Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12618001969257p
Ethics application status
Submitted, not yet approved
Date submitted
13/11/2018
Date registered
5/12/2018
Date last updated
28/11/2019
Date data sharing statement initially provided
5/12/2018
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Comparing information for consent for cardiology procedures given by a video, or by a doctor, to see if this improves patient understanding of a procedure.
Query!
Scientific title
A randomised controlled trial comparing video-assisted medical consent with traditional doctor-patient informed consent for procedures in cardiology to assess patient knowledge and satisfaction
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
296588
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1223-8900
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Ischaemic heart disease
310396
0
Query!
Coronary artery disease
310397
0
Query!
Chest pain
310398
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cardiovascular
309114
309114
0
0
Query!
Coronary heart disease
Query!
Cardiovascular
309192
309192
0
0
Query!
Other cardiovascular diseases
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Patients will receive video-assisted consent or usual care when informed consent is undertaken for cardiology procedures.
Arm 1 (video-assisted consent)
Arm 2 (usual care)
The intervention is one short video animation (approximately 5 minutes) that discusses the risks, benefits and alternatives of the cardiology procedure, and will be watched on a computer or tablet computer in the doctor's clinic or hospital. The animations are narrated by a voiceover artist from a script constructed by cardiology specialists. These videos have been designed specifically for the study. The animation will be watched by the patient and a research assistant will supervise to ensure that the video is watched in its entirety by the patient. All participants will be offered the opportunity to ask questions after the video has been watched or after the doctor has undertaken informed consent. Only one video is watched by the participant, and only one video is available for the procedure.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
312898
0
Behaviour
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
The comparator group is informed medical consent provided by the cardiologist, which is usual / standard care.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
308093
0
Knowledge recall on a knowledge assessment scored out of ten following consent.
The knowledge recall has been designed specifically for this study.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
308093
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
308093
0
Measured immediately after informed consent has been undertaken.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
308094
0
Patient satisfaction recorded on a likert scale.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
308094
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
308094
0
Measured immediately after the consent has been undertaken
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
353929
0
Physician satisfaction recorded on a likert scale.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
353929
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
353929
0
Measured immediately after the consent has been undertaken
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
353930
0
Time per consent measured using a stopwatch
Query!
Assessment method [2]
353930
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
353930
0
Measured in minutes and seconds from the commencement of the consent, and finishing when there are no further questions from the patient
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Patients aged greater than 18 years of age, who are undergoing a cardiology procedure, and who are able to provide informed medical consent will be invited to participate in the study.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Patients with visual impairment, hearing impairment, or who come from a non-English speaking background without a command of English, or do not have the capacity to consent will be excluded from participation.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Educational / counselling / training
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Allocation concealment will be undertaken by sealed opaque envelopes.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Computerised sequence generation will be used to randomly allocate subjects into the different groups.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
We calculated a sample size of 152 participants (76 per group) to detect a minimally clinically important difference of knowledge retention post consent as undertaken on a knowledge questionnaire with 80% power at 5% level of significance.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
2/03/2020
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
16/11/2020
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
16/11/2020
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
152
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
12395
0
Austin Health - Austin Hospital - Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
24662
0
3084 - Heidelberg
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
301166
0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name [1]
301166
0
AVANT DIT Grant
Query!
Address [1]
301166
0
Level 6 Tower 3/Darling Park, 201 Sussex St, Sydney NSW 2000
Query!
Country [1]
301166
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/Industry
Query!
Name
Consentic
Query!
Address
PO Box 4118
Royal North Shore Hospital
NSW 2065
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
300788
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
300788
0
Query!
Address [1]
300788
0
Query!
Country [1]
300788
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Submitted, not yet approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
301910
0
Austin Health Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
301910
0
145 Studley Rd, Heidelberg VIC 3084
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
301910
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
301910
0
14/11/2018
Query!
Approval date [1]
301910
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
301910
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Informed medical consent is often poorly done; it can be time consuming, there is no clear standard between different medical practitioners, and overwhelmingly, the literature provides support for standardised animations or video consent. Video animations have been shown to improve patient comprehension, take the same amount of time, or can even save time and in most cases there is an improvement in patient satisfaction and comprehension. Videos have been successfully used to consent for colonoscopy, knee arthroscopy, laparoscopic urological procedures, cataract surgery, intravenous fluorescent angiography, vascular procedures, coronary angiography, cardiac electrophysiology, urogynaecological surgery as well as for clinical trials. There are no studies evaluating video informed consent for cardiology procedures in Australia. Given the literature shows improvements in patient understanding and satisfaction, it is anticipated that the video informed consent will lead to enhanced clinical practice, including enhanced knowledge retention by patients, improved patient and physician satisfaction, improved recall of the procedure, as well as saving minutes per consultation. We aim to compare traditional doctor-patient informed consent to a video animation when consenting for cardiology procedures such as a coronary angiogram. We propose that the video consent will be superior to traditional doctor patient consent – patients will have better retention of information, comprehension and understanding and higher satisfaction.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
88526
0
Dr Julia Rhodes
Query!
Address
88526
0
Department of Dermatology
Alfred Hospital
55 Commercial Road
Melbourne
Victoria 3004
Australia
Query!
Country
88526
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
88526
0
+61 420902720
Query!
Fax
88526
0
Query!
Email
88526
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
88527
0
Julia Rhodes
Query!
Address
88527
0
Department of Dermatology
Alfred Hospital
55 Commercial Road
Melbourne
Victoria 3004
Australia
Query!
Country
88527
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
88527
0
+61 420902720
Query!
Fax
88527
0
Query!
Email
88527
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
88528
0
Julia Rhodes
Query!
Address
88528
0
Department of Dermatology
Alfred Hospital
55 Commercial Road
Melbourne
Victoria 3004
Australia
Query!
Country
88528
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
88528
0
+61 420902720
Query!
Fax
88528
0
Query!
Email
88528
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
There are no plans to make individual participant data routinely publicly available. The only personal data to be collected is gender and age.
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF