Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12619001064190
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
18/01/2019
Date registered
31/07/2019
Date last updated
31/07/2019
Date data sharing statement initially provided
31/07/2019
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Efficacy of Regional Anaesthesia in a Dedicated Service: A Retrospective Comparison of Supervised Trainees and Consultant Anaesthetists
Query!
Scientific title
Efficacy of Regional Anaesthesia in a Dedicated Service: A Retrospective Comparison of Supervised Trainees and Consultant Anaesthetists
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
297132
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1227-0092
Query!
Trial acronym
RAPTOR
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Acute pain
311162
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Anaesthesiology
309782
309782
0
0
Query!
Anaesthetics
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Query!
Patient registry
False
Query!
Target follow-up duration
Query!
Target follow-up type
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Regional anaesthesia procedure undertaken by either supervised trainee or consultant anaesthetist. Data recorded in post-anaesthesia care unit by recovery nurse: Numeric rating scale pain score, administration of opioid or antiemetic also documented. This data was entered at time of patient care (17 Feb 2015 - 1 Aug 2018). Audit database then to be accessed for study.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
313396
0
Not applicable
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Regional anaesthesia procedure undertaken by either supervised trainee (comparator) or consultant (control) anaesthetist
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
318739
0
Significant post procedural pain (NRS >5) in post-anaesthesia care unit. This is assessed by recovery staff - verbally reported by patient and recorded in patient record. This data point is then transferred to an existing audit database which is the data source for this study.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
318739
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
318739
0
Any time during stay documented in post-anaesthesia care unit record during immediate post-procedure period
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
365866
0
Maximum pain score (NRS) in post anaesthesia care unit. This is assessed by recovery staff - verbally reported by patient and recorded in patient record. This data point is then transferred to an existing audit database which is the data source for this study.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
365866
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
365866
0
Any time during stay documented in post-anaesthesia care unit record during immediate post-procedure period
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
365867
0
Absence of pain (NRS = 0) in post-anaesthesia care unit. This is assessed by recovery staff - verbally reported by patient and recorded in patient record. This data point is then transferred to an existing audit database which is the data source for this study.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
365867
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
365867
0
Any time during stay documented in post-anaesthesia care unit record during immediate post-procedure period
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
365868
0
Requirement for systemic opioid in post-anaesthesia care unit. This is assessed by recovery staff according to routine practice and recorded in patient record. This data point is then transferred to an existing audit database which is the data source for this study.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
365868
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
365868
0
Any time during stay documented in post-anaesthesia care unit record during immediate post-procedure period
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
365869
0
Requirement for antiemetic in post-anaesthesia care unit. This is assessed by recovery staff according to routine practice and recorded in patient record. This data point is then transferred to an existing audit database which is the data source for this study.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
365869
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
365869
0
Any time during stay documented in post-anaesthesia care unit record during immediate post-procedure period
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
All patients entered in to regional anaesthesia audit database at the Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Patients not receiving regional anaesthesia procedures (e.g. vascular access or epidural blood patch).
Patients who did not go to the Post-Anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU) (for example, patients who were cared for in the intensive care unit) – and thus did not have a pain score recorded.
Patients receiving a regional anaesthesia procedure from both a consultant anaesthetist and a supervised trainee.
Patients receiving multiple regional anaesthesia procedures on more than one anatomical region (i.e. lower limb, upper limb, trunk, neuraxial/paravertebral)
Postoperative or “rescue” regional anaesthesia procedures.
Patients where it is unclear who performed the procedure.
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Natural history
Query!
Duration
Longitudinal
Query!
Selection
Defined population
Query!
Timing
Retrospective
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
An estimated 1800 entries are in the 'Green Room' audit database. No estimates (published or using in-house data) of the proportion of consultant or registrar procedures resulting in an NRS >5 in PACU (primary outcome) are available to our knowledge. If we choose a conservative proportion for consultant procedures with an NRS>5 as 0.50, to have greater than 90% power to detect a clinically significant meaningful difference of 0.10, a minimum sample size of 1253 would be required. This is based on a type I error of 0.05 and a ratio of consultant procedures to registrars of 2.5:1.
The set sample size from the Green room database is thus sufficient to address the primary hypothesis.
Statistical Analysis
Summary statistics of variables will be reported. Chi-square for categorical outcomes and Mann-Whitney U-tests for continuous outcomes will test for differences in outcomes between consultants and registrars. P-values < 0.05 will be defined as statistically significant.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
5/08/2019
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
5/08/2019
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
5/08/2019
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
1800
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
QLD
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
12960
0
Royal Brisbane & Womens Hospital - Herston
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
25432
0
4029 - Herston
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
301693
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
301693
0
Dr Adrian Chin, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
Query!
Address [1]
301693
0
Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital,
Corner of Butterfield St and Bowen Bridge Road
Herston, QLD, Australia 4029
Query!
Country [1]
301693
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Dr Adrian Chin
Query!
Address
Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital,
Corner of Butterfield St and Bowen Bridge Road
Herston, QLD, Australia 4029
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
301413
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
301413
0
Query!
Address [1]
301413
0
Query!
Country [1]
301413
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
302413
0
Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
302413
0
Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital Executive Suites Lower Ground Floor Dr James Mayne Building Butterfield St, Herston, QLD 4029
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
302413
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
302413
0
07/12/2018
Query!
Approval date [1]
302413
0
20/12/2018
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
302413
0
LNR/2018/QRBW/47004
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Training junior clinicians requires appropriate case selection and supervision. Thus, randomising patients to be exposed to trainees is problematic. We designed a retrospective observational study examining prospectively collected data. Data will be retrieved from an ongoing audit database of every regional anaesthesia procedure performed by the dedicated regional anaesthesia service of our hospital. This service performs regional anaesthesia using a block room or block team model. The principal proceduralist was recorded immediately after performance of the block as either a consultant or registrar. The study group includes all patients who received care from supervised trainees. The comparator group included patients who received regional anaesthesia care from consultant anaesthestists. Null hypothesis: There is no difference in the effectiveness of regional anaesthesia (defined as inadequate analgesia [NRS >5] in PACU) when supervised trainees are the principal proceduralist, when compared with consultants.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
90158
0
Dr Daniel Foster
Query!
Address
90158
0
Department of Anaesthesia & Perioperative Medicine
Level 4 Ned Hanlon Building
Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital
Cnr Butterfield St & Bowen Bridge Rd
Herston QLD 4029
Query!
Country
90158
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
90158
0
+61 7 3646 8111
Query!
Fax
90158
0
Query!
Email
90158
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
90159
0
Daniel Foster
Query!
Address
90159
0
Department of Anaesthesia & Perioperative Medicine
Level 4 Ned Hanlon Building
Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital
Cnr Butterfield St & Bowen Bridge Rd
Herston QLD 4029
Query!
Country
90159
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
90159
0
+61 7 3646 8111
Query!
Fax
90159
0
Query!
Email
90159
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
90160
0
Daniel Foster
Query!
Address
90160
0
Department of Anaesthesia & Perioperative Medicine
Level 4 Ned Hanlon Building
Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital
Cnr Butterfield St & Bowen Bridge Rd
Herston QLD 4029
Query!
Country
90160
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
90160
0
+61 7 3646 8111
Query!
Fax
90160
0
Query!
Email
90160
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Database of over 2000 entries - not practical
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Doc. No.
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
1105
Study protocol
376775-(Uploaded-18-01-2019-13-00-47)-Study-related document.doc
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF