Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12618000455268
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
6/03/2018
Date registered
29/03/2018
Date last updated
29/03/2018
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Exploring the value of peer mentoring on the psychosocial wellbeing of junior doctors: a qualitative randomised controlled study
Query!
Scientific title
Exploring the value of peer mentoring on the psychosocial wellbeing of junior doctors: a qualitative randomised controlled study
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
294264
0
none
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Depression
306946
0
Query!
Anxiety
307164
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Mental Health
306045
306045
0
0
Query!
Depression
Query!
Mental Health
306220
306220
0
0
Query!
Anxiety
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Provision of peer mentoring to new interns in a tertiary Australian hospital
Mentoring was provided to new interns by PGY 2 or 3 doctors that had volunteered and been selected as appropriate mentors.
The mentors were provided with information packs and escalation strategies but did not receive specific training.
Mentors were paired 1:1 with mentees and provided informal mentoring over the course of one year (the intern year).
The location, mode of delivery, frequency of meetings or content of meetings was not dictated to the mentors or mentees but left to each individual pairing to determine what was best.
No measures of adherence were collected.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
300555
0
Prevention
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
No mentoring was provided to the control group of interns - standard support was provided to these interns.
The postgraduate medical education department can arrange formal and informal psychological support for interns if the intern reports any mental health concerns. However, these were not peer mentors but administrative supports.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
305070
0
Individual interviews and focus groups were held with participating interns and mentors.
The details of these were analysed using qualitative methodology to determine the perception of the effectiveness of peer support on anxiety and depression.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
305070
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
305070
0
1 year post enrollment - end of intern year
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
344083
0
Demand for mentoring was assessed by measuring the number of interns that at the start of their intern year requested to participate in the programme as a proprtion of the total number of interns.
As this programme was run in a single hospital this was assessed using the hospital employment records.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
344083
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
344083
0
At time of enrollment - start of intern year
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
All interns were eligible to participate
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Unwilling to participate
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Allocation was concealed as the participants were not randomised until after all had been registered - all participants were centrally randomised by computer
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Simple, using computer software
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Qualitative analysis - inductive and thematic analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
19/01/2015
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
19/01/2015
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
5/02/2016
Query!
Sample size
Target
79
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
53
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
WA
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
10319
0
Royal Perth Hospital - Perth
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
21987
0
6000 - Perth
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
298901
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
298901
0
Royal Perth Hospital
Query!
Address [1]
298901
0
Wellington St
Perth
WA 6000
Query!
Country [1]
298901
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
Royal Perth Hospital
Query!
Address
Wellington St
Perth
WA 6000
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
298116
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
298116
0
Query!
Address [1]
298116
0
Query!
Country [1]
298116
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
299844
0
Royal Perth Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
299844
0
Royal Perth Hospital Wellington St Perth WA 6000
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
299844
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
299844
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
299844
0
03/11/2014
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
299844
0
HREC 14-086
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Objective To evaluate the impact of a peer mentoring program for newly qualified interns on psychological wellbeing, and assess the demand for such a program within an Australian hospital setting. Design, Setting and Participants Through a randomised controlled study, interns in a tertiary teaching hospital (Perth, Western Australia) were recruited to be mentees and resident junior doctors were selected to be mentors. Methods and Main Outcome Measure Interns were randomised 1:1 to receive, or not to receive, a mentor. Mentors were recruited. Qualitative outcome data was collected using semi-structured interviews and focus groups at 12 months and used to assess psychosocial wellbeing and job satisfaction. Results Fifty-three interns applied to participate in the program. Twenty-six mentor-mentee pairs were matched. Twenty-seven interns were allocated to not receive a mentor. Through iterative data analysis, the overarching themes concluded the value of the program in aiding navigation through the complex healthcare system while enhancing a sense of community. Participants with mentors reported high satisfaction with a positive impact on stress levels, morale, sense of support, job satisfaction, and psychosocial wellbeing. Conclusion A peer mentoring program enhances junior doctor support structures, builds a sense of community and helps interns navigate their new professional environment. To our knowledge, this is the first research of its kind involving Australian prevocational junior doctors and provides a feasibility model that may be adapted regionally or nationally.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
None
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
81746
0
Dr Sonia Chanchlani
Query!
Address
81746
0
Clinical Services
Royal Perth Hospital
Wellington St
Perth WA 6000
Query!
Country
81746
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
81746
0
+61430917410
Query!
Fax
81746
0
Query!
Email
81746
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
81747
0
Sonia Chanchlani
Query!
Address
81747
0
Clinical Services
Royal Perth Hospital
Wellington St
Perth WA 6000
Query!
Country
81747
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
81747
0
+61430917410
Query!
Fax
81747
0
Query!
Email
81747
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
81748
0
Sonia Chanchlani
Query!
Address
81748
0
Clinical Services
Royal Perth Hospital
Wellington St
Perth WA 6000
Query!
Country
81748
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
81748
0
+61430917410
Query!
Fax
81748
0
Query!
Email
81748
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
The value of peer mentoring for the psychosocial wellbeing of junior doctors: a randomised controlled study.
2019
https://dx.doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50163
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF