Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12614001151628
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
31/08/2014
Date registered
31/10/2014
Date last updated
10/02/2015
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
A study for comparison of onset and duration of block in 3 groups of participants following ultrasound guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block using 0.5% Ropivacaine or 0.5% Ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine or 0.5% Ropivacaine with midazolam.
Query!
Scientific title
Comparative study of additive to ropivacaine to assess the block characteristics following brachial plexus block for patients undergoing elective upper limb orthopaedic surgery.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
284913
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1158-8168
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Anaesthesiology for elective upper limb orthopaedic surgery.
292915
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Anaesthesiology
293202
293202
0
0
Query!
Anaesthetics
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
3 Groups of patients based on the study medication used.
Group R: Injection 30 ml 0.5% Ropivacaine + 1 ml 0.9% Saline
Group D: Injection 30 ml 0.5% Ropivacaine + 1mcg/kg of Dexmedetomidine in 1ml 0.9% saline
Group M: Injection 30 ml 0.5% Ropivacaine + 0.05mg/kg of Midazolam in 1ml 0.9% saline
All medications administered in periplexus region around brachial plexus under ultrasound guidance.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
290145
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Group R: Patients receiving periplexus injection of 30 ml 0.5% Ropivacaine with 1 ml 0.9% saline.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
293071
0
Duration of motor blockade
Query!
Assessment method [1]
293071
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
293071
0
Assessed using Modified Bromage criteria:
Grade 0: Normal motor function
Grade 1: Ability to move only fingers
Grade 2: Complete motor block with inabilty to move below wrist and finger
Assessed every half hourly for first 6 hours and every hourly for next 18 hours till complete recovery of motor block.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
293212
0
Duration of sensory blockade
Query!
Assessment method [2]
293212
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
293212
0
Assessed by checking dermatomal sensations using tooth pick prick. Grading: Grade 0: Sharp prick felt Grade 1: Analgesia, dull sensation felt Grade 2: Anaesthesia, no sensation felt Assessed every half hourly for first 6 hours and every hourly for next 18 hours till complete recovery of sensory block.
Query!
Primary outcome [3]
293213
0
Time to rescue analgesia
Query!
Assessment method [3]
293213
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
293213
0
Time from injection of medication to the point when patient asks for first rescue analgesia.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
310290
0
Onset of motor blockade
Query!
Assessment method [1]
310290
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
310290
0
Assessed using Modified Bromage criteria
Assessed every 3 minutes till onset of complete motor block
(Grade 2)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
310601
0
Onset of sensory blockade
Query!
Assessment method [2]
310601
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
310601
0
Assessed using loss of dermatomal tooth pick prick sensation (grading same as primary outcome 2) Assessed every 3 minutes till onset of complete sensory block (Grade 2)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
310618
0
Sedation score
Query!
Assessment method [3]
310618
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
310618
0
Assessed at 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours and 6 hours from time of injection.
Grade 1: Awake and alert
Grade 2: Sedated, responding to verbal stimulus
Grade 3: Sedated, responding to mild physical stimulus
Grade 4: Sedated, responding to moderate or severe physical stimulus
Grade 5: Not arousable
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Patients aged between 18 to 60 years, weighing >50 kilograms, belonging to American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status 1 or 2, posted for elective upper limb (elbow or forearm) orthopaedic surgery under supraclavicular brachial plexus block.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
60
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Patients refusing nerve block, having brachial plexus deficits, on anticoagulants or having bleeding disorders, with history of seizures or local anaesthetic allergy and belonging to American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status 3 or 4.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Computer generated randomization table
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Sample size calculated using data from previous studies for the primary outcome of duration of sensory and motor blockade (Assuming a 30% difference between the groups clinically). The calculated sample size was 16 per group (For statistical power of 80%) and 19 per group (For statistical power of 90%). Hence 20 participants were enrolled in each group.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/08/2014
Query!
Actual
1/08/2014
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
5/12/2014
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
60
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
6330
0
India
Query!
State/province [1]
6330
0
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
289886
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
289886
0
Kasturba medical college, Manipal University
Query!
Address [1]
289886
0
Kasturba Medical College
Manipal.P.O
Udupi
Karnataka-576104
India
Query!
Country [1]
289886
0
India
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Sethulakshmi Prasad
Query!
Address
Room number: 220
Sonia hostel
Kasturba Medical College campus
Manipal .P.O
Udupi, Karnataka 576104
Query!
Country
India
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
288566
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
288566
0
Rohith Krishna
Query!
Address [1]
288566
0
Assistant Professor
Department of Anaesthesiology
Kasturba Medical College, Madhav Nagar
Manipal.P.O
Udupi, Karnataka 576104
Query!
Country [1]
288566
0
India
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
291609
0
Kasturba Hospital Institutional Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
291609
0
Institutional Ethics Committee Kasturba Hospital, Manipal Post box no. 7 Udupi, Karnataka-576104
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
291609
0
India
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
291609
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
291609
0
08/10/2013
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
291609
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Study is aimed at comparing the block characteristics of ultrasound guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block in 3 groups of patients. One group receiving plain ropivacaine (a local anaesthetic) without any additive, second group receiving ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine as additive and third group receiving ropivacaine with midazolam as additive. Previous studies suggest that additives prolong the duration of blockade. Our study is comparing two different additives.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Presented at 62nd annual national conference of Indian Society of Anaesthesiologists held at Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India. Title: Ultrasound guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block using plain ropivacaine and ropivacaine with adjuvants. Authors: Dr Sethulakshmi Prasad, Dr Shaji Mathew, Dr Rohith Krishna
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
49658
0
Dr Sethulakshmi Prasad
Query!
Address
49658
0
Room number: 220
Sonia hostel
Kasturba Medical College campus
Manipal .P.O
Udupi, Karnataka 576104
Query!
Country
49658
0
India
Query!
Phone
49658
0
+919901726835
Query!
Fax
49658
0
Query!
Email
49658
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
49659
0
Rohith Krishna
Query!
Address
49659
0
Assistant Professor
Department of Anaesthesiology
Kasturba Medical College, Madhav Nagar
Manipal.P.O
Karnataka- 576104
Query!
Country
49659
0
India
Query!
Phone
49659
0
+919663378312
Query!
Fax
49659
0
Query!
Email
49659
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
49660
0
Rohith Krishna
Query!
Address
49660
0
Assistant Professor
Department of Anaesthesiology
Kasturba Medical College, Madhav Nagar
Manipal.P.O
Karnataka- 576104
Query!
Country
49660
0
India
Query!
Phone
49660
0
+919663378312
Query!
Fax
49660
0
Query!
Email
49660
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF