Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12619000516189p
Ethics application status
Not yet submitted
Date submitted
26/02/2019
Date registered
1/04/2019
Date last updated
1/04/2019
Date data sharing statement initially provided
1/04/2019
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
A retrospective cohort study to evaluate outcomes in carotid endartertomy vs carotid artery stenting in carotid artery disease
Query!
Scientific title
A retrospective cohort study to evaluate outcomes in carotid endartertomy vs carotid artery stenting in carotid artery disease
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
297531
0
Nil Known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
carotid disease
311742
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Surgery
310368
310368
0
0
Query!
Other surgery
Query!
Stroke
310556
310556
0
0
Query!
Ischaemic
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Query!
Patient registry
False
Query!
Target follow-up duration
Query!
Target follow-up type
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Carotid Endarterectomy
Patients observed in this study are those with unilateral and or bilateral carotid artery stenosis and/or occlusion. They underwent either Carotid endarterectomy or Carotid artery stenting, performed by one primary surgeon. The decision to offer carotid endarterectomy vs carotid artery stenting was based on the surgeons clinical assessment of the patient.
All patients recruited will have had their procedures performed at Hollywood Private Hospital, Nedlands, WA or Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA between the years 2006 and 2018.
All patients have been followed at 3 and 6 months with imaging and in person at 1 year post op by the same primary surgeon in his rooms.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
313765
0
Diagnosis / Prognosis
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Carotid artery stenting for patients with carotid artery stenosis/occlusion
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
319242
0
New ischaemic lesions as diagnosed on post-operative DW-MRI.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
319242
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
319242
0
2-14 days post operatively
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
367405
0
Development of stenosis or progression of pre-existing stenosis in the external carotid artery,
Query!
Assessment method [1]
367405
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
367405
0
ultrasound of neck bilaterally at at 6 months and 1 year post operatively
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
367534
0
Stroke
Query!
Assessment method [2]
367534
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
367534
0
immediately post operatively by neurological examination and DWI-MRI
in the one year follow up period post op by neurological examination
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
367535
0
Transient Ischaemia Attack
Query!
Assessment method [3]
367535
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
367535
0
immediately post operatively by neurological examination, review of medical records
in the one year follow up period post op by patient history
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
367536
0
Myocardial Infarction
Query!
Assessment method [4]
367536
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
367536
0
peri operatively
immediately post operatively
in the one year follow up period post op
by review of medical records
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
All patients who underwent either Carotid artery stenting or Carotid endarterectomy performed by one vascular surgeon between the years 2006 and 2018 are included
Query!
Minimum age
40
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria included allergy to heparin, aspirin or clopidogrel, contraindication to MRI, intracranial hemorrhage, dementia or neurologic illness that might confound neurological evaluation.
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Natural history
Query!
Duration
Longitudinal
Query!
Selection
Defined population
Query!
Timing
Retrospective
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
The primary end point is the evidence of new ischaemic lesions on postoperative DW-MRI. Continuous variables will be expressed as the mean and standard deviation. Categoric data will be compared using the fisher exact test and summarized as absolute frequencies and percentages. An unpaired student t-test will be used to compare continuous variables between the two cohorts and statistical significance is defined as p<0.5.
Binary regression models to compare DW-MRI measures between the two groups will be used. Interactions between the effect of intervention type on the primary outcome measure and selected variables (age, symptomatic status, stent type) will be investigated and adjusted for any significant imbalances in baseline characteristic.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/05/2019
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
31/08/2019
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
31/08/2019
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
350
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
13258
0
Hollywood Private Hospital - Nedlands
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
25818
0
6009 - Nedlands
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
302089
0
Self funded/Unfunded
Query!
Name [1]
302089
0
In Kind - time put in by primary surgeon/chief investigato and associate investigator
Query!
Address [1]
302089
0
Hollywood Private Hospital
Monash Avenue
Nedlands, 6009, Western Australia
Query!
Country [1]
302089
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Dr Kishore Siuenarine
Query!
Address
Hollywood Private Hospital
Monash Avenue
Nedlands, 6009, Western Australia
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
301910
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
301910
0
Dr Rebekah Tan
Query!
Address [1]
301910
0
Hollywood Private Hospital
Monash Avenue
Nedlands, 6009, Western Australia
Query!
Country [1]
301910
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Not yet submitted
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
302768
0
Hollywood Private Hospital Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
302768
0
Hollywood Private Hospital Monash Avenue Nedlands, 6009, Western Australia
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
302768
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
302768
0
04/04/2019
Query!
Approval date [1]
302768
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
302768
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Stroke is the most common life threatening and debilitating neurological disorder. It is commonly caused by the flicking off of plaque from calcified arteries in the neck region in patients with atherosclerotic internal carotid artery stenosis. This study retrospectively compares the outcomes after 2 different treatment options for carotid artery stenosis: carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterecromy (CEA). All patients who underwent either procedure performed by the primary surgeon, in 4 locations will be included. Specific outcome measures are: (1) post procedure occurrence of further clots in the arteries supplying the brain and (2) post procedure occurrence of external carotid (a branch of the artery being operated on) occlusion. In order to measure these outcomes, we will compare the clinical examination findings as well as imaging (MRI, ultrasound, CT angiography) results pre and post operatively. As CEA is currently the gold standard for treating this condition, we predict that long term outcomes are better in CEA as compared to CAS.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
91334
0
Dr Kishore Sieunarine
Query!
Address
91334
0
Hollywood Private Hospital
Monash Avenue
Nedlands 6009, WA
Query!
Country
91334
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
91334
0
+61 893466000
Query!
Fax
91334
0
Query!
Email
91334
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
91335
0
Kishore Sieunarine
Query!
Address
91335
0
Hollywood Private Hospital
Monash Avenue
Nedlands 6009, WA
Query!
Country
91335
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
91335
0
+61 893466000
Query!
Fax
91335
0
Query!
Email
91335
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
91336
0
Kishore Sieunarine
Query!
Address
91336
0
Hollywood Private Hospital
Monash Avenue
Nedlands 6009, WA
Query!
Country
91336
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
91336
0
+61 893466000
Query!
Fax
91336
0
Query!
Email
91336
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Doc. No.
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
1457
Study protocol
377069-(Uploaded-26-02-2019-12-56-27)-Study-related document.docx
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF