Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12611000936921
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
29/08/2011
Date registered
31/08/2011
Date last updated
31/08/2011
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Reliability of an 'online' geriatirc assessment procedure.
Query!
Scientific title
'Online' Geriatric assessment procedure for older adults referred for geriatric assessment during acute care episode for consideration of reliability of triage decisions
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
262966
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1124-0793
Query!
Trial acronym
CGA Reliability study
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
'Online' Geriatric assessment procedure for older adults.
270669
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Other
270841
270841
0
0
Query!
Research that is not of generic health relevance and not applicable to specific health categories listed above
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
All patients receive usual care (a face to face consult by a specialist geriatrician). In addition, the patients medical details are accessed using an 'online' system by a second geriatrician. Each specialist records their predicted triage decisions.
Primary outcome relates to triage decisions made by the consultating team. The triage decision is either: discharge to home; discharge to residenitial care (high or low care); or likely to be deceased. this is compared with actual discharge decisions and three month outcomes.
Patients receive the usual Nurse Assessment which is a comprehensive geriatric assessmnent using the interRAI Acute Care instrument. The data is entered into the CeGA online system which is a web based system which refines the data entered and presents a report. the report is read 'online' by a geriatrician and an online consult is completed and a comment with recommendations is written by the geriatrician onto the web based system, which is added to the report. the final report is referred back to the ward where the patient is. It is printed out and added to the patients file. for this study, the patient is assessed once, on referral for a geriatric consult. Assessments occur across the duration of the project.
Patient recruitment will continue from July 1 2009 to December 31, 2011 (2.5 years). Analysis and paper writing will continue through 2012.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
269287
0
Other interventions
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
All patients receive usual care (a face to face consult by a specialist geriatrician). In addition, patients receive a second face to face consult by a different geriatrician. Each specialist records their predicted triage decisions.
Both consultations need to occur within the usual assessment/consult timeframe in order for the hospital to achieve their geriatric consult KPIs. For example, if a patient is assessed by the nurse on Monday afternoon, and the usual consult round is Tuesday morning. Then both consults have to occur prior to the conclusion of the Tuesday consult round. In this way the patient is not waiting any longer than they would normally wait within the usual care process. each hospital has a different timetable for clinical rounds, but the process is the same. Complete the research project element within the same timetable for usual care.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
279523
0
Agreement between the triage decisions from live-live assessments and between the triage decisions from live-online assessments, calculated using kappa statistics, reported with 95% confidence intervals.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
279523
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
279523
0
Time of consult; time of discharge; three months post discharge.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
287814
0
Agreement between the recognition of common geriatric syndromes from live-live assessments and between the recognition of common geriatric syndromes from live-online assessments, calculated using kappa statistics, reported with 95% confidence intervals.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
287814
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
287814
0
Time of consult.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Inpatient in hospital (acute care) general medical ward or geriatric ward.
Referral for a geriatric consultation
Query!
Minimum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Previously seen by either of the specialist geratricians.
Previously enrolled in the study.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Diagnosis
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Consent for participation in the study will be secured by the nurse assessor prior to the commencement of the consultation. Non-consenting patients will receive the “normal” geriatric consultation for the hospital site.
Each consenting patient will undergo sequential assessment by two independent geriatricians, designated “geriatrician 1” (G1) and “geriatrician 2” (G2), in one of the following randomly allocated configurations: live-live (G1-G2), live-live (G2-G1), online-live (G1-G2) or online-live (G2-G1).
After consent, Research Assistant randamises patients using sealed opaque envelopes.
The paired geriatricians will be blinded to the results of their colleague’s assessment. In the case of live-live assessments the order in which the geriatricians consult the patient will be randomly allocated in order to minimise any systematic influence that the interaction of the first geriatrician with the patient may have on the second assessment. For online-live pairings, the order in which assessments is conducted need not be randomly allocated since only one of the two geriatricians will interact with the patient directly.
In all cases, a structured assessment will be performed by a nurse assessor, using the process described above. Once these findings have been entered by the nurse into the software system, geriatrician consultation follows. The paired geriatrician assessments will be conducted within the timeframe of usual geriatric consults at the site.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
The 'ralloc' command was used to generate 2 separate randomisations in Stata version 10.1 for the CGA Reliability Study.
For step 1 of the study, 404 patients are equally randomised to the 4 treatment arms in blocks of 4 and 8.
For step 2, 200 patients are equally randomised to the 2 treatment arms (doctors 1 and 2) in blocks of 2 and 4. Due to the constraint that a maximum of two patients are to be randomised on any one day and the same doctor must not be used for both, the second of the two patients is deterministically allocated to the doctor who does not attend to the first of the two patients.
Allocations are approximately balanced across 3 studies centres.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
All participants receive standard care (face-to-face consult).
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/07/2009
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
270
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
4404
0
3128
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
4405
0
3076
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
4433
0
4102
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
269747
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
269747
0
National Health and Medical Research Council
Query!
Address [1]
269747
0
National Health and Medical Research Council
GPO Box 1421
Canberra ACT 2601
Query!
Country [1]
269747
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
The University of Queensland
Query!
Address
The University of Queensland
Brisbane QLD 4072
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
268787
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
268787
0
Centre for Research in Geriatric Medicine
Query!
Address [1]
268787
0
Level 2, Bld 33
CRGM
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Ipswich Road
Woolloongabba QLD 4102
Query!
Country [1]
268787
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
271710
0
Princess Alexandra Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
271710
0
Office of the Human Research Ethics Committee Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba QLD 4102
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
271710
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
271710
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
271710
0
27/08/2008
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
271710
0
2008/156
Query!
Ethics committee name [2]
271711
0
Eastern Health Research and Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [2]
271711
0
P.O. Box 94 Box Hill VIC 3128
Query!
Ethics committee country [2]
271711
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [2]
271711
0
Query!
Approval date [2]
271711
0
16/03/2011
Query!
Ethics approval number [2]
271711
0
E92/0910
Query!
Ethics committee name [3]
271712
0
The Northern Health HREC Acute Division
Query!
Ethics committee address [3]
271712
0
Norther Health Corporate Office 1st Floor, The Northern Hospital 185 Cooper Street Epping VIC 3076
Query!
Ethics committee country [3]
271712
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [3]
271712
0
Query!
Approval date [3]
271712
0
07/09/2011
Query!
Ethics approval number [3]
271712
0
A38/10
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
There is a severe shortage of geriatricians and gerontic nurses across Australia. These specialists play a pivotal role in hospital geriatric consultation services which, among other clinical functions, make important triage decisions around access to geriatric assessment units, rehabilitation, community post-acute care, and residential care. In the face of inexorable workload growth, improving the efficiency of geriatric consultation without compromising integrity of the process, is a major challenge. This study explores the reliability, safety and cost-effectiveness of an “online” method of conducting geriatric assessment. The model under scrutiny has been developed by the Academic Unit in Geriatric Medicine and the Centre for Online Health at the University of Queensland. It comprises: - Standardised assessment (based on the interRAI Acute Care system) performed on location by a specifically trained gerontic nurse - Data entry on web-based software - An inbuilt clinical decision support system - A capacity for geriatricians to review and report cases “online” (who can be anywhere in the world) immediately on completion of the nurse assessment - A training strategy for all participating and affiliated practitioners - Electronic messaging systems to facilitate distribution of findings among clinicians. Preliminary research suggests the method to be attractive to clinicians, reliable, safe and highly efficient, while improving the quality of assessment and promoting the skills of gerontic nurse assessors. The study will examine: - The level of agreement between online and live geriatrician clinical assessments and recommendations, taking into account inter-rater reliability of live consultations. The cost of the “online” approach compared to conventional geriatric consultation (including a formal economic evaluation) Paired assessments (online and live) of 115 patients referred for geriatric consultation will be performed by separate geriatricians. To evaluate “natural” variation between geriatrician assessment, inter-rater reliability of (115 paired) live assessments will also be determined. Three pairs of geriatricians across 3 hospital sites will participate. The paired assessments will be randomly configured to remove potential biases. Combinations relate to format (live-live or live-online) and order of patient contact (the order of geriatrician consultation will be randomly allocated for live-live pairings). The assessment outcomes of interest include recommendations for rehabilitation and permanent long term care, as well as diagnoses of common geriatric syndromes. Agreement will be characterised by kappa statistics calculated to appraise the level of agreement of triage recommendations. New diagnoses not present in the medical record at the time of assessment will be recorded, to identify the risk and potential impact of these being overlooked in the online approach. Each procedure will be subject to a detailed costing analysis to support an economic evaluation. If demonstrated to be valid, safe and cost effective, the online assessment method may generate considerable cost savings and dramatically extend the availability of high quality specialist comprehensive geriatric assessment across Australia and the world.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
33085
0
Query!
Address
33085
0
Query!
Country
33085
0
Query!
Phone
33085
0
Query!
Fax
33085
0
Query!
Email
33085
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
16332
0
Dr Melinda Martin-Khan
Query!
Address
16332
0
Level 2 Building 33
Centre for Research in Geriatric Medicine
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Ipswich Road
Woolloongabba QLD 4102
Query!
Country
16332
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
16332
0
61731765530
Query!
Fax
16332
0
61731766945
Query!
Email
16332
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
7260
0
Dr Melinda Martin-Khan
Query!
Address
7260
0
Level 2 Building 33
Centre for Research in Geriatric Medicine
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Ipswich Road
Woolloongabba QLD 4102
Query!
Country
7260
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
7260
0
61731765530
Query!
Fax
7260
0
61731766945
Query!
Email
7260
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF