Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12619001202156
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
7/08/2019
Date registered
28/08/2019
Date last updated
10/12/2020
Date data sharing statement initially provided
28/08/2019
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Improving the diet quality: "My Nutrition Score" of Australian adults using a brief, online, tailored, nutrition messaging intervention: A Randomised Controlled Trial with a nested Cross-Over Trial study design
Query!
Scientific title
Using a brief, online, tailored, nutrition messaging intervention to reduce the discretionary choice intake of Australian adults: A Randomised Controlled Trial with a nested Cross-Over Trial study design
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
298938
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1238-0824
Query!
Trial acronym
MyN
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Poor diet
313926
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Diet and Nutrition
312334
312334
0
0
Query!
Other diet and nutrition disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Name: Group 1 (intervention: tailored message group)
Why: The use of message framing as an influential communication strategy has been successful in promoting health related behaviours such as lowering alcohol consumption and reducing smoking. However, the same success has not always been achieved for eating behaviours.
What: Participants will be invited and randomised to intervention or control group. A baseline online questionnaire will measure: intention to reduce discretionary choice intake; diet quality using a validated Short Food Survey; and positive diet-behaviour enablers. The cross-over trial will test differences in Group 1 participants’ reported intention to eat less discretionary choices following exposure to 4 different evidence-based nutrition messages. The cross-over trial will occur at one time-point, at baseline. The messages will be standard within each frame, and provided as text. They will be framed as follows:
• Gain framed nutrition message (53 words)
• Loss framed nutrition message (53 words)
• Majority social norm framed nutrition message (37 words)
• Minority social norm framed nutrition message (40 words)
How: Participants will receive the messages in a random order with washouts lasting for a minimum of 30 seconds each. Following each message, participants will report their intention to change their discretionary food intake, and the nutrition message with the highest intention for change will be the one that is taken forward as part of the individual’s tailored nutrition intervention.
Where, when, how much: Based on the highest intention-to-change score following the message exposures in the cross-over trial, Group 1 participants will receive this message (the one resulting in the highest intention score) as their tailored intervention, via two emails at baseline and Week 2 of the study, each approximately comprising 500 words. These emails will encourage the new behaviour: eat less discretionary choices, using tailored and instructional messages to support the reduction of discretionary choices, guided by the Behaviour Change Wheel ‘COM-B’ framework.
The tailoring approach will be utilised as evidence shows that, in comparison to general messages, more specific and tailored instruction may increase engagement in a behaviour change intervention.
4 weeks after baseline, all participants will receive an email with links to complete follow-up surveys.
Group 1 will be asked to complete a follow-up questionnaire at Week 4 (from baseline) to measure: follow-up intention and diet quality.
Planned fidelity: In the follow-up questionnaire, participants will be asked if and how often intervention emails were read.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
315212
0
Lifestyle
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Name: Group 0 (control: standard message group)
What: Participants will be invited and randomised to intervention or control group. A baseline online questionnaire will measure: intention to reduce discretionary choice intake; diet quality using a validated Short Food Survey; and positive diet-behaviour enablers.
Where, when, how much: Group 0 will receive two emails; one at baseline and one at Week 2 of the study providing a standard (non-tailored) message to reduce discretionary choices, without additional behavioural support.
4 weeks after baseline, participants will receive an email with a link to complete follow-up surveys to measure: follow-up intention and diet quality.
Planned fidelity: In the follow-up questionnaire, participants will be asked if and how often intervention emails were read.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
320962
0
A difference in discretionary choice serve size intake between the intervention group and the control group, assessed via the Short Food Survey (dietary measurement tool).
Query!
Assessment method [1]
320962
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
320962
0
4 weeks post commencement of intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
373525
0
A change in intention scores following message exposures, compared to baseline/'raw' intention score. Intention score assessed as the mean score from 3 internally consistent questionnaire items constructed based on Theory of Planned Behaviour.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
373525
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
373525
0
At baseline, during cross-over trial
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
373917
0
A serve size reduction in discretionary choice intake in the intervention group from baseline to follow-up, assessed via the Short Food Survey (dietary measurement tool).
Query!
Assessment method [2]
373917
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
373917
0
4 weeks post commencement of intervention
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
• Adults (aged 18 years or over) currently living in Australia;
• Willing to participate in a brief online nutrition intervention over 4 weeks (and complete 2 surveys during this time);
• Have access to an internet enabled computer, phone or tablet to receive emails;
• Not currently avoiding any major food groups in their diet (wholegrains, fruit, vegetables, dairy and/or alternatives, meat and/or alternatives) or following a special diet for medical reasons.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
None
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Central randomisation by computer software
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Simple randomisation using a randomisation table created by computer software (i.e. computerised sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Other
Query!
Other design features
There will be a parallel assignment (Intervention and Control groups), and a cross-over assignment (Intervention group only) nested within this
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Based on an expected 0.25 to 0.35 serve size difference of discretionary choice intake change between the two groups, a-priori power calculations indicated that a sample range of 732 to 1430 participants would give us 80% power to detect the small effect sizes at a significant level of 0.05. An addition of 25% will account for potential drop out of participants not completing the full intervention. Therefore, a sample of between 915 to 1788 participants will be needed.
Data from the cross-over trial will be used to examine if there are any differences in the reported intention to eat less discretionary choices between the 4 nutrition message types. The difference between groups will be assessed by using repeated measures analysis of variance. Post hoc tests (Tukey) will test where the differences occur within the groups. A series of 2-way repeated measures analysis of variance will be performed to identify to which extent moderators effect the reported intention following exposure to a nutrition message.
Data from the follow up surveys of both intervention groups will be used to conduct unpaired (two sample) t-tests to compare the difference in discretionary choice intake change between a brief intervention using tailored nutrition messages (Group 1) and using a standardised message (Group 2). Covariates will be demographic characteristics and baseline consumption of discretionary choices.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/09/2019
Query!
Actual
8/09/2019
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
30/06/2021
Query!
Actual
29/11/2019
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
20/12/2019
Query!
Sample size
Target
1788
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
3453
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
ACT,NSW,NT,QLD,SA,TAS,WA,VIC
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
303478
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
303478
0
Flinders University
Query!
Address [1]
303478
0
Sturt Rd, Bedford Park SA 5042
Query!
Country [1]
303478
0
Australia
Query!
Funding source category [2]
303513
0
Commercial sector/Industry
Query!
Name [2]
303513
0
The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Query!
Address [2]
303513
0
SAHMRI, North Terrace, Adelaide SA 5000
Query!
Country [2]
303513
0
Australia
Query!
Funding source category [3]
303514
0
Other Collaborative groups
Query!
Name [3]
303514
0
Healthy Development Adelaide
Query!
Address [3]
303514
0
Ground Floor, Norwich Centre
55 King William Road
North Adelaide SA 5006
Query!
Country [3]
303514
0
Australia
Query!
Funding source category [4]
303515
0
Government body
Query!
Name [4]
303515
0
Commonwealth Scholarships Program for South Australia - Department of Education
Query!
Address [4]
303515
0
31 Flinders St, Adelaide SA 5000
Query!
Country [4]
303515
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/Industry
Query!
Name
The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Query!
Address
SAHMRI, North Terrace, Adelaide SA 5000
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
303536
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
303536
0
Flinders University
Query!
Address [1]
303536
0
Sturt Rd, Bedford Park SA 5042
Query!
Country [1]
303536
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
304008
0
CSIRO Health and Medical Human Research Ethics Committee (CHM HREC)
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
304008
0
41 Boggo Road, Dutton Park QLD 4102
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
304008
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
304008
0
18/07/2019
Query!
Approval date [1]
304008
0
22/07/2019
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
304008
0
2019_051_LR
Query!
Ethics committee name [2]
304039
0
Flinders University Social and Behavioural Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [2]
304039
0
Sturt Road, Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042
Query!
Ethics committee country [2]
304039
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [2]
304039
0
22/07/2019
Query!
Approval date [2]
304039
0
05/08/2019
Query!
Ethics approval number [2]
304039
0
OH-00224
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
CSIRO’s Nutrition and Health program conducts research to understand how we can do better to motivate and support people to improve their eating habits. Advances in technology means we are starting to move towards delivering online interventions which can reach more people and be tailored more easily for different people. For this project, we are testing tailored and standard nutrition messages delivered online, in a short 5-week intervention. We expect that a tailored intervention approach will be more effective in improving eating habits, compared to a standard 'one size fits all' approach. The findings from this project will help to guide the development of larger, digital programs which aim to improve the health and well-being of Australians.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
95542
0
Dr Gilly Hendrie
Query!
Address
95542
0
CSIRO, SAHMRI, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000
Query!
Country
95542
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
95542
0
+61 08 8305 0662
Query!
Fax
95542
0
Query!
Email
95542
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
95543
0
Gilly Hendrie
Query!
Address
95543
0
CSIRO, SAHMRI, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000
Query!
Country
95543
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
95543
0
+61 08 8305 0662
Query!
Fax
95543
0
Query!
Email
95543
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
95544
0
Gilly Hendrie
Query!
Address
95544
0
CSIRO, SAHMRI, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000
Query!
Country
95544
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
95544
0
+61 08 8305 0662
Query!
Fax
95544
0
Query!
Email
95544
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF