Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12613000805774
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
17/07/2013
Date registered
22/07/2013
Date last updated
23/07/2019
Date data sharing statement initially provided
23/07/2019
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
A randomised trial of propofol sedation versus desflurane anaesthesia, used to supplement spinal anaesthesia, on the quality of recovery following hip replacement surgery in adult patients
Query!
Scientific title
A randomised trial of propofol sedation versus desflurane anaesthesia, used to supplement spinal anaesthesia, on the quality of recovery following hip replacement surgery in adult patients
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
282840
0
nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1145-7188
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Hip surgery
289647
0
Query!
Anaesthesia
289648
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Anaesthesiology
289965
289965
0
0
Query!
Anaesthetics
Query!
Surgery
289974
289974
0
0
Query!
Other surgery
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
For patients receiving propofol infusion, the dose will be adjusted according to sedation requirements by the anaesthetist (This may range fom 50-500 mg/hr via intravenous infusion). Patients will be spontaneously ventilating, with supplemental oxygen administered via a clear Hudson mask at 6 L /min. Supplemental midazolam (1-5 mg intravenous) is permitted. A BIS target of > 65 will be set for depth of sedation.
For patients receiving desflurane anesthesia they will receive intravenous induction of anesthesia with propofol (50-200 mg) followed by desflurane via inhalation. Ventilation will be via larangeal mask anesthesia and spontaneous ventilation unless the treating anaesthetist considers that endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation is required for the particular patient. The dose of desflurane will be adjusted according to the clinical requirement by the anaesthetist. A target BIS of 40-60 will be set for depth of anaesthesia.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
287531
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
sedation with propofol vs light general anaesthesia with desflurane
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
290017
0
The primary endpoint will be the incidence of recovery in the cognitive domain of the PQRS at day 3.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
290017
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
290017
0
Day 3 potoperative
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
303780
0
Recovery for all domains, measured by the postoperative quality of recovery scale (PQRS) at 15 minutes, 40 minutes 1 and 3 days, 1 month and 3 months following cessation of anesthesia.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
303780
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
303780
0
15 minutes, 40 minutes 1 and 3 days, 1 month and 3 months following cessation of anesthesia
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
303781
0
Major adverse events including death, cardiovascular and respiratory complications, intensive care admission, neurological (such as stroke), and infection
Query!
Assessment method [2]
303781
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
303781
0
Hospital admission
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Adult patients undergoing hip replacement surgery under spinal anesthesia
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Patients, who are not fluent in English will be excluded, as they may be unable to answer the recovery questionnaire adequately. Patients where either general or regional anesthesia is contraindicated, will be excluded
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Concealment will be by placing the card containing the allocation information in double opaque sealed envelopes, and concealment will be maintained until after recruitment and the patients is admitted into the operating theatre. The treating anaesthetist will then open the envelopes to reveal the allocation. A non-participant in any process of the study will perform preparation of the envelopes. A copy of the randomization sequence will be stored in a separate databank, which is password protected and not available to the investigators until the study is complete.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
The randomization sequence will by produced using a computer generated randomization sequence
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 4
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
For the primary outcome, the proportion of patients recovered at day 3 in the cognitive domain will be analysed by Fishers exact test. For analysis of recovery between groups over time the Cochran Mantel Haenszel test on the proportions of recovery for each group with continuity correction over five measurement periods. Continuous data will be analyzed using independent samples t test, or RM ANOVA for repeated measurements.
Sample size estimates are based on the primary endpoint of cognitive recovery on day 3. In a previous study involving major joint replacement surgery, the incidence of cognitive recovery on day 3 was 61%. In order to detect a difference with an odds ratio of 2.5 (indicating a moderate size clinical effect) using Fisher’s exact test, with alpha size 0.05 and power 0.8, a sample size of 100 patients per group is required.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Stopped early
Query!
Data analysis
Data analysis is complete
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Participant recruitment difficulties
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
30/08/2013
Query!
Actual
2/09/2013
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
30/06/2016
Query!
Actual
4/04/2016
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
6/07/2016
Query!
Sample size
Target
200
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
52
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
287621
0
Self funded/Unfunded
Query!
Name [1]
287621
0
Query!
Address [1]
287621
0
Query!
Country [1]
287621
0
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
The University of Melbourne
Query!
Address
Grattan St
Carlton
Victoria, 3053
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
286364
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
286364
0
Query!
Address [1]
286364
0
Query!
Country [1]
286364
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
289590
0
Epworth Hospital HREC
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
289590
0
89 Bridge Rd, Richmond VIC 3121
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
289590
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
289590
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
289590
0
30/08/2013
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
289590
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The study aims to assess whether two different anaesthetic techniques can affect the postoperative quality of recovery in patients undergoing total hip replacement surgery. The two techniques are considered as sedation or light general anaesthesia as they supplement a spinal anaesthetic - which is the primary anaesthetic technique for these patients. The quality of recovery is measured using a scale called the PQRS, which measures recovery in a number of different domains and compares recovery to the patients pre-surgery values.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
41478
0
Prof Colin Royse
Query!
Address
41478
0
The University of Melbourne
245 Cardigan St
Carlton
Vic 3095
Query!
Country
41478
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
41478
0
+61390354704
Query!
Fax
41478
0
Query!
Email
41478
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
41479
0
Colin Royse
Query!
Address
41479
0
The University of Melbourne
245 Cardigan St
Carlton
Vic 3095
Query!
Country
41479
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
41479
0
+61390354704
Query!
Fax
41479
0
Query!
Email
41479
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
41480
0
Colin Royse
Query!
Address
41480
0
The University of Melbourne
245 Cardigan St
Carlton
Vic 3095
Query!
Country
41480
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
41480
0
+61390354704
Query!
Fax
41480
0
Query!
Email
41480
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Privacy
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF