Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12615000321549
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
6/03/2015
Date registered
9/04/2015
Date last updated
11/03/2016
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Does flow measurement guided stenting of non-culprit lesions as compared with visual assessment guided stenting in patients presenting with a heart attack improve outcomes.
Query!
Scientific title
A randomized controlled trial to investigate Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) guided intervention compared to visual assessment of non-culprit lesions in patients presenting with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) on cardiac death, MI and revascularization
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
286325
0
nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1165-4375
Query!
Trial acronym
nil
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)
294423
0
Query!
and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI)
294424
0
Query!
acute coronary syndromes
294428
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cardiovascular
294733
294733
0
0
Query!
Coronary heart disease
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided stenting vs. visual assessment stenting.
FFR will be measured with a coronary pressure wire (St Jude Medical) with maximum hyperaemia achieved using adenosine administered at a rate of 140ug per kilogram per minute over 3 minutes given via a central vein. The procedure takes approximately 15 minutes and the distal pressure beyond a coronary stenosis is compared to a proximal pressure reflecting aortic pressure
Query!
Intervention code [1]
291367
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Visual assessment stenting which will be made by looking at the stenosis as assessed by angiography and estimating what the degree of the stenosis is
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
294495
0
Composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization (including percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting)at 30 days and 2 years after randomization
This will be assessed by linkage to National data sets
Query!
Assessment method [1]
294495
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
294495
0
At 30 days and 2 years after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
313458
0
cost effectiveness by counting and comparing costs in both arms eg hospital costs including equipment, length of hospital stay and costs of complications and long term costs of readmissions and procedures and complications
Query!
Assessment method [1]
313458
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
313458
0
At 30 days and 2 years after randomization assessed from patient and National records
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
313459
0
cardiac death
Query!
Assessment method [2]
313459
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
313459
0
at 30 days and 2 years after randomization assessed from patient and National records
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
313680
0
total mortality
Query!
Assessment method [3]
313680
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
313680
0
at 30 days and 2 years after randomization assessed from patient and National records
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
313681
0
stroke
Query!
Assessment method [4]
313681
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
313681
0
at 30 days and 2 years after randomization from patient and national records
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
313684
0
radiation dose
Query!
Assessment method [5]
313684
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
313684
0
At time of cardiac catheterization from hospital records and ANZAC QI which is a National web based electronic program recording data after an acute coronary syndrome
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
313686
0
bleeding
Query!
Assessment method [6]
313686
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
313686
0
from hospital records and ANZAC QI which is a National web based electronic program recording data after an acute coronary syndrome
At 30 days and 2 years after randomization from patient records
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
313687
0
Incidence of the primary composite in the subset of ulcerated, associated with thrombus, or complex coronary stenosis
Query!
Assessment method [7]
313687
0
Query!
Timepoint [7]
313687
0
At 30 days and 2 years after randomization from hospital records and ANZAC QI and National records
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
313893
0
MI
Query!
Assessment method [8]
313893
0
Query!
Timepoint [8]
313893
0
At 30 days and 2 years after randomization from hospital records and ANZAC QI and National records
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
313894
0
revascularization
Query!
Assessment method [9]
313894
0
Query!
Timepoint [9]
313894
0
At 30 days and 2 years after randomization from hospital records and ANZAC QI and National records
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Patients with STEMI undergoing primary angioplasty, rescue PCI or PCI following fibrinolytic therapy, or PCI for non-STEMI
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Left main coronary artery disease, previous bypass surgery, cardiogenic shock, extremely tortuous or calcified coronary vessels, life expectancy < 2years, pregnancy, contraindications to DES placement, Patients in whom the preferred strategy is CABG, contraindications to dual antiplatelet therapy, LVEF<30%,randomization previously in the trial
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
central randomization by computer
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
randomization table created by computer software
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
event driven
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Power calculations estimate with 80% probability that a treatment difference will be detected with a two sided 0.05 significance if the true hazard is 0.6. Based on assumption that the accrual period will be 1.5 years and the follow-up will be 3 years and the event rate in the stent arm is 5% 122 primary events are requiredBaseline demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics of the two randomized groups will be listed with continuous variables presented as medians (25th, 75th percentiles) and compared using ANOVA F test when assumption of normality was satisfied; otherwise, the Kruskal-Wallis test will be used. Categorical variables will be presented as counts (proportions) and compared using the chi-square test when appropriate; otherwise, an exact test will be used. The relationship between randomised groups and clinical outcomes will be assessed by fitting a Cox proportional hazards model for time-to-first event. Variables included in the adjusted model will include age, weight, sex, STEMI presentation, , time from presentation to randomization, family history of CAD, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, current or recent smoker, previous MI, previousPCI, previous peripheral arterial disease, previous atrial fibrillation, previous heart failure, systolic blood pressure at baseline, heart rate at baseline, hemoglobin, creatinine, aspirin at baseline, P2Y12 inhibitor at baseline, beta blocker at baseline, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker at baseline, statin at baseline, study treatment (FFR vs visual stenting),
All statistical tests will be performed at a significance level of 0.05.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Withdrawn
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
10/04/2015
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
850
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
6721
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [1]
6721
0
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
290895
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
290895
0
Health Research Council of New Zealand
Query!
Address [1]
290895
0
3, ProCARE Building 110 Stanley Street,, Parnell, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
Query!
Country [1]
290895
0
New Zealand
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Professor Harvey White
Query!
Address
Cardiology department
Auckland City Hospital
Level 3. Building 32
Auckland 1142
New Zealand
Query!
Country
New Zealand
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
289634
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
289634
0
Health Research Council of New Zealand
Query!
Address [1]
289634
0
3, Procare building 110 Stanley street, Parnell, Auckland 1010
Query!
Country [1]
289634
0
New Zealand
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
292497
0
Northern B Health and Disability Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
292497
0
Ministry of Health Freyberg Building 20 Aitken Street PO Box 5013 Wellington 6011
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
292497
0
New Zealand
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
292497
0
13/01/2015
Query!
Approval date [1]
292497
0
11/02/2015
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
292497
0
15/NTB/11
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The study hypothesis is that assessing the efficacy of stenting heart arteries other than those that caused a heart attack, either by assessing the narrowings by visual assessment or by measuring blood flow across the narrowings, will result in different patient outcomes and costs. Both approaches are used in clinical practice but it not known which is better. There will be 850 patients randomized to either of these approaches and patients will be followed for 2 years. Outcomes will be assessed by National records with names anonymised and will include heart related deaths, heart attacks and need for stenting or bypass surgery. The cost-effectiveness of each approach will also be compared by counting the costs of each procedure and outcomes.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
55002
0
Prof Harvey White
Query!
Address
55002
0
Auckland City Hospital
2 Park Road
Cardiology Department
level 3.Building 32
Auckland 1142
Query!
Country
55002
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
55002
0
+64 9 6309992
Query!
Fax
55002
0
+64 9 6309915
Query!
Email
55002
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
55003
0
Harvey White
Query!
Address
55003
0
Auckland City Hospital
2 Park Road
Cardiology Department
level 3.Building 32
Auckland 1142
Query!
Country
55003
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
55003
0
+64 9 6309992
Query!
Fax
55003
0
+64 9 6309915
Query!
Email
55003
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
55004
0
Harvey White
Query!
Address
55004
0
Auckland City Hospital
2 Park Road
Cardiology Department
level 3.Building 32
Auckland 1142
Query!
Country
55004
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
55004
0
+64 9 6309992
Query!
Fax
55004
0
+64 9 6309915
Query!
Email
55004
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF