Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12618000590268
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
13/03/2018
Date registered
17/04/2018
Date last updated
17/04/2018
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Healthy Homework: A physical activity and nutrition intervention for children
Query!
Scientific title
Healthy Homework: Effects of a school-based health intervention for children's physical activity, nutrition, and body size.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
293438
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Child obesity
305610
0
Query!
Physical inactivity
305611
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Public Health
304833
304833
0
0
Query!
Health promotion/education
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Healthy Homework was an eight-week curriculum-based homework schedule, complemented by an in-class teaching resource, designed to promote physical activity and healthy eating in children (curriculum resources may be provided upon request). The programme was developed under the guidance of an advisory committee comprising experienced health and education professionals (including classroom teachers) with regular input from children and parents. Healthy Homework was based on several established behaviour change theories (including the theory of reasoned action, the theory of planned behaviour, and social-cognitive theory), and was designed to support the achievement objectives associated with the Health and Physical Education strand of the New Zealand Curriculum. The research team provided professional learning for the teachers of the three intervention classes at each intervention school, and to one lead teacher in each of the control schools (who were permitted to implement the programme at the conclusion of the final follow-up point). The professional learning protocol was standardised across all schools, and necessitated one half-day release per teacher.
At the start of the intervention, all children in participating classes received a homework booklet organised into weekly topics that each contained one physical activity and one nutrition component (e.g., walking and fruit/vegetables, screen time and breakfast, fitness and cooking). Three practical homework options were provided for each topic, and the children were directed by their teacher to complete at least one physical activity and one nutrition task per topic (e.g., organising family walks, walking to and from school, limiting screen time, testing the fitness of the family, eating 5+ fruit and vegetables each day, comparing food labels at the supermarket, helping with dinner, preparing a healthy lunch box). Blue or purple rubber wristbands were provided each week for children who completed their homework obligations, with a black colour reserved for those who completed all six tasks on a given week. The Healthy Homework classroom curriculum resource was designed to provide sufficient educational content and in-class exercises for three 1.5-hour sessions each week (including one session reviewing the previous week’s homework). Furthermore, an online portal was developed and monitored to allow teachers to access resources and record student compliance, and to enable children to share homework-related updates with other participants (including those in other schools).
Query!
Intervention code [1]
299681
0
Lifestyle
Query!
Intervention code [2]
300873
0
Behaviour
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Active control: usual school curriculum. All control schools were offered the intervention, including all resources and support, after the final follow=up data collection (6 months post-intervention).
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
304037
0
Weekday in-school physical activity: Physical activity was assessed using sealed NL-1000 pedometers (New Lifestyles Inc, Lee’s Summit, MO) over five consecutive days (three weekdays, two weekend days). These pedometers have a multiday memory function that automatically stores step counts by day of week for up to seven days. Two pedometers were assigned to each child: one clearly labelled ‘School’ and the other ‘Home’. The ‘School’ pedometer was worn during school hours, while the ‘Home’ pedometer was left inside a collection tray in the classroom. At the conclusion of the school day, each child placed their ‘School’ pedometer in the tray and attached their ‘Home’ pedometer. Upon arrival at school the next day, the teacher reminded the children to switch over their pedometers again. This approach was taken as it removed the need for teachers to coordinate a lengthy collection and handout process, and allowed the differentiation of in-school and out-of-school physical activity, while using a cost-effective but objective measurement device.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
304037
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
304037
0
Baseline, immediately post-intervention, 6-months follow-up
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
305492
0
Weekday out-of-school physical activity: Physical activity was assessed using sealed NL-1000 pedometers (New Lifestyles Inc, Lee’s Summit, MO) over five consecutive days (three weekdays, two weekend days). These pedometers have a multiday memory function that automatically stores step counts by day of week for up to seven days. Two pedometers were assigned to each child: one clearly labelled ‘School’ and the other ‘Home’. The ‘School’ pedometer was worn during school hours, while the ‘Home’ pedometer was left inside a collection tray in the classroom. At the conclusion of the school day, each child placed their ‘School’ pedometer in the tray and attached their ‘Home’ pedometer. Upon arrival at school the next day, the teacher reminded the children to switch over their pedometers again. This approach was taken as it removed the need for teachers to coordinate a lengthy collection and handout process, and allowed the differentiation of in-school and out-of-school physical activity, while using a cost-effective but objective measurement device.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
305492
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
305492
0
Baseline, immediately post-intervention, 6-months follow-up
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
305494
0
Weekend physical activity: Physical activity was assessed using sealed NL-1000 pedometers (New Lifestyles Inc, Lee’s Summit, MO) over five consecutive days (three weekdays, two weekend days). These pedometers have a multiday memory function that automatically stores step counts by day of week for up to seven days. Two pedometers were assigned to each child: one clearly labelled ‘School’ and the other ‘Home’. The ‘School’ pedometer was worn during school hours, while the ‘Home’ pedometer was left inside a collection tray in the classroom. At the conclusion of the school day, each child placed their ‘School’ pedometer in the tray and attached their ‘Home’ pedometer. Upon arrival at school the next day, the teacher reminded the children to switch over their pedometers again. This approach was taken as it removed the need for teachers to coordinate a lengthy collection and handout process, and allowed the differentiation of in-school and out-of-school physical activity, while using a cost-effective but objective measurement device.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
305494
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
305494
0
Baseline, immediately post-intervention, 6-months follow-up
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
340777
0
Key dietary patterns were estimated using the Children’s Dietary Questionnaire (CDQ), a parental proxy report that has been validated in children aged 4-16 years. The CDQ focuses on patterns of food intake over the previous 24 hours and/or seven days rather than actual amounts and types of foods consumed. The four dietary subscales selected for analyses in this study were: (1) daily fruit consumption, (2) daily vegetable consumption, (3) weekly fast food consumption, and (4) weekly soft drink consumption. These subscales were selected given their alignment with the New Zealand Food and Nutrition Guidelines, and the high prevalence of soft drink consumption in New Zealand youth.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
340777
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
340777
0
Baseline, immediately post-intervention, 6-months follow-up
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
340778
0
Body mass index: Standing height was measured to the nearest millimetre with a portable stadiometer (SECA 213, Hamberg, Germany) and weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg on a digital scale (SECA 813, Hamberg, Germany). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by squared height (m2).
Query!
Assessment method [2]
340778
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
340778
0
Baseline, immediately post-intervention, 6-months follow-up
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
345450
0
Screen time: Questions pertaining to the frequency and duration of television, computer and gaming console use were assessed via parental proxy questionnaire administered during the consent process.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
345450
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
345450
0
Baseline, immediately post-intervention, 6-months follow-up
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
345451
0
Parental physical activity: Physical activity levels of parents of child participants were assessed by sending home one NL-2000 pedometer and requesting that the parent wear it for seven consecutive days.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
345451
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
345451
0
Baseline, immediately post-intervention, 6-months follow-up
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Eligibility criteria for the schools were as follows: a roll of over 100 students, location within Auckland or Dunedin cities, and a contributing, full primary, or composite structure that included at least one class each of students in school years 3-5. All children in three classes per school were invited to participate in the measurements.
Query!
Minimum age
7
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
10
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
None.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/07/2011
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
24/07/2012
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
7/04/2013
Query!
Sample size
Target
800
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
675
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
9681
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [1]
9681
0
Auckland
Query!
Country [2]
9682
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [2]
9682
0
Otago
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
298067
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
298067
0
Health Research Council of New Zealand
Query!
Address [1]
298067
0
Level 3, 110 Stanley St, Grafton, Auckland 1010
Query!
Country [1]
298067
0
New Zealand
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
Auckland University of Technology
Query!
Address
55 Wellesley St E, Auckland, 1010
Query!
Country
New Zealand
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
298185
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
298185
0
University of Otago
Query!
Address [1]
298185
0
362 Leith St, North Dunedin, Dunedin 9016
Query!
Country [1]
298185
0
New Zealand
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
299083
0
Auckland University of Technology Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
299083
0
55 Wellesley St E, Auckland, 1010
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
299083
0
New Zealand
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
299083
0
12/07/2010
Query!
Approval date [1]
299083
0
11/08/2010
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
299083
0
10/159
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The Healthy Homework project was the first compulsory, curriculum-based intervention that focused on improving physical activity and nutrition in the home environment. The intervention was successfully completed by eight primary schools in Auckland and Dunedin, with an additional eight wait-listed control schools implementing the intervention following project completion. While the major publications are still in preparation, our initial findings show that Healthy Homework had positive effects for out-of-school activity on weekdays and for weekend activity immediately after the intervention. This suggests that compulsory health-related homework can have short-term benefits to children’s physical activity. The long-term (six month) effects of the intervention will be determined and published in the upcoming months, as will the effects of the intervention on dietary patterns and body size. Importantly, we will also be able to assess the secondary effects of the intervention on parental physical activity and nutrition. These data will enable us to determine if health information sent home from school has wider effects within the family.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
None
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
79242
0
A/Prof Scott Duncan
Query!
Address
79242
0
Auckland University of Technology, 55 Wellesley St E, Auckland, 1010
Query!
Country
79242
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
79242
0
+6499219999
Query!
Fax
79242
0
Query!
Email
79242
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
79243
0
Scott Duncan
Query!
Address
79243
0
Auckland University of Technology, 55 Wellesley St E, Auckland, 1010
Query!
Country
79243
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
79243
0
+6499219999
Query!
Fax
79243
0
Query!
Email
79243
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
79244
0
Scott Duncan
Query!
Address
79244
0
Auckland University of Technology, 55 Wellesley St E, Auckland, 1010
Query!
Country
79244
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
79244
0
+6499219999
Query!
Fax
79244
0
Query!
Email
79244
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
Efficacy of a compulsory homework programme for increasing physical activity and improving nutrition in children: A cluster randomised controlled trial.
2019
https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0840-3
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF