Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12614000202662
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
12/02/2014
Date registered
25/02/2014
Date last updated
23/07/2018
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Efficacy and safety of an non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug in the management of acute urinary retention.
Query!
Scientific title
Celecoxib 200 mg once daily in the management of acute urinary retention related to benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). Results of a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
284058
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Acute Urinary Retention
291113
0
Query!
Benign Prostatic Enlargement
291227
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Renal and Urogenital
291455
291455
0
0
Query!
Other renal and urogenital disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Patients with acute urinary retention will be randomized into 2 groups. Patients in group A will recieve 1 tablet of Alfuzocin 10 mg once daily plus 1 capsule of celecoxib 200 mg once daily, for 3 days and then will have a Trial WithOut Catheter (TWOC). The monitor adherence to treatment is going to be monitored by methods of drug tablet return. The TWOC includes the removal of the Foley catheter and monitoring of first urination after 3 days of initial catheterization.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
288748
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Patients in group B will recieve 1 tablet of Alfuzocin 10 mg once daily plus 1 capsule of placebo (looking similar to the celecoxib capsule in color, weight, and shape) once daily (for 3 days and then will have a TWOC).
Query!
Control group
Placebo
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
291437
0
To assess the percentage of TWOC (Trial without catheter) between the two groups of patients. Success of TWOC was defined if patients had a PVR (post void residual) < 100ml after voiding at least 100 mL of urine and did not require recatheterization for a period of 24 hours.
The PVR is going to be measured by ultrasound scan.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
291437
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
291437
0
3 days after initial catheterization.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
306770
0
If there is a statistical significant difference in PVR (Post Void Residual) volume in the first voiding after Foley catheter removal between the two groups of patients.
The PVR is going to be measured by ultrasound scan
Query!
Assessment method [1]
306770
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
306770
0
3 days after initial catheterization.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
306771
0
If there is a statistical significant difference in max flow rate (Qmax) in the first voiding after Foley catheter removal between the two groups of patients. Patients will have an uroflow test.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
306771
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
306771
0
3 days after initial catheterization.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
306772
0
To record the side effects of each treatment. Possible side effects of treatment include headache, gastric pain, nausea, vomiting, hypertension etc. These side effects are going to be assessed by methods of interviewing the patient.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
306772
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
306772
0
3 days after initial catheterization.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Patients able to give written informed consent
2. First episode of AUR (acute urinary retention)
3. Retention urine volume >400 mL
Query!
Minimum age
40
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Males
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Patients required a suprapubic catheterization
2. Clot retention from hematuria
3. Positive urine culture
4. Postoperative retention after major abdominal or pelvic surgery
5. Large residual volume of more than 1 liter
6. Confirmed or suspected urethral stricture
7. History of prostatic or bladder neck surgery
8. Confirmed case of carcinoma prostate
9. History of severe orthostatic hypotension
10. Patients taking any alpha blocker or any NSAID
11. Active peptic ulceration or active gastro-intestinal (GI) bleeding
12. Severe hepatic dysfunction
13. Estimated renal creatinine clearance <60 ml/min
14. Inflammatory bowel disease
15. Congestive heart failure (NYHA II-IV)
16. Patients with hypertension whose blood pressure is persistently elevated above 140/90mmHg and has not been adequately controlled.
17. Established ischemic heart disease, peripheral arterial disease, and/or cerebrovascular disease
18. Allergy in NSAIDs or a-blocker
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Allocation to treatment is going to be centrally accomplished (telephone randomization).
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Computer generated randomization list.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Baseline characteristics and the percentages of successful TWOC will be compared between the groups using chi-square test. The assessed PVR and Qmax after first voiding will be compared using Student’s T test.
In order to find a statistically significant difference between two groups, a power analysis was performed. With a power of 90%, 70 patients are needed with an effect size of 0.5.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Withdrawn
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Lack of funding/staff/facilities
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/04/2014
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
70
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
5813
0
Greece
Query!
State/province [1]
5813
0
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
288682
0
Self funded/Unfunded
Query!
Name [1]
288682
0
Query!
Address [1]
288682
0
Query!
Country [1]
288682
0
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
Gennimatas General Hospital of Thessaloniki
Query!
Address
41 Ethnikis Aminis, Thessaloniki, 54643
Query!
Country
Greece
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
287392
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
287392
0
Query!
Address [1]
287392
0
Query!
Country [1]
287392
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
290546
0
Ethics committee of "G. Gennimatas" General Hospital of Thessaloniki
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
290546
0
41 Ethnikis Aminis str, Thessaloniki, 54346.
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
290546
0
Greece
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
290546
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
290546
0
12/07/2013
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
290546
0
9893/ 12.07.2013
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the most frequent benign neoplasm in men. It is estimated that many of patients suffering from this disease will experience acute urinary retention (AUR). The immediate management of AUR requires bladder decompression by catheterization. Up to now, alpha1-Blockers are used routinely before catheter removal and considered an appropriate treatment option according to European Urology Association guidelines. This study is the first double-blind prospective study assessing the impact of Celecoxib (200mg), an NSAID (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug) added to the standard treatment (a-blocker) on the outcome of a trial without catheter (TWOC) after a first episode of AUR related to BPH.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
46110
0
Dr Vakalopoulos Ioannis
Query!
Address
46110
0
1st Urologic Department of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, G. Gennimatas General Hospital, 41 Ethnikis Aminis Street, Thessaloniki, 54643
Query!
Country
46110
0
Greece
Query!
Phone
46110
0
+30 2310963370
Query!
Fax
46110
0
Query!
Email
46110
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
46111
0
Vakalopoulos Ioannis
Query!
Address
46111
0
1st Urologic Department of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, G. Gennimatas General Hospital, 41 Ethnikis Aminis Street, Thessaloniki, 54643
Query!
Country
46111
0
Greece
Query!
Phone
46111
0
+30 2310963370
Query!
Fax
46111
0
Query!
Email
46111
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
46112
0
Vakalopoulos Ioannis
Query!
Address
46112
0
1st Urologic Department of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, G. Gennimatas General Hospital, 41 Ethnikis Aminis Street, Thessaloniki, 54643
Query!
Country
46112
0
Greece
Query!
Phone
46112
0
+30 2310963370
Query!
Fax
46112
0
Query!
Email
46112
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF