Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01766921
Registration number
NCT01766921
Ethics application status
Date submitted
10/01/2013
Date registered
11/01/2013
Date last updated
30/01/2019
Titles & IDs
Public title
Safety and Immunogenicity of Two Doses of H5N1 Influenza Vaccine in Elderly Subjects
Query!
Scientific title
A Phase II, Randomized, Observer-Blind, Multi-Center, Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability and Immunogenicity of an Adjuvanted Cell Culture-Derived H5N1 Subunit Influenza Virus Vaccine at Two Different Formulations in Healthy Elderly Subjects.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
V89_13
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Pandemic H5N1 Influenza
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Other - Adjuvanted H5N1 pandemic influenza vaccine
Experimental: aH5N1c - High dose -
Experimental: aH5N1c - Low dose -
Treatment: Other: Adjuvanted H5N1 pandemic influenza vaccine
Comparison of two doses of aH5N1c vaccine
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
The Percentages Of Subjects Achieving Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Titers =40 Against A/H5N1 Strain.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The optimal aH5N1c vaccine formulation was evaluated in terms of percentages of subjects achieving HI titers =40 against homologous A/H5N1 strain, three weeks after second vaccination with either low dose or high dose of aH5N1c vaccine, according to the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) criterion.
The CBER criterion for the elderly population is met if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the percentages of subjects achieving HI titer =40 meets or exceeds 60%.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Baseline (day 1) and Three weeks after 2nd vaccination (day 43)
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
The Percentages Of Subjects Achieving Seroconversion Against A/H5N1 Strain.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Immunogenicity was measured in terms of the percentages of subjects achieving seroconversion or significant increase in HI titer against the vaccine strain, three weeks after receiving two injections of low dose or high dose of aH5N1c vaccine according to the CBER criterion.
Seroconversion is defined as, a postvaccination titer =40 in subjects with a prevaccination HI titer \<10; or in subjects with prevaccination HI titer =10, a minimum four-fold rise in postvaccination HI antibody titer.
The CBER criterion for the elderly population is met if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI for the percentages of subjects achieving seroconversion for HI antibody titer meets or exceeds 30%.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Three weeks after 2nd vaccination (day 43)
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
0
0
Number of Subjects Reporting Solicited Local and Systemic Adverse Events, After Any Vaccination.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Safety was assessed as the number of subjects who reported solicited local and systemic adverse events following vaccination with either low or high dose of aH5N1c vaccine.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
From day 1 through day 7 after any vaccination.
Query!
Primary outcome [4]
0
0
Number of Subjects Reporting Unsolicited Adverse Events After Any Vaccination.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Safety was assessed using the number of subjects who reported any unsolicited adverse events, adverse events possibly or probably related to study vaccine, serious adverse events (SAEs), new onset of chronic diseases (NOCDs), medically attended AEs, AEs of special interest (AESIs), AEs leading to withdrawal from study following vaccination with aH5N1c vaccine
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
Day 1 through day 387 after any vaccination
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Geometric Mean Ratios (GMR) Against A/H5N1 Strain Following 2-dose Vaccination Schedule of Either Low Dose or High Dose aH5N1c Vaccine.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Immunogenicity was measured as the GMR. The ratio of postvaccination to prevaccination HI geometric mean titers (GMTs) is reported.
The criterion is met according to the European Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) criterion if the geometric mean increase GMR (day 43/day 1) in HI antibody titer is \>2.0 for subjects \>60 years of age.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
Day 1; day 22; day 43 and day 387
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Percentages Of Subjects With HI Titers =40 Against A/H5N1 Strain
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
Immunogenicity was assessed in terms of percentage of subjects achieving HI titers \>40, three weeks after second vaccination with aH5N1c according to the CHMP criterion.
The European Licensure (CHMP) criterion is met if the percentage of subjects achieving HI titers =40 is \>60%.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
Day 1, day 22, day 43 and day 387.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
The Percentages Of Subjects Achieving Seroconversion Against A/H5N1 Strain
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Immunogenicity was assessed in terms of percentages of subjects achieving seroconversion in HI titers, three weeks after receiving two injections of either low dose or high dose aH5N1c vaccine according to the CHMP criterion.
Seroconversion is defined as a postvaccination titer =40 in subjects with a prevaccination HI titer \<10; or in subjects with prevaccination HI titer =10, a minimum four-fold rise in postvaccination HI antibody titer.
The criterion is met according to the European (CHMP) guideline if the percentage of subjects achieving seroconversion is \>30%.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
Day 22, day 43 and day 387
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Healthy elderly subjects =65 years,
2. Individuals willing to provide written informed consent,
3. Individuals in good health,
4. Individuals willing to allow for their serum samples to be stored beyond the study period.
Query!
Minimum age
65
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Individuals not able to understand and follow study procedures,
2. History of any significant illness,
3. History of any serious chronic medical condition or progressive disease,
4. Presence of medically significant cancer,
5. Known or suspected impairment/alteration of immune function,
6. Presence of any progressive or severe neurologic disorder,
7. Presence of any bleeding disorders or conditions that prolongs bleeding time,
8. History of allergy to vaccine components,
9. Receipt of any other investigational product within 30 days prior to entry into the study,
10. History of previous H5N1 vaccination,
11. Receipt of any other type of seasonal vaccination within 2 months prior to entry into the study,
12. Receipt of any other vaccine within 2 weeks prior to entry into the study
13. Body temperature =38°C.0 (=100.4° F) and/or acute illness within 3 days of intended study vaccination,
14. Body mass index (BMI) = 35 kg/m2,
15. History of drug or alcohol abuse,
16. Any planned surgery during study period,
17. Individuals conducting the study and their immediate family members,
18. Individuals with behavioral or cognitive impairment or psychiatric diseases.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 2
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/01/2013
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/07/2014
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
1393
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,QLD,SA,WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
42 Hunter Clinical Research - Newcastle
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
44 Wesley Research Institute Clinical Trials Center - Auchenflower
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
40 CMAX - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
41 Linear Clinical Research - Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
45 Childrens Clin Rsrch Facility - Perth
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2292 - Newcastle
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
4066 - Auchenflower
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
5000 - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
6009 - Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
6872 - Perth
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Arizona
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
Florida
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Kansas
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Missouri
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
New York
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Texas
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
Utah
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Christchurch
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
Thailand
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Bangkok
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
Novartis Vaccines
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
Department of Health and Human Services
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Evaluate Safety, Tolerability and Immune response of adjuvanted H5N1 cell culture derived influenza vaccine in elderly subjects
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01766921
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Frey SE, Shakib S, Chanthavanich P, Richmond P, Smith T, Tantawichien T, Kittel C, Jaehnig P, Mojares Z, Verma B, Kanesa-Thasan N, Hohenboken M. Safety and Immunogenicity of MF59-Adjuvanted Cell Culture-Derived A/H5N1 Subunit Influenza Virus Vaccine: Dose-Finding Clinical Trials in Adults and the Elderly. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019 Mar 1;6(4):ofz107. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz107. eCollection 2019 Apr.
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Novartis vaccines and Diagnostics
Query!
Address
0
0
Novartis Vaccines
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01766921
Download to PDF