Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12613000159752
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
8/02/2013
Date registered
11/02/2013
Date last updated
20/07/2018
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Videolaryngoscopy for Intubation in Neonates: an Evaluation– a randomized controlled study (The Vine study)
Query!
Scientific title
A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effect of videolaryngoscopy and verbal assistance on the rate of successful intubation in neonates
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
281872
0
none
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
The VINE study
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Intubation of the neonatal trachea
288254
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Reproductive Health and Childbirth
288649
288649
0
0
Query!
Complications of newborn
Query!
Respiratory
288650
288650
0
0
Query!
Other respiratory disorders / diseases
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Infants in the intervention group will be intubated orally by a neonatal trainee using a videolaryngoscope. The attached monitor will be displaying real time images that are visible to a supervisor who is in attendance, supervising and assisting with the intubation attempt. The intervention is the verbal assistance offered during the intubation attempt by the supervisor on seeing ‘what the intubator can see’.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
286471
0
Other interventions
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
The infants in the control group will also be intubated orally by a neonatal trainee and the laryngoscope used will also be the videolaryngoscope. However, the attached monitor screen will remain covered during the intubation attempt and the images therefore not be visible to the attending supervisor. The supervisor can still offer verbal guidance and assistance, as is standard current practice.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
288805
0
The rate of successful intubation on first attempt. An attempted intubation will be defined as the insertion of the laryngoscope into the infant’s mouth.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
288805
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
288805
0
The duration of the intubation attempt
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
301031
0
Time taken for the intubation attempt
Query!
Assessment method [1]
301031
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
301031
0
The time taken is defined by the time difference between when the laryngoscope is inserted and subsequently removed from the patient’s mouth.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
301032
0
The lowest oxygen saturation and heart rate during the procedure. The oxygen saturation will be read from the attached pulsoximeter and the heart rate read either from the pulseoximeter or the infants electrocardiograph recording if attached.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
301032
0
Query!
Timepoint [2]
301032
0
The duration of the intubation attempt
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
301033
0
The rate of endotracheal tube adjustment following chest x-ray evaluation
Query!
Assessment method [3]
301033
0
Query!
Timepoint [3]
301033
0
6 hours following the intubation
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
301034
0
Qualitative data will be obtained from the registrars about their experience of the intubation attempt
Query!
Assessment method [4]
301034
0
Query!
Timepoint [4]
301034
0
Recorded as soon as possible after the intubation attempt
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Infants in the delivery room, operating theatre or in the Newborn Intensive and Special Care (NISC) unit of The Royal Women’s Hospital, Melbourne who require oral endotracheal intubation will be eligible for entry to this study.
Query!
Minimum age
0
Hours
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
4
Months
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Infants will be not be recruited if they are in extremis requiring immediate intubation by a senior experienced operator who will use his/her own preferred method.
Infants who will be intubated nasally will not be included as this technique is generally not taught to registrars.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Sealed opaque, sequentially numbered envelopes will contain the allocation. Once the decision is made to intubate, the infant will be enrolled. Just before the intubation attempt commences, an envelope will be opened revealling the allocation.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Allocation will be stratified according to whether or not the clinical team prescribe premedication. Variable block randomisation will be used within each stratification group.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
In a trial performed at the Royal Women’s Hospital recently - A Randomized Trial of Stylets for Intubating Newborn Infants, 228 intubations by registrars were examined of which 115 were successful on first attempt (50%). Assuming a success rate of 50% in the control group, a sample size of 103 and 103 for the two groups would have a power of 80% to detect a 20% absolute difference in success rates between the groups (50% versus 70%).
The data will be presented as mean (standard deviation) for normally distributed variables and median (interquartile range) when the distribution is skewed. The clinical characteristics and outcome variables will be analysed by using the Student t test for parametric and Mann-Whitney U test for nonparametric comparisons of continuous variables and Chi squared for categorical variables. P values will be 2-sided and P values of less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
26/02/2013
Query!
Actual
26/02/2013
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
26/05/2014
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
26/05/2014
Query!
Sample size
Target
210
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
213
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
551
0
The Royal Women's Hospital - Parkville
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
6291
0
3052 - Parkville
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
286699
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
286699
0
National Health and Medical Research Council Program Grant
Query!
Address [1]
286699
0
National Health and Medical Research Council
GPO Box 1421
Canberra ACT 2601
Query!
Country [1]
286699
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
Prof Peter Davis
Query!
Address
Department of Newborn Research,
The Royal Women's Hospital,
Locked Bag 300,
Corner of Grattan Street and Flemmington Road,
Parkville,
VIC 3052
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
285470
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
285470
0
Query!
Address [1]
285470
0
Query!
Country [1]
285470
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
288765
0
The Royal Women's Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
288765
0
The Royal Women's Hospital, Locked Bag 300, Grattan St and Flemmington Road, Parkville VIC 3052
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
288765
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
288765
0
20/02/2013
Query!
Approval date [1]
288765
0
26/02/2013
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
288765
0
13/05
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This study is looking at methods used to intubate (insert a breathing tube that connects to a ventilator) sick infants. The standard method, which has been used internationally for many years, involves the doctor first inserting a laryngoscope into the infant’s mouth. This is an L-shaped device with a light at the tip. When it is manipulated correctly, it moves the infant’s tongue and jaw allowing a view of the infant’s airway. The doctor can then insert the breathing tube through the voice-box into the airway. This is a difficult procedure for doctors to learn and more than one attempt is often required to insert the breathing tube correctly. A more senior supervising doctor is usually present to assist during the procedure but is limited by the fact that he/she cannot see in the infant’s mouth. The devise being examined in this study is a videolaryngoscope. This is structurally the same as a traditional laryngoscope but displays real time images on to a nearby monitor. This essentially means that the assisting doctor can now see what the intubating doctor sees and can therefore potentially offer improved guidance and assistance. This is a randomised controlled trial and any infant at the Royal Women’s Hospital, Melbourne, who requires intubation, is eligible for inclusion. If the infant is very sick and needs urgent intubation, they are excluded. All intubations in the study will be performed by neonatal registrars, who are junior doctors in training. The enrolled infants will be allocated randomly into the intervention group or the control group. In the intervention group, the registrar will attempt to intubate the infant using the videolaryngoscope and standard breathing tubes. A supervising doctor will be present and view the videolaryngoscope screen. They will offer instruction to the registrar based on the images they see. In the control group, the registrar will attempt to intubate using the videolaryngoscope and standard breathing tubes. However this time, the monitor will remain covered during the intubation attempt. The registrar will still be offered verbal guidance, as would be standard current practice. In both groups it will be recorded if the first attempt resulted in correct placement of the breathing tube. The main result of the study will be a comparison of the rate of correct tube placement between the two groups.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Publications 1 A Randomized Trial of Videolaryngoscopy to Teach Neonatal Intubation. JE O’Shea JE, Thio M, Kamlin COF, McGrory L, Wong C, John J, Roberts C, Kuschel C, Davis PG. Pediatrics 2015;136(5):912-9. 2.Analysis of unsuccessful intubations in neonates using videolaryngoscopy recordings. O'Shea JE, Loganathan P, Thio M, Kamlin COF, Davis PG. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017 Nov 10. Presentations June 2015: Neonatal Society UK • Videolaryngoscopy as an Intubation Training Tool for Neonatal Trainees – a Randomised Controlled Trial. O’Shea JE, Thio M, Kamlin COF, McGrory L, Wong C, John J, Roberts C, Kuschel C, Davis PG April 2015: Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand • Videolaryngoscopy as an Intubation Training Tool for Neonatal Trainees – a Randomised Controlled Trial. O’Shea JE, Thio M, Kamlin COF, McGrory L, Wong C, John J, Roberts C, Kuschel C, Davis PG November 2014: Cool Topics Melbourne • Neonatal Intubation in an Era of Reduced Opportunity. O’Shea JE October 2014: European Society of Paediatric Research • Videolaryngoscopy as an Intubation Training Tool for Neonatal Trainees – a Randomised Controlled Trial. O’Shea JE, Thio M, Kamlin COF, McGrory L, Wong C, John J, Roberts C, Kuschel C, Davis PG
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
37498
0
Dr Joyce O'Shea
Query!
Address
37498
0
Department of Newborn Research
Royal Women's Hospital,
Corner of Grattan St and Flemmington Road,
Parkville,
VIC 3052
Query!
Country
37498
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
37498
0
+61383453775
Query!
Fax
37498
0
Query!
Email
37498
0
joyce.o'shea@ggc,scot.nhs.uk
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
37499
0
Joyce O'Shea
Query!
Address
37499
0
Department of Newborn Research
Royal Women's Hospital,
Corner of Grattan St and Flemmington Road,
Parkville,
VIC 3052
Query!
Country
37499
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
37499
0
+61383453775
Query!
Fax
37499
0
Query!
Email
37499
0
joyce.o'shea@ggc,scot.nhs.uk
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
37500
0
Joyce O'Shea
Query!
Address
37500
0
Department of Newborn Research
Royal Women's Hospital,
Corner of Grattan St and Flemmington Road,
Parkville,
VIC 3052
Query!
Country
37500
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
37500
0
+61383453775
Query!
Fax
37500
0
Query!
Email
37500
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
Source
Title
Year of Publication
DOI
Embase
Videolaryngoscopy as an intubation training tool for neonatal trainees-a randomised controlled trial.
2014
https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2014-307384.1392
Embase
Videolaryngoscopy as an intubation training tool for neonatal trainees-a randomised controlled trial.
2014
https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2014-307384.138
Embase
Neonatal videolaryngoscopy as a teaching aid-the trainees' perspective from an RCT.
2015
https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0036933015609821
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.
Download to PDF