Country [3]
303861
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
304036
0
Eastern Health Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
304036
0
Office for Research and Ethics Eastern Health Level 2, 5 Arnold Street Box Hill VIC 3128
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
304036
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
304036
0
01/07/2019
Query!
Approval date [1]
304036
0
06/08/2019
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
304036
0
LR19/061
Query!
Ethics committee name [2]
304038
0
Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [2]
304038
0
Monash Research Office 26 Sports Walk Monash University Wellington Road Clayton, Victoria, 3800
Query!
Ethics committee country [2]
304038
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [2]
304038
0
07/08/2019
Query!
Approval date [2]
304038
0
08/08/2019
Query!
Ethics approval number [2]
304038
0
21478
Query!
Ethics committee name [3]
304627
0
Austin Health Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [3]
304627
0
Office for Research and Ethics Austin Health Level 8, Harold Stokes Building Heidelberg VIC 3084
Query!
Ethics committee country [3]
304627
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [3]
304627
0
09/07/2019
Query!
Approval date [3]
304627
0
26/09/2019
Query!
Ethics approval number [3]
304627
0
HREC/54329/Austin-2019
Query!
Ethics committee name [4]
304628
0
Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [4]
304628
0
Monash Research Office 26 Sports Walk Monash University Wellington Road Clayton, Victoria, 3800
Query!
Ethics committee country [4]
304628
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [4]
304628
0
26/09/2019
Query!
Approval date [4]
304628
0
07/10/2019
Query!
Ethics approval number [4]
304628
0
22125
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Delays in escalation of care (EOC) can have serious consequences for patient safety and patient outcomes. While initiating a Medical Emergency Team (MET) call is a relatively smooth process, there are no defined behaviours surrounding pre-MET conversations. Even with well-established protocols, clinicians are reported to experience factors that inhibit initiation of EOC conversations. Research has identified key barriers to initiating EOC conversations as: fear of hierarchy, respondents explaining away or dismissing concerns, and poor risk awareness or skills. The purpose of this project is to address some of the barriers involved in EOC conversations prior to a MET call. To do this, an intervention that provides clinicians with training on the expectations of the ‘initiator’ and the ‘responder’ during an escalation conversation (in the form of a ‘choose-your-own-adventure’ training video) will be trialled at Austin Health. The training will be evaluated using pre- and post-intervention questionnaires on clinicians’ knowledge, confidence, and reluctance to escalate patient care, and experience sampling will be employed to examine clinicians’ experiences of EOC conversations during the trial period.
Query!
Trial website
https://www.behaviourworksaustralia.org/victorian-managed-insurance-authority/trial-4-escalation-of-care/
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
95618
0
Dr Dr Breanna Wright
Query!
Address
95618
0
BehaviourWorks Australia, 8 Scenic Blvd, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, 3800
Query!
Country
95618
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
95618
0
+61 4 2231 6401
Query!
Fax
95618
0
Query!
Email
95618
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
95619
0
Dr Breanna Wright
Query!
Address
95619
0
BehaviourWorks Australia, 8 Scenic Blvd, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, 3800
Query!
Country
95619
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
95619
0
+61 4 2231 6401
Query!
Fax
95619
0
Query!
Email
95619
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
95620
0
Bernice Plant
Query!
Address
95620
0
BehaviourWorks Australia, 8 Scenic Blvd, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, 3800
Query!
Country
95620
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
95620
0
+613 9905 9656
Query!
Fax
95620
0
Query!
Email
95620
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
De-identified survey data underlying the published results will be shared only. De-identified MET-call data may be made available subject to hospital approval.
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Immediately following publication, for a minimum of 7 years following publication.
Query!
Available to whom?
Survey data will be available to anyone via Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/). MET-call data will be available subject to hospital approval.
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
De-identified survey data will be available for research purposes only (e.g., to replicate key findings or for meta-analyses).
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
Survey data will be available via Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/).
Applications for MET-call data can be made by contacting the Principal Investigator (Dr Breanna Wright,
[email protected]
).
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF