Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12613000151730
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
4/02/2013
Date registered
8/02/2013
Date last updated
11/02/2013
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
A comparison of alcohol delamination and phototherapeutic keratectomy for the treatment of recurrent erosion syndrome.
Query!
Scientific title
A comparative clinical trial of alcohol delamination versus phototherapeutic keratectomy for the treatment of recurrent corneal erosions.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
281876
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
recurrent corneal erosion syndrome
288261
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Eye
288614
288614
0
0
Query!
Diseases / disorders of the eye
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
alcohol delamination (removal of corneal epithelium with 50um of 25% ethyl alcohol for 40 seconds)
Query!
Intervention code [1]
286439
0
Treatment: Surgery
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
phototherapeutic keratectomy (excimer laser with 9mm treatment zone and depth of 9um). The treatment time including preparation time and epithelial debridement is less than 10 minutes.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
288767
0
pain score using a numerical rating scale
Query!
Assessment method [1]
288767
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
288767
0
24 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
300931
0
recurrence of erosions by subjective report
Query!
Assessment method [1]
300931
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
300931
0
24 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
300932
0
complications by slit lamp examination (eg. haze, infection, scarring) and measurement of visual acuity
Query!
Assessment method [2]
300932
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
300932
0
24 months
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Individuals with symptomatic recurrent corneal erosion syndrome not responding to conservative treatment including regular topical lubrication and a bandage contact lens
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
99
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Individuals with a history of previous ocular surgery including any interventional treatment for their recurrent erosion syndrome other than manual epithelial debridement, prior herpetic eye disease, history of other corneal or external eye disease, corneal hypoaesthesia,or a history of diabetes mellitus
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Enrolment via the corneal clinic at the Hospital. Patients will only be randomised following recruitment and completion of the consent. Allocation involved contacting a trial coordinator who held a computer generated randomisation plan.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Computer generated randomized sequence
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
31/01/2007
Query!
Actual
6/02/2007
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
42
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
532
0
The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital - East Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
6272
0
3002 - East Melbourne
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
286661
0
Self funded/Unfunded
Query!
Name [1]
286661
0
Query!
Address [1]
286661
0
Query!
Country [1]
286661
0
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital
Query!
Address
32 Gisborne St, East Melbourne, VIC 3002
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
285439
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
285439
0
Centre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne
Query!
Address [1]
285439
0
32 Gisborne St, East Melbourne, VIC 3002
Query!
Country [1]
285439
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
288732
0
The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital Human Research and Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
288732
0
32 Gisborne St, East Melbourne, VIC 3002
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
288732
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
288732
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
288732
0
18/12/2006
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
288732
0
06/719H
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
To compare two different treatment methods of reducing pain and recurrent episodes in individuals with recurrent corneal erosion syndrome, a syndrome characterised by pain, watering and light sensitivity due to episisodic loosening of the surface cells of the eye. The two methods are laser treatment and alcohol treatment to the surface of the eye. It is hypothesised that the two methods are comparable in their effect.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
37534
0
Prof Rasik Vajpayee
Query!
Address
37534
0
Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, 32 Gisborne St, East Melbourne, VIC 3002
Query!
Country
37534
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
37534
0
+61399298666
Query!
Fax
37534
0
Query!
Email
37534
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
37535
0
Marios Constantinou
Query!
Address
37535
0
Centre for Eye Research Australia
32 Gisborne St, East Melbourne, VIC 3002
Query!
Country
37535
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
37535
0
+61 3 9929 8360
Query!
Fax
37535
0
Query!
Email
37535
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
37536
0
Marios Constantinou
Query!
Address
37536
0
Centre for Eye Research Australia
32 Gisborne St, East Melbourne, VIC 3002
Query!
Country
37536
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
37536
0
+61 3 9929 8360
Query!
Fax
37536
0
Query!
Email
37536
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF