Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12618000639224p
Ethics application status
Submitted, not yet approved
Date submitted
22/03/2018
Date registered
23/04/2018
Date last updated
23/04/2018
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Do sensory symptoms impact outcomes of the Alert Program for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder?
Query!
Scientific title
The impact of sensory subtype on outcomes of the Alert Program for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: a feasibility study
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
294351
0
Hunter Medical Research Institute G1701354
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1210-9854
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Autism Spectrum Disorder
307074
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Mental Health
306183
306183
0
0
Query!
Autistic spectrum disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
The intervention (AP) will be provided to all participants. It involves a one-on-one face to face consultation weekly for 1 hour for 10 weeks (10 hours total) to be held in the UON Occupational Therapy Clinic. The occupational therapist, child participant and caregiver will be involved in each session and there will be recommendations for follow up and carry over at home. The AP combines principles of cognitive behavioural therapy and sensory integration. The AP is a three-stage active learning program. In Stage 1, an engine analogy is used to explain the concepts of arousal and self-regulation (slow engine=low arousal, sluggish feeling; high engine=high arousal, out of control; just right engine= just right arousal for learning, playing, getting along). Stages 2 and 3 introduce and implement the concept of ‘sensory diet’, where the sensory environment and specific child sensory needs are considered in optimising child arousal and regulation for the activity and environment. Usefulness of the AP has been documented with preschool through early adolescent aged children. Sensory diets are commonly used with children by occupational therapists and are endorsed for use with children with ASD by the American Occupational Therapy Association. AP has been shown effective in improving self-regulation and behaviour in children with emotional disturbance. Sessions will be conducted by a qualified occupational therapist blinded to the sensory subtype of the child. Intervention sessions will be videoed for the purposes of review of intervention fidelity. The occupational therapist will keep session notes after each session detailing attendance, content of the session, child progress and adherence to home activities.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
300660
0
Behaviour
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
N/A
Query!
Control group
Uncontrolled
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
305198
0
Change in child self-regulation measured using Goal Attainment Scaling following parent interview. The Goal Attainment Scaling interview will be completed by a registered occupational therapist blind to the participant's sensory subtype.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
305198
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
305198
0
Immediately following end of intervention.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
305199
0
Change in physiological sensory reactivity measured using electroencephalogram and heart rate variability during a sensory (auditory) oddball paradigm.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
305199
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
305199
0
Immediately following end of intervention
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
305200
0
Change in clinical sensory reactivity measured using the Sensory Experiences Questionnaire (parent report).
Query!
Assessment method [3]
305200
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
305200
0
Immediately following end of intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
344480
0
Change in parent stress and caregiving effort measured using the Parenting Stress Index - Brief Form (parent report).
Query!
Assessment method [1]
344480
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
344480
0
Immediately following end of intervention.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
344481
0
Change in child adaptive behaviour measured using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (parent report).
Query!
Assessment method [2]
344481
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
344481
0
Immediately following end of intervention.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
344482
0
Change in child anxiety using the Spence Child Anxiety Scale (parent report).
Query!
Assessment method [3]
344482
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
344482
0
Immediately following end of intervention.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
345235
0
Change in caregiving effort measured utilising the Parent Effort Scale (parent report).
Query!
Assessment method [4]
345235
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
345235
0
Immediately following end of intervention.
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
345955
0
Primary Outcome: Change in clinical secondary reactivity as measured by the SP3D, a clinician administered sensory evaluation tool.
Query!
Assessment method [5]
345955
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
345955
0
Immediately following the end of the intervention.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Confirmed diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder; can be classified using established methods into either Reactive or MSI sensory subtypes; IQ>70; can attend all study procedures. Caregiver participants must be the parent or legal guardian of a child with ASD who meets the above criteria.
Query!
Minimum age
6
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Nil additional for either child or parent participants.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
N/A
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
N/A
Query!
Masking / blinding
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Single group
Query!
Other design features
N/A
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
All participants in the study will receive the AP intervention. Differences in outcomes between groups will be analysed by pre-existing exposures, namely, sensory subtype. Participants will be classified according to their scores in Reactive and MSI sensory subtypes using the Short Sensory Profile (parent report) on entry to the study. A pre-established algorithm developed by the lead CI will be used to determine subtype scores (i.e. Reactive or MSI). Outcome assessors and intervention therapists will be blind to subtype classification.
Pre- and post-test difference scores will be calculated for each outcome variable according to the relevant measurement conventions. These scores will be submitted to analysis using the General Linear Model for repeated measures to assess differences between matched Reactive and MSI pairs. There is insufficient literature to determine a priori power.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
30/04/2018
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
22/04/2019
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
19/07/2019
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
36
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
22118
0
2308 - Callaghan
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
22119
0
2300 - Newcastle
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
22120
0
2299 - Lambton
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
22122
0
2290 - Charlestown
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
22123
0
2280 - Belmont
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
22124
0
2315 - Nelson Bay
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [7]
22125
0
2325 - Cessnock
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [8]
22126
0
2318 - Williamtown
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
298993
0
Other
Query!
Name [1]
298993
0
Hunter Medical Research Institute
Query!
Address [1]
298993
0
Lot 1 Kookaburra Cct
New Lambton Heights NSW 2305
Query!
Country [1]
298993
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
University of Newcastle
Query!
Address
University Drive
Callaghan NSW 2308
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
298272
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
298272
0
Query!
Address [1]
298272
0
Query!
Country [1]
298272
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Submitted, not yet approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
299923
0
University of Newcastle Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
299923
0
University Drive Callaghan NSW 2308
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
299923
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
299923
0
02/02/2018
Query!
Approval date [1]
299923
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
299923
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) affects learning, social participation and daily function across the lifespan. Approximately 35,000 school-aged Australian children live with ASD; 95% of these experience educational restrictions. Available treatments are only moderately successful and are not effective for all children with ASD. Knowledge about what (intervention) is likely to work for whom is missing from the field. Individuals with ASD and their families frequently attribute the significant functional difficulties experienced to sensory symptoms. Sensory symptoms are reflected in behaviours such as hyper-reactivity (e.g. extreme distress in response to an unexpected sound), hypo-reactivity (e.g. failure to respond to a painful stimulus) and unusual sensory interests (e.g. excessive smelling of objects). Sensory symptoms are so common in ASD that they now form one subset of the diagnostic criteria for ASD. Therapies to remediate sensory symptoms are in high demand. In fact, occupational therapy, which is the lead profession providing sensory-directed therapies, is the second most frequently utilised therapy by families of children with ASD. The few controlled studies that examine the efficacy of sensory-directed therapies, however, report inconclusive results. A critical issue limiting previous research in this area is that sensory symptoms have been broadly defined and imprecisely characterised. Our group has developed a method of classifying children with ASD into clinically meaningful subtypes based on their parent-reported sensory symptoms. We observe that children with ASD can be classified into sensory subtypes that vary on the dimensions of sensory reactivity (regulating the intensity of a response to a given stimulus) and multisensory integration (MSI; simultaneous processing of concurrent sensory modalities). Each sensory subtype has been found to display a distinct pattern of behaviour thus providing a novel basis on which to customize treatments. The primary objective of our study is to assess the relative effectiveness of a sensory regulatory intervention - Alert Program for Self-Regulation (AP) - for children with ASD and their caregivers. The hypothesis for the study is that for all participants, engagement in the AP will result in: 1) achievement of caregiver defined goals in self-regulation, 2) reduced physiological sensory reactivity (EEG & ANS cardiac), 3) reduced clinical sensory reactivity, 3) reduced parent stress and caregiving effort and 4) improved adaptive behaviour and anxiety following participation in the AP. We further hypothesise that participants with a sensory subtype indicating more difficulties with sensory reactivity will demonstrate significantly greater improvements on all measures than matched ASD participants whose sensory subtype indicates difficulties in MSI.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
81998
0
A/Prof Alison Lane
Query!
Address
81998
0
School of Health Sciences
University of Newcastle
University Drive
Callaghan NSW 2308
Query!
Country
81998
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
81998
0
+61 2 4921 5004
Query!
Fax
81998
0
+61 2 4921 7053
Query!
Email
81998
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
81999
0
Alison Lane
Query!
Address
81999
0
School of Health Sciences
University of Newcastle
University Drive
Callaghan NSW 2308
Query!
Country
81999
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
81999
0
+61 2 4921 5004
Query!
Fax
81999
0
+61 2 4921 7053
Query!
Email
81999
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
82000
0
Alison Lane
Query!
Address
82000
0
School of Health Sciences
University of Newcastle
University Drive
Callaghan NSW 2308
Query!
Country
82000
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
82000
0
+61 2 4921 5004
Query!
Fax
82000
0
+61 2 4921 7053
Query!
Email
82000
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF