Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The ANZCTR website will be unavailable from 1pm until 3pm (AEDT) on Wednesday the 30th of October for website maintenance. Please be sure to log out of the system in order to avoid any loss of data.
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12611000210976
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
23/02/2011
Date registered
25/02/2011
Date last updated
25/02/2011
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Using individual food glycaemic index (GI) values to predict the GI of a meal in healthy people and comparing this estimated GI with the GI obtained from the people consuming the meal
Query!
Scientific title
Assessing in people with normal glucose tolerance how the formula used for estimating meal glycaemic index compares with a directly measured meal glycaemic index
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
259662
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Glucose tolerance
261231
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Diet and Nutrition
259376
259376
0
0
Query!
Other diet and nutrition disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
The glycaemic index (GI) of a meal is not normally measured, it is calculated according to a formula using the GIs of the individual foods contributing to the meal. It has been suggested that this predictive method is inaccurate. We therefore designed a study to test how the GIs of three meals, obtained using the predictive formula, compared with the direct determination of the GIs of the meals. The three meals all comprised a portion of chicken, sweet potato, peas, carrots and sauce having a combined carbohydrate content of 25 g. Another 25 g of carbohydrate was provided by including in the meal either potato, rice or pasta.The meals were approximately equicaloric (2100 kJ) and contained approximately 55% carbohydrate, 27% fat and 18% protein. Each meal was consumed comfortably within 15 minutes. Each participant consumed each of the meals with at least two days between successive tests. Participants were given a standard protocol to follow including an overnight fast.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
258090
0
Lifestyle
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Three meals were consumed and the GIs of the meals directly measured. These GI values were compared with the meal GIs estimated from knowing the GI of each of the foods contributing to the meal and summing them up using a mathematical formula.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
262193
0
The primary outcome is the comparison of meal GIs obtained using two methods, direct measurement and estimation. Direct measurement involved measuring postprandial hyperglycaemia in response to a glucose reference beverage and to each of the meals at intervals over 2 hour periods. The GIs of each of the meals was subsequently calculated by expressing the blood glucose incremental area under the curve of each meal relative to the glucose reference beverage. Estimation involved determining the GIs of each of the carbohydrate foods contributing to the meals and summing the GIs according to a formula.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
262193
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
262193
0
Two hours postprandially
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
273300
0
The secondary outcome is to examine how the postprandial blood glucose concentrations obtained following the consumption of three test meals compare.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
273300
0
Query!
Timepoint [1]
273300
0
Two hours postprandially
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Minimum Age 18 - 65 y
Both males and females
Healthy volunteers
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
65
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Diabetes mellitus
Cancer
Cardiovascular disease
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Educational / counselling / training
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Crossover
Query!
Other design features
The GIs of individual foods were tested in the participants and meal GIs calculated using the formula. The participants were then crossed over, consumed each of the three meals and the GI of the meals was directly determined.
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
8/03/2010
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
30
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
3221
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [1]
3221
0
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
258551
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
258551
0
University of Otago
Query!
Address [1]
258551
0
Department of Human Nutrition
PO Box 56
Dunedin 9054
Query!
Country [1]
258551
0
New Zealand
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
University of Otago
Query!
Address
Department of Human Nutrition
PO Box 56
Dunedin
Query!
Country
New Zealand
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
257687
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
257687
0
Not applicable
Query!
Address [1]
257687
0
Not applicable
Query!
Country [1]
257687
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
260519
0
University of Otago Human Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
260519
0
PO Box 56 Dunedin 9054
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
260519
0
New Zealand
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
260519
0
Query!
Approval date [1]
260519
0
28/07/2009
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
260519
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The study was designed to test how well the GI of a meal could be predicted using the GIs of individual foods and summing them up according to a commonly used formula.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
32259
0
Query!
Address
32259
0
Query!
Country
32259
0
Query!
Phone
32259
0
Query!
Fax
32259
0
Query!
Email
32259
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
15506
0
Bernard Venn
Query!
Address
15506
0
University of Otago
Department of Human Nutrition
PO Box 56
Dunedin 9054
Query!
Country
15506
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
15506
0
6434795068
Query!
Fax
15506
0
Query!
Email
15506
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
6434
0
Bernard Venn
Query!
Address
6434
0
University of Otago
Department of Human Nutrition
PO Box 56
Dunedin 9054
Query!
Country
6434
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
6434
0
6434795068
Query!
Fax
6434
0
Query!
Email
6434
0
[email protected]
Query!
No information has been provided regarding IPD availability
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF