Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12615000254594
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
22/02/2015
Date registered
19/03/2015
Date last updated
30/11/2015
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
The effect of spinal cord stimulation on weekly step count of patients with back and leg pain
Query!
Scientific title
The effect of spinal cord stimulation on weekly step count of patients with back and leg pain
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
286238
0
none
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1167-4985
Query!
Trial acronym
SCS Activity Monitoring
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Back and leg pain
294290
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Anaesthesiology
294611
294611
0
0
Query!
Pain management
Query!
Neurological
294680
294680
0
0
Query!
Other neurological disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Observational
Query!
Patient registry
False
Query!
Target follow-up duration
Query!
Target follow-up type
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is used to treat patients with long term nerve pain by applying an electrical current to the spinal cord or peripheral nerves. This is done via small metal contacts called electrodes which are fixed to a cable called a lead. When a pain specialist wants to use a spinal cord stimulator in a patient, the patient has a surgical operation to put one or more leads into the body. These leads are then connected to an external battery which is worn by a patient using a belt. After a “trial” period lasting 1-2 weeks, the effectiveness of the stimulation is assessed and if the ‘trial’ deemed successful a permanent system is implanted.
The stimulators will be programmed by company technicians as per manufacturer guidelines.
Participants will wear a Vivofit (Garmin Ltd) fitness band for 2 weeks before and 1-2 weeks after insertion of the spinal cord stimulator leads.
Patient data from the Vivofit monitor, walking tests and questionnaire responses will be collected during the routine twice weekly outpatient clinic visits used to monitor the clinical progress of the ‘trial’ of stimulation.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
291254
0
Not applicable
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Patient acts as own control pre and post spinal cord stimulator lead results will be compared.
The primary endpoint will be comparing Vivofit baseline (pre institution of neurostimulation therapy) total step count for 1 week prior to lead insertion to weekly total step count in the last week of the trial.
Secondary endpoints will compare Vivofit baseline step counts, sleep and activity patterns to self-report questionnaires (BPI, Dass21, ESS, PCS, PSEQ, SF36, OSW), TUG, 6MWT, in addition to medication usage at the same time points.
Query!
Control group
Uncontrolled
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
294375
0
Change in weekly daily step count before and after insertion stimulator leads. Data will uploaded from the Vivofit fitness band by a research assistant at twice weekly routine clinic visits to monitor clinical progress.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
294375
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
294375
0
baseline week before lead insertion v last week of leads before implant/removal
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
313301
0
Back and leg pain as assessed using the BPI questionnaire
Query!
Assessment method [1]
313301
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
313301
0
baseline week before lead insertion v last week of leads before implant/removal
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
313302
0
Depression, anxiety and stress as assessed using the DASS21 questionnaire
Query!
Assessment method [2]
313302
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
313302
0
baseline week before lead insertion v last week of leads before implant/removal
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
313303
0
Sleepiness as assessed using the ESS questionnaire
Query!
Assessment method [3]
313303
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
313303
0
baseline week before lead insertion v last week of leads before implant/removal
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
313304
0
Catastrophising as assessed using the PCS questionnaire
Query!
Assessment method [4]
313304
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
313304
0
baseline week before lead insertion v last week of leads before implant/removal
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
313305
0
Self-efficacy as assessed using the PSEQ questionnaire
Query!
Assessment method [5]
313305
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
313305
0
baseline week before trial lead insertion v last week of trial leads before implant/removal
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
313306
0
Physical and mental health as assessed using the SF36 questionnaire.
Query!
Assessment method [6]
313306
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
313306
0
baseline week before lead insertion v last week of leads before implant/removal
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
313307
0
Back and leg pain as assessed using the OSW questionnaire
Query!
Assessment method [7]
313307
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
313307
0
baseline week before lead insertion v last week of leads before implant/removal
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
313308
0
Mobility as assessed using the TUG test
Query!
Assessment method [8]
313308
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
313308
0
baseline week before lead insertion v last week of leads before implant/removal
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
313309
0
Functional exercise capacity as assessed using the 6MWT
Query!
Assessment method [9]
313309
0
Query!
Timepoint [9]
313309
0
baseline week before lead insertion v last week of leads before implant/removal
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
313310
0
medication usage will be recorded at baseline and trial on the concomitant medication (ConMed) worksheet.
Query!
Assessment method [10]
313310
0
Query!
Timepoint [10]
313310
0
baseline week before lead insertion v last week of leads before implant/removal
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
- Patients with chronic, intractable back pain, with or without radicular symptoms to one or both legs (with or without prior back surgery) indicated for spinal cord stimulation trial (post spine surgery, neuropathic pain)
- Is a new or existing patient of Frankston Pain Management, Frankston Hospital pain medicine or PainCare clinics
- Has chronic, intractable pain
- Appropriate clinical diagnosis
- Positive psychological evaluation
- No pending lawsuit or economic compensation related to the pain
Query!
Minimum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
patients who are contraindicated from receiving a spinal cord stimulator,
are likely to be non-compliant or
don’t want to participate.
Specific criteria for exclusion include:
- Patients for dorsal root ganglion stimulation
- Patients having full system implanted without prior period of trial stimulation
- Inability to give informed consent,
- Inability to understand English (most pain assessment tools are validated for English language speakers only),
- Contraindicated for spinal cord stimulation; i.e.: are unable to operate the SCS system, are poor surgical risks, are pregnant
- Non-compliance with stimulator usage and/or stimulation parameter settings
- Unable to wear activity monitor on wrist
Query!
Study design
Purpose
Screening
Query!
Duration
Longitudinal
Query!
Selection
Defined population
Query!
Timing
Prospective
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
This is a first time study to compare a new method of outcome evaluation with standard clinical evaluation.
The expected outcome is that 40 patients will allow for a degree of correlation to be established between the 2 measurement methods at each stage of assessment. The degree and nature of any correlation will form the basis for a larger study based on the information gained from this pilot.
Power calculations
We are planning a study with 40 subjects. Prior data indicate that the difference in the response of matched pairs is normally distributed with standard deviation 3000 steps. We will be able to detect a true difference in the mean response of matched pairs of -1363.081 or 1363.081 steps with probability (power) 0.8. The Type I error probability associated with this test of the null hypothesis that this response difference is zero is 0.05.
Statistical methodology
Primary endpoint analysis
The change in step count will be assessed using student paired T-test with each individuals before and after scores.
Secondary endpoints analysis
The data will be analysed using Wilcoxon Rank sum test or Pearson correlation coefficient, subject to data meeting the appropriate criteria as gathered.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/04/2015
Query!
Actual
29/05/2015
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
31/03/2016
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
40
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
WA,VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
3496
0
Frankston Hospital - Frankston
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
3497
0
Beleura Private Hospital - Mornington
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
3529
0
Bethesda Hospital - Claremont
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
9265
0
3199 - Frankston
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
9293
0
3931 - Mornington
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
9294
0
6010 - Claremont
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
9295
0
6011 - Cottesloe
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
290795
0
Commercial sector/Industry
Query!
Name [1]
290795
0
Boston Scientific
Query!
Address [1]
290795
0
PO Box 332
Botany NSW, 1455
Query!
Country [1]
290795
0
Australia
Query!
Funding source category [2]
290797
0
Commercial sector/Industry
Query!
Name [2]
290797
0
St Jude Medical
Query!
Address [2]
290797
0
650 Lorimer St
Port Melbourne Vic 3207
Query!
Country [2]
290797
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Dr Murray Taverner
Query!
Address
Frankston Pain management
Suite 7, 20 Clarendon Street
Frankston, Victoria 3199
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
289477
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
289477
0
Dr John Salmon
Query!
Address [1]
289477
0
PainCare
2/89 Forest Street
Cottesloe WA 6011
Query!
Country [1]
289477
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
278363
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
278363
0
Dr John Monagle
Query!
Address [1]
278363
0
Frankston Pain Management
Suite 7, 20 Clarendon Street
Frankston, Vic, 3199
Query!
Country [1]
278363
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
292423
0
Peninsula Health
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
292423
0
PO Box 52 Frankston, Vic, 3199
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
292423
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
292423
0
23/02/2015
Query!
Approval date [1]
292423
0
07/04/2015
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
292423
0
HREC/15/PH/11
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
General activity level in patients being considered for spinal stimulation and the improvement in activity levels after stimulator insertion have not been documented and both are unknown. In this study physical activity measurements, as measured by the Garmin Vivofit device, will be compared to usual questionnaires that you complete for assessment of pain, pain relief and functional improvement before and after the insertion of spinal cord stimulator leads. This study involves wearing a wrist band (Vivofit, Garmin Ltd) for 2 weeks before and 1-2 weeks after the insertion of the spinal cord stimulator lead. The primary endpoint will be comparing Vivofit baseline (pre institution of neurostimulation therapy) total step count for 1 week prior to lead insertion to weekly total step count in the last week of the trial of stimulation. Secondary endpoints will compare Vivofit baseline step counts to self-report questionnaires (BPI, Dass21, ESS, PCS, PSEQ, SF36, OSW), TUG, 6MWT, in addition to medication usage at the same time points.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
55226
0
Dr Murray Taverner
Query!
Address
55226
0
Frankston Pain Management
Suite 7, 20 Clarendon Street
Frankston, Vic, 3199
Query!
Country
55226
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
55226
0
+61397700522
Query!
Fax
55226
0
+61397700944
Query!
Email
55226
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
55227
0
Adeline Taverner
Query!
Address
55227
0
Frankston Pain Management
Suite 7, 20 Clarendon Street
Frankston, Vic, 3199
Query!
Country
55227
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
55227
0
+61397700522
Query!
Fax
55227
0
+61397700944
Query!
Email
55227
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
55228
0
Murray Taverner
Query!
Address
55228
0
Frankston Pain Management
Suite 7, 20 Clarendon Street
Frankston, Vic, 3199
Query!
Country
55228
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
55228
0
+61397700522
Query!
Fax
55228
0
+61397700944
Query!
Email
55228
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF