Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12617001166369
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
21/07/2017
Date registered
8/08/2017
Date last updated
8/08/2017
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Efficacy of Flywheel Resistance Training on Balance Performance in Older Adults.
Query!
Scientific title
Efficacy of Flywheel Resistance Training on Balance Performance in Older Adults. A Randomized controlled trial
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
292495
0
NONE
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Poor balance
304132
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Physical Medicine / Rehabilitation
303467
303467
0
0
Query!
Other physical medicine / rehabilitation
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Before starting the training program, subjects completed two familiarization sessions that consisted of a review of safety guidelines, adjusting a harness to each participant’s leg length, and practice with the squat training device (kBox 3, Exxentric AB TM, Bromma, Sweden) equipped with one flywheel with a moment inertia of 0.025 kg m-2 (after week 4 a flywheel with a moment inertia of 0.05 kg m-2 was used). Similar to procedures reported elsewhere, participants then underwent six weeks of flywheel resistance training two (week 1, 3, 5) or three (week 2, 4, 6) times a week with at least 48 h of rest between sessions. Participants performed four sets of nine repetitions: two repetitions at the beginning of each set to initiate the flywheel movement and then seven maximal bilateral repetitions accelerating the wheel in the concentric action and, upon completion (when the flywheel strap winds back due to inertial forces), decelerating the wheel by means of an eccentric action. The rest interval between sets was 3 min. Mean Propulsive Velocity (MPV) and average power output were measured during each concentric action (SmartCoachTM Power Encoder, SmartCoach Europe AB, Stockholm, Sweden) and real-time feedback was provided on a computer monitor with the associated software. Research personnel gave verbal encouragement during all repetitions performed. Attendance at training sessions will also be registered.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
298678
0
Rehabilitation
Query!
Intervention code [2]
298767
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Control group participants continued with their typical daily activities that included employment or leisure activities but did not include regular exercise training
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
302836
0
Balance (force platform)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
302836
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
302836
0
Pre and Post (week 6)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
337197
0
Mobility (TUG)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
337197
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
337197
0
Pre and Post (week 6)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
337198
0
Strength (concentric, eccentric, isometric) by means of Isokinetic dynamometry
Query!
Assessment method [2]
337198
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
337198
0
Pre and Post (week 6)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
337503
0
Strength (Sit and Stand)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
337503
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
337503
0
Pre and post (6 weeks)
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Participants >60 years of age who had not been engaged in any regular or systematic exercise-training program in the previous 12 months.
Query!
Minimum age
60
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Individuals, who had to be older than 60 years-of-age, were excluded if they had cognitive or functional disorders that adversely impacts skeletal muscle function or manifests in a mobility disorder.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Randomization was performed by a member of the research team who was not directly-involved in the recruitment or assessment of participants using a computer generated random allocation data processing program.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
1:1 ratio (ETG:CON).
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Descriptive statistics were calculated for demographic variables and dependent measures. All data were first log-transformed to reduce bias and then, the standardised difference or effect size (ES, 90% confidence limit) of the selected variables was calculated using the pooled pretraining SD. The threshold values used for ES were >0.2 (small), >0.6 (moderate) and >1.2 (large). For within/between-groups comparisons, the chances that the differences in performance were better/greater, similar, or worse/smaller as well as the quantitative chances (beneficial/better or detrimental/poorer effect) were calculated as follows: <1%, almost certainly not; 1% to 5%, very unlikely; 5% to 25%, unlikely; 25% to 75%, possibly; 75% to 95%, likely; 95% to 99%, very likely and >99%, almost certainly. If the chances of having beneficial/better and detrimental/poorer performances were both >5% then the true difference was considered to be unclear.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Active, not recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/06/2017
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/06/2017
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
1/09/2017
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
30
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
36
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
9078
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [1]
9078
0
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
297063
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
297063
0
University of Seville
Query!
Address [1]
297063
0
Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación, C/ Pitotécnia s/n. E-41013, Seville (Spain)
Query!
Country [1]
297063
0
Spain
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
University of Seville
Query!
Address
Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación (Universidad de Sevilla), C/ Pitotécnia s/n. E-41013, Seville (Spain).
Query!
Country
Spain
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
296153
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
296153
0
NONE
Query!
Address [1]
296153
0
NONE
Query!
Country [1]
296153
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
298247
0
University of Seville
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
298247
0
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
298247
0
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
298247
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
298247
0
01/07/2016
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
298247
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The efficacy of strength training using inertial devices on balance in older adults is largely unknown. This study aimed to assess the effects of flywheel resistance exercise training (FRET) on postural stability and mobility in older adults and to investigate whether changes in leg power are related to improvements in balance. Study Design: RCT. Methods: Thirty-six individuals will be randomly allocated to either a FRET group (ETG) who will underwent 6-weeks of training (4x9 reps on a squat device, 2-3 times/week) or usual-care control group (CON; n = 18). Measures: During each repetition, the average power and Mean Propulsive Velocity (MPV) will be computed. The Timed up-and-go test (TUG) and postural balance (anterior–posterior (AP) and medial–lateral (ML) center of pressure (COP) excursions) in different tasks and muscle strength will be assessed.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
76462
0
Dr Borja Sañudo
Query!
Address
76462
0
Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación (Universidad de Sevilla), C/ Pitotécnia s/n. E-41013, Seville (Spain).
Query!
Country
76462
0
Spain
Query!
Phone
76462
0
+34652387090
Query!
Fax
76462
0
Query!
Email
76462
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
76463
0
Borja Sañudo
Query!
Address
76463
0
Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación (Universidad de Sevilla), C/ Pitotécnia s/n. E-41013, Seville (Spain).
Query!
Country
76463
0
Spain
Query!
Phone
76463
0
+34652387090
Query!
Fax
76463
0
Query!
Email
76463
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
76464
0
Borja Sañudo
Query!
Address
76464
0
Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación (Universidad de Sevilla), C/ Pitotécnia s/n. E-41013, Seville (Spain).
Query!
Country
76464
0
Spain
Query!
Phone
76464
0
+34652387090
Query!
Fax
76464
0
Query!
Email
76464
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
Type
Is Peer Reviewed?
DOI
Citations or Other Details
Attachment
Study results article
Yes
PMID: 31191105 (2019) PMID: 32040028 (2020)
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF