Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12615000263594
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
13/01/2015
Date registered
20/03/2015
Date last updated
27/05/2019
Date data sharing statement initially provided
27/05/2019
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Bone Density Analysis of Rigid vs Elastic Uncemented Acetabular Cups in Patients with Symptomatic Arthritis of the Hip.
Query!
Scientific title
DEXA Analysis of Conventional Rigid vs. Elastic Uncemented Acetabular Cups in Patients with Symptomatic Arthritis of the Hip.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
285801
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1164-9901
Query!
Trial acronym
DEXA Rigid vs. Elastic Study
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Symptomatic arthritis of hip
293694
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
293995
293995
0
0
Query!
Osteoarthritis
Query!
Surgery
294635
294635
0
0
Query!
Other surgery
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
RM Pressfit Acetabular Cup. The cup is a cementless monoblock press-fit acetabular cup and it is manufactured from UHMWPE, which is stabilised with Vitamin E. The outer surface of the polyethylene is coated with titanium particles for bony in-growth.
This device has no metal shell, and is designed to be flexible in the acetabular bone, unlike a conventional uncemented acetabular cup.
A standard total hip replacement will be performed to implant the device, according to the individual surgeons normal practice.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
290775
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Intervention code [2]
291274
0
Treatment: Surgery
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Rigid Uncemented Acetabular Cup. The cup is a conventional uncemented acetabular cup with a metal shell and polyethylene liner.
A standard total hip replacement will be performed to implant the device, according to the individual surgeons normal practice.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
293783
0
To investigate the acetabular bone stock when using a RM Pressfit Cup compared with a conventional rigid uncemented acetabular cup as assessed by DEXA analysis.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
293783
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
293783
0
2 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
311821
0
To investigate the acetabular bone stock when using a RM Pressfit Cup compared with a conventional rigid uncemented acetabular cup as assessed by DEXA analysis.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
311821
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
311821
0
5 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
311822
0
To examine whether the RM Pressfit Vitamys Cup performs as well as conventional acetabular cups with regards to function using the Oxford Hip Score. Average scores will be compared between the RM Pressfit Cup group and the comparison group.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
311822
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
311822
0
5 years
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
313502
0
To examine whether the RM Pressfit Vitamys Cup performs as well as conventional acetabular cups with regards to quality-of-life using the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL-6D). Average scores for each assessment will be compared between the RM Pressfit Cup group and the comparison group.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
313502
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
313502
0
5 years
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Patients with symptomatic arthritis who are candidates for a primary total hip replacement with an uncemented or cemented femoral stem as determined jointly by the surgeon and the patient.
2. Patients suitable for an uncemented acetabular component
3. Patients who understand the conditions of the study and are willing to participate for the length of the prescribed follow-up
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
70
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Patients who have had previous contralateral hip replacement surgery
2. Pregnant women or those seeking to become pregnant
3. Patients with a history of active infection
4. Patients with conditions or medications associated with osteoporosis or osteopenia ie: bisphosphonates, Protos, steroids and previous acetabular surgery on the affected side.
5. Patients who have severe arthritis of contralateral hip
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Patients who conform to the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be invited to join the study. If they agree, then a consent form will be signed and the treatment group will be randomised via central randomisation software. The patient will not be informed of which study group they have been assigned to prior to surgery.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Permuted block randomisation of equal allocations to each group.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Participants are randomised between the two study groups to receive either the test or control devices. Recruitment and randomisation continue until the sample size is complete.
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
The study has adequate power to determine if the bone density behind the Elastic Cup is maintained compared with the control group.
To estimate the sample group size the following parameters
were set:
1. Level of significance: a or p=0.05, 2 sided
2. Power level: 95%
Using a sample size formula to calculate the average for two groups; the sample size was calculated at 58 patients. This means that 58 patients per group are required to detect a 20% difference with a 95% confidence.
Allowing for a 25% withdrawal or loss to follow-up this will give 72 patients per group.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Withdrawn
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons/comments
Query!
Other reasons
Surgeons decided not to proceed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/01/2019
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
144
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
3242
0
Epworth Richmond - Richmond
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
9024
0
3121 - Richmond
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
290376
0
Commercial sector/Industry
Query!
Name [1]
290376
0
Mathys Orthopaedics Pty Ltd
Query!
Address [1]
290376
0
Unit 6
15–17 Chaplin Drive
Lane Cove West
NSW 2066
Query!
Country [1]
290376
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/Industry
Query!
Name
Mathys Orthopaedics Pty Ltd
Query!
Address
Unit 6
15–17 Chaplin Drive
Lane Cove West
NSW 2066
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
289102
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
289102
0
Query!
Address [1]
289102
0
Query!
Country [1]
289102
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
292080
0
Epworth HealthCare Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
292080
0
89 Bridge Road Richmond VIC 3121
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
292080
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
292080
0
10/10/2012
Query!
Approval date [1]
292080
0
28/11/2012
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
292080
0
56512
Query!
Ethics committee name [2]
292081
0
St John of God Health Care Ethics Commitee
Query!
Ethics committee address [2]
292081
0
12 Salvado Road Subiaco WA 6008
Query!
Ethics committee country [2]
292081
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [2]
292081
0
Query!
Approval date [2]
292081
0
10/10/2012
Query!
Ethics approval number [2]
292081
0
571
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This clinical study is a prospective, randomised, multi-centre study that will enrol 144 patients over a 12-month recruitment period between three surgeons and three centres. The objective of the study is to investigate if the Mathys RM Pressfit Cementless Cup maintains acetabular bone stock by reducing the effects of stress shielding when compared with a conventional rigid cementless acetabular cup. This study also aims to demonstrate safety, and equivalent clinical outcomes to standard care. The RM Pressfit Cementless cup is designed to have a modulus of elasticity that is similar to bone, and therefore it may be possible to transfer physiological loads through the cup and prevent the bone behind the cup from resorbing due to stress shielding. The control group for this study will be a standard hip replacement with a conventional rigid cementless acetabular cup. Standard, functional parameters will be assessed pre-operatively, and post-operatively at 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 2 years and 5 years. Antero-posterior and lateral radiographs will be analysed at 6 weeks, 1 year and 5 years to assess femoral stem and acetabular cup orientation. DEXA (measures bone density) scans will be assessed pre-operatively at 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 2 years and 5 years to measure acetabular bone density, with the aim of showing preservation of bone behind the RM Pressfit Cup when compared to a conventional rigid cup.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
53330
0
Prof Richard de Steiger
Query!
Address
53330
0
Orthopaedic Surgeon
26 Erin Street
Richmond
VIC 3121
Query!
Country
53330
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
53330
0
+61 3 9429 5580
Query!
Fax
53330
0
Query!
Email
53330
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
53331
0
Jenny Burke
Query!
Address
53331
0
NeoSurgical Pty Ltd
17 Macarthur Avenue
Pagewood
NSW 2035
Query!
Country
53331
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
53331
0
+61 0488 240471
Query!
Fax
53331
0
Query!
Email
53331
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
53332
0
Jenny Burke
Query!
Address
53332
0
NeoSurgical Pty Ltd
17 Macarthur Avenue
Pagewood
NSW 2035
Query!
Country
53332
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
53332
0
+61 0488 240471
Query!
Fax
53332
0
Query!
Email
53332
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Study is not proceeding, therefore no data.
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF