Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12619001264178
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
2/08/2018
Date registered
12/09/2019
Date last updated
1/06/2024
Date data sharing statement initially provided
12/09/2019
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
PETReA: Phase 3 evaluation of PET-guided, Response-Adapted therapy in patients with previously untreated, high tumour burden follicular lymphoma
Query!
Scientific title
PETReA: Phase 3 evaluation of PET-guided, Response-Adapted therapy in patients with previously untreated, high tumour burden follicular lymphoma - PETReA
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
295726
0
EUCTR2016-004010-10-GB
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
PETReA
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Follicular Lymphoma
309124
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
307999
307999
0
0
Query!
Lymphoma (non Hodgkin's lymphoma) - Low grade lymphoma
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Randomised Phase III PET -response adapted maintenance therapy
Based on PET response (negative or positive) patients are randomised in the following manner -
Group 1: PET +ve (Deauville 4-5)
Arm A: Rituximab maintenance
Rituximab: 375 mg/m2 intravenous (or 1400 mg subcutaneously) on day 1 of each cycle, repeated every 8 weeks for up to 12 cycles
Arm B: Rituximab + lenalidomide (R2)
Rituximab 375 mg/m2 intravenously (or 1400 mg subcutaneously) on day 1 of each cycle of, repeated every 8 weeks for up to 12 cycles, a cycle lasts 28 days
Lenalidomide oral tablet once daily on days 1 to 21 of every 28-day cycle (dose tailored to renal function and tolerance) for up to 24 cycles
Group 2: PET –ve (Deauville 1-3)
Arm A: Rituximab maintenance
Rituximab: 375 mg/m2 intravenously (or 1400 mg subcutaneously) on day 1 of each cycle, repeated every 8 weeks for up to 12 cycles, a cycle last 28 days
Arm B: No further treatment
Query!
Intervention code [1]
302050
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
For both PET positive and negative groups, the comparator arm is the SoC arm - rituximab maintenance
Rituximab 375 mg/m2 iv (or 1400 mg sc) on day 1 of each cycle, repeated every 8 weeks for up to 12 cycles
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
306975
0
The primary outcome is progression-free survival (PFS). This is the time from randomisation until progression or death from any cause.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
306975
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
306975
0
Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Patients will be assessed for disease progression by physical examination at the end of the induction phase of treatment and at every subsequent study visit. These visits occur every 4 weeks during the 2-year maintenance phase in the PET +ve group, every 8 weeks during the maintenance phase in the PET -ve group and every 24 weeks thereafter. Additional assessments will be performed between planned study visits if there is any suspicion of disease progression.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
350297
0
a) Anatomical response to induction therapy
Query!
Assessment method [1]
350297
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
350297
0
Anatomical response to induction therapy will be based on a pre- and post-induction CT scan and bone marrow biopsy.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
354806
0
b) Metabolic response to induction therapy
Assessment of metabolic response will be based on the intensity of FDG uptake on whole-body PET-CT scans.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
354806
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
354806
0
Assessment of metabolic response will occur post induction therapy
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
354807
0
c) Conversion to PET negativity (PET +ve group only)
The PET +ve group will undergo additional imaging with a conventional ceCT and PET-CT scan
Query!
Assessment method [3]
354807
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
354807
0
The additional imaging for the PET +ve group will occur 52 (+/- 2) weeks after day 1 of the first cycle of maintenance treatment and at least 2 weeks after the most recent administration of rituximab or G-CSF.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
354808
0
d) Overall survival
Query!
Assessment method [4]
354808
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
354808
0
Overall survival will be assessed from randomisation until death by any cause. Pre-progression follow-up and post- progression follow-up will occur every 24 (+/-4) weeks.
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
354809
0
e) Time to next treatment
This will be assessed through pre-progression follow-up assessments which includes vital signs, physical examination, blood tests, questionnaires, toxicity assessments and ceCT scan.
If disease progression is suspected on the basis of symptoms or physical examination findings, patients will undergo conventional CT scanning at the earliest opportunity.
By performing the above-mentioned assessments and confirming disease progression, this will indicate when patients will need to have further treatment.
The name of the questionnaires used are as follows:
QoL questionnaires - EQ-5D and EQ-VAS
Query!
Assessment method [5]
354809
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
354809
0
Time to next treatment will be assessed during pre-progression follow-up.
Pre-progression follow-up will occur after maintenance therapy, every 24 (+/- 4 weeks) weeks. It finishes once progression is documented or at the end of the study, whichever is earlier.
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
354810
0
f) Time to next chemotherapy
This will be assessed through pre-progression follow-up which includes vital signs, physical examination, blood tests, questionnaires, toxicity assessments and ceCT scan.
By performing the above-mentioned assessments and confirming disease progression, this will indicate when patients will need to have further subsequent chemotherapy.
The name of the questionnaires used are as follows:
QoL questionnaires - EQ-5D and EQ-VAS
Query!
Assessment method [6]
354810
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
354810
0
Time to next treatment will be assessed during pre-progression follow-up
.The pre-progression follow-up phase starts immediately after the end of the last cycle of maintenance therapy (day 56 for rituximab monotherapy, day 28 for rituximab + lenalidomide), or after 96 weeks for patients in Arm B of the PET –ve group (no treatment). It finishes once progression is documented or at the end of the study, whichever is earlier.
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
354811
0
g) Toxicity
Toxicity will be assessed through vital signs, physical examinations, blood tests, ECGs, questionnaires, CT scans and PET scans
Questionnaires used are QoL questionnaires - EQ-5D and EQ-VAS.
Query!
Assessment method [7]
354811
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
354811
0
Toxicity will be assessed from the point of informed consent until 36 months post randomisation. Events felt to be a long term side effect of study treatment should be reported outside of this time limit at the discretion of the local investigator, if felt to be clinically relevant and serious.
Subjects will be evaluated for AEs at EACH VISIT with the NCI CTCAE Version 4.03 used as a guide for the grading of severity.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Must be greater than or equal to 18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent form.
2. Must be able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements.
3. Must have a documented diagnosis of follicular lymphoma (grade 1, 2 or 3a).
4. Must be at non-contiguous stage II, stage III or stage IV.
5. Must fulfil at least one of the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomas Folliculaires (GELF) GELF criteria for high tumour burden:
a. Systemic symptoms (> 10% weight loss, temperature greater than or equal to 38°C for more than 5 days, abundant night sweats)
b. Performance status (PS) greater than 1 according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale
c. Elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level
d. ß2-microglobulin level greater than 25.5 nM/L (3 µg/mL)
e. A single lymph node larger than 7 cm
f. Involvement of at least 3 nodal sites, each with diameter greater than 3 cm
g. Marked splenomegaly
h. Organ failure
i. Pleural effusion or ascites
j. Orbital or epidural involvement
k. Blood infiltration
l. Cytopenia
6. Must not have received prior systemic therapy (local radiotherapy is permitted).
7. Must have a WHO performance status score of less than or equal to 2.
8. Must agree to adhere to the Celgene guidance on pregnancy prevention.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Any serious medical condition that would prevent the subject from participating in the study.
2. Known active infection with HIV, HBV or HCV.
3. Pregnant or lactating females.
4. Central nervous system involvement as documented by spinal fluid cytology or imaging.
5. History of active malignancy during the past 5 years with the exception of basal carcinoma of the skin, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, carcinoma in situ of the breast, prostate cancer (TNM stage of T1a or T1b)
6. Any of the following laboratory abnormalities:
a. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <1,000/µL (1.0 X 10^9/L)
b. Platelet count <50,000/µL (50 X 10^9/L)
c. Serum alanine transaminase (ALT) > 3.0 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
d. Serum total bilirubin >1.5 x ULN unless due to Gilbert's Syndrome or biliary obstruction by lymphoma
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Allocation is not concealed
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Simple randomisation using a randomisation table created by computer software (i.e. computerised sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
In total, 1000 patients will be recruited into the full study. An allowance is made for 10% to drop out in the induction phase. Of the remaining 756 patients, it is anticipated that 606 will be PET -ve and randomised to the de-escalation study and that 150 will be PET +ve and randomised to the escalation study. Sample size calculations are carried out for the PET -ve and PET +ve section of the trial separately.
PET -ve group: Following induction therapy, patients will be randomised on a 1:1 basis to receive either rituximab maintenance therapy (control arm) or no further therapy (experimental arm).
The null hypothesis is that removing rituximab maintenance results in a rate of PFS greater than the non-inferiority margin. That is for PFS rates in each treatment arm (PFS1 and PFS2)
H0: PFS1 – PFS2 = delta
The alternative hypothesis is that the change in PFS due to the removal of rituximab therapy will be less than the non-inferiority margin
H1: PFS1 – PFS2 < delta
The design parameters for the non-inferiority study were set after much discussion and use a one-sided alpha level of 0.5 and a Power of 85%.
The primary endpoint is PFS measured at 3 years with the hazard ratio between the two treatment arms the key efficacy parameter of interest. Based on historical data, it is estimated that the 3Y PFS rate will be approximately 76%. An estimate of the PFS rate in the control arm is characterized by a Weibull distribution with scale = 0.00133 and shape = 2.5 parameters. A non-inferiority margin of 8% was chosen via consultation with both clinicians and patient groups and with reference to EMA guidelines which state that larger non-inferiority margins should be considered when the experimental arm has some advantage in another aspect of its profile. Justifications in this instance are given as 1) frontline rituximab maintenance does not confer a survival advantage, 2) omitting rituximab maintenance should significantly reduce the risk of serious infection 3) there are substantial savings in cost to the NHS in not providing rituximab.
Based on a survival rate of 80% in the control arm, a non-inferiority margin of 8% relates to a hazard ratio of 1.47 which is obtained by having a second survival function with scale = 0.00188.
An allowance is also made for a single interim analysis to be carried out once 50% of the events have been observed (after approximately 5 years). Efficacy boundaries are set using O'Brien-Fleming boundaries. Here controlling the overall Type I error at 0.05 requires that assessment of non-inferiority is based on one-sided 99.1% and 95.3% confidence intervals at the interim and final analysis respectively.
Sample size calculations for the number of events are based on a one-side alpha level of 0.05 and 85% power, a total of 250 events are required after adjusting.
Based on these estimates, we anticipate recruiting a total of 840 patients over a period of 53 months. An allowance is made to account for 10% of patients leaving the study in the initial induction phase. Of the remaining patients, 80% are anticipated to be PET -ve giving an estimated 606 patients in this group. Based on this and the assumed PFS rate, it is projected that the required events will be obtained within 87 months following randomisation. Allowing for each patient to have a minimum of 3 years (36 months) follow-up from randomisation will ensure that enough events are available to power the analysis.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
25/03/2019
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/10/2024
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
1/11/2026
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
1000
Query!
Accrual to date
572
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW,QLD,TAS,VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
11562
0
Concord Repatriation Hospital - Concord
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
11563
0
Monash Medical Centre - Clayton campus - Clayton
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
11565
0
Royal Hobart Hospital - Hobart
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
11566
0
Wollongong Hospital - Wollongong
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
11567
0
St George Hospital - Kogarah
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
22563
0
Orange Health Service - Orange
Query!
Recruitment hospital [7]
22564
0
Nepean Hospital - Kingswood
Query!
Recruitment hospital [8]
22565
0
St Vincent's Hospital (Melbourne) Ltd - Fitzroy
Query!
Recruitment hospital [9]
22566
0
St Vincent's Hospital (Darlinghurst) - Darlinghurst
Query!
Recruitment hospital [10]
22567
0
The Townsville Hospital - Douglas
Query!
Recruitment hospital [11]
22568
0
Western Hospital - Footscray - Footscray
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
23606
0
2139 - Concord
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
23607
0
3168 - Clayton
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
23609
0
7000 - Hobart
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
23610
0
2500 - Wollongong
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
23611
0
2217 - Kogarah
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
37814
0
2800 - Orange
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [7]
37815
0
2747 - Kingswood
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [8]
37816
0
3065 - Fitzroy
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [9]
37817
0
2010 - Darlinghurst
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [10]
37818
0
4814 - Douglas
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [11]
37819
0
3011 - Footscray
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
10724
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [1]
10724
0
Liverpool
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
300317
0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name [1]
300317
0
Snowdome Foundation
Query!
Address [1]
300317
0
Suite 4, 209 Toorak Road, South Yarra Vic 3141
Query!
Country [1]
300317
0
Australia
Query!
Funding source category [2]
305543
0
University
Query!
Name [2]
305543
0
The University of Sydney
Query!
Address [2]
305543
0
Level 3, F23 Administration Building, University of Sydney, NSW 2006
Query!
Country [2]
305543
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
University of Liverpool
Query!
Address
2nd Floor Block D Waterhouse Building
3 Brownlow Street
Liverpool
L69 3GL
Query!
Country
United Kingdom
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
299749
0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name [1]
299749
0
Australiasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group
Query!
Address [1]
299749
0
Ground Floor, 35 Elizabeth St
Richmond, VIC 3121
Query!
Country [1]
299749
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
301129
0
Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee - Concord Repatriation Hospital [EC00118]
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
301129
0
Hospital Road, Concord New South Wales 2139
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
301129
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
301129
0
06/08/2018
Query!
Approval date [1]
301129
0
27/09/2018
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
301129
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the clinical utility of therapy based on the result of a PET-scan for patients with follicular lymphoma. Who is it for? You may be eligible for this study if you are aged over 18 and have a documented diagnosis of follicular lymphoma What it involves Participants in this study will be divided into groups (PET-ve and PET +ve) based on their PET-scan. PET +ve patients will be randomised (by chance) into two groups. One group (called Arm A) will have the drug Rituximab through a needle in the arm every 8 weeks for up to 22 months. The other PET +ve group (called Arm B) will also have Rituximab, but will also receive a drug called Lenalidomide by orally every month for up to 24 months. PET –ve patients will also be randomised (by chance) into two groups. One group (called Arm A) will have the drug Rituximab through a needle in the arm every 8 weeks for up to 22 months. The other PET –ve group (called Arm B) will receive no treatment. All participants in all groups and arms will be monitored for disease progression by physical examination and PET scans throughout their time in the study. It is hoped this study will demonstrate effectiveness of Lenalidomide in converting PET positive patients to PET negative patients. It is also hoped this research will show no treatment to be as effective as the current maintenance treatment (Rituximab) in PET negative patients.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
85954
0
A/Prof Judith Trotman
Query!
Address
85954
0
Department of Haematology
Concord Repatriation Hospital
Hospital road, Concord NSW 2137
Query!
Country
85954
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
85954
0
+612 9767 7243
Query!
Fax
85954
0
Query!
Email
85954
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
85955
0
Judith Trotman
Query!
Address
85955
0
Department of Haematology
Concord Repatriation Hospital
Hospital road, Concord NSW 2137
Query!
Country
85955
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
85955
0
+612 9767 7243
Query!
Fax
85955
0
Query!
Email
85955
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
85956
0
Judith Trotman
Query!
Address
85956
0
Department of Haematology
Concord Repatriation Hospital
Hospital road, Concord NSW 2137
Query!
Country
85956
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
85956
0
+612 9767 7243
Query!
Fax
85956
0
Query!
Email
85956
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
No individual participant data will be publicly available as it is the aggregate data that is under investigation.
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF