Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12615000187549
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
12/02/2015
Date registered
26/02/2015
Date last updated
31/07/2019
Date data sharing statement initially provided
31/07/2019
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
The Efficacy of Sodium Benzoate as an Adjunctive Treatment in Early Psychosis
Query!
Scientific title
The Efficacy of Sodium Benzoate as an Adjunctive Treatment in Early Psychosis
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
286135
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1167-0649
Query!
Trial acronym
CADENCE-BZ
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Early psychosis (including schizophrenia, schizophreniform psychosis, delusional disorder, bipolar disorder, psychosis not otherwise specified)
294141
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Mental Health
294462
294462
0
0
Query!
Schizophrenia
Query!
Mental Health
294560
294560
0
0
Query!
Psychosis and personality disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
The study will include 100 individuals with first episode psychosis who will be randomised to receive either 1g/d (500mg twice daily) of sodium benzoate or placebo (1:1 ratio) for 12 weeks, in addition to their normal routine care.
Participants will be requested to return all unused study medication (i.e. unopened blister packs or capsules not taken) and empty blister packs to the delegated research assistants. All unused supplies of study medication will be accounted for and documented by the designated Research Pharmacist. Compliance with study medication will be calculated at each visit by means of self-report and a capsule count.
Face to face clinical assessments will be at baseline (week 0) and weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12. Weekly phone contact will occur in between face to face visits to monitor medication compliance and discuss any concerns the participant may raise regarding the trial medication. A post-completion visit will be conducted at week 14.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
291133
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
This study will use a placebo (microcrystalline cellulose gelatine capsules) adjunct to routine care as a comparator condition.
Query!
Control group
Placebo
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
294265
0
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score
Query!
Assessment method [1]
294265
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
294265
0
12 week assessment
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
312902
0
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) subscales
Query!
Assessment method [1]
312902
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
312902
0
12 week assessment
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
313079
0
Global Assessment of Function (GAF)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
313079
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
313079
0
12 week assessment
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
313082
0
Clinical Global Impression (CGI)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
313082
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
313082
0
12 week assessment
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
313083
0
Hamilton Depression rating Scale-17items (HDRS)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
313083
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
313083
0
12 week assessment
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
316683
0
Physical Activity Questionnaire (PAQ)
Outcome measure is level of physical activity.
Query!
Assessment method [5]
316683
0
Query!
Timepoint [5]
316683
0
week 2
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
316684
0
Patient Global Impression (PGI)- Improvement
Outcome measure is overall patient impression of level of improvement related to the treatment.
Query!
Assessment method [6]
316684
0
Query!
Timepoint [6]
316684
0
week 12
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Aged between 15 and 45 years (inclusive).
2. Fulfil the DSM-IV criteria practice for broadly defined early psychosis, based on the Diagnostic Interview for Psychosis. This includes diagnoses such as schizophrenia, schizophreniform psychosis, delusional disorder, bipolar disorder, psychosis not otherwise specified.
3. Have had the onset of a psychotic disorder within the last two years
4. Have received antipsychotic medications for a period of at least one continuous month within the above two year period.
5. Have a Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score of at least 55.
6. Agree to participate, has capacity to consent and able to follow the study instructions and procedures.
7. If under 18 years of age, a parent or legal guardian consents to the young person’s participation.
Query!
Minimum age
15
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
45
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Known allergies to sodium benzoate (E211) or any part of the formulation of the investigational product.
2. Suspected allergies or known adverse reactions to food preservatives in general.
3. Comorbid physical illnesses that would impair the participants’ ability to complete the trial.
4. People who are unable to understand or communicate in English.
5. For female participant, those currently pregnant, or planning to become pregnant or lactating during the study period
6. Inability to follow the study instructions and procedures.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
One hundred (100) participants will be recruited through the mental health services in five Queensland Hospital and Health Services.
After verbal consent is provided, an assessment of inclusion/exclusion criteria will commence. Participants who meet all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will be invited to participate in the study and the formal consent process will commence. For those who consent to participate, they will be enrolled in the study and randomized according to allocation concealment methods.
Randomization lists will be created by an independent statistician, using computerised methods and provided to the manufacturer. The compounding manufacturer will develop the investigational product according to the randomized list. The independent manufacturer will hold the closed randomisation list and be the only one who has the ability to unblind a participant. The Research Pharmacist will dispense the investigational product based on the randomisation list provided. All study personnel (including the research pharmacist) will be blinded to a participants’ drug group allocation (placebo versus active).
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Randomisation will be carried out using a computer-generated randomization table, stratified by five sites. Each of the five sites will have separate randomization tables. Participants will receive either active treatment or placebo in a 1:1 ratio.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 4
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Analysis will be based on the Intention-to-treat (ITT) sample of all subjects who were randomized regardless of how many weeks of treatment they received. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of each treatment arm will be summarised using descriptive statistics and then compared using Chi-square for categorical variables or independent t-test for continuous variables. If these variables show significant differences between both treatment arms, we will adjust for these predictors in our multivariable analysis to account for any imbalance that may have occurred by chance between the randomized groups (i.e. despite randomization of treatment arm, the order of subject recruitment may result in an imbalance in variables such as age, sex, baseline PANSS etc) (1, 2). It is recommended that these variables are adjusted in assessing the primary outcome (3).Changes in clinical assessment will be assessed using the mixed-effects model repeated measures (MMRM). The MMRM is a superior approach when compared to the ‘last value carried forward’ approach in controlling for type I error and minimize bias as it does not impute or exclude participants with missing data (4). We will include baseline measure, treatment group, week, and treatment-week interaction as fixed effects and intercept as random effects in the model. Sensitivity analysis will be repeated based on the per-protocol population by including participants:
(i) that stayed on the trial for 12 weeks
(ii) whose treatment compliance >= 80%
(iii) with absence of major protocol violation
All statistical test will be conducted using the SAS software and will be evaluated at the .05 level, using two sided test.
1. Steyerberg EW, Bossuyt PM, Lee KL. Clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction: should we adjust for baseline characteristics? American heart journal. 2000;139(5):745-51.
2. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, et al. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340.
3. Rothman KJ. Epidemiologic methods in clinical trials. Cancer. 1977;39(4 Suppl):1771-5.
4. Siddiqui O, Hung HM, O'Neill R. MMRM vs. LOCF: a comprehensive comparison based on simulation study and 25 NDA datasets. Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics. 2009;19(2):227-46.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
17/08/2015
Query!
Actual
19/08/2015
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
29/06/2018
Query!
Actual
10/07/2018
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
9/10/2018
Query!
Actual
9/10/2018
Query!
Sample size
Target
100
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
100
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
QLD
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
3431
0
Royal Brisbane & Womens Hospital - Herston
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
3432
0
Ipswich Hospital - Ipswich
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
3433
0
The Prince Charles Hospital - Chermside
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
3434
0
Gold Coast Hospital - Southport
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
3435
0
Lady Cilento Children's Hospital - South Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
3436
0
Logan Hospital - Meadowbrook
Query!
Recruitment hospital [7]
3437
0
Princess Alexandra Hospital - Woolloongabba
Query!
Recruitment hospital [8]
8324
0
Sunshine Coast University Hospital - Birtinya
Query!
Recruitment hospital [9]
8325
0
Caboolture Hospital - Caboolture
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
9197
0
4305 - Ipswich
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
9198
0
4006 - Herston
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
9199
0
4032 - Chermside
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
9200
0
4215 - Southport
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
9201
0
4122 - Upper Mount Gravatt
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
9202
0
4131 - Meadowbrook
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [7]
9203
0
4101 - South Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [8]
16388
0
4575 - Birtinya
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [9]
16389
0
4510 - Caboolture
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
290723
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
290723
0
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)
Query!
Address [1]
290723
0
Level 1
16 Marcus Clarke Street
Canberra ACT 2601
Query!
Country [1]
290723
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
The University of Queensland
Query!
Address
St Lucia, QLD 4072
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
289410
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
289410
0
Query!
Address [1]
289410
0
Query!
Country [1]
289410
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
292360
0
Metro South Hospital and Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee (EC00167)
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
292360
0
HREC Office – Centres for Health Research Level 7 Translational Research Institute Building Princess Alexandra Hospital Ipswich Road Woolloongabba QLD 4102
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
292360
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
292360
0
05/11/2014
Query!
Approval date [1]
292360
0
12/02/2015
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
292360
0
HREC/14/QPAH/598
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The study will be a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind parallel-group trial over a 12 week period. The primary objective is to examine the clinical efficacy of the add-on treatment of sodium benzoate for persistent symptoms in patients with early psychosis. Specifically, it is hypothesised, that participants allocated to the active arm (1000mg (500mg twice daily)) Sodium Benzoate treatment will have significant reductions in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score at week 12 compared to individuals taking placebo.
Query!
Trial website
https://cadencetrials.com/
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
54774
0
Prof John McGrath
Query!
Address
54774
0
Queensland Brain Institute
University of Queensland
St Lucia, QLD, 4072 Australia
Query!
Country
54774
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
54774
0
+61 7 3346 6372
Query!
Fax
54774
0
Query!
Email
54774
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
54775
0
John McGrath
Query!
Address
54775
0
Queensland Brain Institute
University of Queensland
St Lucia, QLD, 4072 Australia
Query!
Country
54775
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
54775
0
+61 7 3346 6372
Query!
Fax
54775
0
Query!
Email
54775
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
54776
0
John McGrath
Query!
Address
54776
0
Queensland Brain Institute
University of Queensland
St Lucia, QLD, 4072 Australia
Query!
Country
54776
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
54776
0
+61 7 3346 6372
Query!
Fax
54776
0
Query!
Email
54776
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
There will be no IPD sharing for this project. Group data analysis will be conducted and this data will be used for all publications.
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Doc. No.
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
3569
Study protocol
367929-(Uploaded-29-07-2019-12-20-17)-Study-related document.pdf
3570
Statistical analysis plan
367929-(Uploaded-29-07-2019-12-20-17)-Study-related document.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
The efficacy of sodium benzoate as an adjunctive treatment in early psychosis - CADENCE-BZ: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
2017
https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1908-5
Embase
Protocol update and statistical analysis plan for CADENCE-BZ: A randomized clinical trial to assess the efficacy of sodium benzoate as an adjunctive treatment in early psychosis.
2019
https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3232-8
Dimensions AI
Effect of Sodium Benzoate vs Placebo Among Individuals With Early Psychosis
2020
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.24335
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF