Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12613000392763
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
12/03/2013
Date registered
10/04/2013
Date last updated
29/11/2013
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Comparing the use of a needle guidance device with free-hand
technique in performing ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks: a
prospective randomized trial.
Query!
Scientific title
In adult patients undergoing bilateral ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks, does the use of a needle guidance device compared to a free-hand technique when performing the TAP block increase needle tip visibility and reduce procedural time?
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
282035
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Major abdominal surgery requiring transversus abdominis plane block.
288495
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Anaesthesiology
288843
288843
0
0
Query!
Anaesthetics
Query!
Anaesthesiology
289106
289106
0
0
Query!
Other anaesthesiology
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
This is a crossover study, where participants are randomly assigned to two groups. Group 1 participants will receive the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block via the needle guided technique and then followed by free hand technique whilst Group 2 participants will receive the TAP block via free hand technique and then followed by needle guided technique.
The intervention is the use of an ultrasound needle guide (Infiniti, CIVCO Medical Solutions, Kalona, Iowa, USA) when performing an ultrasound-guided TAP block.
The ultrasound needle guide consists of two parts, a reusable bracket that is placed beneath the probe cover, and disposable needle guides that attach to the brackets. The needle is passed through the attached needle guide, which holds the needle in the plane of the ultrasound probe.
The TAP block will be performed with a 21-gauge 100 mm Stimuplex needle and 200 mg of ropivacaine for patients more than or equal to 70 kg (20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine each side) or 150 mg of ropivacaine for patients less than 70 kg (20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine each side). The ultrasound probe will be placed in a transverse plane to the lateral abdominal wall in the midaxillary line, between the lower costal margin and iliac crest. The needle will then be introduced in-plane of the ultrasound probe and advanced until the tip reaches the plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles. At this point 20 ml of ropivacaine solution will be injected in 5 ml aliquots after negative aspiration. The transversus abdominis plane will be visualized expanding with the injection. The intervention will be completed within 5-10 minutes. The duration of the wash-out period is 5 minutes.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
286640
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
A free-hand technique when performing an ultrasound-guided TAP block.
With a free-hand technique, the needle is separate to the ultrasound probe. When advancing the needle the ultrasound probe is shifted to locate the needle tip and adjustments are made to the position of the needle by the user.
The TAP block will be performed with a 21-gauge 100 mm Stimuplex needle and 200 mg of ropivacaine for patients more than or equal to 70 kg (20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine each side) or 150 mg of ropivacaine for patients less than 70 kg (20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine each side). The ultrasound probe will be placed in a transverse plane to the lateral abdominal wall in the midaxillary line, between the lower costal margin and iliac crest. The needle will then be introduced in-plane of the ultrasound probe and advanced until the tip reaches the plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles. At this point 20 ml of ropivacaine solution (as described above) will be injected in 5 ml aliquots after negative aspiration. The transversus abdominis plane will be visualized expanding with the injection. The intervention will be completed within 5-10 minutes. The duration of the wash-out period is 5 minutes.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
288971
0
Proportion of needle visibility - the ratio of time that the needle was completely visualised by ultrasound throughout the procedure will be recorded. The ratio of this time to the overall procedural time (see below) will be calculated.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
288971
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
288971
0
Ultrasounds are recorded at time of procedure.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
288972
0
Total procedural time - the time taken from needle insertion to successful injection of local anaesthetic in the transversus abdominis plane.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
288972
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
288972
0
At time of procedure.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
301472
0
Proceduralist’s satisfaction score - proceduralists will be asked to rank their satisfaction with both techniques on a scale from 0 (lowest score: completely dissatisfied) to 10 (best score: completely satisfied).
Query!
Assessment method [1]
301472
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
301472
0
At time of procedure.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
301473
0
Dermatomal blockade - sensory assessment (using pinprick and ice) will be conducted by a blinded observer in the post-anaesthesia care unit.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
301473
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
301473
0
Baseline, and at 30 minutes after procedure.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Patients must be aged 18 years or over, must be undergoing open abdominal surgery, and are scheduled for bilateral, single shot, ultrasound guided in-plane TAP blocks administered during general anaesthesia at the completion of surgery.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Patients who are unable (due to an intellectual disability, cognitive deficit or language barrier) or unwilling to consent, who have a contraindication to undergoing TAP blocks (coagulopathy, local skin infection, allergy to ropivacaine or planned administration of large volume local anaesthetic by another route [e.g. epidural]) or who will not be available for assessment postoperatively (i.e. ventilated patients) will be excluded.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
After written informed consent is obtained, patients will be assigned using computer-generated randomization to one of two groups - group 1 – needle guided technique followed by free hand technique, or group 2 – free hand technique followed by needle guided technique. Randomisation results will be concealed in opaque sequentially numbered envelopes until after consent has been obtained.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Computer-generated randomization.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Crossover
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Continuous data will be tested for normality. Values will be expressed as mean (+/- standard deviation), median (range), and percentages as appropriate. Comparisons between the groups will be performed by paired t-test for normally distributed data and Wilcoxon’s signed rank test for non-parametric or skewed data. A P value < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
12/04/2013
Query!
Actual
23/04/2013
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
18/09/2013
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
20
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
701
0
Royal Melbourne Hospital - City campus - Parkville
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
6443
0
3050 - Royal Melbourne Hospital
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
286820
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
286820
0
Department of Anaesthesia Research Cost Centre
Query!
Address [1]
286820
0
3 North
The Royal Melbourne Hospital
Grattan Street
Parkville
VIC 3050
Query!
Country [1]
286820
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
Royal Melbourne Hospital
Query!
Address
3 North
The Royal Melbourne Hospital
Grattan Street
Parkville
VIC 3050
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
285608
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
285608
0
Query!
Address [1]
285608
0
Query!
Country [1]
285608
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
288886
0
Melbourne Health Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
288886
0
The Royal Melbourne Hospital Grattan Street Parkville VIC 3050
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
288886
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
288886
0
26/10/2012
Query!
Approval date [1]
288886
0
06/03/2013
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
288886
0
2012.243
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This study is designed to determine whether the use of the CIVCO (Registered Trademark) ultrasound needle guide (Infiniti, CIVCO Medical Solutions, Kalona, Iowa, USA) will improve visualisation of the needle tip during ultrasound-guided TAP blocks when compared with the “free hand” technique for patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Furthermore, we aim to study whether it will shorten the procedural time, improve operator satisfaction or lead to increased dermatomal blockade.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
38186
0
Dr Irene Ng
Query!
Address
38186
0
3 North
Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management
The Royal Melbourne Hospital
Grattan Street
Parkville
VIC 3050
Query!
Country
38186
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
38186
0
+61 3 9342 7540
Query!
Fax
38186
0
+61 3 9342 8623
Query!
Email
38186
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
38187
0
Irene Ng
Query!
Address
38187
0
3 North
Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management
The Royal Melbourne Hospital
Grattan Street
Parkville
VIC 3050
Query!
Country
38187
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
38187
0
+61 3 9342 7540
Query!
Fax
38187
0
+61 3 9342 8623
Query!
Email
38187
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
38188
0
Irene Ng
Query!
Address
38188
0
3 North
Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management
The Royal Melbourne Hospital
Grattan Street
Parkville
VIC 3050
Query!
Country
38188
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
38188
0
+61 3 9342 7540
Query!
Fax
38188
0
+61 3 9342 8623
Query!
Email
38188
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF