Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12617000521325
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
24/01/2017
Date registered
10/04/2017
Date last updated
16/06/2017
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Comparing the miss rate of detecting adenoma using 2 imaging techniques during colonoscopy
Query!
Scientific title
Linked color imaging versus white light: a randomised tandem colonoscopy study of adenoma miss rates
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
291000
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1191-9675
Query!
Trial acronym
LCI-AMR study
Query!
Linked study record
n/a
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Colonic Polyps
301770
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
301460
301460
0
0
Query!
Bowel - Back passage (rectum) or large bowel (colon)
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Interventional Procedure (Arm 1): Initial inspection with linked colour imaging (LCI) then white light (WL)
The procedure will be performed by qualified gastroenterologists (who also underwent additional advanced therapeutic colonoscopy training). They are A/Prof David Hewett (FRACP), Dr Nicholas Tutticci (FRACP) and Dr Ammar Kheir (FRACP).
The duration of the total procedure time will be approximately 30 - 40 minutes. Keeping in mind that insertion time to the caecum will average 5 minutes with minimum 6 minutes withdrawal time (as per national standard) for each insertion.
The device used is the new is the 7000 'Trademark' endoscopic system powered by Fujifilm’s unique 4-LED Multi Light 'Trademark' technology sets a new standard in light intensity and endoscopic imaging (this is equivalent to the European model ELUXEO 'Trademark'). The white light (WL) is essentially a high definition normal white light without manipulation of the normal light wavelengths. The Linked-colour imaging (LCI) creates clear and bright endoscopic images using short wavelength witha narrow-band light that enhances the vessels in on the mucosal surface and patterns of the mucosa (410-nm and 450-nm wavelengths with a bandwidth that is <2nm),
A research assistant will measure insertion and withdrawal times by using a stopwatch. On insertion, the stopwatch will be started at the moment the rectal mucosa is visualised, and timing will be continued until the colonoscope tip has entered the caecal caput. On withdrawal, mucosal inspection will be performed firstly using linked colour imaging until withdrawn to the rectum. Polyps will be removed as they are identified (via standard polypectomy techniques) and each polyp submitted separately for pathological examination.
Reinsertion will then be performed to the caecum and further mucosal inspection performed using white light until withdrawn to the rectum. Further detected polyps will be removed as they are identified (via standard polypectomy techniques) and each polyp submitted separately for pathological examination.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
296963
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Intervention code [2]
296964
0
Prevention
Query!
Intervention code [3]
297397
0
Diagnosis / Prognosis
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Comparator / Control Procedure (Arm 2): Initial inspection with white light (WL) then linked colour imaging (LCI)
A research assistant will measure insertion and withdrawal times by using a stopwatch. On insertion, the stopwatch will be started at the moment the rectal mucosa is visualised, and timing will be continued until the colonoscope tip has entered the caecal caput. On withdrawal, mucosal inspection will be performed firstly using white light until withdrawn to the rectum. Polyps will be removed as they are identified (via standard polypectomy techniques) and each polyp submitted separately for pathological examination.
Reinsertion will then be performed to the caecum and further mucosal inspection performed using linked colour imaging system until withdrawn to the rectum. Further detected polyps will be removed as they are identified (via standard polypectomy techniques) and each polyp submitted separately for pathological examination.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
300857
0
Adenoma miss rate
The adenoma miss rate is defined as the number of additional adenomas detected by the second assessment (WL or LCI) for each group divided by the total number of adenomas detected.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
300857
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
300857
0
After the second colonoscopy inspection is completed.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
331056
0
Patient miss rate
This id defined as the number of patients with one or more additional adenomas detected by the second assessment (WL or LCI) for each group divided by the total number of patients with one or more adenomas detected.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
331056
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
331056
0
Once all participants have been completed the procedure..
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
331060
0
Applicability of LCI in optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps using the NICE (NBI International Colorectal Endoscopic) classification.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
331060
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
331060
0
Once all participants have completed the procedure.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
332439
0
Optical Diagnosis of colorectal Polyps using LCI (Diagnostic Test Performance)
For this outcome, we will assess the diagnostic test performance of the endoscopic prediction of polyp histology using LCI and correlate that with the "gold-standard" pathological diagnosis of polyps.
Diagnostic test performance will be assessed using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and NPV.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
332439
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
332439
0
Once all participants have been completed the procedure.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
332440
0
Optical Diagnosis of colorectal Polyps using LCI (inter and intra observer reliability)
For this outcome, we will assess the inter-observer and intra-observer agreement performance for optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps using LCI. This will be measured using Fleiss Kappa and Kappa, respectively.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
332440
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
332440
0
Once all participants have been completed the procedure.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
All patients undergoing elective colonoscopy
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
- Patients under 18 years of age
- Complex cases for advanced therapeutic colonoscopy (endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, colonic stenting, colonic dilatation, colonic strictures)
- Previous surgical resection of the colon or rectum
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes (SNOSE).
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Simple randomisation using a randomisation table created by computer software (computerised sequence generation).
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
The following assumptions were used to calculate required sample size: 30% adenoma miss rate for white light inspection and 10% miss rate for linked colour imaging inspection; two thirds of patients will have at least one adenoma, and patients with polyps will have an average of 3.7 polyps [as per previous study by Hewett and Rex (Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 77581)].
For the study to have 80% power to detect 3 fold reduction in adenoma miss rates, by using a chi square test with 5% significance level, the study will need 62 polyps per group (i.e. 124 polyps total). Thus recruitment of 100 patients (n=100, with n=50 per arm) will ensure that the study will fulfill the above criteria with a power of 80%.
alpha = 0.05 , power = 0.8 , delta = 0.2
For characterisation, 60 consecutive images will be used and 60 consecutive videos (5-10 seconds in white light, 5-10 seconds in LCI). Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and NPV will be measured. Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement will be measured (Fleiss Kappa and Kappa, respectively).
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
10/04/2017
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
5/02/2018
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
100
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
QLD
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
7385
0
Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital - Coopers Plains
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
15178
0
4108 - Coopers Plains
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
295425
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
295425
0
Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital
Query!
Address [1]
295425
0
Endoscopy Unit, Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital, Cnr Kessels & Troughton Roads, Coopers Plains, QLD, 4108, Australia.
Query!
Country [1]
295425
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital
Query!
Address
Endoscopy Unit, Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital, Cnr Kessels & Troughton Roads, Coopers Plains, QLD, 4108, Australia.
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
294245
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
294245
0
Query!
Address [1]
294245
0
Query!
Country [1]
294245
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
296758
0
Metro South Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
296758
0
Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Wolloongabba, Queensland 4102
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
296758
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
296758
0
22/09/2016
Query!
Approval date [1]
296758
0
17/11/2016
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
296758
0
HREC/16/QPAH/639
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The primary purpose of this trial is to evaluate the efficiency of two endoscopic imaging techniques for detecting colonic adenoma during colonoscopy. Who is it for? You may be eligible to enroll in this trial if you are aged 18 or over, and are scheduled to undergo a colonoscopy. Study details All participants enrolled in this trial will receive colonoscopy using both standard white light (WL) and linked colour imaging (LCI). LCI is a new endoscopic image enhancement technology that is built-in within scopes and activated by a push-button and highlight mucosal abnormalities within the gastrointestinal lumen. LCI uses different band widths and filters and is hypothesized to improve detection of subtle gastrointestinal pathology. Participants will be randomly allocated (by chance) to receive WL imaging first, followed immediately by LCI to detect any polyps missed by WL, or to receive LCI imaging first, followed immediately by WL to detect any polyps missed by LCI. This will allow researchers to investigate which technique results in less missed adenomas during colonoscopy.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Attachments [1]
1386
1386
0
0
/AnzctrAttachments/372228-SSA-16-640_Approved_Letter[1].pdf
(Ethics approval)
Query!
Query!
Attachments [2]
1387
1387
0
0
/AnzctrAttachments/372228-LCI-AMR Polyp Record Sheet_DH14Sep 14Oct (2).docx
(Supplementary information)
Query!
Query!
Attachments [3]
1388
1388
0
0
/AnzctrAttachments/372228-SSA-16-640_Approved_RCASE[1].pdf
(Supplementary information)
Query!
Query!
Attachments [4]
1389
1389
0
0
/AnzctrAttachments/372228-LCI-AMR consent form_v2_13Oct Kheir.doc
(Participant information/consent)
Query!
Query!
Attachments [5]
1390
1390
0
0
/AnzctrAttachments/372228-LCI-AMR Protocol V1.1.doc
(Protocol)
Query!
Query!
Attachments [6]
1391
1391
0
0
/AnzctrAttachments/372228-LCI-AMR SAE form V1.doc
(Supplementary information)
Query!
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
71970
0
Dr Ammar Kheir
Query!
Address
71970
0
Endoscopy Unit, Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital, Cnr Kessels & Troughton Roads, Coopers Plains, QLD 4108, Australia
Query!
Country
71970
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
71970
0
+61 424266194
Query!
Fax
71970
0
Query!
Email
71970
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
71971
0
Ammar Kheir
Query!
Address
71971
0
Endoscopy Unit, Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital, Cnr Kessels & Troughton Roads, Coopers Plains, QLD 4108, Australia
Query!
Country
71971
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
71971
0
+61 424266194
Query!
Fax
71971
0
Query!
Email
71971
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
71972
0
Ammar Kheir
Query!
Address
71972
0
Endoscopy Unit, Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital, Cnr Kessels & Troughton Roads, Coopers Plains, QLD 4108, Australia
Query!
Country
71972
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
71972
0
+61 424266194
Query!
Fax
71972
0
Query!
Email
71972
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF