Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12619000146190
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
25/01/2019
Date registered
31/01/2019
Date last updated
31/01/2019
Date data sharing statement initially provided
31/01/2019
Date results provided
31/01/2019
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Goal oriented instructions increase the number of repetitions completed in stroke rehabilitation: A within-participant, repeated measures experimental study
Query!
Scientific title
Goal oriented instructions increase the number of repetitions completed in stroke rehabilitation A within-participant, repeated measures experimental study
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
297214
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Stroke
311259
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Stroke
309882
309882
0
0
Query!
Haemorrhagic
Query!
Stroke
309927
309927
0
0
Query!
Ischaemic
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Participants were be observed performing 25 repetitions of one of their usual exercises in the rehabilitation gym, under a non-specific instruction " do this exercise". The time taken to perform 25 repetitions was recorded. This formed the baseline measure. After a short rest, the participant was was presented with one of the following goal oriented instructions:
• A: “stand up and sit down 25 times”
• B: “stand up and sit down 25 times as fast as you can”
• C: “stand up and sit down 25 times as fast as you can, aim for your personal best!” The researcher provided additional encouragement whilst the participant performed the exercise such as “Go, Go, Go!”, “Over halfway there” and a countdown from 10 repetitions.
The time taken to perform 25 repetitions under each exercises was recorded using a stopwatch.
All participants received each of the three instructions over three days. The order the instructions were presented were block randomised. A new baseline measure was recorded each day.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
313465
0
Rehabilitation
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
The baseline measure, a non-specific instruction, was used as a comparator to determine the effect of each goal oriented instruction. The baseline measure acted as a control for each patient.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
318830
0
The number of repetitions completed per minute under each instruction. A stopwatch was used to time how long it took the participants to complete 25 repetitions under each instruction. A hand-held tally counter was used to count the number of repetitions. The results were converted into repetitions per minute.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
318830
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
318830
0
Immediately post each instruction delivered.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
366195
0
Not applicable
Query!
Assessment method [1]
366195
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
366195
0
Not applicable
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
greater than or equal to 18 years old; inpatients with an expected length of stay likely greater than one week or outpatients expected to attend at least five more therapy sessions
able to perform 50 repetitions of a lower limb exercise without physical assistance (e.g. sit to stand, tilt table strengthening exercises, stepping exercises)
sufficient English to understand simple instructions
adequate cognition to follow simple instructions.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Patients were excluded if they did not require inpatient physiotherapy rehabilitation and/or were not medically stable to participate in rehabilitation exercises.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Instruction orders were block randomised and sequentially allocated to participants as the were enrolled into the study.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Crossover
Query!
Other design features
All participants received each of the three instructions, the order they were presented in and the content of each instruction was blinding from the patient.
Due to the nature of the study, it was not possible to blind assessors as they presented the instruction and recorded the time taken to perform the exercise.
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
All data analyses were performed using statistical software with the level of significance set at p<0.05. The mean difference and 95% confidence interval between baseline and each goal oriented instruction was calculated and the average percentage increase of repetition rate from baseline to each goal oriented instruction was calculated. Repeated measures of variance (ANOVA) was applied to the percentage change to ascertain statistically significant differences between the instructions. Bonferroni adjustment was used for multiple comparisons. As significance was found paired sample t-tests were used to compare the percentage change between each instruction (A vs B, A vs C, B vs C) to determine the most effective instruction.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
14/08/2017
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
15/10/2018
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
26/10/2018
Query!
Sample size
Target
24
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
24
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
12992
0
Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital - Bankstown
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
25472
0
2200 - Bankstown
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
301767
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
301767
0
Australian Catholic Universtiy
Query!
Address [1]
301767
0
Australian Catholic University
Level 6, 33 Berry Street
North sydney, NSW
2060
Query!
Country [1]
301767
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Tessa Hillig
Query!
Address
Australian Catholic University
Level 6, 33 Berry Street
North Sydney, NSW
2060
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
301532
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
301532
0
Simone Dorsch
Query!
Address [1]
301532
0
Level 6,
33 Berry Street
North Sydney, NSW 2060
Query!
Country [1]
301532
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
302482
0
South Western Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
302482
0
Level 2, UNSW Clinical School Liverpool Hospital, Goulburn St Liverpool, NSW 2170
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
302482
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
302482
0
07/06/2017
Query!
Approval date [1]
302482
0
14/07/2017
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
302482
0
HREC/17/LPOOL/86
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
After stroke, there is strong evidence that indicates that the greater the intensity of practice in rehabilitation, the better the function outcome for the patient. Currently, there is no research that has determined the effect of instructions on increasing intensity of practice in rehabilitation. Therefore, the primary purpose of this study is to test three goal oriented instructions and compare them to a non-specific instruction. A non specific instruction, "do this exercise", was presented to a participant and the time taken to perform repetitions was recorded. Then, one of three goal oriented instructions were presented. These instructions are 1) “do [exercise] 25 times,”, 2) “do [exercise] 25 times as fast as you can and 3) “do [exercise] 25 times, as fast as you can, aiming for a personal best”, The time taken under each instruction was converted to repetitions per minute, Each participant received all three instructions in a random order, with one instruction presented per day over three days. For each instruction, the recorded time for twenty five repetitions was converted to a rate of repetitions/minute. The time taken to perform the twenty five repetitions under each goal oriented instruction was be compared with the non specific instruction and a percentage change in rate of repetitions was calculated. Statistical anaylsis was applied to determine if one instruction was more effective at increasing intensity of practice
Query!
Trial website
Not application
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Not applicable
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
90370
0
Miss Tessa Hillig
Query!
Address
90370
0
Australian Catholic University
Level 6, 33 Berry Street, North Sydney
2060
Query!
Country
90370
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
90370
0
+61 423 084 409
Query!
Fax
90370
0
Query!
Email
90370
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
90371
0
Simone Dorsch
Query!
Address
90371
0
Australian Catholic University
Level 6, 33 Berry Street, North Sydney NSW 2060
PO Box 968
Query!
Country
90371
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
90371
0
+61 2 9739 2277
Query!
Fax
90371
0
Query!
Email
90371
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
90372
0
Simone Dorsch
Query!
Address
90372
0
Australian Catholic University
Level 6, 33 Berry Street, North Sydney NSW 2060
PO Box 968
Query!
Country
90372
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
90372
0
+61 2 9739 2277
Query!
Fax
90372
0
Query!
Email
90372
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Participant data will remain confidential. A mean rate of repetitions for each instruction will be presented.
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Doc. No.
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
1170
Study protocol
376828-(Uploaded-25-01-2019-17-32-19)-Study-related document.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF